Your activity: 24 p.v.
your limit has been reached. plz Donate us to allow your ip full access, Email: sshnevis@outlook.com

Advantages and disadvantages of central vein approaches

Advantages and disadvantages of central vein approaches
Approach Advantages Disadvantages
External jugular
  • Superficial vessel that is often visible
  • Coagulopathy not prohibitive
  • Minimal risk of pneumothorax (especially with US guidance)
  • Head-of-table access
  • Prominent in older adult patients
  • Rapid venous access
  • Not ideal for prolonged venous access
  • Poor landmarks in patients with obesity
  • High rate of malposition
  • Catheter may be difficult to thread
Internal jugular
  • Minimal risk of pneumothorax (especially with US guidance)
  • Head-of-table access
  • Procedure-related bleeding amenable to direct pressure
  • Lower failure rate with novice operator
  • Excellent target using US guidance
  • Not ideal for prolonged access
  • Risk of carotid artery puncture
  • Uncomfortable
  • Dressings and catheter difficult to maintain
  • Thoracic duct injury possible on left
  • Poor landmarks in patients with obesity/edematous patients
  • Potential access and maintenance issues with concomitant tracheostomy
  • Vein prone to collapse with hypovolemia
  • Difficult access during emergencies when airway control being established
Subclavian
  • Easier to maintain dressings
  • More comfortable for patient
  • Better landmarks in patients with obesity
  • Accessible when airway control is being established
  • Associated with lower incidence of catheter-related infection*[1]
  • Increased risk of pneumothorax
  • Procedure-related bleeding less amenable to direct pressure
  • Decreased success rate with inexperience
  • Longer path from skin to vessel
  • Catheter malposition more common (especially right SCV)
  • Interference with chest compressions
  • Risk for stenosis/occlusion, which impacts future hemodialysis arteriovenous access
Femoral
  • Rapid access with high success rate
  • Does not interfere with CPR
  • Does not interfere with intubation
  • No risk of pneumothorax
  • Trendelenburg position not necessary during insertion
  • Delayed circulation of drugs during CPR
  • Prevents patient mobilization
  • Difficult to keep site sterile
  • Difficult for PA catheter insertion
  • Increased risk of iliofemoral thrombosis
US: ultrasound; SCV: subclavian vein; CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation; PA: pulmonary artery.
* From Parenti, infection rates: subclavian 0.5%; jugular 1.4%; femoral 1.2%.
Adapted from: Factor P, Sznajder JI. Vascular cannulation. In: Principles of Critical Care, Hall JB, Schmidt GA, Wood LDH (Eds), McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992.
Reference:
  1. Parienti JJ, Mongardon N, Mégarbane B, et al. Intravascular Complications of Central Venous Catheterization by Insertion Site. 3SITES Study Group. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:1220.
Graphic 71716 Version 10.0