Your activity: 38 p.v.
your limit has been reached. plz Donate us to allow your ip full access, Email: sshnevis@outlook.com

Treatment of gout flares

Treatment of gout flares
Author:
Angelo L Gaffo, MD, MsPH
Section Editor:
Nicola Dalbeth, MBChB, MD, FRACP
Deputy Editor:
Philip Seo, MD, MHS
Literature review current through: Dec 2022. | This topic last updated: Apr 07, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — A gout flare is an intensely painful and disabling inflammatory arthritis, usually involving a single joint but occasionally involving two or more joints. The goal of therapy in a gout flare is prompt and safe termination of pain and disability. Without therapy, the gout flare usually resolves completely within a few days to several weeks, particularly in early disease. However, symptoms improve more quickly with administration of any of a broad array of antiinflammatory drugs [1]. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout", section on 'Gout flares'.)

Upon resolution of a gout flare, the patient is said to have entered a symptom-free (interval, intercritical, or between flares) period. However, flares recur in the great majority of patients; with more frequent episodes, flares may be more severe and prolonged, with consequent shortening of asymptomatic periods. Patients with recurrent flares and those who develop chronic arthritis or tophi can benefit from long-term prophylactic therapy with a urate-lowering agent to prevent further recurrences of gout flare and chronic tophaceous disease. (See "Pharmacologic urate-lowering therapy and treatment of tophi in patients with gout" and "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout", section on 'Intercritical gout and recurrent gout flares'.)

The management of gout flares will be reviewed here. The approach to asymptomatic hyperuricemia; the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of gout; and the prevention of recurrent gout after resolution of the gout flares are discussed separately. (See "Asymptomatic hyperuricemia" and "Pathophysiology of gout" and "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout" and "Pharmacologic urate-lowering therapy and treatment of tophi in patients with gout".)

GENERAL THERAPEUTIC PRINCIPLES — Several classes of antiinflammatory agents are effective for the treatment of gout flares, including systemic and intraarticular glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), colchicine, and biologic agents that inhibit the action of interleukin (IL) 1 beta [2]. A set of general principles is important in the effective management of a gout flare, regardless of the specific antiinflammatory agent used. These include the following:

Early treatment – Treatment should start as soon as possible after the patient perceives the beginning of a flare, preferably within several hours of symptom onset. More rapid and complete resolution of symptoms occurs the earlier that treatment is introduced, especially if treatment is initiated at the full recommended dose of the chosen antiinflammatory agent. Patients should be continued on treatment for the duration of the flare, usually at reduced doses once a significant reduction in symptoms is achieved.

Duration of therapy – Complete cessation of treatment for a gout flare can usually be safely done within two to three days of complete resolution of the flare; however, in the case of oral glucocorticoids, we sometimes taper more slowly to lower the risk of a recurrent ("rebound") flare. (See 'Oral glucocorticoids' below and 'Administration of NSAIDs' below and 'Administration and standard dosing of colchicine' below.)

The duration of therapy for a gout flare may range from only a few days (eg, in a patient treated within hours of symptom onset) to several weeks (eg, in a patient begun on treatment after four or five days of symptoms). Many patients require antiinflammatory treatment for a gout flare for no more than five to seven days if begun on therapy within 12 to 36 hours of symptom onset.

Gout flare prophylaxis – Low-dose antiinflammatory therapy should generally be continued during the early months of urate-lowering treatment [3-5]. The intent of this treatment, called antiinflammatory gout flare prophylaxis, is to reduce the risk of additional flares, which are common early in the course of urate-lowering treatment. (See "Pharmacologic urate-lowering therapy and treatment of tophi in patients with gout", section on 'Prophylaxis during initiation of urate-lowering therapy'.)

Continuing urate-lowering therapy during flares – In patients already receiving urate-lowering pharmacotherapy at the time of a gout flare (eg, allopurinol, febuxostat, probenecid, lesinurad, benzbromarone, or pegloticase), the urate-lowering medication should be continued without interruption. There is no benefit to temporary discontinuation, and subsequent reintroduction after a period off the agent may predispose to another flare.

However, despite urate-lowering therapies being of no direct benefit in the treatment of a gout flare, initiation of a urate-lowering agent along with antiinflammatory therapy is an acceptable option as they also do not impair resolution of the flare [5]. (See "Pharmacologic urate-lowering therapy and treatment of tophi in patients with gout", section on 'Initiation and duration of urate-lowering pharmacotherapy'.)

Therapeutic recommendations for gout flares in patients receiving urate-lowering agents are the same as those for patients not taking such therapy. (See "Pharmacologic urate-lowering therapy and treatment of tophi in patients with gout", section on 'Initiation and duration of urate-lowering pharmacotherapy'.)

Tophaceous gout – Treatment of a gout flare does not differ substantially in patients with or without clinically apparent tophi, although the presence of tophi is an indication for the initiation of long-term urate-lowering pharmacotherapy either during or following resolution of a gout flare to prevent or reverse chronic gouty arthritis and joint damage. Urate-lowering therapy is discussed separately. (See "Pharmacologic urate-lowering therapy and treatment of tophi in patients with gout".)

Comorbidities – Important comorbidities (and their ongoing therapies) that are frequent among gout patients may affect antiinflammatory drug safety or effectiveness, especially in older patients (see 'Older adults' below); consideration of these circumstances is critical in the choice of antiinflammatory treatment for a gout flare. The following factors are of particular importance in selecting an agent:

Renal function

Cardiovascular disease, including heart failure, poorly controlled hypertension, and coronary artery disease

Gastrointestinal disease, including peptic ulcer disease

Concurrent medication use

Diabetes mellitus, especially if poorly controlled

Drug allergy or intolerance

Concurrent infection

Adjunctive measures – Adjunctive measures, none of which are of proven efficacy, are often administered for symptom relief and include icing the affected joint [6], resting the joint that is involved, and administering analgesic medications (eg, acetaminophen or opioids). In the infrequent patient who requires opioid therapy, these agents should be used in the lowest doses and for the shortest duration necessary. These measures do not substitute for effective antiinflammatory treatment of the gout flare.

INITIAL TREATMENT — Several different therapies, including systemic and intraarticular glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and colchicine, are each effective for the treatment of the gout flare; there is no single best agent for all patients experiencing a flare [5]. The availability of multiple classes of agents and approaches likely to provide treatment benefit permits the opportunity to choose which therapy, based upon an assessment of specific features of the individual patient and the flare history, is most likely to achieve benefit and minimize the risk of adverse therapeutic consequences (algorithm 1). (Related Pathway(s): Gout: Initial management of adults with a gout flare.)

Factors affecting drug choice — Factors that may influence the choice of medication include:

Patient-related medical factors – These include patient comorbidities (nature, number, and current clinical status); past medical history, especially of kidney, liver, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal disease and diabetes; concomitant medication use; suspicion of concurrent infection; allergies; and childbearing status.

The patient's gout history – In patients with a previously established diagnosis of gout (see "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout", section on 'Diagnosis'), these include total flare number, recent rate of flare occurrence, and patient prior flare experience with specific therapies (antiinflammatory agent tolerability and effectiveness).

Differential diagnosis of flare symptoms – In patients in whom the current flare is atypical for the patient's prior gout flares, the diagnosis of gout has not been established, or the flare occurs in a high-risk setting, particular attention should be directed to the likelihood of an alternative or an accompanying cause of acute inflammatory arthritis (eg, infection). In patients who require arthrocentesis and synovial fluid analysis and culture to exclude infection, we avoid oral (as well as intraarticular) glucocorticoids until the results of these studies are available, but these conditions would not preclude treatment with an NSAID or colchicine. (See 'Choice of agent' below and "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout", section on 'Differential diagnosis of a gout flare'.)

Characteristics of the gout flare – Variables that may influence the choice of agent and route of therapy with respect to the current flare include the duration of flare from symptom onset to therapeutic assessment, the number of affected joints and the injection accessibility of the inflamed joint(s), and the clinical setting in which the flare is occurring (eg, during initiation of urate-lowering therapy, during a postoperative period, or when the patient is unable to take medications by mouth).

Logistic factors and patient preference – These include issues such as drug availability and cost, the location of the patient (eg, home or clinic), clinician expertise, and patient acceptance of arthrocentesis and joint injection.

Choice of agent — We take the following approach to patients with a gout flare (algorithm 1), which depends upon knowledge of the contextual medical and other factors that influence the relative safety and efficacy of each agent in individual patients (see 'Factors affecting drug choice' above) (related Pathway(s): Gout: Initial management of adults with a gout flare):

Oral therapies – In patients with established gout experiencing a gout flare typical of prior flares and able to take oral medications, we suggest oral glucocorticoids, NSAIDs, and colchicine as equivalent first-line options that must be individualized for most patients.

Oral glucocorticoids – We use oral glucocorticoids in many patients, particularly those who are not candidates for intraarticular glucocorticoid injection and those who have contraindications to use of NSAIDs. The initial dose is 30 to 40 mg of prednisone or prednisolone given once daily or in a divided twice-daily dose; the duration of therapy depends upon several factors. (See 'Oral glucocorticoids' below.)

Glucocorticoids are similar or superior in efficacy to other agents and have no greater risk of adverse effects in most patients [7], although other options may be preferred in patients with suspected or concomitant infection, prior glucocorticoid intolerance, brittle diabetes, and those who are in a postoperative period in whom glucocorticoids may increase risk of impaired wound healing. In addition, NSAIDs or low-dose colchicine may be preferred over glucocorticoids in patients with frequently recurrent gout flares to avoid excessive total glucocorticoid dosing over time.

Caution in the initiation of oral glucocorticoid flare therapy is also called for when: either a first or recurrent gout flare is accompanied by fever, chills, or other systemic symptoms or clinical signs suggesting intercurrent infection; the flare is not typical of the patient's prior flares (if any); or the diagnosis of gout is not supported by prior urate crystal demonstration in a synovial fluid or tophus aspirate or by application of a "diagnostic rule" [8,9] utilizing a set of clinical, historic, and laboratory criteria (see "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout", section on 'Diagnosis of a gout flare'). In these circumstances, we perform arthrocentesis and synovial fluid analysis and culture, if feasible. We avoid oral (as well as intraarticular) glucocorticoid administration for flare mitigation until the results of these studies are available, but these conditions would not preclude initiation of antiinflammatory treatment with an NSAID or colchicine.

NSAIDs – A reasonable alternative to oral glucocorticoids is a potent oral NSAID, such as naproxen (500 mg twice daily) or indomethacin (50 mg three times daily). NSAIDs are a particularly appropriate alternative in younger patients (less than 60 years old) who lack renal, cardiovascular, or active gastrointestinal disease. Different NSAIDs appear comparably effective when used at full doses, and the ready availability of several NSAIDs without a prescription may favor their use in some patients. (See 'NSAID therapy' below.)

Colchicine – A reasonable alternative to glucocorticoids or NSAIDs is colchicine, which is at least comparably effective to the other agents when taken within 24 hours of onset of a gout flare. Colchicine should be administered in a total dose on day 1 not to exceed 1.8 mg, typically by taking 1.2 mg for the first dose followed by 0.6 mg an hour later; on subsequent days, colchicine is taken once or twice daily until flare resolution. In some countries, colchicine is available as a 0.5 mg rather than as a 0.6 mg pill. (See 'Colchicine therapy' below.)

High-dose colchicine dosing regimens (persistent hourly doses until resolution of flare) are discouraged because of unacceptably high toxicity.

Colchicine is a particularly convenient agent for patients already taking this medication for flare prophylaxis and for patients who have the drug available at home for use only at the onset of a gout flare.

A reduced dose of colchicine may be required in patients with diminished renal or hepatic function or potential drug interactions, and colchicine should be avoided in patients with severe renal or hepatic impairment and in patients on certain medications, particularly those that strongly inhibit the cytochrome P450 system component CYP3A4 (table 1) or that inhibit the membrane P-glycoprotein (P-gp) drug efflux pump (table 2), which may result in dangerously increased colchicine drug levels. (See 'Administration and standard dosing of colchicine' below and 'Dosing in renal or hepatic impairment or with risk of drug interactions' below.)

Parenteral glucocorticoids – In patients with established gout who present with a typical flare limited to one or two joints, flare reduction can usually be accomplished with parenteral glucocorticoids:

Candidates for arthrocentesis and joint injection – Glucocorticoid intraarticular injection is an alternative to the use of orally administered glucocorticoids, NSAIDs, or colchicine in patients with only one or two actively inflamed joints and whose clinical evaluation suggests a low risk for joint infection (see 'Intraarticular glucocorticoids' below). Patients unable to take oral medications but otherwise fitting this clinical profile are also candidates for this approach, which requires ready access to a clinician with expertise in joint aspiration and injection. (See 'Intraarticular glucocorticoids' below.)

Not candidates for arthrocentesis and injection – In the rare patient with established gout, a flare affecting more than two joints (or joints inaccessible to injection), and/or who is unable to take oral medication, we suggest treatment with intravenous or intramuscular glucocorticoids. The choice of glucocorticoid and the route of administration depend upon the clinical context. (See 'Parenteral glucocorticoids' below.)

Initial combination therapy – In selected patients with severe polyarticular flares, particularly in patients who have previously responded only partially to monotherapy, we sometimes combine intraarticular glucocorticoids with one or two oral agents (eg, colchicine plus either NSAIDs or oral glucocorticoids in the same doses used for oral monotherapy). (See 'Glucocorticoid therapy' below and 'NSAID therapy' below and 'Colchicine therapy' below.)

Concomitant anticoagulation therapy – In patients receiving anticoagulation, the treatment options include low-dose oral colchicine, which is most effective when taken within 24 hours of flare onset, and intraarticular, intravenous, or oral glucocorticoids. (See 'Patients on anticoagulation' below.)

Persistent symptoms – The management of patients with persistent symptoms due to a confirmed gout flare depends upon the prior therapy and upon patient comorbidities. Useful interventions include more prolonged treatment courses than usual, switching or combining agents, and the use of interleukin (IL) 1 inhibitors. (See 'Resistant disease or unable to take other therapies' below and 'Investigational therapy' below.)

Despite widespread use in the treatment of gout flares, the various classes of antiinflammatory agents had, until about 2002 to 2005, only infrequently been compared with placebo [10,11] or with one another in randomized trials [3,12,13]. The results of efforts to obtain more evidence of the relative efficacy of these agents are reflected in the guidelines of the major professional groups [3,4,14], which state that a glucocorticoid (given orally, by intraarticular injection, or parenterally), an oral NSAID, and oral colchicine in a low-dose regimen each has substantial efficacy in reducing or preventing full expression of the symptoms and signs of a gout flare [15-26].

Our approach to the patient with a gout flare is based upon the available data and our clinical experience; this approach is generally consistent with that recommended by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR; formerly European League Against Rheumatism), the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), the American College of Physicians (ACP), and the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) [3-5,27].

Glucocorticoid therapy

Administration and choice of glucocorticoid — Glucocorticoids are highly effective as rapidly acting antiinflammatory agents. The chosen route of administration depends upon several factors, including the number of involved joints, patient preference, the timely availability of the patient and the clinician, the experience of the clinician with joint injection techniques, the need in some patients for parenteral rather than orally administered glucocorticoid therapy, and patient preference. For these reasons, as well as the generally favorable benefit/risk profile of oral glucocorticoid use [22-25], glucocorticoids are administered orally much more commonly in practice than by parenteral routes. (See 'Oral glucocorticoids' below and 'Intraarticular glucocorticoids' below and 'Parenteral glucocorticoids' below.)

Glucocorticoids should be used with caution and close monitoring in patients with heart failure, poorly controlled hypertension, or glucose intolerance, but they may be used in patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency.

Several randomized trials comparing oral glucocorticoid (or, in one case, intramuscular glucocorticoid) with NSAID therapy for gout flare indicate that glucocorticoids are at least as efficacious as NSAID therapy and may have fewer serious adverse outcomes [22-25]. Glucocorticoid treatment also offers routes of administration appropriate for some patients who are either not candidates for oral antiinflammatory drug therapy or who might benefit from intraarticular glucocorticoid therapy. For these reasons, as well as the ready availability and modest cost, glucocorticoid therapy is increasingly favored by most [3,4,14], but not all [27], expert guideline panels for first-line gout flare treatment.

Oral glucocorticoids — We suggest oral glucocorticoids (eg, prednisone or prednisolone) for most patients with a gout flare, particularly for those who are not candidates for intraarticular glucocorticoid injection because of polyarticular disease or who do not have ready access to a clinician with expertise in arthrocentesis and injection. We use prednisone (or an equivalent glucocorticoid) in doses of 30 to 40 mg once daily or in two divided doses until flare resolution begins, and we then taper the dose of glucocorticoids, usually over 7 to 10 days.

Rebound flares are relatively common once glucocorticoids are withdrawn, especially in patients who have previously suffered a number of prior flares, whose intercritical periods have progressively shortened, and who are not receiving antiinflammatory flare prophylaxis; in these groups of patients, slower tapering of the glucocorticoid dose with extension of the duration of the taper to 14 or even 21 days is advisable.

Shorter glucocorticoid courses (eg, prednisone 30 to 40 mg daily for five days or those provided by tapered packs of oral prednisone or methylprednisolone) can be effective in many cases. In the authors' experience, they commonly lead to incomplete resolution and rebound flares, mainly in more complicated or more severe gout flares. Thus, clinical follow-up is needed to assure an adequate treatment course, although a clinical trial comparing prednisolone with naproxen for treatment of gout flares did not describe rebound flares in any of the 59 patients who took prednisolone for five days when followed three weeks later [22].

Common adverse effects of short-term, moderate- to high-dose glucocorticoid use include mood changes, hyperglycemia, increased blood pressure, and fluid retention (see "Major side effects of systemic glucocorticoids"), but most patients tolerate glucocorticoids well in the rapid tapering regimens used for a gout flare. Frequent and repeated courses of glucocorticoids should be avoided to limit adverse effects. In the long term, such patients will benefit more from concomitant initiation of antiinflammatory gout flare prophylaxis and serum urate-monitored urate-lowering therapy.

Several randomized trials comparing oral glucocorticoids with NSAID therapy for gout flare indicate that glucocorticoids such as prednisone and prednisolone are at least as efficacious as NSAIDs and may have fewer serious adverse outcomes [22-24]. As an example, in one randomized trial, 416 patients with a gout flare presenting to an emergency department within three days of symptom onset were treated with either prednisolone (30 mg administered orally once daily for five days) or indomethacin (50 mg administered orally three times daily for two days, then 25 mg three times daily for three days) [24]. There was no significant difference between the groups in the degree to which pain was reduced either in the emergency department or during the subsequent two weeks. During the first two hours in the emergency department, adverse events (mostly dizziness, sleepiness, and nausea) were more frequent in the group receiving indomethacin (19 versus 6 percent), but the frequency of side effects did not differ between the groups from days 1 to 14. No serious adverse events were observed.

Intraarticular glucocorticoids — We suggest arthrocentesis with joint fluid aspiration and intraarticular injection of glucocorticoids for patients with gout who have only one or two actively inflamed joints or are unable to take oral medications, and (in either situation) for whom the likelihood of infection is judged remote. Use of this approach is contingent upon the ready availability of a clinician with expertise in such procedures and the accessibility of the inflamed joint(s) to injection.

We use triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg for a large joint [eg, knee], 30 mg for a medium joint [eg, wrist, ankle, elbow], and 10 mg for a small joint) or equivalent doses of methylprednisolone acetate. (See "Joint aspiration or injection in adults: Technique and indications" and "Joint aspiration or injection in adults: Complications".)

Glucocorticoid joint injection should be withheld in patients in whom a diagnosis of gout has not previously been established or in whom the clinical history and physical examination suggest the alternative or additional possibility of joint infection. To achieve this critical distinction, joint aspiration should be carried out in such patients, with examination of the synovial fluid by Gram stain and culture, by cell count and differential white cell count, and by polarized light microscopy for urate or other crystals that are pathognomonic either for gout (urate crystals) or acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition disease (pseudogout). (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition (CPPD) disease".)

Importantly, septic arthritis and a gout flare can coexist; therefore, even if gout has been diagnosed in the past, caution should be taken in the use of glucocorticoid joint injection if the current clinical picture is uncertain, even in a patient with well-established gout.

Evidence of the benefit of intraarticular glucocorticoids has been limited to small, open-label trials, although, in our experience, such treatment is usually highly effective and works quickly, often within 24 hours [28]. However, a 2013 systematic review of the safety and efficacy of intraarticular glucocorticoid injection for gout flares could not identify any randomized trials of intraarticular glucocorticoids that met the inclusion criteria, illustrating the very limited formal evidence available regarding the efficacy and safety of this approach [29].

Indirect evidence supporting the use of intraarticular glucocorticoid injections in gout includes the significant benefit that may result from such injections for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. (See "Use of glucocorticoids in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis", section on 'Intraarticular therapy' and "Management of moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis", section on 'Limited role of intraarticular glucocorticoid injections'.)

Parenteral glucocorticoids — In patients who are unable to take medications orally and who are not candidates for intraarticular glucocorticoid injection, we generally suggest treatment with intravenous or intramuscular glucocorticoids. The choice of glucocorticoid and the route of administration depend upon the clinical context:

In hospitalized patients with polyarticular involvement, with existing or easily established intravenous access, and with no contraindications to glucocorticoids, we suggest intravenous administration of a parenteral glucocorticoid. The dose and frequency depend upon the agent chosen. A typical dose is 20 mg of methylprednisolone administered intravenously twice daily, with stepwise reduction by half of each dose when improvement begins and with rapid transition, when feasible, to oral prednisone or another oral glucocorticoid equivalent to complete therapy.

Intramuscular glucocorticoid injection has also been reported to be effective [25,30] for gout flare management, usually with an initial dose of triamcinolone acetate (40 to 60 mg; or an equivalent dose of methylprednisolone) that may need to be repeated once or twice (at intervals of at least 48 hours) if benefit fades or if resolution of the flare is not achieved.

Few randomized trials have adequately evaluated the benefit of systemic parenteral glucocorticoids [31]; the published studies and the few randomized trials had significant limitations in quality and strength of evidence [13,32]. A network meta-analysis of randomized trials found parenteral glucocorticoids to be at least as good as other strategies used to treat gout flares [7].

Corticotropin (adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH]) has also been reported to be efficacious for gout flare treatment, but cost and limited availability restrict the use of parenteral ACTH treatment.

NSAID therapy

Administration of NSAIDs — We use a potent oral NSAID, such as naproxen (500 mg twice daily) or indomethacin (50 mg three times daily), as an alternative to glucocorticoids for treatment of a gout flare, particularly in younger patients (less than 60 years old) with neither renal or cardiovascular comorbidities or active gastrointestinal disease. Nonselective NSAIDs of all types are inexpensive, readily available to patients at the onset of a flare (some without a prescription), and, in our experience, probably as effective and safe as other agents [13,15-19,26] for this indication and with treatment for a limited duration [13,17-20]. Other orally administered NSAIDs (and initial doses) that may be used, for example, include ibuprofen (800 mg three times daily), diclofenac (50 mg two to three times daily), meloxicam (15 mg daily), and celecoxib (200 mg twice daily; alternatively, some experts treat with a single initial dose of 400 mg followed by 200 mg twice daily) [20]. Patients should not be treated concurrently with more than one NSAID and should be queried regarding their medications (including over–the-counter therapies) to avoid such unintended use.

NSAIDs are most effective when treatment is initiated within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms. The dose may be reduced after a significant decrease in symptoms has occurred, but the frequency of dosing should be maintained for several more days for optimal antiinflammatory effect. (See 'Efficacy of NSAIDs' below.)

The NSAID can be discontinued two to three days after clinical signs have completely resolved. Typically, the total duration of NSAID therapy for a gout flare is five to seven days. It is likely to be shorter in patients treated within the first 24 hours of symptom onset and may be longer in patients in whom treatment is not begun until several days later.

There are important contraindications to NSAIDs, including:

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) with creatinine clearance (CrCl) of less than 60 mL/minute per 1.73 m2. (See "Nonselective NSAIDs: Overview of adverse effects", section on 'Renal effects' and "Overview of the management of chronic kidney disease in adults", section on 'Definition and classification' and "Assessment of kidney function".)

Active duodenal or gastric ulcer. (See "NSAIDs (including aspirin): Primary prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity" and "NSAIDs (including aspirin): Secondary prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity".)

Cardiovascular disease, particularly heart failure or hypertension that is difficult to control.

Caution is necessary in patients with known cardiovascular disease or with multiple risk factors for atherosclerotic coronary disease since an increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure has been associated with use of both nonselective NSAIDs and COX-2 selective inhibitors (coxibs). Whether such risk is increased in patients receiving short courses of NSAIDs for a gout flare is unknown.

NSAID allergy.

Ongoing treatment with anticoagulants. (See 'Patients on anticoagulation' below.)

Adverse effects are uncommon with brief courses of therapy but may include gastrointestinal intolerance and worsening of renal function.

In a flare of several days' duration prior to starting therapy, a longer course of treatment may be necessary. In such patients, added interventions to prevent NSAID gastropathy (eg, use of a proton pump inhibitor) may be of benefit, particularly in patients at increased risk due to advanced age or to a prior history of ulcer disease or gastrointestinal bleeding. (See "NSAIDs (including aspirin): Primary prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity" and "NSAIDs (including aspirin): Secondary prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity".)

Aspirin is not used to treat gout flares because of the paradoxical effects of salicylates on serum urate, resulting from renal uric acid retention at low doses (<2 to 3 g/day) and from uricosuria at higher doses [33-36]. However, low-dose aspirin that is being used for cardiovascular prophylaxis generally does not need to be discontinued during the treatment of a gout flare, although these very low doses can increase serum urate levels modestly in some patients [35,36]. There is one report that low-dose aspirin can increase the risk of gout flares in patients with established gout who were not being treated with allopurinol [37].

Efficacy of NSAIDs — Complete or nearly complete resolution of the pain and disability of a gout flare typically occurs within several days to one week. There are relatively few high-quality randomized trials of NSAIDs for gout flares [12,13,20,38]. A randomized open-label trial of 399 participants with gout flares compared naproxen 750 mg oral dose followed by 250 mg every eight hours for seven days with low-dose colchicine 0.5 mg three times per day for four days [26]; at seven days, there was no difference in pain intensity, but naproxen caused fewer side effects. Several randomized trials comparing oral glucocorticoid (or in one case, intramuscular glucocorticoid) with NSAID therapy for gout flare indicate similar benefit, although glucocorticoids may have fewer adverse effects, particularly in comparison with indomethacin [22-25]. A number of trials have compared different NSAIDs with each other, without any apparent differences in efficacy [13,15-20]. One additional study showed superiority of an NSAID (tenoxicam) over placebo [11]. In one randomized trial, treatment with high doses of celecoxib (a single dose of 800 mg followed by 400 mg twice daily) was of comparable efficacy to indomethacin (50 mg three times daily) [20].

Colchicine therapy — We use low-dose oral colchicine for gout flare therapy in two circumstances:

In patients with glucocorticoid and NSAID intolerance or with absolute (or often relative) contraindications to glucocorticoid and NSAID use, we use low-dose oral colchicine therapy for a gout flare. (See 'Glucocorticoid therapy' above and 'NSAID therapy' above.)

In patients initiating antiinflammatory gout flare therapy within 24 hours of symptom onset, colchicine is an alternative to glucocorticoids and NSAIDs when the patient and clinician prefer colchicine over the other options based upon prior clinical experience and drug availability.

In our experience, incipient gout flares may frequently be aborted by use of low-dose oral colchicine as soon as the patient perceives the first sign of a flare. For this reason, we use colchicine as an alternative to glucocorticoids or NSAIDs for flare treatment in patients with prior flares successfully treated with colchicine. We prescribe such patients a supply of this agent for home use to allow early initiation of low-dose treatment (see 'Administration and standard dosing of colchicine' below) at the first symptom of flare recurrence.

Patients receiving ongoing colchicine antiinflammatory gout flare prophylaxis should also be instructed in the low-dose colchicine gout flare regimen in the event that a gout flare develops during prophylaxis. (See "Pharmacologic urate-lowering therapy and treatment of tophi in patients with gout", section on 'Prophylaxis during initiation of urate-lowering therapy'.)

In patients who have initiated gout flare therapy with an NSAID and have either experienced an adverse event warranting an alternative antiinflammatory agent or have had no pain reduction, we would consider use of colchicine rather than an oral glucocorticoid as the second-line agent only if time since flare onset is within 36 hours. We generally do not initiate colchicine as first-line therapy for gout flares that have been ongoing for more than 36 hours because of the diminished likelihood of benefit, and we prefer to initiate treatment during the first 24 hours because of the greater likelihood of benefit. (See 'Efficacy of oral colchicine' below.)

Administration and standard dosing of colchicine — There are several low-dose colchicine regimens that may be effective for management of a gout flare. As an example, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a schedule for the first 24 hours of colchicine treatment for a gout flare, recommending an initial dose of 1.2 mg of oral colchicine, followed one hour later by another 0.6 mg, for a total dose on the first day of therapy of 1.8 mg [21,39,40]. In many countries other than the United States the medication is formulated as a 0.5 mg pill, which we would use in place of the 0.6 mg dose indicated here and elsewhere in this topic review.

Approximately 60 percent of patients will not achieve a 50 percent reduction in pain within 24 hours of colchicine treatment. Patients should be continued on treatment for the duration of the gout flare at reduced doses (eg, 0.6 mg once or twice daily as tolerated). Complete cessation of treatment can be safely done within two to three days of complete resolution of the gout flare.

In patients already receiving colchicine prophylaxis (0.6 mg once to twice daily) at the time of their flare, the higher total daily dose for flare of 1.8 mg is taken in place of the usual prophylactic dose on the first day of therapy for the flare. From day 2 until 48 hours after flare resolution, we supplement to provide 0.6 mg twice daily (total 1.2 mg per day), then resume the previous prophylaxis dose. (See 'General therapeutic principles' above.)

The most common adverse effects of colchicine, diarrhea and abdominal cramping [21,41], are less likely in patients who receive no more than 1.8 mg in total on the first day, compared with patients receiving higher doses, such as 0.6 mg every one to two hours until symptom relief or intolerance (as was historically employed) [10,21].

When low-dose colchicine therapy is ineffective or minimally effective in suppressing the gout flare in a timely fashion, alternative antiinflammatory agents, including glucocorticoids or NSAIDs, may be required. In patients without contraindications to NSAID or glucocorticoid use, supplemental oral therapy with an NSAID or with a glucocorticoid (given orally, by intraarticular injection, or parenterally) may also be used. (See 'Glucocorticoid therapy' above and 'NSAID therapy' above.)

Dosing in renal or hepatic impairment or with risk of drug interactions — In patients with renal or hepatic impairment and in patients using or recently completing (within the previous 14 days) treatment with medications that may inhibit the cytochrome P450 system component CYP3A4 (table 1) and/or the P-gp efflux pump (table 2), the size of the initial and subsequent doses and the frequency of colchicine administration may need to be reduced or colchicine may need to be avoided altogether. (See 'Precautions' below.)

Numerous drugs inhibit CYP3A4 (table 1) and/or P-gp (table 2) and are responsible for the large number of colchicine drug interactions. CYP3A4 is found in hepatocytes and transforms colchicine to inactive metabolites. P-gp is found in epithelial cells lining the gastrointestinal tract, kidney proximal tubules, bile duct membranes, and the blood-brain barrier. Inhibition of P-gp within the intestinal lumen increases colchicine oral bioavailability. Inhibition of P-gp at bile-ductule membranes and impaired renal or hepatic function decrease colchicine clearance [42]. Both effects contribute to increasing serum concentrations and prolong colchicine half-life.

Colchicine has a narrow therapeutic margin, and drug accumulation is associated with severe, and sometimes fatal, consequences (see 'Safety of colchicine' below). It is therefore essential that prescribers perform regular assessments of drug interactions, organ function, and other factors that can influence serum concentrations and prescribe a reduced dose and/or frequency when warranted, or avoid its use entirely. (See 'Precautions' below.)

Dosing guidelines for colchicine have been proposed by one manufacturer for those patients with normal renal and hepatic function who are receiving interacting agents or who have received them within 14 days, and guidelines for colchicine administration in patients with renal or hepatic impairment who are not using an interacting medication have also been described [40]. However, formal guidelines for dose adjustment in patients with multiple interacting factors have not been established, and our approach, which is based upon our personal experience, may differ in some limited respects from the manufacturer's guidelines.

More common examples of medications that may result in adverse interactions, with increased colchicine levels, include:

P-gp inhibitors – More commonly used inhibitors of P-gp include macrolide antibiotics (azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin), cyclosporine, tacrolimus, amiodarone, quinidine, azole antifungals, verapamil, and others (table 2).

CYP3A4 inhibitors – Commonly used strong CYP3A4 inhibitors include human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors, pharmacokinetic-boosting agents such as those used in HIV therapeutics (ritonavir, cobicistat), clarithromycin, azole antifungals, and others (table 1) [43].

A number of drugs inhibit both P-gp and CYP3A4, including pharmacokinetic-boosting agents (cobicistat, ritonavir), cyclosporine, verapamil, erythromycin, clarithromycin, and others.

Care should also be taken in combining use of colchicine with the wider array of less potent CYP3A4 inhibitors, including diltiazem, fluconazole, and grapefruit juice (table 1); and drugs with potential for additive side effects, such as myotoxicity in combination with a statin or fibrate (eg, gemfibrozil).

Patients receiving colchicine should have their medication regimen regularly analyzed for drug interactions, particularly when initiating and adjusting therapy; this may be done by use of the Lexicomp drug interactions program included with UpToDate.

Precautions — Our approach to the use of colchicine in patients with renal or hepatic impairment or potential drug interactions is to take the following precautions:

Colchicine contraindicated – Colchicine is contraindicated in the presence of any degree of renal or hepatic impairment in patients receiving a P-gp inhibitor (table 2) or an agent that strongly reduces CYP3A4 availability (table 1) [39-41]. We also avoid colchicine in patients with organ impairment if they have recently (eg, within the past 14 days) completed treatment with a P-gp or strong CYP3A4 inhibitor.

Colchicine use at a reduced dose ONLY IF no other therapeutic options – In a small number of these patients in whom there are no other therapeutic alternatives, we use colchicine for gout flare treatment at a reduced dose and/or frequency with close monitoring.

Colchicine dosing adjustments for gout flares should generally follow the guidelines provided in the manufacturer’s FDA-approved prescribing information [40].

In patients at particularly high risk, with multiple factors that may potentially increase colchicine exposure beyond safe levels, colchicine should be administered by a clinician with expertise in using the drug in these high-risk groups. Usually, no more than 0.3 mg is administered on day of flare and this dose is not repeated for three to seven days or more in such patients, depending upon the individual factors that are present. These particularly high-risk groups include:

Patients on colchicine prophylaxis within the past 14 days, with normal renal and hepatic function, but who have taken a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (table 1) or a drug that inhibits P-gp (table 2) within the last 14 days [41].

Patients on colchicine prophylaxis within the past 14 days, with any renal or hepatic impairment, who have taken a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor (table 1) within the last 14 days.

Patients regardless of recent colchicine use, who have advanced renal or hepatic impairment (CrCl of <30 mL/minute or Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis or equivalent, respectively) who are not receiving any interacting medications.

Examples of additional factors that may affect dosing and further mandate a need for reduced dose and frequency of administration or avoidance of colchicine altogether include:

Additional drug interactions beyond those recognized from drugs that are moderate or strong CYP3A4 (table 1) or P-gp (table 2) inhibitors (eg, additive myotoxicity with combined use of statin and colchicine). The Lexicomp drug interactions tool available within UpToDate should be consulted for additional information.

Advanced age.

Chronic ill health and debility.

Use of more than one medication that can interact with colchicine.

Combinations of multiple factors, some of which alone may not be problematic but which in combination can increase risk of colchicine accumulation.

All patients using colchicine should be advised about the potential for adverse events on colchicine therapy and to stop therapy and report to their clinician if symptoms of toxicity arise, especially diarrhea, but also vomiting, dysesthesias, or weakness. Close monitoring of pertinent organ function and clinical status may be required and should be individualized depending upon the patient's clinical status.

We advise all patients who are prescribed colchicine not to consume grapefruit juice (a CYP3A4 inhibitor) or grapefruit while using colchicine.

We do not administer colchicine intravenously, and we strongly advise against such use because of the risk of serious adverse effects, including death, which are associated with the intravenous administration of this drug. Due to this concern, in many countries, an intravenous form of colchicine is no longer available.

Efficacy of oral colchicine — Colchicine for the treatment of gout flares has not been extensively studied in randomized trials [10,21] even though it was used for centuries for the treatment of a gout flare. Oral colchicine (uncombined with another active ingredient, such as probenecid) was first formally approved by the FDA for use in the United States for the treatment of gout flares in 2009 [44].

In our experience, incipient gout flares may be aborted with oral colchicine taken at the onset of the first symptom. Colchicine was similar to naproxen in efficacy and speed of resolution of gout flares when compared with naproxen in an open-label randomized trial [26]. Side effects are less likely when a low-dose regimen is used at the onset of flare symptoms, and such regimens appear to achieve a degree of benefit comparable to that achieved with higher colchicine doses.

These points were illustrated by the results of the Acute Gout Flare Receiving Colchicine Evaluation (AGREE) trial, a randomized trial that compared treatment administered within 12 hours of flare onset using low-dose colchicine (1.8 mg total over one hour), very high-dose colchicine (4.8 mg total over six hours), and placebo [21]. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the low- and high-dose colchicine treatment groups (38 and 33 percent), compared with those receiving placebo (16 percent), achieved a 50 percent reduction in pain by 24 hours from treatment initiation without the use of rescue medication. This trial was limited by the short duration of treatment.

Safety of colchicine — Gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea and abdominal cramping, as well as abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting) are the most common adverse reactions to colchicine administration during the limited duration of treatment of a gout flare [40]. Colchicine was reported to have more side effects than naproxen in a clinical trial, with higher frequencies of diarrhea and headaches [26].

A readily reversible peripheral neuropathy or more severe organ failure may occur in instances of more persistent colchicine dosing, but severe colchicine toxicities may develop insidiously with prolonged colchicine therapy. These may include combinations of serious, life-threatening, or fatal adverse events, such as blood cytopenias, rhabdomyolysis or myopathy, peripheral neuropathy, liver failure, or severe cutaneous eruption. The latter outcomes have only rarely been reported in patients receiving brief administration of this agent for a gout flare, as in a patient treated with very high-dose colchicine together with multiple drugs affecting colchicine levels over an eight-day period [45].

SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES

Patients on anticoagulation — In patients on anticoagulants, we use one of the following approaches:

In patients initiating treatment promptly after flare onset, in the absence of contraindications, we use low-dose colchicine because of its efficacy, convenience, lack of effect on blood clotting, and lack of need for arthrocentesis and joint injection with a glucocorticoid preparation. (See 'Colchicine therapy' above.)

In patients with polyarticular involvement or if arthrocentesis cannot be performed for other reasons, oral glucocorticoids can be used (see 'Oral glucocorticoids' above and 'Intraarticular glucocorticoids' above and "Joint aspiration or injection in adults: Technique and indications", section on 'Approach to the patient on anticoagulants'). Caution and closer monitoring should be exercised if there is a history of peptic ulcer disease or gastrointestinal bleeding.

Joint aspiration and injection with a glucocorticoid provide another option if only one or two joints are involved; this can be done safely even with anticoagulation by a clinician highly experienced in arthrocentesis. Care is necessary to avoid a hemarthrosis. (See 'Intraarticular glucocorticoids' above and "Joint aspiration or injection in adults: Technique and indications", section on 'Approach to the patient on anticoagulants'.)

Selected patients on anticoagulation who are unable to be treated with either glucocorticoids or colchicine may be managed, if necessary, with celecoxib, which lacks the antiplatelet effect of the nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but retains some potential for gastrointestinal toxicity. (See 'Efficacy of NSAIDs' above and "Overview of COX-2 selective NSAIDs", section on 'Reduction in gastroduodenal toxicity' and "Overview of COX-2 selective NSAIDs", section on 'Lack of platelet inhibition and use during anticoagulation'.)

An alternative for patients on anticoagulation and with multiple medical comorbidities that preclude use of first-line therapies (eg, renal failure, gastrointestinal bleeding) is a short-acting interleukin (IL) 1 inhibitor, such as anakinra. (See 'Resistant disease or unable to take other therapies' below.)

Older adults — The management of gout flares in older patients is complicated by the greater prevalence of comorbidities, the use of multiple medications, and reductions in renal function associated with aging [46,47], although a systematic review of clinical trials for treatment of gout suggested that all of the antiinflammatory agents discussed here were likely to be efficacious in older patients [48].

These safety concerns reduce the proportion of patients for whom NSAIDs or colchicine may be preferred agents, although these drugs can be used in patients who lack such contraindications. However, we avoid the use of indomethacin in older adults because of the greater risk of adverse effects with this medication compared with other NSAIDs, consistent with the Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults [49]. (See 'General therapeutic principles' above and "Drug prescribing for older adults".)

Glucocorticoids are generally tolerated in short-term use for gout flares in patients in whom NSAIDs or colchicine may pose an increased risk. (See 'Administration and choice of glucocorticoid' above and 'Efficacy of NSAIDs' above and 'Safety of colchicine' above.)

Contraindications to the use of NSAIDs that are of particular concern in older adults include the presence of heart failure, renal impairment, or gastrointestinal disease.

Contraindications to colchicine include gastrointestinal intolerance, dosing restrictions in patients with renal and hepatic dysfunction, and potential drug interactions, and also may include the high cost of therapy. Colchicine myopathy and peripheral neuropathy can be subtle in older adults. Complaints of weakness and functional decline while taking colchicine should prompt a careful neurologic examination, laboratory evaluation including a serum creatine kinase, and empirical drug discontinuation. General principles and special concerns in prescribing drugs in this population are discussed in more detail separately. (See "Drug prescribing for older adults" and "Drug-induced myopathies", section on 'Colchicine'.)

End-stage kidney disease and transplantation — We generally treat patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage kidney disease requiring maintenance dialysis with intraarticular, oral, or parenteral glucocorticoids. (See 'Glucocorticoid therapy' above.)

In patients on chronic hemodialysis, NSAIDs may be used as an alternative to glucocorticoids, particularly in patients with milder gout flares in whom lower doses and shorter courses can be employed (see 'NSAID therapy' above). Other concerns in patients on hemodialysis include concomitant use of anticoagulation and risk of gastrointestinal toxicity.

In patients with residual kidney function, including patients on peritoneal dialysis, NSAIDs should be avoided because of the risk of worsening of renal function; any use of NSAIDs in this setting should only be done in consultation with the patient's nephrologist. (See "NSAIDs: Acute kidney injury".)

Colchicine is generally avoided in hemodialysis patients with gout flares because it is not removed by dialysis, and therefore these patients have a heightened risk of colchicine toxicity. (See 'Dosing in renal or hepatic impairment or with risk of drug interactions' above and 'Safety of colchicine' above.)

Gout flares in organ transplant recipients should only be managed by clinicians experienced with these clinical problems because of the complexities of management due to reduced uric acid excretion and because of the frequent accompanying use of cyclosporine. Colchicine, NSAIDs, and glucocorticoids can potentially be used, but limits on dosing, frequency, and duration of therapy usually apply. Treatment in this setting is discussed in more detail separately. (See "Kidney transplantation in adults: Hyperuricemia and gout in kidney transplant recipients", section on 'Selection of initial antiinflammatory therapy'.)

Pregnancy and lactation

In pregnant women with a gout flare, we generally use oral glucocorticoid therapy (see 'Glucocorticoid therapy' above). The use of NSAIDs is limited to the first 20 to 30 weeks of gestation, and we avoid use of colchicine in pregnant women. (See 'NSAID therapy' above.)

Potential contraindications to glucocorticoids in such patients include poorly controlled hypertension or diabetes, in addition to other usual concerns. We also employ symptomatic treatment measures, such as icing and protection of the affected site of inflammation.

In breastfeeding women, we use either glucocorticoids or NSAID therapy (see 'Glucocorticoid therapy' above and 'NSAID therapy' above) while continuing to avoid the use of colchicine.

Gout flares are exceedingly uncommon during pregnancy and lactation, paralleling the low prevalence of hyperuricemia in women of childbearing age in most populations (see "Asymptomatic hyperuricemia", section on 'Epidemiology'). Thus, the occurrence of an acute inflammatory arthritis resembling gout during pregnancy or breastfeeding should direct attention to the exclusion of alternative diagnoses, such as septic arthritis. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout", section on 'Differential diagnosis'.)

Despite its rarity, gout flares during pregnancy and/or lactation have been reported among women with familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy [50,51] (see "Autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease", section on 'ADTKD due to UMOD pathogenic variants'), unspecified "renal impairment," and gestational diabetes [52].

Although antiinflammatory doses of an NSAID (eg, naproxen, ibuprofen, or indomethacin) have been effective in some pregnant patients with a gout flare, use of NSAIDs is limited to the first two trimesters of pregnancy because of concerns about NSAID-induced premature closure of the ductus arteriosus later in pregnancy. NSAID therapy should also be withheld during pregnancy in the presence of impaired renal function. The use of NSAIDs during pregnancy and lactation is described in detail separately. (See "Safety of rheumatic disease medication use during pregnancy and lactation", section on 'NSAIDs'.)

Data directly derived from treatment of gout in pregnant and lactating women are fragmentary, although studies of colchicine in pregnant and breastfeeding patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) and patients with pericardial diseases have not found increased adverse effects with its use [53,54]. However, reports of chromosomal damage associated with colchicine exposure and the detection of colchicine in breast milk [55] raise concerns regarding the safety of colchicine during pregnancy and lactation [27,54].

In the infrequent patient with recurrent flares during pregnancy or breastfeeding who requires prophylaxis to prevent gout flares, we use daily low-dose glucocorticoids, given the need to avoid both colchicine and NSAIDs.

RESISTANT DISEASE OR UNABLE TO TAKE OTHER THERAPIES — In patients with symptoms that are not improving as expected, the patients' adherence to the treatment program should be assessed. Additionally, alternative agents should be considered, depending upon what has already been tried, and the diagnosis should be reevaluated. Arthrocentesis may be required to exclude other causes of a flare of acute inflammatory arthritis, including infection, if joint aspiration was not already performed during the gout flare.

It is important not to become overly concerned if gout flares do not resolve within one to three days of starting treatment. Most gout flares resolve within 7 to 10 days, regardless of the type of therapy, and resolution is much more rapid if the patient is treated early in the flare. Thus, truly resistant disease is uncommon, although some gout flares may resolve slowly, especially if treatment is not started early or if there is extensive polyarticular disease leading to chronic gouty arthritis, in which near-continuous joint inflammation is present. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout", section on 'Gout flares' and "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout", section on 'Differential diagnosis of a gout flare'.)

The management of patients with persistent symptoms due to a confirmed gout flare depends upon the prior therapy and upon the patients' comorbidities:

In patients being treated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), a more prolonged course of therapy than usual may be required in some patients with persistent symptoms, especially if treatment was not started until the flare was ongoing for several days. Patients with a flare that appears resistant to an adequate course of NSAID therapy may respond to treatment with glucocorticoids. (See 'Glucocorticoid therapy' above.)

In patients who are being treated with colchicine but who do not have contraindications to glucocorticoids or NSAIDs, it may be necessary to switch to one of these therapies if no improvement is seen within several days, especially if the gout flare was not treated early. (See 'Administration and standard dosing of colchicine' above and 'NSAID therapy' above and 'Glucocorticoid therapy' above.)

The management of recurrent (or "rebound") gout flares following treatment with glucocorticoids is discussed above. (See 'Oral glucocorticoids' above.)

In patients in whom a joint injection was not used for the initial management of a flare, an intraarticular glucocorticoid injection could still be performed later, alone or in combination with an oral agent, in patients with persistent symptoms. (See 'Intraarticular glucocorticoids' above.)

Interleukin (IL) 1 inhibition may be of benefit in selected patients. We use anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist protein, only in gout patients with frequent and/or documented gout flares in whom other available treatments have failed, are contraindicated, or in whom "rebound flares" occur even when glucocorticoid treatment is appropriately tapered.

Although IL-1 antagonist agents are available in some countries for the treatment of conditions other than gout, such as anakinra for rheumatoid arthritis, canakinumab for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and canakinumab and rilonacept for cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes, only the first two have shown clear efficacy in treatment of gout flares, and their use for this indication remains investigational in the United States. Canakinumab has been approved in the European Union for use in patients with more than three gout flares annually that are refractory to treatment with alternative agents. (See 'Investigational therapy' below.)

INVESTIGATIONAL THERAPY — Interleukin (IL) 1 is an important mediator of gouty inflammation and a potential therapeutic target in gout flares [56]. Thus, agents inhibiting IL-1 action are under study for the treatment of gout flares (see "Pathophysiology of gout"). These include:

Anakinra – Anakinra (100 mg daily, administered subcutaneously) is the preferred IL-1 antagonist for use in a gout flare because of its short half-life of IL-1 blockade and its relatively modest cost compared with other alternative IL-1 inhibitors, such as canakinumab. (See "Overview of biologic agents and kinase inhibitors in the rheumatic diseases", section on 'IL-1 inhibition' and "Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults resistant to initial biologic DMARD therapy", section on 'Resistant to standard therapies'.)

The efficacy of anakinra, a recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist, for gout flares has been suggested in observational studies [57-60] and further documented in randomized trials [61,62]:

Beneficial effects of IL-1 inhibition were seen in some patients in open-label pilot studies of anakinra, with 100 mg daily given subcutaneously until symptoms of the gout flare improved [57-59].

In a randomized trial involving 88 patients with a crystal-proven gout flare, anakinra (100 mg daily for five consecutive days) resulted in similar degrees of benefit to usual antiinflammatory flare treatment (with either colchicine, oral glucocorticoids, or full-dose naproxen) with respect to magnitude of change in pain from baseline through days 2 to 4 of treatment; anakinra resulted in comparable safety and improvements in pain, index joint swelling, and tenderness at day 5 [61].

In a randomized trial involving 165 patients with a gout flare who were not candidates for NSAID or colchicine therapy, anakinra in doses of 100 to 200 mg per day provided similar reductions in pain as a single 40 mg injection of intramuscular triamcinolone after 24 to 72 hours (0 to 100 visual analog scale pain reduction of 41.2 for anakinra versus 39.4 for triamcinolone) [62]. There were no infections reported as adverse events, although the frequency of severe adverse events with anakinra was greater than with triamcinolone (7.5 versus 0 percent).

A retrospective review of 115 episodes of crystalline arthritis in hospitalized patients, of which 93 were related to patients with gout, found anakinra to be effective, with 75 percent of cases fully resolved after four days of treatment. The study suggested that anakinra could be safe in the context of infection, transplantation, and in the perioperative setting [60].

The randomized trial of anakinra (see above) [62] followed patients for 52 weeks and supported observations in prior reports [57-59] that recurrent flares were not uncommon among anakinra-treated patients, as more than twice as many patients in the anakinra group were treated for three flares compared with the triamcinolone group. Anakinra appears to be an effective option for treatment of gout flares when there is intolerance or a contraindication to first-line therapies. The short biologic half-life of anakinra, which mandates daily subcutaneous administration, makes this agent a less optimal candidate for gout flare prophylaxis but may, in the case of gout flares, provide an advantage in safety, since blocking of IL-1 beta action is rapidly reversed when treatment with anakinra is discontinued.

Canakinumab – Canakinumab has been evaluated [63] and approved in the European Union for treatment of refractory gout flares. It is indicated for use in the treatment of patients with at least three gout flares annually that cannot be effectively managed with other antiinflammatory treatment options. (See "Cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes and related disorders", section on 'Canakinumab'.)

Canakinumab is a fully humanized, long-acting monoclonal antibody that blocks IL-1 beta signaling; it can be effective for the treatment of gout flares in patients who have a history of multiple flares and who have either refractoriness or contraindication to gout flare treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or colchicine [63,64]. Canakinumab has also shown effectiveness in preventing gout flares. (See "Pharmacologic urate-lowering therapy and treatment of tophi in patients with gout", section on 'Prophylaxis during initiation of urate-lowering therapy'.)

A small number of trials support the effectiveness of canakinumab in treating gout flares:

The efficacy and safety of canakinumab (a single subcutaneous injection of 150 mg plus a placebo intramuscular injection) were evaluated in such patients in comparison with triamcinolone acetonide (a single intramuscular injection of 40 mg plus a placebo subcutaneous injection) in two identically designed randomized trials (one in the United States and the other in Europe and other non-United States countries) involving a total of 456 patients [64]. Canakinumab administration resulted in a significantly greater reduction in mean 72-hour pain score using a 100 mm visual analog scale (decrease of 35.7 versus 25 mm).

Four patients in the published trials, all receiving canakinumab, required hospitalization for treatment of infections (one abscess of the jaw, one abscess of the forearm, pneumonia, and gastroenteritis), but there were no opportunistic infections. Other adverse events that were most common with canakinumab included low neutrophil counts and low platelet counts.

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Gout and other crystal disorders".)

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

Basics topics (see "Patient education: Gout (The Basics)")

Beyond the Basics topics (see "Patient education: Gout (Beyond the Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Therapeutic goals and treatment principles – The goal of therapy in a gout flare is prompt and safe termination of pain and disability. Symptoms will usually resolve without therapy within a few days to several weeks but improve more quickly with administration of one of several classes of antiinflammatory drugs. More rapid and complete resolution of symptoms occurs the earlier that treatment is introduced. Initiation of treatment with urate-lowering pharmacotherapies is of no direct benefit in treating a gout flare, but ongoing urate-lowering therapy should not be interrupted in patients on such therapy at the time of a flare. (See 'General therapeutic principles' above and "Pharmacologic urate-lowering therapy and treatment of tophi in patients with gout".)

Factors in choice of therapy – The choice of therapy for a gout flare depends upon an individual patient assessment of multiple factors, including patient age, comorbidities, and associated medical therapies; flare characteristics and past responses to therapy; the number of affected joints and their accessibility to arthrocentesis and injection; and patient and clinician preferences (algorithm 1). (See 'Initial treatment' above.) (Related Pathway(s): Gout: Initial management of adults with a gout flare.)

Principal therapeutic options – In most patients who can take oral medications, we suggest oral glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or colchicine for the treatment of gout flares (Grade 2C). All three of these antiinflammatory agents are effective; the choice depends upon multiple individual factors (algorithm 1) (see 'Choice of agent' above) (related Pathway(s): Gout: Initial management of adults with a gout flare):

Oral glucocorticoids – We use oral glucocorticoids in many patients, particularly for those who are not candidates for intraarticular glucocorticoid injection and those who have contraindications to use of NSAIDs: prednisone or prednisolone, at an initial dose of 30 to 40 mg once daily or in a divided twice-daily dose until flare resolution begins, then we taper the dose, usually over 7 to 10 days. Because rebound flares occur more frequently with glucocorticoids than with alternative agents, especially among patients with multiple recent flares, we extend the course of glucocorticoid tapering to 14 to 21 days in such individuals. (See 'Oral glucocorticoids' above.)

Other options (eg, NSAIDs, colchicine) may be preferred in patients with concomitant infection, prior glucocorticoid intolerance, brittle diabetes, and those who are in a postoperative period in whom glucocorticoids may increase risk of impaired wound healing. NSAIDs or low-dose colchicine may also be preferred over glucocorticoids in patients with frequently recurrent gout flares to avoid excessive total glucocorticoid dosing over time.

NSAIDs – A reasonable alternative to oral glucocorticoids for a gout flare is a potent oral NSAID, such as naproxen (500 mg twice daily) or indomethacin (50 mg three times daily). NSAIDs are particularly appropriate in younger patients (less than 60 years old) who lack renal, cardiovascular, or active gastrointestinal disease. (See 'NSAID therapy' above.)

NSAIDs are most effective when treatment is initiated within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms. The NSAID can be discontinued two to three days after clinical signs have completely resolved. Typically, the total duration of NSAID therapy for a gout flare is five to seven days. It is likely to be shorter in patients who are treated within the first 24 hours of symptom onset and may be longer in patients in whom treatment is not begun until several days later. Aspirin is not used for the treatment of gout flares because of the paradoxical effects of salicylates on serum urate.

Colchicine – Another reasonable alternative to glucocorticoids or NSAIDs is colchicine, which is at least comparably effective to the other agents when taken within 24 hours of onset of a gout flare. Colchicine should be administered in a total dose on day 1 not to exceed 1.8 mg, typically as 1.2 mg for the first dose followed by 0.6 mg an hour later. Most patients will not achieve complete resolution of pain within 24 hours but will respond further over several days of continued dosing at 0.6 mg once or twice daily, as tolerated, with stepwise reduction in the dose as the flare gradually resolves. Colchicine flare treatment can be discontinued within two to three days of flare resolution. In some countries, colchicine is available as a 0.5 mg pill rather than a 0.6 mg pill. (See 'Colchicine therapy' above.)

Colchicine is a particularly convenient agent for patients already taking this medication for flare prophylaxis and for patients who have the drug available at home for use only at the onset of a gout flare. Patients already receiving colchicine gout flare prophylaxis should resume the prophylaxis dose within one or two days of gout flare therapy. Particular attention should be given to avoidance of colchicine administration in patients with moderate to severe renal or hepatic disease receiving inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 system component CYP3A4 (table 1) or inhibitors of the membrane P-glycoprotein multidrug resistance transporter (P-gp) (table 2). Drug interactions can also be identified by use of the Lexicomp drug interactions program included in UpToDate. (See 'Colchicine therapy' above and 'Dosing in renal or hepatic impairment or with risk of drug interactions' above.)

Joint injection – In patients who are unable to take oral medications and/or who have only one or two actively inflamed joints (and in whom infection has been excluded), we suggest arthrocentesis and intraarticular injection of glucocorticoids (Grade 2C). We prefer triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg for a large joint [eg, knee], 30 mg for a medium joint [eg, wrist, ankle, elbow], and 10 mg for a small joint) or equivalent doses of methylprednisolone acetate. (See 'Intraarticular glucocorticoids' above.)

Intravenous glucocorticoids – For patients with polyarticular involvement who are unable to take oral medications, have existing or easily established intravenous access, and have no contraindications to glucocorticoids, we suggest systemic administration of an intravenous glucocorticoid (Grade 2C). The dose and frequency depend upon the agent chosen. A typical dose is 20 mg methylprednisolone twice daily, with stepwise reduction to half of each dose when improvement begins and with maintenance of at least 4 mg twice daily (or oral equivalent) for at least five days. For patients with no intravenous access, intramuscular glucocorticoids may be used. (See 'Parenteral glucocorticoids' above.)

IL-1 inhibition – For patients who are unresponsive or have contraindications to any other available approach, an additional option is an interleukin (IL) 1 inhibitor, such as anakinra or canakinumab. The benefits of these agents for symptomatic relief need to be balanced with the potential for increased risk for serious infections. (See 'Resistant disease or unable to take other therapies' above.)

Patients on anticoagulants and those with kidney disease – In patients who are anticoagulated, we use low-dose colchicine or oral glucocorticoids. We use intraarticular glucocorticoids for the treatment of gout flares if oral agents are contraindicated. We generally treat gout flares in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) or with end-stage kidney disease requiring maintenance dialysis with intraarticular, oral, or systemic glucocorticoids. (See 'Patients on anticoagulation' above and 'End-stage kidney disease and transplantation' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT — The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Michael A Becker, MD, who contributed to an earlier version of this topic review.

  1. Mikuls TR. Gout. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:1877.
  2. Pillinger MH, Mandell BF. Therapeutic approaches in the treatment of gout. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2020; 50:S24.
  3. Qaseem A, Harris RP, Forciea MA, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Management of Acute and Recurrent Gout: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2017; 166:58.
  4. Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, et al. 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76:29.
  5. FitzGerald JD, Dalbeth N, Mikuls T, et al. 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72:744.
  6. Schlesinger N, Detry MA, Holland BK, et al. Local ice therapy during bouts of acute gouty arthritis. J Rheumatol 2002; 29:331.
  7. Zeng L, Qasim A, Neogi T, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacologic Interventions in Patients Experiencing a Gout Flare: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2021; 73:755.
  8. Janssens HJ, Fransen J, van de Lisdonk EH, et al. A diagnostic rule for acute gouty arthritis in primary care without joint fluid analysis. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170:1120.
  9. Kienhorst LB, Janssens HJ, Fransen J, Janssen M. The validation of a diagnostic rule for gout without joint fluid analysis: a prospective study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015; 54:609.
  10. Ahern MJ, Reid C, Gordon TP, et al. Does colchicine work? The results of the first controlled study in acute gout. Aust N Z J Med 1987; 17:301.
  11. Garcia de la Torre I. A comparative, double-blind, parallel study with tenoxicam vs placebo in acute gouty arthritis. Invest Med Int 1987; 14:92.
  12. Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T, et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: Management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65:1312.
  13. Sutaria S, Katbamna R, Underwood M. Effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of acute and prevention of recurrent gout--a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006; 45:1422.
  14. Khanna D, Khanna PP, Fitzgerald JD, et al. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 2: therapy and antiinflammatory prophylaxis of acute gouty arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64:1447.
  15. Schumacher HR Jr, Boice JA, Daikh DI, et al. Randomised double blind trial of etoricoxib and indometacin in treatment of acute gouty arthritis. BMJ 2002; 324:1488.
  16. Rubin BR, Burton R, Navarra S, et al. Efficacy and safety profile of treatment with etoricoxib 120 mg once daily compared with indomethacin 50 mg three times daily in acute gout: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50:598.
  17. Maccagno A, Di Giorgio E, Romanowicz A. Effectiveness of etodolac ('Lodine') compared with naproxen in patients with acute gout. Curr Med Res Opin 1991; 12:423.
  18. Lomen PL, Turner LF, Lamborn KR, et al. Flurbiprofen in the treatment of acute gout. A comparison with indomethacin. Am J Med 1986; 80:134.
  19. Altman RD, Honig S, Levin JM, Lightfoot RW. Ketoprofen versus indomethacin in patients with acute gouty arthritis: a multicenter, double blind comparative study. J Rheumatol 1988; 15:1422.
  20. Schumacher HR, Berger MF, Li-Yu J, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol 2012; 39:1859.
  21. Terkeltaub RA, Furst DE, Bennett K, et al. High versus low dosing of oral colchicine for early acute gout flare: Twenty-four-hour outcome of the first multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-comparison colchicine study. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62:1060.
  22. Janssens HJ, Janssen M, van de Lisdonk EH, et al. Use of oral prednisolone or naproxen for the treatment of gout arthritis: a double-blind, randomised equivalence trial. Lancet 2008; 371:1854.
  23. Man CY, Cheung IT, Cameron PA, Rainer TH. Comparison of oral prednisolone/paracetamol and oral indomethacin/paracetamol combination therapy in the treatment of acute goutlike arthritis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 49:670.
  24. Rainer TH, Cheng CH, Janssens HJ, et al. Oral Prednisolone in the Treatment of Acute Gout: A Pragmatic, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med 2016; 164:464.
  25. Zhang YK, Yang H, Zhang JY, et al. Comparison of intramuscular compound betamethasone and oral diclofenac sodium in the treatment of acute attacks of gout. Int J Clin Pract 2014; 68:633.
  26. Roddy E, Clarkson K, Blagojevic-Bucknall M, et al. Open-label randomised pragmatic trial (CONTACT) comparing naproxen and low-dose colchicine for the treatment of gout flares in primary care. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:276.
  27. Hui M, Carr A, Cameron S, et al. The British Society for Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017; 56:e1.
  28. Fernández C, Noguera R, González JA, Pascual E. Treatment of acute attacks of gout with a small dose of intraarticular triamcinolone acetonide. J Rheumatol 1999; 26:2285.
  29. Wechalekar MD, Vinik O, Schlesinger N, Buchbinder R. Intra-articular glucocorticoids for acute gout. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD009920.
  30. Alloway JA, Moriarty MJ, Hoogland YT, Nashel DJ. Comparison of triamcinolone acetonide with indomethacin in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis. J Rheumatol 1993; 20:111.
  31. Janssens HJ, Lucassen PL, Van de Laar FA, et al. Systemic corticosteroids for acute gout. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; :CD005521.
  32. Groff GD, Franck WA, Raddatz DA. Systemic steroid therapy for acute gout: a clinical trial and review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1990; 19:329.
  33. Yu TF, Gutman AB. Study of the paradoxical effects of salicylate in low, intermediate and high dosage on the renal mechanisms for excretion of urate in man. J Clin Invest 1959; 38:1298.
  34. Yu TF, Dayton PG, Gutman AB. Mutual suppression of the uricosuric effects of sulfinpyrazone and salicylate: A study in interactions between drugs. J Clin Invest 1963; 42:1330.
  35. Caspi D, Lubart E, Graff E, et al. The effect of mini-dose aspirin on renal function and uric acid handling in elderly patients. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43:103.
  36. Segal R, Lubart E, Leibovitz A, et al. Renal effects of low dose aspirin in elderly patients. Isr Med Assoc J 2006; 8:679.
  37. Zhang Y, Neogi T, Chen C, et al. Low-dose aspirin use and recurrent gout attacks. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73:385.
  38. van Durme CM, Wechalekar MD, Buchbinder R, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute gout. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; :CD010120.
  39. Colchicine and other drugs for gout. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2009; 51:93.
  40. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/022352s017lbl.pdf (Accessed on April 12, 2019).
  41. Terkeltaub RA. Colchicine update: 2008. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2009; 38:411.
  42. Niel E, Scherrmann JM. Colchicine today. Joint Bone Spine 2006; 73:672.
  43. Yu DK. The contribution of P-glycoprotein to pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 39:1203.
  44. Colcrys FDA Approval Letter. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2009/022351s000ltr.pdf (Accessed on February 10, 2010).
  45. Bouquié R, Deslandes G, Renaud C, et al. Colchicine-induced rhabdomyolysis in a heart/lung transplant patient with concurrent use of cyclosporin, pravastatin, and azithromycin. J Clin Rheumatol 2011; 17:28.
  46. Stamp LK, Jordan S. The challenges of gout management in the elderly. Drugs Aging 2011; 28:591.
  47. Singh H, Torralba KD. Therapeutic challenges in the management of gout in the elderly. Geriatrics 2008; 63:13.
  48. Fravel MA, Ernst ME. Management of gout in the older adult. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2011; 9:271.
  49. By the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019; 67:674.
  50. Simmonds HA, Cameron JS, Goldsmith DJ, et al. Familial juvenile hyperuricaemic nephropathy is not such a rare genetic metabolic purine disease in Britain. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2006; 25:1071.
  51. Lhotta K, Gehringer A, Jennings P, et al. Familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy: report on a new mutation and a pregnancy. Clin Nephrol 2009; 71:80.
  52. van Veen TR, Haeri S. Gout in pregnancy: a case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2015; 79:217.
  53. Rabinovitch O, Zemer D, Kukia E, et al. Colchicine treatment in conception and pregnancy: two hundred thirty-one pregnancies in patients with familial Mediterranean fever. Am J Reprod Immunol 1992; 28:245.
  54. Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by: The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2015; 36:2921.
  55. Ben-Chetrit E, Scherrmann JM, Levy M. Colchicine in breast milk of patients with familial Mediterranean fever. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39:1213.
  56. Martinon F, Pétrilli V, Mayor A, et al. Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature 2006; 440:237.
  57. So A, De Smedt T, Revaz S, Tschopp J. A pilot study of IL-1 inhibition by anakinra in acute gout. Arthritis Res Ther 2007; 9:R28.
  58. Chen K, Fields T, Mancuso CA, et al. Anakinra's efficacy is variable in refractory gout: report of ten cases. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2010; 40:210.
  59. Tran AP, Edelman J. Interleukin-1 inhibition by anakinra in refractory chronic tophaceous gout. Int J Rheum Dis 2011; 14:e33.
  60. Liew JW, Gardner GC. Use of Anakinra in Hospitalized Patients with Crystal-associated Arthritis. J Rheumatol 2019; 46:1345.
  61. Janssen CA, Oude Voshaar MAH, Vonkeman HE, et al. Anakinra for the treatment of acute gout flares: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active-comparator, non-inferiority trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019.
  62. Saag KG, Khanna PP, Keenan RT, et al. A Randomized, Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Anakinra in the Treatment of Gout Flares. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021; 73:1533.
  63. Schlesinger N, Alten RE, Bardin T, et al. Canakinumab for acute gouty arthritis in patients with limited treatment options: results from two randomised, multicentre, active-controlled, double-blind trials and their initial extensions. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71:1839.
  64. So A, De Meulemeester M, Pikhlak A, et al. Canakinumab for the treatment of acute flares in difficult-to-treat gouty arthritis: Results of a multicenter, phase II, dose-ranging study. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62:3064.
Topic 1666 Version 50.0

References