Your activity: 8 p.v.

Surgical blood conservation: Blood salvage

Surgical blood conservation: Blood salvage
Michele Heath, LP, CCP
Aryeh Shander, MD, FCCM, FCCP, FASA
Section Editors:
Steven Kleinman, MD
Jonathan B Mark, MD
Deputy Editors:
Nancy A Nussmeier, MD, FAHA
Jennifer S Tirnauer, MD
Literature review current through: Nov 2022. | This topic last updated: May 13, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Surgical blood conservation techniques are used to reduce patient exposure to allogeneic blood during and after surgery. Techniques include preoperative autologous donation, intraoperative hemodilution, and blood salvage (also called cell salvage) during surgery.

This topic will review the indications, advantages, and potential complications of intraoperative blood salvage (ie, intraoperative autologous transfusion or intraoperative autotransfusion) and postoperative blood salvage. Other perioperative blood conservation techniques are discussed in detail separately. (See "Surgical blood conservation: Preoperative autologous blood donation" and "Surgical blood conservation: Acute normovolemic hemodilution".)

INTRAOPERATIVE BLOOD SALVAGE — We suggest intraoperative blood salvage in surgical procedures having a high likelihood of significant blood loss (>1000 mL), based on evidence that allogeneic transfusion and associated complications can be avoided with a very low incidence of adverse events [1-3]. We also suggest intraoperative blood salvage in some situations of blood conservation such as difficulty cross matching or declining blood components administration.

Indications and benefits — Intraoperative blood salvage has the following potential benefits:

Avoiding or minimizing allogeneic transfusion – The technique can be effective in avoiding or reducing allogeneic blood transfusion, with its attendant costs and risks (eg, transfusion reactions, transfusion-transmitted infections) [1].

Minimizing transfusion during major surgical procedures – Intraoperative blood salvage is presumed to be beneficial, although randomized trials have not demonstrated improved outcomes. In a 2010 systematic review including 75 trials (36 involving orthopedic procedures, 33 involving cardiac procedures, 6 involving vascular surgery), the absolute reduction in the use of allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion was 21 percent (95% CI 15-26 percent) [1]. In a 2015 systematic review in emergency abdominal or thoracic trauma surgery (one trial; n = 44), the reduction in the use of allogeneic RBCs in the blood salvage group was 4.7 units (95% CI 1.31-8.09 units) [4]. These systematic reviews concluded that intraoperative blood salvage did not increase the risk of adverse events, including mortality and infection [1,4]. (See "Indications and hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion in the adult", section on 'Risks and complications of transfusion'.)

Intraoperative blood salvage has been applied effectively in a variety of surgical procedures having high surgical blood loss, whether elective or emergency, including cardiac, vascular, orthopedic, urologic, trauma, gynecologic, and transplantation procedures [1,4-22]. Intraoperative blood salvage has also been effective in neurosurgery and plastic surgery cases with a high likelihood of blood transfusion [23-26].

Patients who will not accept allogeneic blood – Intraoperative blood salvage may also be acceptable to some Jehovah's Witnesses, who will not accept allogeneic blood [27-29]. Requirements for acceptance by these patients may include assurance that the blood does not leave the operating room for processing and/or that the blood remains continuously connected to the patient via intravenous tubing. (See "The approach to the patient who declines blood transfusion", section on 'Jehovah's Witnesses'.)

Intraoperative blood salvage may be lifesaving in patients with a rare blood type or multiple RBC alloantibodies when crossmatch-compatible blood cannot readily be obtained.

Increasing number of available units compared with other autologous blood conservation techniques – Intraoperative blood salvage complements other methods of blood conservation. It has the potential to deliver much larger amounts of blood than intraoperative hemodilution, which generally only provides 1 to 3 units of autologous blood [30,31].

Time saving – Intraoperative blood salvage is usually done in the operating room without direct involvement of the transfusion service and also eliminates the need for the patient to provide autologous donations. Thus, intraoperative salvage may save time for the patient and the blood collection facility.

Contraindications — There are both absolute and relative contraindications to the use of intraoperative blood salvage [32].

Absolute contraindications

Presence of contraindicated fluids – Salvaged blood must never be mixed with fluids such as sterile water (or any hypotonic solution) because RBC hemolysis will occur [17,32]. Also, intraoperative blood salvage cannot proceed if solutions that would be toxic with intravascular administration could come into contact with the salvaged blood. Examples include antibiotic irrigation or hydrogen peroxide, alcohol, or povidone-iodine solutions.

Admixture with hemostatic products or bone cement – Blood salvage cannot be used during suctioning of blood from the surgical field when there is any potential for simultaneous collection of hemostatic products such as topical thrombin, fibrin glue, or microfibrillar bovine collagen-based products (eg, Avitene, Actifoam Collagen Sponge, Ultrafoam Sponge, Instat, Helitene, or similar products). (See "Overview of topical hemostatic agents and tissue adhesives".)

Similarly, blood salvage cannot be used if there is any chance of admixture with methyl methacrylate (ie, bone cement) [17,32].

Relative contraindications — The following relative contraindications are controversial, in that there is no compelling evidence to suggest an association with adverse outcomes. Notably, use of intraoperative blood salvage in these settings has been expanded without clear-cut negative consequences [32].

Bacterial infections – Decisions about using intraoperative blood salvage in patients with bacterial infections are made on a case-by-case basis, with consideration of relative risks and benefits for the individual patient, and with informed consent [3].

Bacterial contamination of the surgical wound has traditionally been a contraindication to use of intraoperative blood salvage. However, small studies support the appropriateness of more liberal use of intraoperative blood salvage in this setting. In a case series of intraoperative blood salvage in 11 hemorrhaging trauma patients with enterically contaminated wounds, rapid access to a large volume of autologous blood for reinfusion was potentially lifesaving; no patient developed intraabdominal sepsis, and no deaths were reported [33]. A 2015 systematic review in emergency abdominal or thoracic trauma surgery (one trial; n = 44) noted no difference in sepsis (measured by blood cultures) or mortality in the blood salvage group compared with the control group receiving allogeneic blood [4]. A study that retrospectively evaluated clinical outcomes in 36 patients who received salvaged blood during cardiac surgery found no clinical sequelae in the third of patients who were transfused with blood found to contain bacteria or endotoxin [34].

There are no reports of bacteremia and sepsis in otherwise healthy people who were transfused in the intraoperative period with salvaged blood containing bacteria. Absence of clinical sequelae may be attributable to the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in surgical patients, irrigation of surgical wounds before resuming salvage procedures when contamination occurs, and the thorough washing and filtration process used for intraoperative blood salvage [17]. Although washing blood that contains bacteria cannot completely sterilize it, processing blood via a blood salvage system and then filtering it using a leukocyte reduction filter has been associated with a 98 to 100 percent reduction in a variety of bacterial organisms [35,36]. Thus, decisions regarding reinfusion of salvaged blood in the setting of systemic infection should consider the potential infection risk of this technique compared with the known risk of postoperative infection after transfusion of allogeneic blood [37]. (See "Indications and hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion in the adult", section on 'Risks and complications of transfusion' and "Transfusion-transmitted bacterial infection".)

Active malignancy – Decisions about using intraoperative blood salvage in patients with active malignancy are made on a case-by-case basis, with consideration of factors such as the risk of major intraoperative bleeding, the need for transfusion, the availability of allogeneic blood, and informed patient consent [3].

The successful use of intraoperative blood salvage in cancer surgery supports more liberal use of the technique in patients with active malignancy [38]. Malignant cells have been observed in shed blood collected intraoperatively, and extensive cell washing does not remove these cells [39]. However, leukocyte depletion filters have been shown to remove tumor cells from salvaged blood, similar to their ability to remove bacteria [39-44] (see 'Reinfusion' below). Importantly, in a 2012 systematic review and meta-analysis including 10 controlled but not randomized studies, patients who received salvaged autologous blood during oncology surgery had no increase in cancer recurrence or development of metastases compared with those receiving allogeneic blood [38].

Areas of uncertainty — Intraoperative blood salvage has been used successfully in the following settings, with continuing research to clarify its risks and benefits [3,17,32,45,46]:

Obstetrics – Blood salvage, if available, can be helpful in managing patients at risk for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) during cesarean delivery, when patients refuse allogeneic blood, or when banked blood is not available [45-51]. Preoperative planning for its use is prudent in obstetric patients at high risk for significant PPH (eg, placenta accreta) [3,52]. Blood salvage in this setting is discussed separately. (See "Postpartum hemorrhage: Management approaches requiring laparotomy", section on 'Role of intraoperative cell salvage'.)

In some centers, blood salvage is used routinely for patients undergoing cesarean section, or in patients who develop abnormal bleeding during the procedure [52,53]. In this setting, unique hazards include the possibility of aspiration of amniotic fluid or hemostatic agents together with blood in the surgical field.

Hemoglobinopathies – There is uncertainty regarding the safety of intraoperative blood salvage for patients with sickle cell disease (eg, theoretical risk of increased sickling) or thalassemia (eg, theoretical risk of increased hemolysis) [17,32,54].

Cold agglutinin disease – There is uncertainty regarding the safety of intraoperative blood salvage for patients with cold agglutinin disease, dependent on the thermal amplitude of the antibody and the temperature of the room. If intraoperative blood salvage is used in a patient with known cold agglutinin disease, the reinfused blood should be passed through a blood warmer. (See "Cold agglutinin disease", section on 'Cold avoidance'.)

Technology and procedural steps — The intraoperative blood salvage machine (commonly referred to as a "cell saver"; the newer term "cell recovery," is being adopted) separates, washes, and concentrates salvaged RBCs. Several steps are involved, including suctioning of shed blood from the surgical field, addition of an anticoagulant, separation and washing of RBCs (to remove the anticoagulant, free hemoglobin molecules, activated thrombogenic substances, and cellular stroma), concentration of the blood, and eventual reinfusion to the patient (figure 1) [3,17].

Aspiration of blood from the surgical field — RBC salvage with the intraoperative blood salvage machine starts with the surgeon aspirating blood through a suction wand as it collects in the surgical field or is squeezed out from blood-soaked surgical gauze pads [55]. The blood is mixed with an anticoagulant (eg, heparin or citrate) as it is aspirated to prevent coagulation [17]. Typically, heparin in saline with a concentration of approximately 30,000 units/L is used. This solution is slowly and automatically added to the aspirated blood at a rate of 15 mL per 100 mL of collected blood [17]. During subsequent washing of the collected blood, all but a trace of heparin is removed [17,56].

If there is concern about heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a citrate-based anticoagulant/preservative solution (eg, citrate-phosphate-dextrose [CPD] or citrate-phosphate-dextrose-adenine [CPD-A]) should be used instead of heparin. Citrate-containing solutions are administered at a rate of 15 mL per 100 mL of collected blood [17]. Citrate is rapidly metabolized by the liver after transfusion. Therefore, iatrogenic anticoagulation is unlikely with intraoperative blood salvage techniques. However, if there is concern about citrate-induced hypocalcemia (eg, due to impaired liver function, changes consistent with hypocalcemia on the electrocardiogram, or a low measured ionized calcium level), intravenous calcium chloride or calcium gluconate can be administered [57]. In patients with advanced liver disease who receive a large volume of salvaged blood, it is helpful to monitor calcium levels to detect hypocalcemia.

Processing of blood — The aspirated blood is collected in a sterile, filtered reservoir until the amount is sufficient for processing (typically 375 to 750 mL).

Centrifugation — The salvaged blood is then pumped into the centrifuge bowl in which the higher density RBCs are separated and concentrated. The plasma, platelets, and waste components are sent to the waste bag.

Washing — Salvaged blood has a high concentration of free hemoglobin, inflammatory mediators, and other cellular debris [17]. Therefore, it is washed with an isotonic solution, usually normal (0.9 percent) saline. In one study, use of a balanced bicarbonate buffered solution (Balsol) resulted in fewer acid-base and electrolyte derangements compared with use of normal saline [58]. Some centers change to a balanced electrolyte solution (eg, PlasmaLyte-A) only after administration of a large volume of normal saline (eg, after approximately 1500 mL of saline is reinfused with 3000 mL of salvaged blood) [17,59].  

Blood salvage instruments can process a full reservoir of blood in approximately three minutes, resulting in 55 to 250 mL of RBCs with hemoglobin concentration as high as 17 g/dL [17,60]. A "partial bowl" that is at least one-half full of RBCs can be processed if necessary (eg, insufficient blood to process a full bowl), but the resulting hemoglobin concentration will be <17 g/dL.

Reinfusion — The processed red cell suspension is pumped from the centrifuge bowl into a blood salvage bag for reinfusion. Reinfusion is typically instituted as soon as the washed blood is available, but may be delayed for up to six hours if not clinically indicated at the moment of preparation (eg, in a patient who is clinically hypervolemic) [17].

Microaggregate filters – A 40-micron microaggregate filter is installed between the blood salvage bag and the patient to filter the final blood product as it is reinfused into the patient [61].

Leukocyte depletion filters – Although not routinely used, a leukocyte depletion filter is an excellent alternative to a microaggregate filter when it is desirable to achieve optimal removal of bacteria, cancer cells, fat particles, or amniotic fluid [3,47,62] (see 'Relative contraindications' above and 'Areas of uncertainty' above). This type of filter must be changed after reinfusion of each 500 mL of blood [17].

Typically, leukocyte-reduced blood has <1x106 leukocytes/mL of blood, corresponding to approximately 99 percent leukocyte depletion [63,64].

Other components in the blood such as platelets and contaminants can also adhere to these filters, but at least 85 percent of RBCs pass through the filter and into the patient. Commonly used polyester or polyamide filters have a 40-micron pore size and promote relatively selective adhesion of negatively charged leukocytes via three passive mechanisms (blocking, bridging, and interception) and one active mechanism (adhesion). Adhesion-based filters are the most efficient, allowing >99.9 percent leukocyte depletion [65,66].

Washed versus unwashed blood — We recommend using washed blood for all patients undergoing intraoperative blood salvage, based on the likely lower risk of complications compared with infusing salvaged blood that has not been washed. Although washing reduces the platelet count, it mitigates the negative effects on platelet function after reinfusion of salvaged blood [67].

In one study, washing increased cell-free hemoglobin and markedly decreased biologic response modifiers such as cell-derived microvesicles, CD40 ligand, and microvesicle numbers, with no effect on neutral lipids [68]. Washing increased hemolysis by less than 0.8 percent, and was feasible in 99 percent of cardiac surgical patients in this study. Overall, the quality of salvaged, washed, autologous RBCs, as measured by posttransfusion RBC survival and enzymatic indices of RBC function, is equivalent, if not superior, to washed RBCs obtained by standard blood donation [59,69-71].

Salvaged washed red cells — Separation, washing, and concentration of RBCs is performed by the blood salvage machine (ie, "cell saver") in the operating room. (See 'Technology and procedural steps' above.)

Separation and washing of RBCs removes added anticoagulant and virtually eliminates free hemoglobin, platelets, white blood cells, and cellular stroma products (which are potentially thrombogenic). However, fibrinogen and coagulation factors II, VII, X, and XIII are also decreased [72]. Thus, patients who receive a large number of units of washed autologous RBCs may develop a dilutional coagulopathy that may require treatment with plasma and/or platelet transfusions (see "Massive blood transfusion", section on 'Approach to volume and blood replacement'). Centrifuging salvaged blood concentrates the RBCs, which reduces the total fluid volume administered to the patient.

Salvaged unwashed blood — In rare intraoperative settings with extremely rapid sustained blood loss (eg, >500 mL/min), it may be lifesaving to return the salvaged blood without separating or washing, until control of bleeding can be achieved. Returning whole blood in this setting allows the blood to be almost immediately available for reinfusion and may preserve some clotting factors and platelets. However, the risks and disadvantages of infusing unwashed blood are significant, including [73,74]:

The anticoagulant that was added to the blood is not removed and may cause coagulopathy.

The reinfused platelets may be dysfunctional after being suctioned from the surgical field [67].

Thrombogenic substances (eg, inflammatory mediators and microaggregates consisting of white cell and platelet debris) may be introduced.

Hemoglobin levels are low (range: 7 to 9 g/dL or lower [depending on the patient's current hemoglobin level], versus 16 to 18 g/dL in processed washed blood).

Free hemoglobin levels may be very high due to hemolysis.

Fat may be present in the unwashed product, which increases the risk of fat embolism.

In these rare emergency circumstances, it is particularly important to use a 40-micron microaggregate filter for reinfusion. Also, the anticoagulant drip rate is increased due to the larger blood volume being processed; thus, a heparin-neutralizing agent, such as protamine, is administered following infusion of unwashed RBC to avoid coagulopathy.

Salvaged washed platelets — An autotransfusion device that uses hollow fiber filtration technology (similar to filters used for plasmapheresis or for ultrafiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass) salvages and washes both RBCs and platelets. One study of device performance noted that recovery of RBCs was 88 percent, while recovery of platelets was 37 percent, without significant impact on cell integrity or function [75].

Storage and handling — Blood collected by intraoperative blood salvage may be stored either at room temperature for up to six hours or at 1 to 6°C for up to 24 hours, provided that it is collected under aseptic conditions with a device that provides washing and that cold storage is begun within six hours of initiating the collection. Such stored blood must be properly labeled. Minimum requirements for labeling include the name and identifying number of the patient, the component name, the statement "For Autologous Use Only," and the expiration date and time.

Blood collected by intraoperative salvage should never be transfused to any patient other than the one from whom it was collected.

POSTOPERATIVE BLOOD SALVAGE — Postoperative blood salvage refers to the collection of blood from surgical drains and subsequent reinfusion through a 40-micron microaggregate filter, with or without a washing process [3]. (See 'Washed versus unwashed blood' above.)

Major orthopedic procedures — Major orthopedic surgery is the main setting in which postoperative blood salvage is used. Randomized trials have demonstrated a reduction in allogeneic blood transfusion in joint replacement surgery [76-81].

The use of postoperative blood salvage after major orthopedic surgery is evolving and is individualized based upon institutional expertise and available technologies. Development of efficient systems for collecting, anticoagulating, and filtering blood for reinfusion has increased interest in salvaging blood after major orthopedic surgery, despite residual concerns regarding the safety of unwashed salvaged blood (see 'Washed versus unwashed blood' above). However, other techniques to reduce allogeneic blood transfusion may be equally effective in this setting (eg, use of an antifibrinolytic drug such as tranexamic acid or adhering to a restrictive transfusion protocol) [82].

Cardiac surgery — We avoid reinfusion of shed mediastinal blood from postoperative chest tube drainage following cardiac surgery. Shed mediastinal blood contains fibrinogen degradation products, tissue-type plasminogen activators, inflammatory cytokines, complement, and endotoxin, resulting in activation of the extrinsic coagulation pathway [83], and possible association with postoperative bleeding tendency [84-88] and sternal or systemic infections [89,90].

POTENTIAL COMPLICATIONS — Perioperative blood salvage has some of the same potential complications that are associated with transfusion of allogeneic blood. These include the following:

Coagulation defects – Since intraoperative blood salvage replaces only red blood cells (RBCs), dilution of clotting factors can result in clinical coagulopathy and may be a challenging problem accompanying a large blood loss replaced solely by reinfusion of salvaged blood that does not contain plasma or platelets [79,91]. Using viscoelastic testing with rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) measurements, one study noted that salvaged blood transfusion exceeding 18.5 percent of a patient's whole blood volume decreased the maximum clot firmness of fibrinogen assay (FIBTEM-MCF), with potentially impaired coagulation function [92]. However, laboratory values (test results), per se, must be correlated with clinical findings before any intervention is applied. (See "Massive blood transfusion", section on 'Approach to volume and blood replacement'.)

Transfusion-associated circulatory/volume overload – Pulmonary edema due to transfusion-associated circulatory/volume overload (TACO) may occur, especially in patients with compromised cardiac function. TACO may occur more frequently in surgical settings where large volumes of fluid and blood are administered. (See "Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO)".)

Infection – As with transfusion of any blood component, the risk of bacterial contamination is a possibility [79].

Air embolism – Cell savers have the ability to pump massive amounts of air into the reinfusion bag [93,94] (see "Air embolism"). Safety measures and air detection have been added to most cell recovery equipment. If these are not present in older equipment, safeguards to avoid air embolism include (1) transferring the blood into a separate bag or (2) disconnecting the bag from the cell saver equipment before giving it back to the patient [94,95]. Other standard safety precautions for intravenous infusions are also employed, including removing residual air from the bag containing the red cell product to be infused, avoiding the use of "pressure bags" to increase the reinfusion rate, and using inline air detectors when blood reinfusion is administered via an infusion pump.

Embolism of microaggregates or fat – Embolism of microaggregates consisting of white blood cell and platelet debris in salvaged blood is preventable by use of a 40-micron microaggregate filter for reinfusion, which, in addition to RBC washing, is standard practice in blood salvage programs. Fat embolism is also possible but is preventable by extra washing and/or use of a leukocyte-reducing filter [62].

In one multicenter retrospective review of the autotransfusion and risk management system records for 33,351 patients receiving salvaged blood, only two potential adverse events were identified (one patient with acute tachycardia, hypertension, and dyspnea with rigors and another with acute hypotension and dyspnea) [2]. There were no air emboli and no deaths in this large review.

ESTABLISHING A BLOOD SALVAGE PROGRAM — The Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies (AABB) Standards for Perioperative Autologous Blood Collection and Administration recommend that hospitals with intraoperative blood salvage programs and blood centers providing the service should establish written policies and procedures for proper collection, labeling, and storage of the collected blood [95]. All policies and procedures should be regularly reviewed by a clinician responsible for the program. Periodic quality control testing of collected blood is recommended to ensure that collection equipment and techniques result in an aseptic blood product.

Guidelines and training are essential for the quality assurance of intraoperative blood salvage [3], which has been pointedly described in an editorial as a "largely unregulated cottage industry" [96]. The technique can potentially be performed by a cross-trained operating room employee (eg, an anesthesia technician) or by a member of a specialist service (eg, an extracorporeal technologist or perfusionist). Cross-training employees as blood salvage technicians might be more economical than using an outsourced specialist service when the caseload exceeds 55 cases per year [97].

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Transfusion and patient blood management".)


Intraoperative blood salvage can be utilized throughout the surgical procedure to rapidly provide large quantities of autologous blood. (See 'Indications and benefits' above.)

We suggest blood salvage in surgical procedures having a high likelihood of significant blood loss (>1000 mL), rather than relying on transfusion of allogeneic blood (Grade 2B). Blood salvage avoids or reduces allogeneic blood transfusion with its attendant risks. (See 'Intraoperative blood salvage' above.)

Blood salvage is contraindicated in the presence of solutions that are hypotonic (eg, sterile water) or toxic (eg, alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, or povidone-iodine solution), or when there is a possibility of simultaneous collection of hemostatic agents (microfibrillar collagen-based products, topical thrombin, or fibrin glue) or methyl methacrylate (bone cement). (See 'Contraindications' above.)

Use of intraoperative blood salvage in patients with bacterial infections, active malignancy, or hemorrhage at cesarean delivery is decided on a case-by-case basis. (See 'Relative contraindications' above and 'Areas of uncertainty' above.)

Processing of intraoperative salvaged blood involves separation, washing, and centrifuging (concentrating) blood aspirated from the surgical field and mixed with an anticoagulant. The result is a salvaged red blood cell (RBC) product with a hemoglobin >17 g/dL. (See 'Processing of blood' above.)

Salvaged blood should be washed. Salvaged blood that is not washed or otherwise processed (eg, centrifuged) has low hemoglobin levels (7 to 9 g/dL), residual anticoagulant, dysfunctional platelets, thrombogenic substances, free hemoglobin levels, and fat emboli that might lead to coagulation abnormalities. (See 'Salvaged unwashed blood' above.)

A 40-micron microaggregate filter is installed between the blood salvage bag and the patient to filter the blood as it is reinfused into the patient. A leukocyte depletion filter is an excellent alternative when it is desirable to achieve optimal removal of bacteria, cancer cells, fat particles, or amniotic fluid. (See 'Reinfusion' above.)

Salvaged washed RBCs have the same posttransfusion RBC survival as traditional washed RBC products. Neither product contains functional platelets, white blood cells, or coagulation factors. (See 'Salvaged washed red cells' above.)

Blood collected by intraoperative blood salvage may be stored either at room temperature for up to six hours or at 1 to 6°C for up to 24 hours, provided that blood is collected under aseptic conditions with a device that provides washing and that cold storage is begun within six hours of initiating the collection. Such stored blood must be properly labeled. (See 'Storage and handling' above.)

Blood collected by intraoperative blood salvage should never be transfused to any patient other than the one from whom it was collected. (See 'Storage and handling' above.)

Postoperative blood salvage after major orthopedic surgery (eg, joint replacement surgery) is evolving and is individualized based upon institutional expertise and available technologies. (See 'Postoperative blood salvage' above.)

Potential complications of perioperative blood salvage include some of those associated with allogeneic blood transfusion (eg, coagulopathy, transfusion-related volume overload, bacterial contamination, and embolism of air, cellular microaggregates, or fat). (See 'Potential complications' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT — The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Michael Avidan, MD, who contributed to an earlier version of this topic review.

The UpToDate editorial staff also acknowledges extensive contributions of Arthur J Silvergleid, MD to earlier versions of this and many other topic reviews.

  1. Carless PA, Henry DA, Moxey AJ, et al. Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; :CD001888.
  2. DeAndrade D, Waters JH, Triulzi DJ, et al. Very low rate of patient-related adverse events associated with the use of intraoperative cell salvage. Transfusion 2016; 56:2768.
  3. Klein AA, Bailey CR, Charlton AJ, et al. Association of Anaesthetists guidelines: cell salvage for peri-operative blood conservation 2018. Anaesthesia 2018; 73:1141.
  4. Li J, Sun SL, Tian JH, et al. Cell salvage in emergency trauma surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 1:CD007379.
  5. Brown CV, Foulkrod KH, Sadler HT, et al. Autologous blood transfusion during emergency trauma operations. Arch Surg 2010; 145:690.
  6. Singbartl G, Held AL, Singbartl K. Ranking the effectiveness of autologous blood conservation measures through validated modeling of independent clinical data. Transfusion 2013; 53:3060.
  7. Wang G, Bainbridge D, Martin J, Cheng D. The efficacy of an intraoperative cell saver during cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesth Analg 2009; 109:320.
  8. Raval JS, Nelson JB, Woldemichael E, Triulzi DJ. Intraoperative cell salvage in radical prostatectomy does not appear to increase long-term biochemical recurrence, metastases, or mortality. Transfusion 2012; 52:2590.
  9. Son M, Evanko JC, Mongero LB, et al. Utility of cell salvage in women undergoing abdominal myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211:28.e1.
  10. Pasternak J, Nikolic D, Milosevic D, et al. An analysis of the influence of intra-operative blood salvage and autologous transfusion on reducing the need for allogeneic transfusion in elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Blood Transfus 2014; 12 Suppl 1:s182.
  11. Weltert L, Nardella S, Rondinelli MB, et al. Reduction of allogeneic red blood cell usage during cardiac surgery by an integrated intra- and postoperative blood salvage strategy: results of a randomized comparison. Transfusion 2013; 53:790.
  12. Odak S, Raza A, Shah N, Clayson A. Clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of intraoperative cell salvage in pelvic trauma surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013; 95:357.
  13. Greenky M, Shaner J, Rasouli MR, et al. Intraoperative blood salvage in revision total hip arthroplasty: who benefits most? J Arthroplasty 2014; 29:1298.
  14. Kim JM, Kim GS, Joh JW, et al. Long-term results for living donor liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma using intraoperative blood salvage with leukocyte depletion filter. Transpl Int 2013; 26:84.
  15. Vonk AB, Meesters MI, van Dijk WB, et al. Ten-year patterns in blood product utilization during cardiothoracic surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in a tertiary hospital. Transfusion 2014; 54:2608.
  16. Shenolikar A, Wareham K, Newington D, et al. Cell salvage auto transfusion in total knee replacement surgery. Transfus Med 1997; 7:277.
  17. Waters JH. Intraoperative blood recovery. ASAIO J 2013; 59:11.
  18. Nathan M, Tishler B, Gauvreau K, et al. A red cell preservation strategy reduces postoperative transfusions in pediatric heart surgery patients. Paediatr Anaesth 2018; 28:450.
  19. Meybohm P, Choorapoikayil S, Wessels A, et al. Washed cell salvage in surgical patients: A review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials under PRISMA. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e4490.
  20. Cronin JA, Oetgen ME, Gordish-Dressman H, et al. Association between perioperative surgical home implementation and transfusion patterns in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing spinal fusion. Paediatr Anaesth 2019; 29:611.
  21. Geube M, Sale S, Bakdash S, et al. Prepump autologous blood collection is associated with reduced intraoperative transfusions in aortic surgery with circulatory arrest: A propensity score-matched analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021.
  22. Neef V, Vo L, Herrmann E, et al. The association between intraoperative cell salvage and red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery - an observational study in a patient blood management centre. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2021; 53:1.
  23. Di Rocco C, Tamburrini G, Pietrini D. Blood sparing in craniosynostosis surgery. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2004; 11:278.
  24. Chanda A, Smith DR, Nanda A. Autotransfusion by cell saver technique in surgery of lumbar and thoracic spinal fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg 2002; 96:298.
  25. Vega RA, Lyon C, Kierce JF, et al. Minimizing transfusion requirements for children undergoing craniosynostosis repair: the CHoR protocol. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014; 14:190.
  26. International Hemoglobin Information Center variants list. Hemoglobin 1992; 16:127.
  27. Hughes DB, Ullery BW, Barie PS. The contemporary approach to the care of Jehovah's witnesses. J Trauma 2008; 65:237.
  28. Nieder AM, Simon MA, Kim SS, et al. Intraoperative cell salvage during radical prostatectomy: a safe technique for Jehovah's Witnesses. Int Braz J Urol 2004; 30:377.
  29. Garcia JH, Coelho GR, Feitosa Neto BA, et al. Liver transplantation in Jehovah's Witnesses patients in a center of northeastern Brazil. Arq Gastroenterol 2013; 50:138.
  30. Williamson KR, Taswell HF, Rettke SR, Krom RA. Intraoperative autologous transfusion: its role in orthotopic liver transplantation. Mayo Clin Proc 1989; 64:340.
  31. Warnock DF, Davison JK, Brewster DC, et al. Modification of the Haemonetics Cell Saver for optional high flow rate autotransfusion. Am J Surg 1982; 143:765.
  32. Esper SA, Waters JH. Intra-operative cell salvage: a fresh look at the indications and contraindications. Blood Transfus 2011; 9:139.
  33. Timberlake GA, McSwain NE Jr. Autotransfusion of blood contaminated by enteric contents: a potentially life-saving measure in the massively hemorrhaging trauma patient? J Trauma 1988; 28:855.
  34. Bland LA, Villarino ME, Arduino MJ, et al. Bacteriologic and endotoxin analysis of salvaged blood used in autologous transfusions during cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 103:582.
  35. Waters JH, Tuohy MJ, Hobson DF, Procop G. Bacterial reduction by cell salvage washing and leukocyte depletion filtration. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:652.
  36. Wollinsky KH, Oethinger M, Büchele M, et al. Autotransfusion--bacterial contamination during hip arthroplasty and efficacy of cefuroxime prophylaxis. A randomized controlled study of 40 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68:225.
  37. Dzik WH, Sherburne B. Intraoperative blood salvage: medical controversies. Transfus Med Rev 1990; 4:208.
  38. Waters JH, Yazer M, Chen YF, Kloke J. Blood salvage and cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of available studies. Transfusion 2012; 52:2167.
  39. Kumar N, Lam R, Zaw AS, et al. Flow cytometric evaluation of the safety of intraoperative salvaged blood filtered with leucocyte depletion filter in spine tumour surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:4330.
  40. Perseghin P, Viganò M, Rocco G, et al. Effectiveness of leukocyte filters in reducing tumor cell contamination after intraoperative blood salvage in lung cancer patients. Vox Sang 1997; 72:221.
  41. Edelman MJ, Potter P, Mahaffey KG, et al. The potential for reintroduction of tumor cells during intraoperative blood salvage: reduction of risk with use of the RC-400 leukocyte depletion filter. Urology 1996; 47:179.
  42. Catling S, Williams S, Freites O, et al. Use of a leucocyte filter to remove tumour cells from intra-operative cell salvage blood. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:1332.
  43. Kumar N, Chen Y, Zaw AS, et al. Use of intraoperative cell-salvage for autologous blood transfusions in metastatic spine tumour surgery: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15:e33.
  44. Kumar N, Ahmed Q, Lee VK, et al. Can there be a place for intraoperative salvaged blood in spine tumor surgery? Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:2436.
  45. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 183: Postpartum Hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130:e168.
  46. Lim G, Melnyk V, Facco FL, et al. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Intraoperative Cell Salvage for Obstetric Hemorrhage. Anesthesiology 2018; 128:328.
  47. Goucher H, Wong CA, Patel SK, Toledo P. Cell Salvage in Obstetrics. Anesth Analg 2015; 121:465.
  48. Waters JH, Biscotti C, Potter PS, Phillipson E. Amniotic fluid removal during cell salvage in the cesarean section patient. Anesthesiology 2000; 92:1531.
  49. Liumbruno GM, Liumbruno C, Rafanelli D. Intraoperative cell salvage in obstetrics: is it a real therapeutic option? Transfusion 2011; 51:2244.
  50. Yan H, Hu LQ, Wu Y, et al. The Association of Targeted Cell Salvage Blood Transfusion During Cesarean Delivery With Allogeneic Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusions in a Maternity Hospital in China. Anesth Analg 2018; 127:706.
  51. Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology 2016; 124:270.
  52. Waters JH, Beck S, Yazer MH. How do I perform cell salvage in obstetrics? Transfusion 2019; 59:2199.
  53. Sullivan IJ, Ralph CJ. Obstetric intra-operative cell salvage: a review of an established cell salvage service with 1170 re-infused cases. Anaesthesia 2019; 74:976.
  54. Waters JH, Lukauskiene E, Anderson ME. Intraoperative blood salvage during cesarean delivery in a patient with beta thalassemia intermedia. Anesth Analg 2003; 97:1808.
  55. Chung YS, Kim HR, Kang H, et al. Fragility of Red Blood Cells Collected Under Different Conditions With a Cell Saver Device. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33:1224.
  56. Kelleher A, Davidson S, Gohil M, et al. A quality assurance programme for cell salvage in cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 2011; 66:901.
  57. Spahn DR, Bouillon B, Cerny V, et al. Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma: an updated European guideline. Crit Care 2013; 17:R76.
  58. Pillay K, Perumal S. Intraoperative Cell Saving: Is the Solution the Actual Problem? J Extra Corpor Technol 2021; 53:62.
  59. Hansen E, Hansen MP. Reasons against the retransfusion of unwashed wound blood. Transfusion 2004; 44:45S.
  60. Gruber M, Breu A, Frauendorf M, et al. Washing of banked blood by three different blood salvage devices. Transfusion 2013; 53:1001.
  61. Ramírez G, Romero A, García-Vallejo JJ, Muñoz M. Detection and removal of fat particles from postoperative salvaged blood in orthopedic surgery. Transfusion 2002; 42:66.
  62. Konig G, Waters JH. Washing and filtering of cell-salvaged blood - does it make autotransfusion safer? Transfus Altern Transfus Med 2012; 12:78.
  63. Singh S, Kumar A. Leukocyte depletion for safe blood transfusion. Biotechnol J 2009; 4:1140.
  64. Jirousková M, Bartunková J, Smetana K Jr, et al. Comparative study of human monocyte and platelet adhesion to hydrogels in vitro - effect of polymer structure. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997; 8:19.
  65. Sharma AD, Sreeram G, Erb T, et al. Leukocyte-reduced blood transfusions: perioperative indications, adverse effects, and cost analysis. Anesth Analg 2000; 90:1315.
  66. Dzik S. Leukodepletion blood filters: filter design and mechanisms of leukocyte removal. Transfus Med Rev 1993; 7:65.
  67. Gäbel J, Malm CJ, Radulovic V, et al. Cell saver processing mitigates the negative effects of wound blood on platelet function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60:901.
  68. Welsby IJ, Norris PJ, Mauermann WJ, et al. Bedside Allogeneic Erythrocyte Washing with a Cell Saver to Remove Cytokines, Chemokines, and Cell-derived Microvesicles. Anesthesiology 2021; 134:395.
  69. Ansell J, Parrilla N, King M, et al. Survival of autotransfused red blood cells recovered from the surgical field during cardiovascular operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 84:387.
  70. Valeri CR, Pivacek LE, Gray AD, et al. The safety and therapeutic effectiveness of human red cells stored at -80 degrees C for as long as 21 years. Transfusion 1989; 29:429.
  71. Shulman G. Quality of processed blood for autotransfusion. J Extra Corpor Technol 2000; 32:11.
  72. Adam EH, Funke M, Zacharowski K, et al. Impact of Intraoperative Cell Salvage on Blood Coagulation Factor Concentrations in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. Anesth Analg 2020; 130:1389.
  73. Matsuda K, Nozawa M, Katsube S, et al. Activation of fibrinolysis by reinfusion of unwashed salvaged blood after total knee arthroplasty. Transfus Apher Sci 2010; 42:33.
  74. Gäbel J, Hakimi CS, Westerberg M, et al. Retransfusion of cardiotomy suction blood impairs haemostasis: ex vivo and in vivo studies. Scand Cardiovasc J 2013; 47:368.
  75. Mansour A, Decouture B, Roussel M, et al. Combined Platelet and Erythrocyte Salvage: Evaluation of a New Filtration-based Autotransfusion Device. Anesthesiology 2021; 135:246.
  76. Moonen AF, Knoors NT, van Os JJ, et al. Retransfusion of filtered shed blood in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Transfusion 2007; 47:379.
  77. Sarkanović ML, Gvozdenović L, Savić D, et al. Autologous blood transfusion in total knee replacement surgery. Vojnosanit Pregl 2013; 70:274.
  78. Thomas D, Wareham K, Cohen D, Hutchings H. Autologous blood transfusion in total knee replacement surgery. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86:669.
  79. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Management. Practice guidelines for perioperative blood management: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Management*. Anesthesiology 2015; 122:241.
  80. Jones HW, Savage L, White C, et al. Postoperative autologous blood salvage drains--are they useful in primary uncemented hip and knee arthroplasty? A prospective study of 186 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 2004; 70:466.
  81. Xie J, Feng X, Ma J, et al. Is postoperative cell salvage necessary in total hip or knee replacement? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 2015; 21:135.
  82. Oremus K, Sostaric S, Trkulja V, Haspl M. Influence of tranexamic acid on postoperative autologous blood retransfusion in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Transfusion 2014; 54:31.
  83. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservation Guideline Task Force, Ferraris VA, Brown JR, et al. 2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91:944.
  84. de Haan J, Schönberger J, Haan J, et al. Tissue-type plasminogen activator and fibrin monomers synergistically cause platelet dysfunction during retransfusion of shed blood after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 106:1017.
  85. Svenmarker S, Engström KG. The inflammatory response to recycled pericardial suction blood and the influence of cell-saving. Scand Cardiovasc J 2003; 37:158.
  86. Roberts SR, Early GL, Brown B, et al. Autotransfusion of unwashed mediastinal shed blood fails to decrease banked blood requirements in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery. Am J Surg 1991; 162:477.
  87. Spanier T, Tector K, Schwartz G, et al. Endotoxin in pooled pericardial blood contributes to the systemic inflammatory response during cardiac surgery. Perfusion 2000; 15:427.
  88. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservation Guideline Task Force, Ferraris VA, Ferraris SP, et al. Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83:S27.
  89. Dial S, Nguyen D, Menzies D. Autotransfusion of shed mediastinal blood: a risk factor for mediastinitis after cardiac surgery? Results of a cluster investigation. Chest 2003; 124:1847.
  90. Body SC, Birmingham J, Parks R, et al. Safety and efficacy of shed mediastinal blood transfusion after cardiac surgery: a multicenter observational study. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 13:410.
  91. Ashworth A, Klein AA. Cell salvage as part of a blood conservation strategy in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105:401.
  92. Son K, Yamada T, Tarao K, et al. Effects of Cardiac Surgery and Salvaged Blood Transfusion on Coagulation Function Assessed by Thromboelastometry. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:2375.
  93. Linden JV, Kaplan HS, Murphy MT. Fatal air embolism due to perioperative blood recovery. Anesth Analg 1997; 84:422.
  94. Engelhardt W, Blumenberg D. [Risks and side effects of intraoperative autotransfusion]. Beitr Infusionsther 1991; 28:317.
  95. AABB. Standards for Perioperative Autologous Blood Collection and Administration, 5th ed, 2013.
  96. Weiskopf RB. Erythrocyte salvage during cesarean section. Anesthesiology 2000; 92:1519.
  97. Szpisjak DF, Potter PS, Capehart BP. Economic analysis of an intraoperative cell salvage service. Anesth Analg 2004; 98:201.
Topic 7937 Version 33.0