Your activity: 2 p.v.

Incidentally discovered sellar masses (pituitary incidentalomas)

Incidentally discovered sellar masses (pituitary incidentalomas)
Author:
Peter J Snyder, MD
Section Editor:
David S Cooper, MD
Deputy Editor:
Kathryn A Martin, MD
Literature review current through: Dec 2022. | This topic last updated: Mar 31, 2021.

INTRODUCTION — The frequent detection of unsuspected anatomic abnormalities in many glands ("incidentalomas"), including the pituitary, made possible by the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), raises the question of how to evaluate patients who have such an abnormality. The causes, evaluation, and treatment of pituitary incidentaloma are discussed here. The causes, clinical presentation, and evaluation of sellar masses are reviewed separately. (See "Causes, presentation, and evaluation of sellar masses".)

EPIDEMIOLOGY — The term "pituitary incidentaloma" refers to a previously unsuspected lesion that is detected on an imaging study performed for reasons other than pituitary symptoms or disease. Among adults undergoing imaging studies (computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) for reasons other than pituitary symptoms or disease, the frequency of incidentally discovered signal abnormalities (<10 mm) varies among studies from 4 to 20 percent by CT [1-3] and 10 to 38 percent by MRI [4,5].

Not all incidentally discovered sellar masses are pituitary adenomas. In one study of 61 incidentally discovered sellar masses found among 1000 unselected autopsy specimens, there were 37 Rathke's cleft cysts, 18 pituitary adenomas, and 2 each of hyperplasia, infarction, and hemorrhage [6]. However, pituitary adenomas are a common finding, as illustrated by a review of 29 autopsy studies that included over 18,000 pituitary glands [7]. The frequency of pituitary adenomas was approximately 10 percent, and nearly all of the adenomas were microadenomas (<10 mm). The frequencies were similar for males and females and across age groups in adults.

CHARACTERISTICS OF REFERRED PATIENTS — Patients who are referred for evaluation of incidentally discovered magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal abnormalities within the sella tend to have larger lesions and a higher incidence of neurologic abnormalities than would be expected from autopsy and MRI series of unselected patients [8,9]. This presumably reflects the selection process of a referral population. In one series of 328 referred patients, 233 had lesions 10 mm or larger [10]. Of the 328, 179 were diagnosed as nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, 47 as Rathke's cleft cysts, 37 as lactotroph adenomas, 16 as somatotroph adenomas, and 7 as corticotroph adenomas. Over one-half had one or more hormonal deficiencies. In a prospective study of 131 patients who had incidentally discovered adenomas, 30 had hypogonadism, 13 had hypothyroidism, and 9 had secondary adrenal insufficiency [11].

The overall frequency of different types of pituitary adenomas is not known, because many large series of incidentally discovered sellar masses intentionally exclude those patients who have lesions that are hypersecreting. In our experience, however, it is common for a sellar mass that is discovered incidentally to be associated, on further evaluation, with obvious clinical consequences, including visual impairment and hormonal hypersecretion. Some of these patients even have obvious clinical manifestations of the hypersecretion (eg, acromegaly) that had been overlooked until the mass was discovered. Severe hormonal hyposecretion, including marked hypothyroidism and hypoadrenalism, can also be seen.

NATURAL HISTORY — Little information is available about the natural history of incidentally discovered sellar masses. In the series of 506 patients described above, 258 underwent surgery soon after discovery of the mass and 248 were monitored using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for a mean of 26.9 months (range 6 to 173 months) [12]. The size of the sellar mass increased in 30 (20 of the 123 with lesions originally >10 mm and 10 of the 57 with lesions originally <10 mm). Among the latter, only 3 (all ≥5 mm) increased to >10 mm in 65 to 84 months of observation. In a report since that review, 2 of 16 with a mass <10 mm increased in size in an average of 41 months of observation, neither to a clinically significant degree [13].

In a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that included 865 patients with incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning sellar masses, those ≥10 mm were approximately four times more likely to experience growth during follow-up than those <10 mm (incidence 12.5 versus 3.3 per 100 person-years, respectively) [14].

EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT — Evaluation of a patient found incidentally to have a lesion within the pituitary depends upon the size of the lesion (algorithm 1). Lesions 10 mm or larger are more likely to be associated with visual and hormonal abnormalities at the time they are discovered and are more likely to enlarge during observation than smaller lesions. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gonadotroph and other clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas".)

Lesions 10 mm or larger — These lesions should be evaluated as a symptomatic sellar mass of similar size. Vision should be evaluated clinically and by formal testing of acuity and fields. We suggest that these patients undergo clinical and biochemical evaluation for both hormone hypersecretion and hypopituitarism. For hypersecretion, this includes serum prolactin, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) [15], luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and alpha subunit, corticotropin (ACTH), and 24-hour urine cortisol [16]. The evaluation of hypopituitarism is reviewed separately. (See "Causes, presentation, and evaluation of sellar masses", section on 'Hormonal evaluation' and "Diagnostic testing for hypopituitarism".)

Patients with pituitary adenomas resulting in hormonal hypersecretion (eg, hyperprolactinemia, acromegaly, or Cushing's disease) should be treated as other patients with these disorders. (See "Management of hyperprolactinemia" and "Treatment of acromegaly" and "Primary therapy of Cushing's disease: Transsphenoidal surgery and pituitary irradiation".)

For patients with gonadotroph adenomas and other clinically nonfunctioning lesions causing visual impairment or other neurologic symptoms, transsphenoidal surgery is the treatment of choice for initial therapy. (See "Treatment of gonadotroph and other clinically nonfunctioning adenomas".)

For patients with adenomas less than 20 mm without clinically important hormonal hypersecretion and no visual or other neurologic abnormalities, we suggest careful observation [17].These patients should be monitored for size of the mass, visual changes, and hormonal hypersecretion in 6 and 12 months, then annually for several years, and perhaps less frequently thereafter. Hormonal hyposecretion should be treated by appropriate replacement. (See "Treatment of hypopituitarism" and "Treatment of gonadotroph and other clinically nonfunctioning adenomas", section on 'Asymptomatic adenomas'.)

Most patients whose adenomas are greater than 20 mm will have visual impairment or other neurologic symptoms that make reduction in size desirable. If there are no neurologic symptoms and the patient is an older adult and/or a poor surgical risk, observation is a reasonable course.

Lesions less than 10 mm — Patients with smaller lesions should be evaluated clinically for hormonal hypersecretion and biochemically for any hypersecretion suspected clinically. Only serum prolactin should be measured if there is no clinical suspicion of hormonal hypersecretion, an approach that, in one report, was much more cost effective than either measurement of multiple hormones or performance of follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 6 and 12 months [18]. No evaluation for hormonal hyposecretion or visual abnormalities is necessary. Our approach differs from the 2011 Endocrine Society Guidelines, which recommend that patients with an incidentaloma of any size undergo initial testing for hormonal hypersecretion and hypopituitarism [19].

Patients with lesions not associated with hormonal hypersecretion may be treated as follows [18]:

For patients with lesions 2 to 4 mm in diameter, we suggest no further testing as additional tests do not appear to affect outcome [7].

For patients with lesions 5 to 9 mm in diameter, we suggest monitoring with pituitary MRI yearly for two years; if the lesion is stable in this period, the frequency can be decreased to every few years and then even less often.

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Pituitary tumors and hypopituitarism".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A pituitary incidentaloma is a previously unsuspected sellar mass that is detected on an imaging study performed for reasons other than pituitary symptoms or disease.

Pituitary incidentalomas are common. In imaging studies, the frequency of incidentally discovered pituitary lesions is 4 to 20 percent by computed tomography (CT) scan and 10 to 38 percent by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In autopsy studies, the frequency of previously unsuspected pituitary adenomas is approximately 10 percent. (See 'Epidemiology' above.)

Patients who are referred for evaluation of incidentally discovered MRI abnormalities within the sella tend to have larger lesions and a higher incidence of neurologic abnormalities than would be expected from autopsy and MRI series of unselected patients. This presumably reflects the selection process of a referral population. (See 'Characteristics of referred patients' above.)

Incidentally discovered sellar masses >10 mm in diameter are more likely to grow than those <10 mm. (See 'Natural history' above.)

For patients with pituitary incidentalomas ≥10 mm:

We suggest evaluation for hormonal hyper- and hyposecretion (hypopituitarism). (See "Causes, presentation, and evaluation of sellar masses", section on 'Hormonal evaluation' and "Diagnostic testing for hypopituitarism".)

For patients with gonadotroph adenomas and other clinically nonfunctioning lesions causing visual impairment or other neurologic symptoms, we recommend transsphenoidal surgery for initial therapy. This issue is reviewed in detail separately. (See "Treatment of gonadotroph and other clinically nonfunctioning adenomas".)

For patients with pituitary lesions ≥10 mm and symptoms related to clinically important hormonal hypersecretion (hyperprolactinemia, Cushing's syndrome, acromegaly), treatment is described separately. (See "Management of hyperprolactinemia" and "Treatment of acromegaly" and "Primary therapy of Cushing's disease: Transsphenoidal surgery and pituitary irradiation".)

For patients with pituitary lesions ≥10 mm without neurologic symptoms or hormonal hypersecretion, we suggest close observation with hormonal testing (for both hyper- and hyposecretion), visual testing, and pituitary MRI at 6 and 12 months during the first year. (See 'Lesions 10 mm or larger' above and "Treatment of gonadotroph and other clinically nonfunctioning adenomas", section on 'Asymptomatic adenomas'.)

For patients with pituitary lesions ≥20 mm and visual impairment or other neurologic symptoms, treatment to reduce the size of the adenoma is indicated. However, if there are no neurologic symptoms and the patient is an older adult and/or a poor surgical risk, we choose observation. (See 'Lesions 10 mm or larger' above.)

For patients with pituitary incidentalomas <10 mm:

We suggest that only serum prolactin be measured if there is no clinical suspicion of hormonal hypersecretion.

For patients with lesions 2 to 4 mm in diameter, we suggest no further imaging tests.

For those with lesions between 5 to 9 mm in diameter, we suggest MRI yearly for two years; if the lesion is stable in this period, the frequency can be decreased to every few years and then less often. (See 'Lesions less than 10 mm' above.)

  1. Peyster RG, Adler LP, Viscarello RR, et al. CT of the normal pituitary gland. Neuroradiology 1986; 28:161.
  2. Wolpert SM, Molitch ME, Goldman JA, Wood JB. Size, shape, and appearance of the normal female pituitary gland. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 143:377.
  3. Chambers EF, Turski PA, LaMasters D, Newton TH. Regions of low density in the contrast-enhanced pituitary gland: normal and pathologic processes. Radiology 1982; 144:109.
  4. Hall WA, Luciano MG, Doppman JL, et al. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging in normal human volunteers: occult adenomas in the general population. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:817.
  5. Chong BW, Kucharczyk W, Singer W, George S. Pituitary gland MR: a comparative study of healthy volunteers and patients with microadenomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15:675.
  6. Teramoto A, Hirakawa K, Sanno N, Osamura Y. Incidental pituitary lesions in 1,000 unselected autopsy specimens. Radiology 1994; 193:161.
  7. Molitch ME. Nonfunctioning pituitary tumors and pituitary incidentalomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2008; 37:151.
  8. Reincke M, Allolio B, Saeger W, et al. The 'incidentaloma' of the pituitary gland. Is neurosurgery required? JAMA 1990; 263:2772.
  9. Donovan LE, Corenblum B. The natural history of the pituitary incidentaloma. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155:181.
  10. Imran SA, Yip CE, Papneja N, et al. Analysis and natural history of pituitary incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol 2016; 175:1.
  11. Freda PU, Bruce JN, Khandji AG, et al. Presenting Features in 269 Patients With Clinically Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas Enrolled in a Prospective Study. J Endocr Soc 2020; 4:bvaa021.
  12. Sanno N, Oyama K, Tahara S, et al. A survey of pituitary incidentaloma in Japan. Eur J Endocrinol 2003; 149:123.
  13. Karavitaki N, Collison K, Halliday J, et al. What is the natural history of nonoperated nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007; 67:938.
  14. Fernández-Balsells MM, Murad MH, Barwise A, et al. Natural history of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas and incidentalomas: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96:905.
  15. Wade AN, Baccon J, Grady MS, et al. Clinically silent somatotroph adenomas are common. Eur J Endocrinol 2011; 165:39.
  16. Karavitaki N, Ansorge O, Wass JA. Silent corticotroph adenomas. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2007; 51:1314.
  17. Dekkers OM, Hammer S, de Keizer RJ, et al. The natural course of non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas. Eur J Endocrinol 2007; 156:217.
  18. King JT Jr, Justice AC, Aron DC. Management of incidental pituitary microadenomas: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997; 82:3625.
  19. Freda PU, Beckers AM, Katznelson L, et al. Pituitary incidentaloma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96:894.
Topic 6642 Version 12.0