Your activity: 6 p.v.

Comparison of methods to quantify gene expression

Comparison of methods to quantify gene expression
  Amount of starting RNA required Sensitivity of test Analytic requirements Information obtained from the test Number of targets Relative cost Advantages Disadvantages
Northern blot High Low Low Presence and size of RNA of interest Few Low Straightforward Risk of RNA degradation
Radioactivity use
Lower sensitivity
Higher starting quantity of RNA
Ribonuclease protection assay High Moderate Low Presence and size of RNA of interest Few Low Higher specificity for the gene Complex protocol
Better sensitivity Radioactivity use
In-situ hybridization High Low to moderate Low Presence and spatial localization of RNA of interest Few Low Spatial localization in a tissue section or cell Low sensitivity
Qualitative, not quantitative
Spotted cDNA arrays Moderate Moderate to high Moderate to high Relative gene expression between two conditions Several hundred Moderate Simultaneous detection of hundreds of genes Limited reproducibility
Direct comparison of two samples
Oligonucleotide arrays Low to moderate Moderate to high Moderate to high Relative gene expression Thousands Moderate Simultaneous detection of thousands of genes Analysis limited to known genes
Higher resolution than older methods Decreased sensitivity for lowly expressed transcripts
RT-PCR Low High Low to moderate Relative gene expression Few to several hundred Low Straightforward protocol Needs careful primer selection
Higher sensitivity
Transcriptome sequencing Low to moderate High Very high Digital counts of each RNA molecule (as measure of gene expression) with excellent dynamic range Unlimited High Higher resolution than microarrays High cost
Large dynamic range, can detect low abundance transcripts Low throughput
Detects novel transcripts Large storage space needed for data
Can identify polymorphisms within a sequence Intensive computational analysis
Graphic 76106 Version 2.0