Your activity: 4 p.v.

Atlas of thyroid cytopathology

Atlas of thyroid cytopathology
Author:
Douglas S Ross, MD
Section Editor:
David S Cooper, MD
Deputy Editor:
Jean E Mulder, MD
Literature review current through: Dec 2022. | This topic last updated: Mar 16, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy and fine-needle capillary (FNC) sampling are the two most widely used diagnostic techniques for assessing the cytopathology of thyroid nodules to identify those patients who have nodules that should be excised. This topic will review the most common cytopathologic findings and the clinical entities they represent. Thyroid biopsy techniques (including core needle biopsies) and an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules are discussed separately. (See "Thyroid biopsy" and "Diagnostic approach to and treatment of thyroid nodules" and "Evaluation and management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology".)

FNA CYTOLOGY CLASSIFICATION SCHEME — The National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) State of the Science Conference ("Bethesda Conference") suggests the following six major cytologic categories, each of which indicates a different subsequent evaluation and management (table 1) [1,2]:

I. Nondiagnostic

II. Benign

III. Follicular lesion or atypia of undetermined significance (FLUS or AUS)

IV. Follicular neoplasm

V. Suspicious for malignancy

VI. Malignant

The terms used by different cytopathologists to describe follicular thyroid nodules vary (table 2). It is essential that clinicians interpreting these reports be familiar with the terminology used by their cytopathologist.

Nondiagnostic — A nondiagnostic sample is inadequate (eg, insufficient number of follicular cells, specimen obscured by blood, cyst fluid only) [2]. The nondiagnostic rate varies from 3 to 10 percent at experienced centers. It is critical that the absence of malignant cells not be interpreted as a negative biopsy if no follicular tissue is obtained. For nondiagnostic biopsy results, we typically repeat the FNA biopsy under ultrasound guidance. This is consistent with the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines [3]. A cutting-needle biopsy under ultrasound guidance may also help after repetitive nondiagnostic FNAs. (See "Thyroid biopsy", section on 'Other techniques'.)

Benign — Common entities in this category are:

Normal thyroid tissue

Nodules from adenomatous or multinodular goiters

Chronic lymphocytic (Hashimoto's) thyroiditis

Subacute granulomatous thyroiditis.

Normal thyroid tissue, nodules from adenomatous or multinodular goiters, and some true monoclonal tumors can have a macrofollicular pattern on cytology (picture 1A-B). This pattern may also be referred to as adenomatoid, hyperplastic, macrofollicular, or colloid adenomas (table 2).

Benign follicular nodule — Cytology of macrofollicular nodules may show both intact macrofollicles and macrofollicles that have been broken apart, forming a flat sheet (picture 1A). The cells appear uniform in size and are not crowded together. Follicle size may vary, with a few microfollicles interspersed among the macrofollicles, especially if the sample was obtained from an area close to the capsule of the lesion. At high power, the follicular cells are seen to be small, uniform in size, flat, and non-crowded, and smeared colloid is seen in the background (picture 1B).

Macrofollicular nodules may have areas of cystic degeneration with cellular debris and hemosiderin-laden macrophages. There may be focal Hürthle (oxyphil) cell change and, rarely, multinucleated giant cells. (See 'Hürthle cells' below.)

Colloid, which stains blue on a Papanicolaou stain, is usually abundant in the background of macrofollicular lesions (picture 2). Colloid may also be obtained from colloid cysts, and those smears may have few or no intact follicular cells.

Surgical specimens of sporadic goiter often contain many such macrofollicles (picture 3). During needle aspiration, the follicles are frequently disrupted so that the colloid is smeared across the slide or occasionally is aggregated into droplets. The follicular cells lining the follicles may remain intact or break apart and form sheets.

Hashimoto's thyroiditis — Since the diagnosis of Hashimoto's thyroiditis can be made in most patients on the basis of the clinical presentation and laboratory findings, FNA should not be performed unless a discrete nodule is present.

There is considerable histologic variability in both FNA and histologic specimens from Hashimoto's thyroiditis. In surgical specimens, some sections are composed of normal-appearing follicles with minimal lymphocytic infiltration, while other areas show complete destruction of follicles with dense lymphocytic infiltration and lymphoid germinal centers (picture 4). Plasma cells are commonly seen, as are Hürthle cell changes in the remaining follicular cells, and fibrosis may be prominent.

Each of these findings may be the major cytologic feature in fine-needle aspirates. In some patients, the aspirates consist mostly of lymphocytes surrounding rare follicular cells (picture 5). Since blood lymphocytes contaminate most FNA specimens, the diagnosis of thyroiditis can be challenging. However, lymphocytes embedded within tissue are more fragile and tear easily when smeared (picture 6).

Some aspirates are devoid of any follicular cells and may be read as nondiagnostic. Nevertheless, a presumptive diagnosis of Hashimoto's thyroiditis can be made if other cytologic features are present, such as lymphocytes, plasma cells, germinal centers, and fibrotic follicles and if the clinical presentation is compatible with this disorder. One potential problem is that papillary thyroid cancer frequently has areas of lymphocytic infiltration, sampling of which can occasionally lead to false-negative FNA results interpreted as Hashimoto's. Another potential problem is that the Hürthle (oxyphil) cell changes may result in a false-positive interpretation of a Hürthle cell tumor. In addition, it may be necessary to do flow cytometry when cytology specimens show only lymphocytes to exclude the possibility of a well-differentiated lymphoma.

Subacute granulomatous thyroiditis — Subacute, granulomatous thyroiditis (also called subacute or de Quervain's thyroiditis) is usually a clinical diagnosis. This disorder is typically a viral or postviral syndrome characterized by fever, malaise, and an exquisitely tender thyroid gland. Because the gland may be quite firm, concern about cancer may lead to FNA. Multinucleated giant cells, macrophages, and degenerated follicular cells are seen. (See "Subacute thyroiditis".)

Follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) or atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) — This category was proposed for lesions that are not convincingly benign but do not have definitive features of a follicular neoplasm and are not highly suspicious of malignancy (table 2).

Atypia of undetermined significance – AUS includes lesions with mild nuclear atypia and lesions with extensive oncocytic (Hürthle cell) change but not enough to be classified as Hürthle cell neoplasm. This may be referred to as nuclear atypia, or oncocytic atypia, respectively.

Follicular lesion of undetermined significance – FLUS are those with a mixed macrofollicular and microfollicular pattern where the proportion of microfollicles and macrofollicles is similar and specimens that are compromised because of poor fixation or obscuring blood. Nodules with features of both macrofollicular fragments and microfollicular lesions are common, especially in nodular goiters. This may be referred to as architectural atypia.

The conference intended that no more than 7 percent of preparations would fall into this category, but the use of this term by cytopathologists has been variable, with some centers reporting its use in up to 29 percent of cytology readings [4]. In one multicenter analysis, the introduction of the FLUS or AUS category to diagnostic cytopathology reports (prior to the use of molecular testing) resulted in a dramatic increase in surgical referrals from 9 to 37 percent [5]. Following the introduction of the gene expression classifier, however, a 10-fold reduction in surgical referrals for indeterminate thyroid nodules was reported [6]. (See "Evaluation and management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology", section on 'Molecular markers'.)

The risk of malignancy with this cytologic classification ranges from 5 to 32 percent [1,7]. While the Bethesda classification and most analyses have combined AUS and FLUS into one category and the 2017 update of Bethesda specifically indicates that these terms can be used interchangeably [2], other analyses suggest a higher malignancy risk for AUS (nuclear atypia) than FLUS (architectural atypia) [7,8]. Thus, the ultimate usefulness of this classification requires further study [4]. It should be noted that there may be substantial variability among cytopathologists in classifying FNA cytology in this category (AUS or FLUS) [9]. In one study, second review changed the Bethesda classification in 32 percent of thyroid aspirates [10]. Thus, a second review of indeterminate biopsies (FLUS, AUS, or follicular neoplasm) may be warranted, especially at low-volume centers.

Follicular neoplasm or suspicious for follicular neoplasm — As many as 15 to 30 percent of all biopsies are classified as follicular neoplasms [1,2,11-13]. The category of neoplasm includes microfollicular or cellular adenomas. This pattern may also be referred to as cellular or indeterminate. Microfollicular or cellular neoplasms may represent any of the following:

Benign adenomas

Autonomously functioning (benign) adenomas

Well-differentiated follicular thyroid cancers

Follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancers

Noninvasive follicular tumors with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP)

Autonomously functioning thyroid nodules (which are virtually always benign) may rarely appear to be suspicious for a follicular neoplasm [14].

Microfollicles are easily identified in specimens obtained by FNA (picture 7). Colloid is absent or scant, and the cells are more crowded than in macrofollicular nodules and may form clusters. Well-developed microfollicles, crowding, and scant colloid is the least worrisome pattern. More suspicious is the absence of follicle formation, cells arranged in clusters and clumps, and varying nuclear atypia and cellular pleomorphism (picture 8).

Since FNA samples only a portion of the nodule, surgical excision and extensive sectioning are required to determine if a microfollicular lesion is benign or malignant. Microfollicular nodules that do not show vascular or capsular invasion after surgical excision are considered benign, while those that demonstrate even focal microscopic invasion are classified as follicular carcinomas (or follicular variant papillary cancers). Surgically excised microfollicular adenomas show well-developed microfollicles with considerably less colloid than is seen in macrofollicular nodules (picture 9). This pattern of well-developed microfollicles was previously referred to as a "fetal adenoma" as it is reminiscent histologically of the fetal thyroid. However, if invasion is seen, then, as noted, the pathologic diagnosis is follicular cancer (see "Follicular thyroid cancer (including Hürthle cell cancer)"). Lesions with less definite or no follicle formation are more likely to show vascular or capsule invasion.

Postsurgical evaluation reveals a malignancy rate of approximately 6 to 30 percent [15,16]. The difficulty in accurately diagnosing malignancy in a microfollicular adenoma is illustrated by a pathologic re-review of 185 follicular neoplasms excised 10 years previously [17]. Twenty-five percent had a change in diagnosis: 35 from benign to malignant and 11 from malignant to benign. The most common change in diagnosis was from benign to follicular variant papillary cancer. (See "Papillary thyroid cancer: Clinical features and prognosis", section on 'Follicular variants'.)

Several approaches are currently in use to improve upon cytology alone for the assessment of follicular lesions [18-22]. The routine use of molecular analysis on indeterminate FNA aspirates (follicular neoplasm, AUS, FLUS) reduces substantially the number of patients who require diagnostic thyroid surgery. There are two approaches to the molecular characterization of FNA aspirates that are commercially available in the United States: identification of particular molecular markers of malignancy, such as BRAF and RAS mutational status, and use of high-density genomic data for molecular classification (an FNA-trained mRNA classifier). The use of molecular markers in the assessment of patients with cytologic results showing FLUS/AUS or follicular neoplasm is reviewed in detail separately. (See "Evaluation and management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology", section on 'Molecular markers'.)

Hürthle cells — Hürthle cell or oxyphil cell tumors, analogous to follicular neoplasms (microfollicular lesions), may represent benign adenomas or Hürthle cell carcinomas. However, in one study, the risk of malignancy in microfollicular oxyphil cell lesions was twice that of nonoxyphil lesions (32 versus 16 percent) [23]. Hürthle cells are large polyclonal cells with abundant oxyphilic cytoplasm. Sheets of Hürthle cells are seen in Hürthle cell adenomas (picture 10).

Focal Hürthle cell change can be seen in both degenerating macrofollicular lesions and Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Because of limited sampling, scant FNA specimens from these disorders may show apparent sheets of Hürthle cells and can result in a false-positive cytologic diagnosis of a Hürthle cell tumor.

Suspicious for malignancy — This category includes lesions with some features suggestive of, but not definitive for, thyroid cancer. Typically, nodules in this category have a 50 to 75 percent risk of malignancy. This risk is sufficiently high to warrant surgical resection.

Malignant — The malignant category includes papillary cancer, medullary cancer, thyroid lymphoma, anaplastic cancer, cancer metastatic to the thyroid, and lymphoma. It does not include follicular or Hürthle cell thyroid cancer. The diagnosis of follicular or Hürthle cell thyroid cancer is made on the basis of capsular or vascular invasion, which cannot be identified in specimens obtained by FNA.

Papillary cancer — The cytologic diagnosis of papillary cancer is usually straightforward. The architecture is papillary, the cells are large, their cytoplasm has a "ground glass" appearance, nucleoli are prominent, and the nuclei demonstrate clefts and grooves and intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions ("Orphan Annie eyes") (picture 11). Psammoma bodies (picture 12) and dense "sticky" colloid (picture 13) may also be seen. Although colloid is scant in this disorder, the colloid that is present appears to "stick" to debris and cell clusters, instead of smearing across the slide. (See "Papillary thyroid cancer: Clinical features and prognosis", section on 'Histology'.)

Epithelioid giant cells can be seen in papillary carcinomas but are also frequently seen in degenerating areas of macrofollicular nodules and in subacute granulomatous thyroiditis (picture 14). However, patients with the latter disorder rarely undergo FNA, because the clinical manifestations of subacute granulomatous thyroiditis are so characteristic that FNA is rarely indicated. (See "Subacute thyroiditis".)

In patients with papillary cancer, the surgical specimen typically shows a papillary structure, with or without follicles, and little or no colloid (picture 15). In follicular variant papillary cancer, only follicular development is seen. The diagnosis of papillary cancer then is based upon the cytologic features of the cells, the presence or absence of a capsule, and capsular or vascular invasion:

A noninvasive, encapsulated, well-circumscribed follicular lesion with papillary-like nuclear features was previously referred to as a noninvasive follicular variant papillary cancer, subtype (NI-FVPTC), but is now called a NIFTP [24].

A follicular tumor subtype with papillary nuclear features and with either invasion (capsular or vascular invasion) or lacking a well-defined capsule is a follicular variant papillary cancer.

This new nomenclature suggests that encapsulated, noninvasive follicular variant papillary cancers not be labeled a malignancy [24]. These tumors are treated similar to a follicular neoplasm that has not invaded its capsule or blood vessels and is called a follicular adenoma rather than a follicular cancer. Importantly, these NIFTP can only be diagnosed after surgical excision. (See "Papillary thyroid cancer: Clinical features and prognosis", section on 'Follicular variants'.)

Medullary cancer — Cytologists will usually recognize FNAs from medullary thyroid cancer as suspicious but will not always make the diagnosis preoperatively [25]. The cells frequently disperse and are characterized by eccentrically placed nuclei and cytoplasmic tails. The cytoplasm may be slightly granular and is usually configured as a tear drop or cytoplasmic tail. Immunocytologic staining for calcitonin confirms medullary cancer (picture 16). The cellular pleomorphism and lack of follicular development usually results in a recommendation for surgical excision even if the diagnosis is not made on FNA.

Surgical specimens from patients with medullary cancer of the thyroid show spindle-shaped and frequently pleomorphic cells without follicle development because these cells originate from the calcitonin-producing parafollicular C cells of the thyroid (picture 17). Occasional red cytoplasmic granules are seen, and the supporting stroma frequently stains for amyloid.

Anaplastic — Clinical suspicion and cytology demonstrating marked pleomorphism, bizarre giant cells, and spindle cells characterize anaplastic cancer. (See "Anaplastic thyroid cancer".)

Cancer metastatic to thyroid — Renal cell is the most common cancer metastatic to the thyroid. Colorectal, lung, breast, sarcoma, melanoma, and uterine cancer are among the other more common cancers that metastasize to the thyroid [26,27]. If uncertainty exists, thyroglobulin staining as well as other markers may help determine the origin of the cells. If the underlying cancer diagnosis is known, specific antibodies can be used for immunohistochemical analysis.

Lymphoma — Aggressive lymphomas are readily diagnosed based upon clinical findings and lymphocytes on FNA or core-needle biopsy. However, low-grade lymphomas may be difficult to distinguish from Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Virtually all thyroid lymphomas originate within Hashimoto's thyroiditis; as a result, sampling error is also a concern. Flow cytometry and immunocytochemical studies may be useful and may require larger fragments of tissue from a cutting-needle biopsy. The patient may be spared surgery if the diagnosis can be made on needle biopsy, although many pathologists prefer tissue obtained from an open biopsy. (See "Clinical presentation and initial evaluation of non-Hodgkin lymphoma", section on 'Analysis of biopsy material'.)

SUMMARY

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy and fine-needle capillary (FNC) sampling are the two most widely used diagnostic techniques for assessing the cytopathology of thyroid nodules to identify those patients who have nodules that should be excised. (See 'Introduction' above.)

The National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference ("Bethesda Conference") suggests the following six major cytologic categories, each of which indicates a different subsequent evaluation and management (table 1):

I. Nondiagnostic

II. Benign

III. Follicular lesion or atypia of undetermined significance (FLUS or AUS)

IV. Follicular neoplasm

V. Suspicious for malignancy

VI. Malignant

Thyroid biopsy techniques (including core-needle biopsies) and their indications, utility, and complications are discussed separately. (See "Thyroid biopsy".)

The management of thyroid nodules is reviewed separately. (See "Diagnostic approach to and treatment of thyroid nodules", section on 'Management' and "Evaluation and management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology", section on 'Evaluation and management'.)

  1. Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA, Asa SL, et al. Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: a synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Diagn Cytopathol 2008; 36:425.
  2. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid 2017; 27:1341.
  3. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016; 26:1.
  4. Layfield LJ, Morton MJ, Cramer HM, Hirschowitz S. Implications of the proposed thyroid fine-needle aspiration category of "follicular lesion of undetermined significance": A five-year multi-institutional analysis. Diagn Cytopathol 2009; 37:710.
  5. Bongiovanni M, Crippa S, Baloch Z, et al. Comparison of 5-tiered and 6-tiered diagnostic systems for the reporting of thyroid cytopathology: a multi-institutional study. Cancer Cytopathol 2012; 120:117.
  6. Duick DS, Klopper JP, Diggans JC, et al. The impact of benign gene expression classifier test results on the endocrinologist-patient decision to operate on patients with thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration cytopathology. Thyroid 2012; 22:996.
  7. Olson MT, Clark DP, Erozan YS, Ali SZ. Spectrum of risk of malignancy in subcategories of 'atypia of undetermined significance'. Acta Cytol 2011; 55:518.
  8. Valderrabano P, Khazai L, Thompson ZJ, et al. Cancer Risk Associated with Nuclear Atypia in Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Thyroid 2018; 28:210.
  9. Cibas ES, Baloch ZW, Fellegara G, et al. A prospective assessment defining the limitations of thyroid nodule pathologic evaluation. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159:325.
  10. Olson MT, Boonyaarunnate T, Aragon Han P, et al. A tertiary center's experience with second review of 3885 thyroid cytopathology specimens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98:1450.
  11. Yassa L, Cibas ES, Benson CB, et al. Long-term assessment of a multidisciplinary approach to thyroid nodule diagnostic evaluation. Cancer 2007; 111:508.
  12. Yang J, Schnadig V, Logrono R, Wasserman PG. Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a study of 4703 patients with histologic and clinical correlations. Cancer 2007; 111:306.
  13. Hegedüs L. Clinical practice. The thyroid nodule. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1764.
  14. Walfish PG, Strawbridge HT, Rosen IB. Management implications from routine needle biopsy of hyperfunctioning thyroid nodules. Surgery 1985; 98:1179.
  15. Nayar R, Ivanovic M. The indeterminate thyroid fine-needle aspiration: experience from an academic center using terminology similar to that proposed in the 2007 National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Cancer 2009; 117:195.
  16. Ohori NP, Nikiforova MN, Schoedel KE, et al. Contribution of molecular testing to thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology of "follicular lesion of undetermined significance/atypia of undetermined significance". Cancer Cytopathol 2010; 118:17.
  17. Widder S, Guggisberg K, Khalil M, Pasieka JL. A pathologic re-review of follicular thyroid neoplasms: the impact of changing the threshold for the diagnosis of the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surgery 2008; 144:80.
  18. Nikiforov YE, Ohori NP, Hodak SP, et al. Impact of mutational testing on the diagnosis and management of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules: a prospective analysis of 1056 FNA samples. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96:3390.
  19. Chudova D, Wilde JI, Wang ET, et al. Molecular classification of thyroid nodules using high-dimensionality genomic data. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:5296.
  20. Marchetti I, Iervasi G, Mazzanti CM, et al. Detection of the BRAF(V600E) mutation in fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid papillary microcarcinoma cells selected by manual macrodissection: an easy tool to improve the preoperative diagnosis. Thyroid 2012; 22:292.
  21. Kitano M, Rahbari R, Patterson EE, et al. Evaluation of candidate diagnostic microRNAs in thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples. Thyroid 2012; 22:285.
  22. Prasad NB, Kowalski J, Tsai HL, et al. Three-gene molecular diagnostic model for thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2012; 22:275.
  23. Sangalli G, Serio G, Zampatti C, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid: a comparison of 5469 cytological and final histological diagnoses. Cytopathology 2006; 17:245.
  24. Nikiforov YE, Seethala RR, Tallini G, et al. Nomenclature Revision for Encapsulated Follicular Variant of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Paradigm Shift to Reduce Overtreatment of Indolent Tumors. JAMA Oncol 2016; 2:1023.
  25. Jayaram G. Fine needle aspiration cytologic study of the solitary thyroid nodule. Profile of 308 cases with histologic correlation. Acta Cytol 1985; 29:967.
  26. Cichoń S, Anielski R, Konturek A, et al. Metastases to the thyroid gland: seventeen cases operated on in a single clinical center. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2006; 391:581.
  27. Chung AY, Tran TB, Brumund KT, et al. Metastases to the thyroid: a review of the literature from the last decade. Thyroid 2012; 22:258.
Topic 7823 Version 17.0

References