Your activity: 4 p.v.

Juvenile dermatomyositis and polymyositis: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations

Juvenile dermatomyositis and polymyositis: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations
Authors:
Clare Hutchinson, MDCM, FRCPC
Brian M Feldman, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Section Editors:
Suzanne C Li, MD, PhD
Marc C Patterson, MD, FRACP
Deputy Editor:
Elizabeth TePas, MD, MS
Literature review current through: Nov 2022. | This topic last updated: Aug 13, 2021.

INTRODUCTION — Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) and juvenile polymyositis (JPM) are rare autoimmune myopathies in childhood. JDM is primarily a capillary vasculopathy, whereas JPM involves direct T cell invasion of muscle fibers similar to that seen in adult polymyositis (PM) [1,2]. However, as the diagnostic tools become more sophisticated (eg, biopsies that demonstrate inclusion body myositis or inflammatory dystrophies, or autoantibodies that are markers of particular types of myositis such as anti-signal recognition particle [SRP] indicating necrotizing myopathy), fewer patients are diagnosed with JPM, calling into question whether JPM is a specific entity. (See "Clinical manifestations of dermatomyositis and polymyositis in adults".)

The epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations of JDM and JPM are reviewed here. Diagnosis and treatment of these disorders are discussed elsewhere. (See "Juvenile dermatomyositis and other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Diagnosis" and "Juvenile dermatomyositis and polymyositis: Treatment, complications, and prognosis".)

EPIDEMIOLOGY — JDM is the most common idiopathic inflammatory myopathy of childhood, accounting for approximately 85 percent of cases [3,4]. In population-based studies, JDM has a reported annual incidence that ranges from two to four cases per one million children [5-9] and a prevalence of approximately 4 per 100,000 [10]. The peak incidence is from 5 to 10 years of age [8,9]. Females are affected more often than males, with a two- to fivefold greater rate [7,8,11].

JPM occurs less frequently and accounts for only 3 to 6 percent of childhood idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [3,7].

PATHOGENESIS — JDM and JPM are thought to be autoimmune disorders. JDM is associated with systemic vasculopathy. It is sometimes associated with occlusive arteriopathy and capillary necrosis; these changes eventually lead to capillary loss and tissue ischemia. Although the etiology remains unclear, it has been proposed that JDM and JPM are caused by an autoimmune reaction in genetically susceptible persons, possibly in response to infection or environmental triggers such as prenatal exposure to tobacco smoke and particulate inhalants [12]. JDM, as with adult dermatomyositis, is probably an "antibody-dependent, complement-mediated disease characterized by capillary injury that results in perifascicular muscle fiber atrophy" [13].

Genetic susceptibility — The occurrence of JPM and JDM in monozygotic twins and first-degree relatives in some families suggests a genetic predisposition to these disorders [14,15]. A genome-wide association study identified single nucleotide polymorphisms in the alleles comprising the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) 8.1 ancestral haplotype (AH8.1) as a genetic risk factor associated with all myositis phenotypes including JDM [16].

Non-HLA-associated genes, including genetic polymorphisms in tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha and interleukin (IL) 1 receptor antagonist, are known risk factors for the development of JDM and for a more severe presentation [17-19].

A significantly increased rate of autoimmune diseases, particularly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and type 1 diabetes, is seen in family members of children with JDM [20]. Higher levels of interferon (IFN) alpha were seen in children with JDM who had family members with SLE, suggesting a shared predisposing factor.

Immunologic mechanisms — The following findings support the role of the immune system in the pathogenesis of JDM and JPM:

T cell invasion of muscle fibers in patients with JPM [1].

Epitopes that are common both to human skeletal muscle and the bacterium Streptococcus pyogenes are targets for cytotoxic T cell responses in patients with early, active JDM, indicating a possible link between an immune response to bacteria and the development of myositis [21].

Increased mast cell numbers in the skin and mature plasmacytoid dendritic cells in both muscle and skin in patients with JDM [22].

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are present in approximately 70 percent of patients with JDM and JPM [23]. Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) are found in a significant proportion of adults with dermatomyositis and polymyositis and are associated with specific clinical subgroups. A study of 116 children registered in the UK and Ireland JDM National Registry and Repository showed a 23 percent prevalence of anti-p155/140 antibodies; children with positive antibodies had more extensive skin disease [24]. A subsequent study found specific autoantibodies in over half of the studied children; these autoantibodies correlated with histologic and clinical features [25]. (See 'Cutaneous manifestations' below and "Overview of and approach to the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies", section on 'Myositis-specific autoantibodies'.)

Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibodies are associated with the occurrence of interstitial lung disease in patients with JDM [26]. Appearance of these antibodies may precede clinical signs of interstitial lung disease. (See 'Pulmonary involvement' below.)

Similarity of observed histologic changes between JDM and chronic graft-versus-host disease. The presence of persistent maternal cells (maternal microchimerism), which triggers an immunologic response, was proposed as a common pathogenetic pathway for the two disorders. Two studies have reported evidence of maternal microchimerism in the peripheral blood and muscle biopsies of boys with juvenile inflammatory myopathy [27,28].

Experimental data demonstrating increased T cell reactivity of in vitro peripheral blood mononuclear cells to heat shock protein (HSP) 60 in patients compared with normal controls [29]. HSPs are proposed to have a regulatory role in chronic inflammatory diseases and may be an autoantigen for these disorders. (See "Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Epidemiology and immunopathogenesis", section on 'Gamma-delta-T cells'.)

An IFN-alpha-induced gene expression signature in muscle and serum, which may be stimulated by autoantibodies associated with nucleic acids, was seen in gene expression studies that used microarray-based technologies [30,31]. This gene expression is similar to the gene expression signature seen in patients with SLE. IFN gene expression and protein production are high in the muscle of untreated patients with JDM [32], and gene expression of IFN-mediated viral response genes is upregulated as well [33]. These findings suggest that a viral trigger, leading to a chronic antiviral response, is an important pathogenic mechanism.

Perifascicular atrophy, the hallmark pathologic finding in the muscle of patients with JDM, appears to result from ischemia that is associated with marked loss of adjacent endothelial capillaries due to complement-mediated damage to the vessels. The complement-mediated damage appears to result from activation of the classical pathway, independent of immunoglobulin, and is perhaps triggered by type 1 IFN activity [34].

Infection — Several observations have suggested that JDM may develop as an unusual response to infection in a genetically susceptible host:

There is an increased prevalence of Coxsackie B antibodies in children with JDM compared with matched controls [35].

Case reports of viral isolation from muscle specimens in adult myositis have been described [36].

There is an association between echovirus infection and chronic polymyositis in children with agammaglobulinemia [37].

A seasonal variation of onset in JDM has been described, with clustering of cases in the spring and summer [38].

Respiratory and gastrointestinal complaints and/or antibiotic use are common in the three months before diagnosis of JDM [39,40].

However, attempts at demonstrating a viral etiology of JDM have failed. As an example, a study of 79 patients with new-onset JDM found normal antibody titers to herpes simplex virus, coxsackievirus B 1 through 6, and Toxoplasma gondii [41]. Another report using the polymerase chain reaction was unable to demonstrate evidence of viral genetic material in the muscle of 20 individuals with active, untreated, recent-onset JDM [42].

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS — Muscle weakness is the hallmark of JDM and JPM, although approximately 5 percent of patients with JDM do not have clinically evident weakness (amyopathic or hypomyopathic JDM) [4]. In addition, patients with JDM, but not JPM, present with characteristic rashes (picture 1). Children with JDM and JPM also may have constitutional symptoms (fever, weight loss, fatigue, and headache), which may be the initial finding prior to the onset of muscle weakness and, in patients with JDM, rash.

The clinical presentation of JDM varies and is exemplified by the two following case series. In the first review from a single tertiary Canadian center of 105 patients with JDM (mean age at diagnosis 7.6 years), the most common symptoms/findings and their frequency noted at disease onset were [4]:

Gottron's rash – 91 percent

Heliotrope rash – 83 percent

Malar/facial rash – 42 percent

Nailfold capillary change – 80 percent

Myalgia/arthralgia – 25 percent

Dysphonia or dysphagia – 24 percent

Anorexia – 18 percent

Fever – 16 percent

The second case series is from the JDM Research Registry and included 166 newly diagnosed children living in the continental United States from 1994 to 1999 [11]. The mean age of diagnosis was 7.5±3.8 years, and the median duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis was four months. There was no difference in the age of diagnosis or duration of untreated disease based upon sex or ethnicity. The initial symptoms/findings on presentation were:

Rashes – 65 percent

Weakness alone – 29 percent

Both rash and weakness – 6 percent

Thus, although nearly all patients with JDM develop muscle weakness, the classic rashes are the more common initial finding on presentation. The severity of the weakness increased with the duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis.

Additional findings included:

Lower height and weight compared with normative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES) III survey

Nailfold capillary dilation

Arthritis

Difficulty swallowing

Abdominal pain

Fever

The cutaneous manifestations of JDM may appear in the absence of clinically apparent muscle disease in a small number of children. This presentation is termed amyopathic (or hypomyopathic) JDM. All such children require evaluation by an experienced pediatric rheumatologist, physiotherapist, or pediatric neurologist to assure that they are not, in fact, weak. Children with this presentation may never develop muscle weakness. However, in others, amyopathic JDM may reflect an early phase in the disease course before muscle weakness has developed.

There are fewer data available on the clinical manifestations of JPM since it is a rare disease. In one series of 39 patients diagnosed with JPM, the most common clinical features included [43]:

Proximal muscle weakness – 100 percent

Fatigue – 82 percent

Arthritis or arthralgias – 69 percent

Myalgias – 64 percent

Falling – 60 percent

Weight loss – 54 percent

Fever – 47 percent

Muscle atrophy – 46 percent

Distal muscle weakness – 44 percent

Dysphagia – 41 percent

Abdominal pain – 31 percent

Periungual capillary changes – 31 percent

Raynaud phenomenon – 28 percent

Dysphonia – 24 percent

Palpitations – 23 percent

Patients with periungual capillary changes, Raynaud phenomenon, and gastrointestinal manifestations most likely have overlap syndrome (JPM with features of scleroderma).

Muscle weakness — The inflammatory myopathies are characterized by symmetric muscle weakness that is more apparent proximally than distally (but often presents distally as well). This may present with functional limitations, such as difficulty getting up from the floor, getting into and out of motor vehicles, or climbing stairs. Washing or grooming hair may pose a challenge, and severely affected children may not be able to feed themselves. In very young children, frequent falls may be an important symptom. A Gower's sign (pushing with the hands on the legs, from the knees to hips, to attain an upright position) is frequently present.

Weakness of the palate and cricopharyngeal muscle may result in problems swallowing, a nasal voice, tracheal aspiration, and reflux of food into the nasopharynx. Involvement of the upper esophagus can lead to dysphagia for solids and liquids [44].

Testing of muscle strength is reviewed separately. (See "Juvenile dermatomyositis and other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Diagnosis", section on 'Muscle strength testing'.)

Cutaneous manifestations — Cutaneous manifestations are common in children with JDM and include a characteristic heliotrope rash, Gottron's papules, nailfold capillary changes, and skin ulcerations (picture 2). The rashes may occur simultaneously with muscle involvement or appear prior to obvious muscular weakness. Rash is an important distinguishing feature between JDM and JPM as it is not present in the latter condition. Skin disease may be exacerbated by exposure to sunlight [45]. Skin disease appears to last longer and be more resistant to treatment than muscle disease [46,47]. Calcinosis, a well-recognized complication, is discussed in detail separately. (See "Juvenile dermatomyositis and polymyositis: Treatment, complications, and prognosis", section on 'Calcinosis'.)

Heliotrope rash — Heliotrope dermatitis is a reddish-purple rash on the upper eyelids, often accompanied by swelling of the eyelid (picture 1). Malar and facial erythema may also be present. Heliotrope rash is one of the most common findings in patients with JDM, with a reported rate of 83 percent in the previously mentioned Canadian study and a 94 percent rate in 44 patients from Hungary [4,48]. Periorbital edema, upper lid edema, or telangiectasia of the eyelid capillaries can be seen in 50 to 90 percent of children [49,50].

Gottron's papules — Gottron's papules are an erythematous, papulosquamous eruption over the dorsal surfaces of the knuckles (picture 1). The term "Gottron's sign" is often used if the lesions are not papular. Similar lesions can occur over the extensor aspects of the elbows, knees, and medial malleoli, at times mimicking psoriasis. Gottron's papules are a common feature in patients with JDM, with a reported rate of 91 percent of Canadian and 77 percent of Hungarian patients from the previously mentioned studies [4,48].

Nailfold capillary changes — Nailfold capillary changes, including capillary dilatation, tortuosity, and dropout (loss of capillary loops), as shown in panel C (picture 2), are a frequent sign and are probably present in all patients with JDM at early stages of the disease [51]. The changes may be seen grossly but usually are only apparent under magnification. Nailfold capillaroscopy is reviewed in detail separately. (See "Juvenile dermatomyositis and other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Diagnosis", section on 'Nailfold capillaroscopy'.)

Skin ulcerations — Ulcerative skin disease, as shown in panel E (picture 2), is a serious and potentially life-threatening manifestation of JDM. Ulcers presumably reflect significant vasculopathy in the skin (with tissue hypoxia and necrosis) and may signal vasculopathy in other organs (especially the lungs and gut). Patients with ulcerative lesions have more severe disease and a worse prognosis. (See "Juvenile dermatomyositis and polymyositis: Treatment, complications, and prognosis", section on 'Prognosis'.)

Arthritis — Nonerosive arthralgia and arthritis may be present at the time of diagnosis or during the disease course [3,4,52]. Contractures are sometimes seen but are usually related to muscle inflammation rather than arthritis.

Lipodystrophy — Acquired lipodystrophy, as shown in panel F (picture 2), and associated metabolic abnormalities such as insulin resistance, acanthosis nigricans, and type 2 diabetes are increasingly recognized in patients with JDM [53]:

In a study of 20 patients with JDM, four were found to have lipodystrophy accompanied by either insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes, while an additional eight had glucose and lipid abnormalities without evidence of lipodystrophy [54].

In another study of 20 patients, 13 patients had lipoatrophy based upon subcutaneous fat quantification by skinfold caliper, including eight patients with physical findings of lipodystrophy [55]. Oral glucose tests were normal in all patients, but 12 of 18 patients tested were found to have hypertriglyceridemia.

In a retrospective review, JDM alone or in association with another autoimmune disease (eg, juvenile idiopathic arthritis) was the underlying disease in 18 of 23 children with acquired lipodystrophy. Other findings included acanthosis nigricans (n = 5 patients), hyperpigmentation (n = 5), elevated liver enzymes (n = 5), and hypertension (n =3) [56].

A study, published from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Childhood Myositis Heterogeneity Collaborative Study, showed that lipoatrophy is associated with a more severe and chronic disease course, with a higher frequency of muscle atrophy, joint contractures, calcinosis, metabolic abnormalities, and rashes [53].

Pulmonary involvement — Pulmonary manifestations are much less common in children with JDM or JPM than adults, but interstitial lung disease may occur [43,57]. High serum levels of Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6), anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibodies, and interleukin (IL) 18 are associated with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease [58]. (See 'Immunologic mechanisms' above.)

Gastrointestinal vasculopathy — Gastrointestinal tract involvement is relatively rare in patients with JDM and in patients with JPM and scleroderma features (overlap syndrome) but can be life threatening. Affected patients may present with abdominal pain, pneumatosis intestinalis, gastrointestinal bleeding, or perforation [2,59]. Acute gastrointestinal vasculitis and chronic abdominal endarteropathy have been described in patients with JDM, indicating that the underlying pathology leading to ulceration and perforation of the intestines is complex [60]. (See "Juvenile dermatomyositis and polymyositis: Treatment, complications, and prognosis", section on 'Intestinal perforation'.)

Any patient with JDM experiencing abdominal pain that persists or progresses warrants careful investigation because gastrointestinal vasculopathy may occur late in the disease course or in a patient with only mild myositis. Of note, abdominal radiographs and stool testing for occult blood may be normal in patients with gastrointestinal involvement. The need for further investigation, such as abdominal ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT), must be guided by clinical suspicion for significant gastrointestinal involvement.

Anasarca — Anasarca is an uncommon finding seen in patient with JDM. The presence of anasarca at presentation is a potential poor prognostic sign indicating severe disease that may respond slowly to treatment and may not respond to glucocorticoids alone. The generalized edema may be the result of a diffuse capillary leak resulting from vascular endothelial damage [61]. Subcutaneous edema, conversely, is probably common, although it may fail to be appreciated clinically. It is associated with fascial inflammation, and its presence may predict the development of calcinosis [62].

LABORATORY FINDINGS — Elevated levels of serum muscle enzymes (creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, aldolase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase) indicate muscle damage and are often found in JDM or JPM. (See "Juvenile dermatomyositis and other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Diagnosis", section on 'Measurement of muscle enzymes'.)

Although other blood tests are often performed in patients suspected of having childhood inflammatory myopathy, these studies are often not directly useful in establishing the diagnosis. They include the following:

Complete blood count – Leukocytosis and anemia are uncommon findings at disease onset, with the possible exception of a low hematocrit in a child with significant gastrointestinal bleeding. Lymphopenia may be present in children with JDM and usually resolves after glucocorticoid therapy [63].

Inflammatory markers – Both C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) may be elevated in patients with JDM and JPM [64]. However, these often do not correlate with the degree of inflammation detected clinically and are not useful in making the diagnosis or monitoring disease activity in patients with JDM or JPM.

von Willebrand factor (vWF) – Although several studies have shown that children with active JDM have increased plasma vWF levels [65,66], increased vWF levels are not more specific for active disease than serum muscle enzyme measurements. Blood vessel injury is thought to cause the release of vWF from platelets and endothelial cells, resulting in elevated plasma levels of vWF.

Autoantibodies – Although antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are present in 70 percent of patients with JDM and JPM, a positive ANA is nonspecific and has limited diagnostic value. Testing for myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) is routinely performed at many centers, and commercially available assays are becoming more common and more easily available. (See 'Immunologic mechanisms' above and "Juvenile dermatomyositis and other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Diagnosis", section on 'Antibody testing'.)

HISTOLOGY — The hallmark biopsy finding in JDM is perifascicular atrophy (see 'Immunologic mechanisms' above). Other common findings on light microscopy include centralization of nuclei, degeneration, regeneration, and a scant inflammatory infiltrate. Tubular reticular inclusions are often seen on electron microscopy.

Muscle biopsy specimens from patients with JDM often contain an inflammatory infiltrate. The inflammatory cells are located perivascularly. These scattered inflammatory infiltrates are composed predominantly of monocytes and T cells, but other cells types such as B cells, mast cells, and, rarely, eosinophils are also present [67].

Normal muscle cells do not express class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens, but these antigens are strongly expressed on muscle fibers in patients with JDM [68]. MHC class I overexpression is an early event in JDM and may occur in the absence of lymphocytic infiltration and muscle damage.

In one study, the degree of inflammation on biopsy (as measured using a standardized scoring method) predicted the development of calcinosis [69].

SUMMARY — Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) and juvenile polymyositis (JPM) are rare autoimmune myopathies affecting children.

JDM is the most common of these disorders, accounting for 85 percent of cases, with a reported incidence that ranges from two to four cases per million children. (See 'Epidemiology' above.)

Although the etiology of JDM and JPM remains unclear, it is suspected that these disorders are caused by an autoimmune reaction within the small blood vessels and/or the muscle tissue of genetically susceptible individuals, in whom the innate immune system is activated, possibly in response to infection or environmental triggers. (See 'Pathogenesis' above.)

Symmetrical proximal muscle weakness is the most striking clinical feature of these two disorders. In addition, heliotrope rash (reddish-purple rash on the upper eyelids, often accompanied by swelling of the eyelid) (picture 1) and Gottron's papules (erythematous, papulosquamous eruption over the dorsal surfaces of the knuckles) (picture 1) are characteristic rashes of JDM. Children with JDM and JPM may also have constitutional symptoms (fever, weight loss, fatigue, and headache), which may appear prior to the onset of muscle weakness and rash (in patients with JDM).

Other clinical manifestations of JDM include nailfold capillary changes, skin ulcerations, calcinosis (soft tissue calcification), nonerosive arthralgia and arthritis, lipodystrophy, and insulin resistance (picture 2). Interstitial lung disease, when it occurs, may be severe. Gastrointestinal vasculopathy is a relative rare but life-threatening manifestation that may present as abdominal pain, pneumatosis intestinalis, gastrointestinal bleeding, or perforation. (See 'Clinical manifestations' above.)

  1. Arahata K, Engel AG. Monoclonal antibody analysis of mononuclear cells in myopathies. I: Quantitation of subsets according to diagnosis and sites of accumulation and demonstration and counts of muscle fibers invaded by T cells. Ann Neurol 1984; 16:193.
  2. Banker BQ, Victor M. Dermatomyositis (systemic angiopathy) of childhood. Medicine (Baltimore) 1966; 45:261.
  3. McCann LJ, Juggins AD, Maillard SM, et al. The Juvenile Dermatomyositis National Registry and Repository (UK and Ireland)--clinical characteristics of children recruited within the first 5 yr. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006; 45:1255.
  4. Ramanan AV, Feldman BM. Clinical features and outcomes of juvenile dermatomyositis and other childhood onset myositis syndromes. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2002; 28:833.
  5. Oddis CV, Conte CG, Steen VD, Medsger TA Jr. Incidence of polymyositis-dermatomyositis: a 20-year study of hospital diagnosed cases in Allegheny County, PA 1963-1982. J Rheumatol 1990; 17:1329.
  6. Pelkonen PM, Jalanko HJ, Lantto RK, et al. Incidence of systemic connective tissue diseases in children: a nationwide prospective study in Finland. J Rheumatol 1994; 21:2143.
  7. Symmons DP, Sills JA, Davis SM. The incidence of juvenile dermatomyositis: results from a nation-wide study. Br J Rheumatol 1995; 34:732.
  8. Mendez EP, Lipton R, Ramsey-Goldman R, et al. US incidence of juvenile dermatomyositis, 1995-1998: results from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Registry. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49:300.
  9. Gardner-Medwin JM, Dolezalova P, Cummins C, Southwood TR. Incidence of Henoch-Schönlein purpura, Kawasaki disease, and rare vasculitides in children of different ethnic origins. Lancet 2002; 360:1197.
  10. Moegle C, Severac F, Lipsker D. Epidemiology of juvenile dermatomyositis in Alsace. Br J Dermatol 2020; 182:1307.
  11. Pachman LM, Abbott K, Sinacore JM, et al. Duration of illness is an important variable for untreated children with juvenile dermatomyositis. J Pediatr 2006; 148:247.
  12. Orione MA, Silva CA, Sallum AM, et al. Risk factors for juvenile dermatomyositis: exposure to tobacco and air pollutants during pregnancy. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014; 66:1571.
  13. De Paepe B. Vascular changes and perifascicular muscle fiber damage in dermatomyositis: another question of the chicken or the egg that is on our mind. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5:22.
  14. Harati Y, Niakan E, Bergman EW. Childhood dermatomyositis in monozygotic twins. Neurology 1986; 36:721.
  15. LEONHARDT T. Familial occurrence of collagen diseases. II. Progressive systemic sclerosis and dermatomyositis. Acta Med Scand 1961; 169:735.
  16. Miller FW, Chen W, O'Hanlon TP, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies HLA 8.1 ancestral haplotype alleles as major genetic risk factors for myositis phenotypes. Genes Immun 2015; 16:470.
  17. Pachman LM, Liotta-Davis MR, Hong DK, et al. TNFalpha-308A allele in juvenile dermatomyositis: association with increased production of tumor necrosis factor alpha, disease duration, and pathologic calcifications. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43:2368.
  18. Rider LG, Artlett CM, Foster CB, et al. Polymorphisms in the IL-1 receptor antagonist gene VNTR are possible risk factors for juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Clin Exp Immunol 2000; 121:47.
  19. Mamyrova G, O'Hanlon TP, Sillers L, et al. Cytokine gene polymorphisms as risk and severity factors for juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58:3941.
  20. Niewold TB, Wu SC, Smith M, et al. Familial aggregation of autoimmune disease in juvenile dermatomyositis. Pediatrics 2011; 127:e1239.
  21. Massa M, Costouros N, Mazzoli F, et al. Self epitopes shared between human skeletal myosin and Streptococcus pyogenes M5 protein are targets of immune responses in active juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46:3015.
  22. Shrestha S, Wershil B, Sarwark JF, et al. Lesional and nonlesional skin from patients with untreated juvenile dermatomyositis displays increased numbers of mast cells and mature plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62:2813.
  23. Pachman LM. Inflammatory myopathy in children. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1994; 20:919.
  24. Gunawardena H, Wedderburn LR, North J, et al. Clinical associations of autoantibodies to a p155/140 kDa doublet protein in juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 47:324.
  25. Yasin SA, Schutz PW, Deakin CT, et al. Histological heterogeneity in a large clinical cohort of juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: analysis by myositis autoantibody and pathological features. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2019; 45:495.
  26. Kobayashi I, Okura Y, Yamada M, et al. Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody is a diagnostic and predictive marker for interstitial lung diseases associated with juvenile dermatomyositis. J Pediatr 2011; 158:675.
  27. Artlett CM, Ramos R, Jiminez SA, et al. Chimeric cells of maternal origin in juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Childhood Myositis Heterogeneity Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000; 356:2155.
  28. Reed AM, Picornell YJ, Harwood A, Kredich DW. Chimerism in children with juvenile dermatomyositis. Lancet 2000; 356:2156.
  29. Elst EF, Klein M, de Jager W, et al. Hsp60 in inflamed muscle tissue is the target of regulatory autoreactive T cells in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58:547.
  30. Tezak Z, Hoffman EP, Lutz JL, et al. Gene expression profiling in DQA1*0501+ children with untreated dermatomyositis: a novel model of pathogenesis. J Immunol 2002; 168:4154.
  31. Balboni I, Niewold TB, Morgan G, et al. Interferon-α induction and detection of anti-ro, anti-la, anti-sm, and anti-rnp autoantibodies by autoantigen microarray analysis in juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65:2424.
  32. Moneta GM, Pires Marafon D, Marasco E, et al. Muscle Expression of Type I and Type II Interferons Is Increased in Juvenile Dermatomyositis and Related to Clinical and Histologic Features. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019; 71:1011.
  33. Musumeci G, Castrogiovanni P, Barbagallo I, et al. Expression of the OAS Gene Family Is Highly Modulated in Subjects Affected by Juvenile Dermatomyositis, Resembling an Immune Response to a dsRNA Virus Infection. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19.
  34. Lahoria R, Selcen D, Engel AG. Microvascular alterations and the role of complement in dermatomyositis. Brain 2016; 139:1891.
  35. Christensen ML, Pachman LM, Schneiderman R, et al. Prevalence of Coxsackie B virus antibodies in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29:1365.
  36. Tang TT, Sedmak GV, Siegesmund KA, McCreadie SR. Chronic myopathy associated with coxsackievirus type A9. A combined electron microscopical and viral isolation study. N Engl J Med 1975; 292:608.
  37. Webster AD, Tripp JH, Hayward AR, et al. Echovirus encephalitis and myositis in primary immunoglobulin deficiency. Arch Dis Child 1978; 53:33.
  38. Pachman LM, Hayford JR, Hochberg MC. Seasonal onset in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDMS): an epidemiological study. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35:S88.
  39. Pachman LM, Lipton R, Ramsey-Goldman R, et al. History of infection before the onset of juvenile dermatomyositis: results from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research Registry. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53:166.
  40. Manlhiot C, Liang L, Tran D, et al. Assessment of an infectious disease history preceding juvenile dermatomyositis symptom onset. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 47:526.
  41. Pachman LM, Hayford JR, Hochberg MC, et al. New-onset juvenile dermatomyositis: comparisons with a healthy cohort and children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40:1526.
  42. Pachman LM, Litt DL, Rowley AH, et al. Lack of detection of enteroviral RNA or bacterial DNA in magnetic resonance imaging-directed muscle biopsies from twenty children with active untreated juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38:1513.
  43. Mamyrova G, Katz JD, Jones RV, et al. Clinical and laboratory features distinguishing juvenile polymyositis and muscular dystrophy. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013; 65:1969.
  44. McCann LJ, Garay SM, Ryan MM, et al. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM): an evaluation of videofluoroscopy swallow study (VFSS) changes in relation to clinical symptoms and objective muscle scores. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46:1363.
  45. Dugan EM, Huber AM, Miller FW, et al. Photoessay of the cutaneous manifestations of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Dermatol Online J 2009; 15:1.
  46. Wang A, Morgan GA, Paller AS, Pachman LM. Skin disease is more recalcitrant than muscle disease: A long-term prospective study of 184 children with juvenile dermatomyositis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 84:1610.
  47. Lim LS, Pullenayegum E, Moineddin R, et al. Methods for analyzing observational longitudinal prognosis studies for rheumatic diseases: a review & worked example using a clinic-based cohort of juvenile dermatomyositis patients. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2017; 15:18.
  48. Constantin T, Ponyi A, Orbán I, et al. National registry of patients with juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in Hungary--clinical characteristics and disease course of 44 patients with juvenile dermatomyositis. Autoimmunity 2006; 39:223.
  49. Akikusa JD, Tennankore DK, Levin AV, Feldman BM. Eye findings in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol 2005; 32:1986.
  50. COOK CD, ROSEN FS, BANKER BQ. DERMATOMYOSITIS AND FOCAL SCLERODERMA. Pediatr Clin North Am 1963; 10:979.
  51. Schmeling H, Stephens S, Goia C, et al. Nailfold capillary density is importantly associated over time with muscle and skin disease activity in juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011; 50:885.
  52. Tse S, Lubelsky S, Gordon M, et al. The arthritis of inflammatory childhood myositis syndromes. J Rheumatol 2001; 28:192.
  53. Bingham A, Mamyrova G, Rother KI, et al. Predictors of acquired lipodystrophy in juvenile-onset dermatomyositis and a gradient of severity. Medicine (Baltimore) 2008; 87:70.
  54. Huemer C, Kitson H, Malleson PN, et al. Lipodystrophy in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis--evaluation of clinical and metabolic abnormalities. J Rheumatol 2001; 28:610.
  55. Verma S, Singh S, Bhalla AK, Khullar M. Study of subcutaneous fat in children with juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 55:564.
  56. Pope E, Janson A, Khambalia A, Feldman B. Childhood acquired lipodystrophy: a retrospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55:947.
  57. Kobayashi I, Yamada M, Takahashi Y, et al. Interstitial lung disease associated with juvenile dermatomyositis: clinical features and efficacy of cyclosporin A. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42:371.
  58. Kobayashi N, Takezaki S, Kobayashi I, et al. Clinical and laboratory features of fatal rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease associated with juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015; 54:784.
  59. Downey EC Jr, Woolley MM, Hanson V. Required surgical therapy in the pediatric patient with dermatomyositis. Arch Surg 1988; 123:1117.
  60. Mamyrova G, Kleiner DE, James-Newton L, et al. Late-onset gastrointestinal pain in juvenile dermatomyositis as a manifestation of ischemic ulceration from chronic endarteropathy. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57:881.
  61. Mitchell JP, Dennis GJ, Rider LG. Juvenile dermatomyositis presenting with anasarca: A possible indicator of severe disease activity. J Pediatr 2001; 138:942.
  62. Kimball AB, Summers RM, Turner M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging detection of occult skin and subcutaneous abnormalities in juvenile dermatomyositis. Implications for diagnosis and therapy. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43:1866.
  63. Brown VE, Pilkington CA, Feldman BM, et al. An international consensus survey of the diagnostic criteria for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006; 45:990.
  64. Haas RH, Dyck RF, Dubowitz V, Pepys MB. C-reactive protein in childhood dermatomyositis. Ann Rheum Dis 1982; 41:483.
  65. Guzmán J, Petty RE, Malleson PN. Monitoring disease activity in juvenile dermatomyositis: the role of von Willebrand factor and muscle enzymes. J Rheumatol 1994; 21:739.
  66. Bloom BJ, Tucker LB, Miller LC, Schaller JG. von Willebrand factor in juvenile dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol 1995; 22:320.
  67. Wedderburn LR, Varsani H, Li CK, et al. International consensus on a proposed score system for muscle biopsy evaluation in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis: a tool for potential use in clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57:1192.
  68. Li CK, Varsani H, Holton JL, et al. MHC Class I overexpression on muscles in early juvenile dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol 2004; 31:605.
  69. Sag E, Demir S, Bilginer Y, et al. Clinical features, muscle biopsy scores, myositis specific antibody profiles and outcome in juvenile dermatomyositis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2021; 51:95.
Topic 6419 Version 20.0

References