INTRODUCTION — The most frequent complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy are pancreatitis, cholangitis, hemorrhage, and duodenal perforation. A number of less common adverse events have also been described including cardiopulmonary complications, contrast allergy, impaction of a retrieval basket, and numerous other events reported in only small numbers of patients or individual case reports. These uncommon adverse events, which may be difficult to manage, can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality [1,2].
This topic will focus on uncommon complications of ERCP. Other complications, including post-ERCP pancreatitis, are discussed separately.
●(See "Overview of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in adults".)
●(See "Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis".)
●(See "Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) bleeding".)
INCIDENCE — Uncommon complications of ERCP have been described in several large studies.
●Miscellaneous complications occurred in 25 of 2347 cases (1 percent) in a prospective series of patients who underwent biliary sphincterotomy [3]. Six of these were cardiopulmonary events, which were fatal in three patients.
●Similar findings were noted in two Italian prospective series that included a total of 4872 patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP [4,5]. Miscellaneous complications were observed in 0.4 to 0.5 percent of patients, more than one-half of which were cardiopulmonary.
●In a systematic review of 14 prospective studies including a total of 12,973 patients, there were a total of 173 miscellaneous complications (1.3 percent) and nine deaths (0.07 percent) [6].
●A Danish study of 39 consecutive claims for compensation due to adverse events included five uncommon complications (back pain after ERCP under general anesthesia, Hashimoto thyroiditis, a fatal case of cholecystitis, tooth injury, and need for repeat uneventful ERCP due to a stone being missed at the first ERCP) [7].
CARDIOPULMONARY AND SEDATION-RELATED COMPLICATIONS — Severe respiratory and cardiac side effects of endoscopy are infrequent [8]. However, the risk is probably increased with ERCP due to relatively deep sedation, long duration of the examination, prone position of the patient, advanced age of the patient, and frequent comorbid diseases [9-11]. In a database study that included 6092 ERCPs, there were 129 cardiopulmonary events (2.1 percent) [12].
As a result, close surveillance of the patient, monitoring of cardiac function and oxygen saturation, aspiration of secretions, administration of flow oxygen when needed, and prompt availability of resuscitation equipment and reversal agents should be part of the routine support during ERCP. Gas embolisms should be considered, among other possibilities, in patients who develop sudden, severe cardiopulmonary events during ERCP. (See 'Portal vein gas and air embolism' below.)
CONTRAST ALLERGY — Anaphylactic reactions to contrast agents used during ERCP are rare [13]. Nevertheless, a history of sensitivity to iodine contrast or drug should always be considered in the preprocedure assessment and in the informed consent process.
In patients with prior allergy to contrast media, prophylactic measures adopted by most endoscopists include [14]:
●Use of nonionic/low-osmolarity contrast media.
●Premedication with oral steroids starting the day before ERCP, or intravenous steroids when allergy is discovered just before the procedure. Some endoscopists also give an intravenous antihistamine in combination with the steroids.
However, a study of 601 patients who did not receive prophylaxis (including 80 patients with a documented history of reactions to intravascular contrast media) failed to show any adverse reactions associated with the administration of contrast media [13].
ELECTROSURGICAL HAZARDS — Malfunction, incorrect use of electrosurgical equipment and accessories during therapeutic procedures, or defective devices can lead to potentially severe complications of ERCP such as perforation, bleeding, and pancreatitis. Other complications reported in case series include fracture of a Teflon-coated guidewire and retroperitoneal perforation following guidewire-assisted sphincterotomy [15,16] and rupture of a metal biliary endoprosthesis following electrocoagulation for tumor ingrowth, a risky maneuver which should be avoided [17].
Electrocautery can influence implantable devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators. Although most modern pacemakers are unaffected by electrocautery, cardiac arrhythmias can develop if a monopolar current passes through the pacemaker or the heart. The risk is greater for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators since electrocautery may trigger their activation. As a result, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Technology Assessment Committee recommends that implantable cardioverter-defibrillators be deactivated during endoscopic electrosurgery [18,19].
EXTRAVASATION OF CONTRAST MEDIUM INTO THE DUODENAL WALL — Extravasation of contrast medium into the duodenal wall surrounding the papilla during ERCP can interfere with cannulation and therapeutic procedures, and thereby is a risk factor for complications [4]. In addition, forceful attempts in cannulation with fine taper catheters or stiff guidewires, especially in patients with bile or pancreatic duct stenosis or those undergoing precut sphincterotomy, can cause transmural false passages and injection of contrast into the retroperitoneal space or vascular structures. A case of septic cholangitis was reported after an inadvertent submucosal contrast injection during a diagnostic ERCP [20].
OPACIFICATION OF PORTAL, ARTERIAL, OR LYMPHATIC VESSELS — Opacification of the portal vein has been described following sphincterotomy [21], ERCP for pancreatic cancer [22,23], needle-knife sphincterotomy [24,25], and cannulation of the accessory papilla [26]. In addition, documented cases of portal vein visualization during ERCP were reported in patients with pancreatitis (one from a traumatic inadvertent cannulation of the superior mesenteric vein, and another from a preexisting fistula between a pseudocyst and the portal vein) [27]. Two reports described accidental wire-guided cannulation of the portal vein despite the absence of sphincterotomy [28,29]. Guidewire cannulation of the portal vein via an accessory pancreatic duct has also been reported [30]. Accidental cannulation of the hepatic artery following needle-knife sphincterotomy has also been reported [31]. Accidental insertion of a plastic pancreatic into the portal vein was reported in a patient who had sustained a blunt abdominal trauma with pancreatic transection [32]. Opacification of the periampullary lymphatic system has also been described following injection of contrast into the pancreatic duct in a patient with pancreatic head carcinoma [33].
Filling of portal, arterial, or lymphatic vessels has potential risks, including sepsis, air embolism, bleeding, and thrombosis. Furthermore, failed prompt recognition of contrast in vascular structures may be a source of confusion leading to prolongation of the procedure, thereby further increasing the risk of complications. As an example, an opacified portal vein (picture 1) may be misinterpreted as an incompletely filled bile duct. Insertion of a stent into the portal vein may further worsen the consequences; a case has been reported of placement of an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube in the portal vein, fortunately without subsequent complications [34]. In a separate case report, a portobiliary fistula complicating endoscopic stenting was reported in a patient with pancreatic cyst [35].
DUODENAL PNEUMATOSIS — A limited collection of air within the duodenal wall (duodenal pneumatosis) has been observed following needle-knife sphincterotomy in a patient with biliary obstruction from ampullary tumor [36]. The procedure should be stopped upon recognition of this complication since further bowel manipulation may lead to frank perforation.
PORTAL VEIN GAS AND AIR EMBOLISM — In the past, the appearance of gas in the portal venous system was usually a sign of lethal conditions such as advanced intestinal infarction, but portal venous gas has also been observed following abdominal interventions and gastrointestinal endoscopy [37]. (See "Air embolism".)
Gas embolism is largely iatrogenic. In most cases, the embolized gas is air. Air embolism is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic event. Cases of air embolism have been reported following upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy, although most described cases have been related to an ERCP [32,38-85]. In a review including 40 cases of systemic air embolism following an endoscopic procedure, 24 patients (60 percent) underwent ERCP [86]. In an analysis of an inpatient database including over two million endoscopic procedures, air embolism occurred in 13 patients, resulting in an air embolism rate of 0.57 per 100,000 endoscopies. Air embolism was more common with ERCP compared with EGD or colonoscopy (3.32 per 100,000 procedures versus 0.44 and 0.38 per 100,000 procedures, respectively) [87].
Possible pathophysiologic mechanisms for air embolism during endoscopy include:
●Air insufflated under pressure by the endoscope entering an exposed vessel through a compromised mucosa barrier, either via portal or hepatic veins.
●Air insufflated entering a previous communication between the biliary system and the circulation.
●Air insufflated directly into the hepatic veins while using small diameter endoscopes during intraductal biliary endoscopy.
There are two categories of air embolism, venous and arterial embolism:
●A venous air embolism occurs when air passes from the portal vein to the systemic venous circulation through the hepatic veins and then to the right ventricle and pulmonary circulation.
●An arterial air embolism occurs when air in the venous system enters the arterial system through a patent foramen ovale or pulmonary arteriovenous shunts; it may also occur in the absence of a shunt if the rate and volume of air entry exceeds the filtering capacity of the lung.
The true incidence of air embolism is unknown, and many cases are subclinical and thus go unreported [88].
The table illustrates a series of reported cases of air embolism during ERCP (table 1). General observations from the series include [89]:
●Reporting trends – The number of case reports has increased over time.
●Sex – The frequency is similar between men and women.
●Indication and procedures – Both benign and malignant diseases, and both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were associated with embolism.
●Clinical presentation – The clinical presentation depends on the rapidity and amount of air entering the circulation; the reported clinical symptoms are cardiovascular, pulmonary, and neurologic. Both venous and arterial air embolism occurred in one-half of the cases.
●Diagnostic tests – Tests that provided supportive evidence were chest and abdominal radiography, cardiac auscultation, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, abdominal and cerebral computed tomography scan, cerebral and spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and autopsy.
●Risks for air embolism – Factors associated with air embolism include previous biliary interventions, previous liver biopsy, percutaneous or transhepatic cholangiography, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement, using a rendezvous technique for ERCP, blunt or penetrating trauma to the liver, hepatic abscesses, tumors, choledochoscopy, insufflation of air with high pressure, and long procedure duration.
A potential area of concern is the increasing use of direct intraductal endoscopy using small caliber endoscopes (eg, cholangioscopy), which may increase the risk of air embolism. Several cases of air embolism during peroral cholangioscopy with slim endoscopes have been reported [59,90]. Data on the use of carbon dioxide insufflation during cholangioscopy and risk of air embolism are mixed [59,91,92]. As an example, cases of fatal systemic gas embolism during direct peroral cholangioscopy using carbon dioxide insufflation have also been reported [91,92]. However, the consequences of air embolism may be mitigated with the use of carbon dioxide insufflation rather than air insufflation because carbon dioxide is more rapidly absorbed and eliminated if embolism occurs. Thus, we use carbon dioxide insufflation for ERCP [85,93]. (See "Anesthesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy in adults", section on 'Complications'.)
●Differential diagnosis – Air embolism should be considered in any patient who has sudden onset of cardiopulmonary or neurologic decompensation during an endoscopic procedure. A bedside echocardiogram is a valuable diagnostic aid.
●Treatment – Once portal venous air is recognized during ERCP and air embolism is suspected, the procedure should be terminated immediately and the patient should be observed for signs of shock, bleeding, perforation, or sepsis [44]. Together with cardiopulmonary resuscitation, it is recommended to place the patient in Trendelenburg and left lateral decubitus position and give adequate oxygen or hyperbaric oxygenation therapy as soon as possible. Air aspiration via central venous catheter could be considered but is very difficult to perform, and the success of appreciable aspiration of air is far from ideal [94].
●Prognosis and outcomes – Patient survival and overall prognosis depend on rapid diagnosis and treatment. Death occurred in approximately one-half of the reported cases.
●Prevention – Clinicians should be aware of the risk of air embolism and prepared to manage adverse events. ERCP should be performed extremely cautiously or not at all in patients who are suspected of having a biliary-vascular fistula. In addition, we use carbon dioxide insufflation for ERCP because it may reduce the risk of air embolism [85,93].
Some authors have recommended deep sedation or even general anesthesia systematically during ERCP, but fatal cases have occurred with anesthesia assistance. The general consensus is that the patient must be carefully monitored by the operator and assistants with the help of electronic monitoring devices.
HEMORRHAGE FROM SPLENIC, HEPATIC OR VASCULAR TRAUMA — Hemorrhage following endoscopic sphincterotomy usually occurs in the duodenal lumen arising from the actual sphincterotomy site. (See "Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) bleeding".)
However, in rare cases intraperitoneal hemorrhage has been described from injury to the spleen, liver, or abdominal vessels.
Splenic injury is more commonly caused by colonoscopy, but it has also been reported following ERCP [95,96]. Previous abdominal surgery with adhesion formation is recognized as a risk factor; concomitant liver laceration has also been reported [97,98]. The severity of the splenic injury varies from a subcapsular hematoma to the avulsion of splenic vessels. As a result, patients do not always present with shock and acute abdomen, and the injury may be overlooked. As an example, a subcapsular splenic laceration was diagnosed six days after ERCP in a patient with chronic pancreatitis [95]. The diagnosis of a subcapsular splenic laceration should be suspected in patients who develop the acute onset of left upper quadrant abdominal pain following ERCP. The pain is often delayed and is not always associated with obvious signs of peritoneal irritation, hemodynamic instability, or a drop in the hematocrit. A subcapsular splenic laceration was diagnosed six days after ERCP in a patient with chronic alcoholic pancreatitis [95]. A case of hemoperitoneum after endoscopic sphincterotomy was found from a capsular tear in the splenic hilum, possibly from "bowing" of the endoscope in the long position with torsion on the great curvature of the stomach resulting in splenic vascular avulsion or capsular tears [96]. Definitive diagnosis requires ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) scan, angiography, laparoscopy, or laparotomy. Surgery is usually required for management.
Numerous other bleeding events have been described in case reports:
●One report documented intraperitoneal hemorrhage due to traumatic disruption of the right gastroepiploic artery following endoscopic sphincterotomy and technically difficult stone extraction [99].
●A retroperitoneal hematoma occurred as a complication of ERCP after liver transplantation [100].
●Transverse mesocolon disruption and ischemic colitis following ERCP with sphincterotomy, and requiring laparotomy and bowel resection [101].
●Another report documented an intra-abdominal hematoma following a difficult ERCP requiring prolonged manipulation and long looping of the endoscope in the stomach during the advancement into the duodenum [102].
●Hepatic hematoma after ERCP is a rare but potentially serious complication, and may be related to use of a guidewire [103-105].
●Duodenal hematoma following ERCP that was endoscopically treated with needle knife and transnasal drainage has also been reported [106].
●Bleeding from bile duct varices has been described as a complication of ERCP with sphincterotomy and dilatation of a distal common bile duct stricture in a patient with cirrhosis and cavernous transformation of the portal vein [43].
●Hemobilia following hydrostatic dilation of stenosis of common bile duct in a patient with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia [107]. Hemobilia has also been attributed to a hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm secondary to plastic biliary stent insertion for a bile duct tumor [108,109].
●Bleeding from a pseudocyst that contained a pseudoaneurysm was reported following nontraumatic cannulation of the pancreatic duct [110].
●A pseudoaneurysm complicating precut-sphincterotomy [111].
●Life-threatening hemobilia from hepatic pseudoaneurysm following ERCP [112] and arteriobiliary fistulas caused by biliary stents [113,114].
●A potentially life-threatening bleed occurred following a needle-knife incision of a swollen papilla in a patient with acute pancreatitis [115]. What had been assumed to be a cystic lesion, on the basis of conventional abdominal ultrasound, was, in fact, a pseudoaneurysm of a branch of the pancreaticoduodenal artery (picture 2).
●Acute duodenal ischemia and periampullary intramural hematoma have been reported after ERCP with sphincterotomy and stone extraction in a patient with primary myelofibrosis on antiplatelet treatment [116].
●An intramural hematoma of the upper esophagus as a result of ERCP has been reported [117].
●Gastrointestinal bleeding resulting from a migrated plastic biliary plastic stent has been reported [118].
UNCOMMON SEPTIC COMPLICATIONS — Acute cholecystitis and liver abscess are uncommon but well-known septic complications of ERCP. (See "Infectious adverse events related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)".)
Other uncommon infectious complications have included:
●Biliary obstruction and cholangitis due to a blood clot that obstructed the common bile duct after endoscopic sphincterotomy [119-122].
●Pyogenic cholangitis without evidence of biliary tract disease occurred after inadvertent injection of submucosal contrast in the papilla of Vater [20].
●A severe case of retropharyngeal abscess following instrumental injury during ERCP that was reported in the 1970s [123].
●A retroperitoneal abscess caused by Haemophilus influenzae and H. parainfluenzae following pancreatic sphincterotomy and stone extraction [124].
●A subcapsular hematoma that occurred during ERCP with sphincterotomy that was complicated by development of a splenic abscess [125].
●Abscess formation in a simple renal cyst has been described as a complication of pancreatitis following biliary sphincterotomy [126]. The septic involvement of the renal cyst originated from extrapancreatic collections in the perirenal space.
●A spinal epidural abscess after endoscopic treatment for chronic pancreatitis [127].
●A case of iatrogenic Escherichia coli endogenous pan-endophthalmitis after ERCP-associated biliary sepsis [128].
UNCOMMON PERFORATIONS — Three types of perforation complicating ERCP are most frequently recognized:
●Retroperitoneal duodenal perforation
●Free bowel-wall perforation
●Perforation of the bile ducts
Of these, retroperitoneal duodenal perforations are the most common. (See "Post-ERCP perforation".)
Some less common forms of perforation have also been described:
●Intestinal perforation related to biliary stents. (See 'Complications related to biliary and pancreatic stents' below.)
●Sigmoid colon perforation as a consequence of bowel air distension and diverticular disease [4,129].
●Cystic duct perforation as a complication of endoscopic stone extraction in a patient with chronic cholecystitis and dense adhesions [130].
●Subcutaneous emphysema of the penis and scrotum mimicking gas gangrene secondary to retroperitoneal duodenal perforation [131].
●Pneumoperitoneum following ERCP as a result of air traversing from the duodenum to the peritoneum through a ruptured T-tube in two patients who had undergone cholecystectomy with a retained common bile duct [132].
●Idiopathic perforation of acalculous gallbladder after insertion of a transpapillary pancreatic stent [133].
●A bilious pleural effusion occurred after ERCP with metal stent placement in a patient with gallbladder adenocarcinoma [134].
PNEUMOTHORAX, PNEUMOMEDIASTINUM, AND PNEUMOPERITONEUM — Pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and pneumoperitoneum have been reported secondary to gastrointestinal perforation, including perforation following endoscopic sphincterotomy. However, pneumothorax has also been described during diagnostic upper endoscopy [135,136] and during ERCP without perforation [4]. Such cases are due to a rise in airway and intraalveolar pressure and the rupture of pulmonary blebs.
Data on pneumothorax related to ERCP are limited to case reports. In a systematic review of 44 studies reporting pneumothorax after ERCP, a total of 49 cases were identified [137]. Twenty-one patients (43 percent) had abnormal gastrointestinal anatomy (eg, periampullary diverticula, surgically altered anatomy, local tumor). Pneumothorax occurred bilaterally in 22 patients (45 percent). The cause of pneumothorax in most cases was duodenal perforation at a periampullary site in 20 procedures (41 percent) or distant from the papilla in 11 procedures (23 percent).
Data from individual case reports included:
●Reports described bilateral pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumoperitoneum, and pneumoretroperitoneum occurred in a patient who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy and extraction of choledochal stones [138,139].
●A case of tension pneumoperitoneum without perforation was reported after insertion of an endoscopic biliary stent for postcholecystectomy biliary leak [140]. The authors' explanation was that air passed from the duodenum into the biliary system through the stent and then through the opening in the common bile duct into the peritoneum.
●Pneumoperitoneum from rupture or intrahepatic bile ducts occurred after ERCP and bile duct stent in a patient with pancreatic cancer and hepatic metastasis [141].
●Pneumoperitoneum occurred following therapeutic ERCP in a septic patient with hepatic abscess and rupture of Glisson's capsule [142].
IMPACTION OF RETRIEVAL BASKETS AND FRACTURE OF THE TRACTION WIRE — Impaction of a Dormia basket around a large calculus was a feared complication of bile duct extraction prior to the introduction of mechanical lithotripsy. Despite the availability of lithotripsy, cases are still reported. Usually the basket becomes trapped at the ampulla within the intraduodenal portion of the common bile duct. However, impaction above the intrapancreatic portion of the bile duct, in the intrahepatic ducts, in the main pancreatic duct, and even in the gallbladder has been described [143-146].
The risk for basket trapping is increased with big, irregular shaped and hard stones, or multiple stones, in association with small sphincterotomy size. Other risk factors are distal narrowing of the common bile duct and segmental dilatation of intrahepatic ducts as in Caroli disease.
Tailoring the sphincterotomy size appropriately and refraining from fully closing the basket around a large stone may prevent entrapment. In addition, prevention of basket impaction requires experience and good judgment in recognizing conditions in which standard techniques of stone extraction are likely to fail and alternative approaches should be considered.
Once the basket impaction has occurred, the first and common alternative is mechanical lithotripsy. Thus, retrieval baskets should always be suitable for mechanical lithotripsy; baskets that are not designed for lithotripsy can fracture. If mechanical lithotripsy is complicated by fracture of the central traction wire of the Dormia basket without breakage of the stone, a rescue second basket has been successfully used in rare cases [147]. Other nonsurgical methods, singularly or in combination, may be effective, including extended sphincterotomy, intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy (which requires the use of a "mother and baby" system or a percutaneous choledochoscopic approach), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, and intracorporeal laser lithotripsy. Surgery is required when these techniques are not available or if they are unsuccessful [148]. Temporary drainage through nasobiliary drain or stent should be provided if the choice of a new option involves a delay. (See "Endoscopic management of bile duct stones".)
COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO BILIARY AND PANCREATIC STENTS
Plastic biliary and pancreatic stents — A common and generally late complication related to biliary and pancreatic stents is occlusion. Plastic stent insertion may also contribute to the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis (see "Pancreatic stenting at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): Indications, techniques, and complications"). Uncommon complications are misplacement, dislodgement, and fracture, the last being generally due to attempts at removal and replacement of the stent.
Inadvertent primary misplacement of plastic biliary stents into the retroperitoneum or into an intrahepatic extrabiliary position can occur in patients with malignant bile duct obstruction [149]. Duodenal wall ulceration and perforation resulting from pressure necrosis have been observed by several authors following the long-term use of straight prostheses with a long distal intraduodenal part [150-156]. A biliocutaneous fistula and a duodenoscrotal fistula have been described following distal migration of long biliary stents [157,158].
Impaction and perforation of the gut in sites distant from duodenum, especially at the level of sigmoid diverticula, have also been reported by several authors [159,160]. A complex colovesicular fistula has been reported as a late severe complication caused by distal migration of a biliary stent placed for choledocholithiasis [161-163]. A pericardio-biliary fistula developed in patient with IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis when a plastic biliary stent migrated proximally [164]. Proximal or distal stent migration has been described in 5 to 7 percent of patients after placement of a plastic biliary stent and 5 to 8 percent of patient after placement of a pancreatic stent [165]. As a result, patients should be monitored for stent migration and stents should be removed orally [166,167].
The endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated biliary and pancreatic stents can be technically challenging or unsuccessful [168-171]. One study described a late distal perforation of the common bile duct by the distal tip of a migrated straight endoprosthesis [172]. Cases of bile duct-duodenum and a pancreatic-gastric fistula have been reported secondary to proximal stent migration of a biliary and a pancreatic stent, respectively [173]. Cases of pleurobiliary fistula following intrahepatic biliary stent migration have also been reported [174]. Bronchobiliary fistula has been seen as a complication of long-term stenting of the hepatic ducts following hepatobiliary surgery for a hydatid cyst (the stents were placed during ERCP) [175]. A hepaticogastric fistula has been described as a late complication from a proximally migrated long biliary stent [176].
One report described a pancreatic fistula without pancreatitis after endoscopic biliary stent placement for a large bile leak in two patients who had undergone orthotopic liver transplantation [177]. The authors suggested that placement of a large diameter biliary stent without previous sphincterotomy caused relative obstruction of the pancreatic orifice at the papilla and retrograde flux of pancreatic juice into the bile duct. Acute portal vein thrombosis and massive necrosis of the liver occurred after stenting for chronic pancreatitis [178]. Another report described migration of a prophylactic pancreatic stent into the portal vein resulting in portal vein thrombosis [179].
Metal stents — Other than occlusion by tumor ingrowth, complications related to self-expandable metal biliary stents are less frequent than for plastic stents, in part because they have been relatively recently introduced, and are less commonly used. In addition, most patients who receive a metal stent have a limited life expectancy since they are typically placed for malignant obstruction. Nevertheless, a number of adverse events have been described, including:
●Migration of covered stents [180,181]
●Failed deployment, impaction of the delivery device, dislodgement, migration, rupture [17,166,180,182]
●Early stent occlusion by blood clot [183]
●Duodenal ulceration, stent-related bleeding and perforation [184-188]
●Upper gastrointestinal bleeding from a biliary-duodenal fistula [189]
●Hemobilia from hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm causing an arteriobiliary fistula [113,190]
●Lower intestinal hemorrhage due to a dislodged metallic stent [191]
●Impaction of a plastic biliary stent placed through an occluded metal stent [192]
●Biliorenal fistula [193]
●Cholecystitis related to both uncovered and covered biliary stents [180,194]
●Fatal air embolism occurred following placement of metallic stent for an ampulloma [55]
●Massive hemobilia (picture 3 and picture 4) during extraction of a covered self-expandable metal stent in a patient with portal hypertension [195]
●A malpositioned metallic self-expandable stent penetrated the liver and extended into the peritoneal cavity [196]
●Inferior vena cava syndrome secondary to compression by a biliary stent [197]
Guidewires — Guidewire fracture during ERCP is rare. It has been reported in a few cases involving hydrophilic wires with an angled tip [198-200], or following guidewire-assisted sphincterotomy [15]. Liver and pancreatic parenchymal perforation by the guidewire during ERCP are poorly recognized complications, and subcapsular liver hematoma and subcapsular biloma can occur in this context [201]. In one case, a guidewire used during ERCP was believed to cause an infected liver hematoma [202].
A classification system for guidewire-related injuries has been proposed along with their possible consequences [201]:
●A – Pancreatic duct into parenchyma (peripancreatic fluid collection due to pancreatitis)
●B – Pancreatic duct through parenchyma (pancreatitis and leak from the pancreatic duct)
●C – Intrahepatic bile ducts into parenchyma (subcapsular hematoma or biloma)
●D – Intrahepatic bile ducts through parenchyma (free bile leak)
GALLSTONE ILEUS — Large stones, usually over 25 mm, can cause gallstone ileus when released into the duodenum following endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. The clinical presentation may be delayed by months, and be atypical or severe [203-205]. Successful treatment by electrohydraulic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has been reported [206,207]. However, the management is usually surgical [208-210]. (See "Gallstone ileus".)
RADIOLOGICAL MISDIAGNOSES — Complications can arise from mistakes in the interpretation of diagnostic findings during ERCP. The most common mistake is missing common duct stones. Such patients may require subsequent investigations and have a delayed diagnosis resulting in potential insurance claims [7,211,212]. A more serious error is overlooking a hilar biliary stricture in a patient with biliary stones or erroneously considering a stricture to be benign.
MISCELLANEOUS — The following rare adverse events related to ERCP have been reported:
●Tooth injury.
●Conjunctival ecchymosis.
●Corneal abrasion [213].
●Uvular necrosis [214].
●Transient swelling of the parotid gland (authors' personal observation) and acute parotitis [215,216].
●Dislocation of temporomandibular joint [217,218].
●Hemolysis due to G6PD deficiency presumably induced by hypoxemia and temporary acidosis during ERCP [219].
●Methemoglobinemia caused by topical benzocaine spray [220].
●Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura following post-ERCP pancreatitis [221].
●Hashimoto's thyroiditis presumed to be caused by contrast exposure [7].
●An intramural duodenal hematoma [222,223].
●Mallory-Weiss tear [224].
●Hepatic subcapsular biloma (a collection of bile outside the biliary tree) secondary to bile leak induced by high pressure injection of contrast [225,226].
●Pancreatic duct perforation during brushing [227].
●Prolonged cholestasis responding to glucocorticoids, suspected drug-induced hepatitis [228-230].
●Development of a pseudotumor of the pancreatic head after therapeutic ERCP [231].
●Duodenal obstruction following papillary stenosis [232].
●Electrical burn in the liver secondary to sphincterotomy [233].
●Acute pulmonary embolism [234].
●Bronchobiliary fistula and lithoptysis after ERCP and liver biopsy [235].
●Reversible acute duodenitis as a complication of endoscopic biliary stenting [236].
●Vision loss due to isolated bilateral lateral geniculate body infarction in a 22-year-old healthy woman who underwent ERCP for suspected choledocholithiasis and developed acute post-ERCP pancreatitis despite rectal prophylaxis with indomethacin [237].
●Pituitary apoplexy [238].
SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)".)
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
●The most frequent complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy are pancreatitis, cholangitis, hemorrhage, and duodenal perforation. A number of uncommon adverse events have also been described. (See "Overview of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in adults".)
●Uncommon complications of ERCP include:
•Severe respiratory and cardiac side effects. (See 'Cardiopulmonary and sedation-related complications' above.)
•Anaphylactic reactions to contrast agents used during ERCP. (See 'Contrast allergy' above.)
•Malfunction or incorrect use of electrosurgical equipment and accessories during therapeutic procedures, or defective devices can lead to potentially severe complications such as perforation, bleeding, and pancreatitis. (See 'Electrosurgical hazards' above.)
•Opacification of the portal vein has been described with multiple therapeutic interventions. (See 'Opacification of portal, arterial, or lymphatic vessels' above.)
•Appearance of gas in the portal venous system. (See 'Portal vein gas and air embolism' above.)
•Cardiac and cerebral air embolism. (See 'Portal vein gas and air embolism' above.)
•Intraperitoneal hemorrhage from injury to the spleen, liver, or abdominal vessels. (See 'Hemorrhage from splenic, hepatic or vascular trauma' above.)
•Pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and pneumoperitoneum. (See 'Pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and pneumoperitoneum' above.)
•Impaction of retrieval baskets and fracture of the traction wire. (See 'Impaction of retrieval baskets and fracture of the traction wire' above.)
•Complications related to biliary and pancreatic stents. (See 'Complications related to biliary and pancreatic stents' above.)
•Gallstone ileus due to the release of large stones, usually over 25 mm, into the duodenum. (See 'Gallstone ileus' above.)
•Mistakes in the interpretation of diagnostic findings during ERCP. (See 'Radiological misdiagnoses' above.)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT — The UpToDate editorial staff thank Francesco Ferrara, MD, for his contributions as author to prior versions of this topic review.