Your activity: 6 p.v.

Epidemiology of foster care placement and overview of the foster care system in the United States

Epidemiology of foster care placement and overview of the foster care system in the United States
Authors:
Moira A Szilagyi, MD, PhD
Sandra H Jee, MD, MPH
Section Editors:
Marilyn Augustyn, MD
Sanghamitra M Misra, MD, MEd
Deputy Editor:
Mary M Torchia, MD
Literature review current through: Dec 2022. | This topic last updated: Jun 24, 2021.

INTRODUCTION — Children and adolescents who spend time in foster care have been exposed to multiple adverse childhood experiences and trauma. This is also true for other children whose families are involved with the child welfare system and children living away from their parents in informal placements with relatives.

An understanding of the structure, goals, and mandates of the foster care system, as well as the unique health, mental health, developmental, and educational problems of children and adolescents in foster care, facilitates provision of appropriate comprehensive care to this vulnerable population [1,2]. In particular, health providers need to understand and be able to educate other professionals and caregivers about the impact of early childhood adversity and trauma on emotional, behavioral, and developmental health. (See "Comprehensive health care for children in foster care", section on 'Complex childhood trauma and toxic stress'.)

The epidemiology of foster care placement and an overview of the structure, goals, and mandates of the foster care system will be discussed here. The health, mental health, developmental, and educational needs of children in the foster care system are discussed separately. (See "Comprehensive health care for children in foster care".)

BACKGROUND — Involvement with child welfare usually begins when a mandated reporter or other citizen makes a report to child protective services for concerns of child abuse or neglect. Of the 4.4 million families reported in 2019 in the United States, approximately 60 percent were investigated for child maltreatment and approximately 16 percent of these families, involving approximately 673,000 children, have allegations of maltreatment founded [3]. Whether or not allegations are founded, most families remain intact and are referred to a variety of preventive services.

Removal of children occurs when child protective services affirms that the child is at imminent risk of harm if they remain in the home. Child welfare has to substantiate the reasons for removal to the court system within 72 hours to keep the child in placement. Approximately 250,000 children were removed from their families and placed in foster care in 2019 [4].

Children who are placed in foster care must be placed in the least restrictive setting that meets their needs, which is usually family foster care. Some communities place children in shelters pending availability of a family. Approximately one-third of children are placed with relative or kin, while the majority are placed in nonrelative foster care. Oversight by the court and case management by child welfare continue until discharge from foster care by the court.

Children and adolescents who are placed in foster care have usually suffered childhood trauma from a variety of accumulated adverse childhood experiences. Placement in foster care is intended to be a temporary arrangement during which the health and safety of children are protected while the birth parents are provided with services that support reunification with their children.

Foster care is mandated to seek timely permanency for children in its care, either through reunification with family, placement with relatives, or adoption. If independent living is a realistic goal for an adolescent, foster care is mandated to provide services that nurture the adolescent toward independent adult living.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Number of children in foster care — The exact numbers of children in foster care are difficult to determine. In the United States, approximately 424,000 resided in foster care on any given day in 2019 [4]. A study using data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System and synthetic cohort life tables (2000 through 2011) estimated that approximately 6 percent of children in the United States were placed in foster care at some point between birth and 18 years of age [5]. During the same time period, annual foster care placement numbers decreased by approximately 25 percent, but child abuse referrals increased and the number of children and adolescents classified as emotionally disturbed almost doubled [6]. Although overall numbers of children in foster care declined, the greatest decline was in African American children. From 2009 to 2019, the percentages of Black children entering foster care decreased from 25 to 21 percent, while the percentages of White, Hispanic, and multiracial children entering foster care increased [7].

Between 2000 and 2017, the number and proportion of foster care placements attributed to parental drug use steadily increased (from 39,130 to 96,672 and 14.5 to 36.3 percent, respectively) [8]. There was also a surge in unaccompanied refugee minors in 2014 to 2016, mostly from Mexico and Central America [9]. Most states have a Safe Haven Law, which allows anonymous surrender of unwanted newborns [10].

Although no national database tracks legally surrendered or illegally abandoned newborns and infants, in a cross-sectional study from a large urban county, more than one-half of safely surrendered infants had medical issues, suggesting the need for increased monitoring and access to medical and social services [11].

Reason for placement — Almost all children and adolescents in foster care are placed involuntarily by court order for reasons of abuse or neglect, abandonment, or because they are "persons (or children) in need of supervision" (PINS or CHINS) or juvenile delinquents (JD) [3,12]. In 2019, 251,359 children were admitted to foster care [4].

Among children admitted to foster care who were maltreated in the United States during 2019, the various types of maltreatment occurred with the following frequencies [4]:

Neglect – 63 percent

Drug abuse of parent – 34 percent

Caregiver inability to cope – 14 percent

Physical abuse – 13 percent

Child behavior problems – 8 percent

Inadequate housing – 10 percent

Parent incarceration – 7 percent

Alcohol abuse by parent – 5 percent

Abandonment – 5 percent

Sexual abuse – 4 percent

Other (child substance abuse, child disability, relinquishment, parent death) – 6 percent

Less than 1 percent of children are voluntarily placed in foster care because of parent request or child complex chronic illness. Some parents continue to seek placement for children and adolescents with serious mental health or behavioral problems when parents have exhausted their health insurance benefits for their mental health care [13]. Birth parents who place their children voluntarily retain the right to terminate the placement at any time with written notice [14].

Risk factors — Parents of children entering foster care have a high burden of mental illness, substance abuse, family violence, and impaired parenting skills [15-17]. In the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being, more than 80 percent of the birth parents/caregivers were reported to have significantly impaired parenting skills by the investigating child protective caseworker [17]. The parents' problems are often rooted in personal experience of childhood trauma, adversity, or loss; approximately one-third report that they were a victim of child maltreatment.

Poverty is a major predictor for foster care placement [18]; other contributing factors include [1,2,15,18,19]:

Homelessness

Parental involvement in criminal activity

Parent severe/chronic physical illness

Lack of social supports

Single parent

Parent with limited education

Parent with cognitive impairment

Parent substance use disorder

Parent mental health problems

Domestic violence

Age and sex — Approximately 37 percent of children in foster care are younger than five years of age, and another 30 percent are adolescents [4]. The numbers of males and females in foster care are approximately equal.

Race/ethnicity — Children of color and children from underrepresented groups are disproportionately represented [4]. Black or African American children, who account for approximately 15 percent of the general population, are overrepresented in foster care (23 percent in 2019). Despite a relatively larger reduction in the percentage of Black or African American children in care compared with other racial/ethnic groups, concern persists that the overrepresentation of Black or African American children in foster care results from bias in decision-making during child protective investigation, with relatively more children from underrepresented groups removed from their families than White non-Hispanic children, despite similar risk factors.

Length of stay — The average length of stay in foster care is approximately 20 months [4]. Data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System indicate that 46 percent of children who exited foster care during 2019 spent <12 months in foster care, but 27 percent spent ≥24 months, and 5 percent spent ≥5 years [4].

Children of color, older children, and children with significant behavioral problems or developmental disabilities are twice as likely to remain in foster care [1]. Length of stay is inversely related to the birth family's abilities to meet their obligations as set out in the child welfare permanency plan.

Placement changes — In the Northwest Foster Care Alumni Study, which surveyed 479 foster care alumni at an average age of 24.2 years, the mean placement change rate was 1.4 per year [20]. The same factors that predict longer stays in foster care (children from underrepresented groups, older children, children with significant developmental or behavioral problems) also predict more placement changes or greater placement instability. However, placement changes are also affected by child welfare administrative decisions and by child behavior problems. Increased length of stay in foster care is an independent predictor of decreased likelihood of reunification and increased placement instability [21]. Children in kinship care have more stable placements but longer lengths of stay [22].

OVERVIEW OF THE FOSTER CARE SYSTEM — The foster care system in the United States is complex. Caseloads are high, and worker training and education is often inadequate to the complexity of the tasks for which they are responsible [1]. The legal and regulatory framework designed to protect children and families and improve their outcomes is challenging to navigate. Courts have oversight, and there are multiple attorneys and advocates representing child welfare, parents, and children in each case. The federal government determines the patterns of funding and regulatory guidelines, whereas state agencies determine the structure and implementation of programs [1]. At the local level, the day-to-day foster care operations can be managed by private foster care agencies or public child welfare agencies, or a combination of public-private partnership. Foster care agencies, whether public or private, have five main tasks [23]:

To establish and maintain a system of substitute care for children who have been removed from their parents.

To help children adjust to substitute care and to monitor their progress while in the substitute care setting.

To provide services to birth parents that will increase the likelihood of reunification. This includes visitation, which maintains and improves the parent-child relationship while protecting the child's safety.

To make a "diligent effort" toward establishing a permanent home for children in foster/kinship care through reunification with family, placement with relatives, or adoption. (See 'Foster care legislation' below.)

To prepare adolescents for independent adult living when reunification, adoption, kinship care, or guardianship are not possible.

Foster care legislation — Legislation provides the foundation for the regulatory framework developed by the states to manage and guide their child welfare agencies. States are sometimes sued when they fail to meet the requirements set forth in legislation, and a number of states are operating under consent decrees to redesign their systems of care to better meet the needs of children as a result of those lawsuits.

The major federal laws that regulate foster care in the United States include [24]:

The Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 – The Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-272) mandated states to develop a permanency plan for each child within 18 to 24 months of entry into the foster care system [25]. This law was, in part, a response to a 1977 survey showing that more than 100,000 children had been in foster care for longer than six years without a permanent family resource identified [26].

Public Law 96-272 requires agencies to implement an accountability system to safeguard the rights of all involved parties [14,27]:

Agencies must make "diligent efforts" to prevent placement and keep the family intact before a child is placed in foster care.

Written case plans must document that the placement has been made in the least restrictive setting, in the child's best interests, and close to the parents' home.

Case reviews must be conducted every six months to assess compliance with the case management plan, the appropriateness of the current plan, and a projected date for termination of foster care. Natural parents must be notified of case reviews and invited to attend.

A dispositional court hearing must be held no later than 18 months after the child enters foster care.

The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 – The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (ASFA, PL-105-89) was a response to what was viewed at the time to be an over-emphasis on birth parents' rights to the exclusion of what was in the best interests of children (permanency in a family setting). ASFA refocused the foster care system on the rights of children to health, safety, and permanency [28]. It mandated that a permanency plan must be made no later than 12 months after the child's entry into care and that states begin termination of parental rights once a child had been in foster care for 15 of the previous 22 months as long as there was no compelling reason not to do so. It also provided increased adoption subsidies.

The Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008 (PL 110-351) – This major overhaul of the child welfare system has several major provisions:

Provides states the opportunity to extend guardianship assistance to support kinship caregivers in cases where children in foster care are unlikely to be adopted or reunify with their parents

Requires states to make reasonable efforts to place siblings together or provide for frequent sibling visitation

Requires states to notify adult relatives of a child within 30 days of a child's removal from their parent

Allows states to claim federal reimbursement for foster care board subsidy for youth through 21 years of age who are in a supervised independent living setting and requires development of a transition plan within 90 days of emancipation from foster care

Requires states to address educational stability and ensure enrollment of all school-age children in school

Requires states to develop a plan for oversight and coordination of health care services for children in foster care, including access to a medical home, and requires states to engage pediatricians in development of such plans

Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act (PL 112-34) required, among other things:

Each state plan for oversight and coordination of health care services for any child in foster care to include an outline of:

-The monitoring and treatment of emotional trauma associated with a child's maltreatment and removal from home

-Protocols for the appropriate use and monitoring of psychotropic medications

Each state plan for child welfare services to describe:

-Activities to reduce the length of time children under age five are without a permanent family

-Activities to address the developmental needs of such children who receive benefits or services

The Families First Services and Prevention Act (HR 1892) of 2018 – The Families First Services and Prevention Act emphasizes the importance of children growing up in families, maintaining children in their family of origin, and rearing children who are removed from their family in a family-like setting unless there are unique special health care needs for which a higher level of care is needed.

The Families First Services and Prevention Act:

Enables states to use Title-V E foster care funds to provide families with evidence-based services to prevent family disruption, including home-based mental health and substance abuse services. Although initial services are limited to a duration of 12 months, families can receive these services more than once.

Removes outdated income restrictions, increasing the number of families eligible for preventive services.

Establishes the first federal guidelines for residential treatment facilities, including evaluation of need, support for parenting education to facilitate reunification, required use of trauma-informed services, and individual and family counseling services.

However, the Families First Services and Prevention Act did not address foster parent recruitment and training to correct the shortage of foster homes willing to care for adolescents.

Foster care personnel — Each family involved with the foster care system is assigned a caseworker who has several tasks [1]:

Make a "diligent effort" to help parents access a variety of educational, service, and community resources needed for them to achieve safe reunification (eg, counseling, drug rehabilitation, housing)

Supervise the care provided by the foster parent and help to coordinate the educational, developmental, medical, and mental health services for the child

Ensure that visitation is of a frequency and quality to maintain and support the birth parent-child relationship while ensuring the child's safety

Support foster parents through the process of caring for the child in an uncertain world

Document the progress of the child and family for the court

Concurrently plan for reunification, placement with a relative, or adoption in order to facilitate timely permanency

The ability of caseworkers to accomplish these demanding, and sometimes conflicting, tasks is limited by lack of availability of specialized services for birth parents and children, lack of adequate and appropriate training and education, and large caseloads [1,14]. Child welfare is, however, structured so that caseworkers are mentored and supervised by more senior experienced personnel.

In addition to the caseworker, children in the foster care system may be appointed a law guardian (also called a "guardian ad litem"). This professional is often an attorney but may be a layperson in some states. The law guardian is designated to be the child's voice in court, although many law guardians may not have met the child before appearing in court on the child's behalf. Occasionally, the court also may appoint a special advocate (court-appointed special advocate, or CASA) who represents the interests of the child in court; the CASA is a trained volunteer, not an attorney.

The birth parents and the foster care agency also have legal representation in court.

Court is by design an adversarial process compared with the movement in child welfare toward shared parenting and building relationships between resources and birth parents in the best interests of the child.

Types of placement — The site of placement is determined by the child's needs and is supposed to be in the least restrictive environment. The options include foster care homes, kinship care homes, specialized or therapeutic foster homes, and residential or group home facilities. The optimal placement is within a well-supported family where the foster- or kinship-care parents have received training related to child development, behavior, parenting, and the impact of childhood trauma.

Foster care home – Foster parenting is a voluntary program that is heavily dependent upon the good intentions and abilities of altruistic laypeople. Foster parents usually are motivated by love of children, religious conviction, altruism, or personal need [1]. They typically are married, have raised their own children, and have middle or lower-middle incomes [1,15]. Most foster parents care for more than one child in foster care; state laws set the maximum number of children in foster homes, depending upon their ages, from four to six [1]. An unknown percentage of foster parents choose the foster-to-adopt pathway in hopes of being able to adopt children placed in their home.

Foster parents typically receive limited training and minimal continuing education. Training briefly covers child development, managing behavior problems, discipline, safety, the impact of child abuse and neglect, childhood trauma, and the foster parents' relationship with the foster care agency and birth parents. Caseworkers, who may have no more than some college education, are expected to provide ongoing support and advice but frequently lack expertise about child development, behavior, parenting, and the impact of childhood trauma. The annual recertification required for foster parents is less intense than the initial certification process [1].

While foster parents receive a foster care board subsidy for the care they provide, the amount of reimbursement varies from state to state. Although the board subsidy should be adjusted depending upon the age of the child and the anticipated complexity of care, average basic monthly stipends for children without complex medical needs range widely [29]. The stipend is expected to cover the cost of food, shelter, personal needs, recreation, transportation, and education for the child. Some states provide an additional allowance for clothing [1]. The cost of medical care usually is paid by state Medicaid programs. In most states, on average, foster parents subsidize approximately 33 percent of the true cost of caring for a foster child [29].

Kinship care – Kinship care is a term that encompasses relatives who have become certified foster parents as well as relatives and friends who care for children placed with them by the court as a result of child protective investigation but choose not to enroll in the certification process. The largest group of children living with adults who are not their parents reside in informal kinship care, most without ever being involved with child welfare or the courts. Until the passage of Fostering Connections in 2008, states usually did not provide subsidies for kinship families who were not certified foster parents.

It is estimated that there are approximately four to eight times as many children living in informal kinship care as in foster care, and that kinship caregivers are older, poorer, and have more health problems than the average foster parent [30-32]. There has been a substantial increase in the use of kinship homes so that, in some communities, nearly one-half of the foster homes are kinship homes [19]. Overall, placement with a relative occurs in approximately 30 percent of official foster care placements [4].

Placement in kinship care is advantageous in maintaining the child's belonging in the larger family of origin and is less likely to be a disruptive transition since children are likely to have had a pre-existing relationship with the kin caregiver. Kinship placements are also more stable for children over time than foster care placements, and caregivers report fewer behavioral problems than unrelated foster caregivers [22,31,33]. However, children in kinship care are less likely to receive needed health services, have more unsupervised contact with birth parents, stay in foster care longer, and have less contact with agency social workers than those in traditional foster care [24,34,35].

The American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care states that placement of a child in kinship care be "based on a careful assessment of the needs of the child and of the ability of the kinship care to meet those needs. As with all foster care placements, kinship care must be supervised adequately" [35].

Specialized or therapeutic foster homes – Specialized or therapeutic foster homes are those in which foster parents have extra training and education and/or provide care for children with special health care needs (eg, emotional disturbances, chronic medical illness, major developmental disabilities). A few successful therapeutic foster parenting models have been developed in which foster parents receive detailed education and training and ongoing support from a mental health specialist in managing a child or teen with significant mental health problems [36,37]. Unfortunately, in most localities, the term "therapeutic" is applied more loosely, and foster parents may not receive the level of training, support, and supervision necessary to help children heal [38,39]. With few exceptions, the outcomes for children placed in these treatment homes have not been studied rigorously [39].

Residential or group homes – Approximately 12 percent of children in foster care live in group homes or residential treatment facilities [4]; most of these children are ≥12 years of age [40]. In general, these "congregate care facilities" care for older children and adolescents with significant mental health or behavioral problems. Professional supervision is available on site to trained staff, and most states have detailed regulations covering health and safety. The Families First Services and Prevention Act of 2018 provides federal guidance for residential treatment, the highest level of group care.

Residential treatment facilities are intended to provide time-limited placement for diagnosis and treatment, but care often becomes extended for adolescents with major mental health issues [1]. Because children require a continuous, nurturing caregiver for optimal emotional and cognitive development, facilities with rotating staff may not be in their best interests. Given the lack of data regarding the impact of group care on outcomes, group care should be reserved for extreme situations.

The Families First Services and Prevention Act did not address foster parent recruitment and training to correct the shortage of foster homes willing to care for adolescents. The shortage of foster parents, especially in large urban settings, has led to an increased use of "shelters" (ie, short-term, emergency housing pending longer term placement) when children are removed from their parents. Even with state regulations limiting the duration of such placements, agencies are often forced to maintain children in these groups care facilities for longer periods as they search for a family home setting.

Birth parents — Birth parents retain legal guardianship of their children and are expected to cooperate with the child welfare agency in designing and implementing the service plan that will permit reunification with their children [19]. Most birth parents, however, have multiple challenges, including their own mental health and/or substance abuse issues. At least 10 percent of birth parents are cognitively delayed, and few experienced a normal, predictable upbringing themselves. Approximately 33 percent of birth parents have a history of childhood abuse and neglect [41].

Many birth parents require a range of services (mental health, substance abuse treatment, housing, job training, parenting skills training), not all of which may be available in their communities or in appropriate settings. Parenting skills training, in particular, often occurs in a classroom, in isolation from their children, when one-to-one mentoring during visitation may be more beneficial.

Visitation — Visitation is a mandatory component of foster care and is the single best predictor of reunification [42]. Visits are intended to maintain and improve the quality of the child-parent relationship. They provide the child welfare agency with an opportunity to monitor parent compliance with the case management plan and to evaluate parent-child interactions [35]. Visits also provide an opportunity to offer trauma-informed mental health services, such as parent-child interaction therapy or child-parent psychotherapy, which have been associated with improved outcomes [43].

However, visitation is stressful for all involved parties; children may react to parental visits with an increase in behavioral problems even when the visits are going well and are desirable to the child [14,19,44]. Children in foster care worry about their parents, and the separation at the end of each visit may evoke intense fear in the child. Conflict between the foster parent and birth parent, differences in parenting styles, erratic parental compliance, and unrealistic expectations regarding the quality or outcome of the visits may create confusion, anxiety, or anger in children. Occasionally, birth parents engage in subtle or provocative behaviors that remind children of prior trauma.

Visitation supervisors must be alert to safety issues, including emotional safety issues, for children. Foster parents can help the children in their care by preparing them for visits with their birth parent(s) and assuring them that the foster parents will be there to greet them after the visit [22]. Rescheduling visits that significantly disrupt the child's routines can improve the quality of the visits. Visits that are scheduled during a child's usual nap-time, that conflict with a child or teen's favorite activity, or disrupt the school day should be rescheduled.

Involving the child's therapist in the visits, changing the setting, or increasing the level of supervision may be required [14]. In rare circumstances, suspension of visits with parents may be necessary (eg, if the parent behaves in ways that traumatize the child, or if there is no realistic chance that the parent will be able to care for the child in the future) [14].

Although the preferred practice is for agencies to hire and train child welfare professionals to support birth parents and children through visitation, some agencies rely on foster or kinship caregivers to monitor or supervise visits if child welfare professionals are not available. Caregivers may identify concerns about the behavior of the birth parent but feel constrained in reporting because of concern about the impact on their relationship with the birth parent or that the birth parent will request a placement change.

Termination of parental rights — The birth parents may lose their parental rights through voluntary surrender or through a legal process called "termination of parental rights."

Voluntary surrender of parental rights is infrequent. However, occasionally a birth parent makes the difficult decision that adoption is in the best interest of their child and voluntarily surrenders their rights. Voluntary surrender is often accompanied by an "open adoption" in which the child may maintain some ongoing contact with the birth parent.

More often, involuntary termination of parental rights occurs by court order [1]. Parental rights may be involuntarily terminated for a number of reasons [14]:

Birth parent(s) have made little progress in improving the home situation despite "diligent efforts" on the part of the case worker

Birth parent(s) have not visited regularly for the previous six months

Birth parent(s) fail to "substantially maintain contact with the child or to plan for their future, although physically and financially able to do so"

Birth parent(s) are unable to provide adequate and safe care by reason of mental illness, intellectual disability, or other impairment

OUTCOMES OF FOSTER CARE — The outcomes of foster care placement are as follows [1,15]:

The majority of children are returned to a parent or relative (approximately 47 and 6 percent, respectively).

Of children who are reunited with their families, 20 to 30 percent reenter the foster care system within 12 months of reunification.

Approximately 25 percent are adopted out of foster care annually. Of those who were adopted in 2019, 52 percent were adopted by their foster parent and 36 percent by a relative [4].

Approximately 8 percent age out of the foster care system annually. While youth can emancipate from foster care on their 18th birthday, all but one state now enable young adults to remain in foster care until their 21st birthday as long as they are in job training, employed, or in school [45].

In observational studies, emancipation from the child welfare system is associated with poor outcomes, including increased risk of pregnancy before age 21 years [46] and homelessness for at least one day [20].

The 2010 Affordable Care Act enabled the extension of Medicaid coverage until age 26 years for youth who age out of foster care. Over 40 percent of states have used the Chafee Option or plan to use the option to extend Medicaid. Coverage for those who move out of state after age 18 years varies from state to state, but federal law will enable all states to provide coverage to youth alumni who move across state lines beginning in 2023 [47,48].

Approximately 3 percent of youth continue in state guardianship beyond foster care because they are intellectually or physically disabled and deemed unable to care for themselves. At age 18 to 21 years, they are transferred from foster care to state guardianship and receive care in a group home or residential facility.

During the course of any year, under 1 percent of youth run away from their foster care placement. These adolescents are at high risk of commercial sexual exploitation, homelessness, substance use, and criminal justice involvement [49].

Comprehensive studies of the effects of reunification with birth parents compared with placement with relatives or adoption have not been conducted. A single prospective study of 149 ethnically diverse children compared children who were not reunited with reunified children and showed significantly more self-destructive behavior (15 versus -11 percent), higher rates of substance abuse (16 versus -11 percent), and school drop-out rates (21 versus 9 percent) in the reunified group [50]; the groups did not differ, however, in the prevalence of sexual behaviors, pregnancy, or school suspension.

Other outcomes studies of foster care have focused on young adults who grew up in the foster care system and have shown high rates of chronic health problems, mental health issues, relationship problems, unemployment, and homelessness [51-56].

SUMMARY

Children and adolescents are placed in foster care because there are imminent concerns about their safety. (See 'Background' above.)

Almost all children and adolescents in foster care are placed involuntarily by court order for reasons of abuse or neglect. (See 'Reason for placement' above.)

Each family involved with the foster care system is assigned a caseworker; in addition, the child may be appointed a law guardian or court-appointed advocate who represents the child's interests in court. (See 'Foster care personnel' above.)

The type of placement is supposed to be determined by the child's needs and should be in the least restrictive environment, but availability of the optimal setting may be limited. Options include foster care homes, kinship care homes, specialized or therapeutic foster homes, and residential or group home facilities. Foster care and kinship care placements are most common. (See 'Types of placement' above.)

Birth parents retain legal guardianship of their children during foster care unless they voluntarily surrender their rights or the court terminates them through a legal process called "termination of parental rights." (See 'Birth parents' above and 'Termination of parental rights' above.)

Visitation is a mandatory component of foster care. It is the single best predictor of reunification. (See 'Visitation' above.)

The majority of children who are placed in foster care are returned to a parent or relative. Approximately one-fifth are adopted out of foster care. (See 'Outcomes of foster care' above.)

  1. Szilagyi M. The pediatric role in the care of children in foster and kinship care. Pediatr Rev 2012; 33:496.
  2. Mather M. Adoption: a forgotten paediatric speciality. Arch Dis Child 1999; 81:492.
  3. Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. Child Maltreatment 2019. Report, United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2021.
  4. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Adoption and Foster Care Statistics.Available at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/report/afcars-report-27 (Accessed on June 08, 2021).
  5. Wildeman C, Emanuel N. Cumulative risks of foster care placement by age 18 for U.S. children, 2000-2011. PLoS One 2014; 9:e92785.
  6. Conn AM, Szilagyi MA, Franke TM, et al. Trends in child protection and out-of-home care. Pediatrics 2013; 132:712.
  7. Child Welfare Information Gateway. Foster care statistics 2019. Numbers and Trends, Children's Bureau; United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2021.
  8. Meinhofer A, Angleró-Díaz Y. Trends in Foster Care Entry Among Children Removed From Their Homes Because of Parental Drug Use, 2000 to 2017. JAMA Pediatr 2019; 173:881.
  9. Kandel W. Unaccompanied alien children: An overview. Congressional Research Service. CRS Report prepared for members and committees of Congress, January 18, 2017. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R43599.pdf (Accessed on October 12, 2017).
  10. Pruitt SL. The number of illegally abandoned and legally surrendered newborns in the state of Texas, estimated from news stories, 1996-2006. Child Maltreat 2008; 13:89.
  11. Orliss M, Rogers K, Rao S, et al. Safely surrendered infants in Los Angeles County: A medically vulnerable population. Child Care Health Dev 2019; 45:861.
  12. COUNCIL ON FOSTER CARE, ADOPTION, AND KINSHIP CARE, COMMITTEE ON ADOLESCENCE, and COUNCIL ON EARLY CHILDHOOD. Health Care Issues for Children and Adolescents in Foster Care and Kinship Care. Pediatrics 2015; 136:e1131.
  13. Child welfare and juvenile justice: Federal agencies could play a stronger role in helping states reduce the number of children placed solely to obtain mental health services. GAO-03-397, United States General Accounting Office, Washington, DC 2003.
  14. Simms MD. Foster children and the foster care system, Part II: Impact on the child. Curr Probl Pediatr 1991; 21:345.
  15. Schor EL. Foster care. Pediatr Rev 1989; 10:209.
  16. National Commission of Family Foster Care. A Blueprint for Fostering Infants, Children, and Youths in the 1990s, Child Welfare League of America, Washington, DC 1991.
  17. Szilagyi MA, Jee SH, Toth S, et al. Outpatient specialty mental health utilization for children in foster care. Pediatric Academic Societies' Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2006.
  18. Lindsey D. Factors affecting the foster care placement decision: an analysis of national survey data. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1991; 61:272.
  19. Rosenfeld AA, Pilowsky DJ, Fine P, et al. Foster care: an update. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997; 36:448.
  20. Pecora PJ, Kessler RC, Williams J, et al. Improving family foster care. Findings from the Northwest foster care alumni study. www.casey.org/Resources/Publications/ImprovingFamilyFosterCare.htm (Accessed on January 25, 2012).
  21. James S, Landsverk J, Slymen DJ. Placement movement in out-of-home care: Patterns and predictors. Child Youth Serv Rev 2004; 26:185.
  22. Rubin DM, Downes KJ, O'Reilly AL, et al. Impact of kinship care on behavioral well-being for children in out-of-home care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008; 162:550.
  23. Child Welfare League of America. Standards for Foster Family Service. Child Welfare League of America, New York 1975.
  24. Jee SH, Simms MD. Health and well-being of children in foster care placement. Pediatr Rev 2006; 27:34.
  25. Fein E. The elusive search for certainty in child welfare: introduction. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1991; 61:576.
  26. Shyne AW, Schroeder AG. National study of social services to children and their families: Overview. Bulletin 017-091-0025-8. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1978.
  27. P.L. 96-272, Approved June 17, 1980 (94 Stat.500) Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980. www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/comp2/F096-272.html (Accessed on January 25, 2012).
  28. Public Law 105-89. Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/laws_policies/cblaws/public_law/pl105_89/pl105_89.htm (Accessed on January 25, 2012).
  29. US Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008, P.L. 110-351. Available at: www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/federal/index.cfm?event=federallegislation.viewlegis&id=121 (Accessed on April 28, 2014).
  30. US Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families. Report to the congress on kinship foster care. June 2000. aspe.hhs.gov/HSP/kinr2c00/ (Accessed on January 25, 2012).
  31. Sakai C, Lin H, Flores G. Health outcomes and family services in kinship care: analysis of a national sample of children in the child welfare system. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011; 165:159.
  32. Stein RE, Hurlburt MS, Heneghan AM, et al. Health status and type of out-of-home placement: informal kinship care in an investigated sample. Acad Pediatr 2014; 14:559.
  33. Winokur M, Holtan A, Valentine D. Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; :CD006546.
  34. Foster care: health needs of many young children are unknown and unmet. GAO/HEHS-95-114, US General Accounting Office, Washington, DC 1995.
  35. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Early Childhood and Adoption and Dependent Care. Developmental issues for young children in foster care. Pediatrics 2000; 106:1145.
  36. Dozier M, Albus K, Fisher PA, Sepulveda S. Interventions for foster parents: implications for developmental theory. Dev Psychopathol 2002; 14:843.
  37. Fisher PA, Burraston B, Pears K. The early intervention foster care program: permanent placement outcomes from a randomized trial. Child Maltreat 2005; 10:61.
  38. Simms MD. Medical care of children who are homeless or in foster care. Curr Opin Pediatr 1998; 10:486.
  39. Reddy LA, Pfeiffer SI. Effectiveness of treatment foster care with children and adolescents: a review of outcome studies. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997; 36:581.
  40. United States Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families, Child Welfare Outcomes 2015: Report to Congress. Available at: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/resource/cwo-2015 (Accessed on August 10, 2019).
  41. Goldman, J, Salus, MK, Wolcott, D, Kennedy, KY. A coordinated response to child abuse and neglect: The foundation for practice. Chapter Five: What factors contribute to child abuse and neglect? www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanuals/foundation/foundatione.cfm (Accessed on January 25, 2012).
  42. Fanshel D, Shinn EB. Children in Foster Care: A Longitudinal Investigation, Columbia University Press, New York 1978.
  43. Thomas R, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ. Parent-child interaction therapy: an evidence-based treatment for child maltreatment. Child Maltreat 2012; 17:253.
  44. Gean MP, Gillmore JL, Dowler JK. Infants and toddlers in supervised custody: a pilot study of visitation. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 1985; 24:608.
  45. American Public Human Services Association. Medicaid access to youth aging out of foster care. www.aphsa.org/Home/Doc/Medicaid-Access-for-Youth-Aging-Out-of-Foster-Care-Rpt.pdf (Accessed on January 25, 2012).
  46. Putnam-Hornstein E, Hammond I, Eastman AL, et al. Extended Foster Care for Transition-Age Youth: An Opportunity for Pregnancy Prevention and Parenting Support. J Adolesc Health 2016; 58:485.
  47. Aratani Y. Homeless children and youth: Causes and consequences. National Center for Children in Poverty 2009. Available at: https://www.nccp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/text_888.pdf (Accessed on June 19, 2021).
  48. Emam D, Golden O. The Affordable Care Act and youth aging out of foster care: New opportunities and strategies for action. State Policy Advocacy and Reform Center (SPARC) 2014; 1. Accessed at childwelfaresparc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/The-Affordable-Care-Act-and-Youth-Aging-Out-of-Foster-Care.pdf (Accessed on October 25, 2017).
  49. Van Leeuwen J. Reaching the hard to reach: innovative housing for homeless youth through strategic partnerships. Child Welfare 2004; 83:453.
  50. Taussig HN, Clyman RB, Landsverk J. Children who return home from foster care: a 6-year prospective study of behavioral health outcomes in adolescence. Pediatrics 2001; 108:E10.
  51. Courtney M, Terao S, Bost N. Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth: Conditions of youth preparing to leave state care. Chapin Hall Center for Children, Chicago, IL 2004.
  52. Courtney ME, Dworsky A, Hook J, et al. Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth. www.chapinhall.org/research/report/midwest-evaluation-adult-functioning-former-foster-youth (Accessed on January 25, 2012).
  53. Dworsky A, Napolitano L, Courtney M. Homelessness during the transition from foster care to adulthood. Am J Public Health 2013; 103 Suppl 2:S318.
  54. Ahrens KR, Garrison MM, Courtney ME. Health outcomes in young adults from foster care and economically diverse backgrounds. Pediatrics 2014; 134:1067.
  55. Côté SM, Orri M, Marttila M, Ristikari T. Out-of-home placement in early childhood and psychiatric diagnoses and criminal convictions in young adulthood: a population-based propensity score-matched study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018; 2:647.
  56. Almquist YB, Rojas Y, Vinnerljung B, Brännström L. Association of Child Placement in Out-of-Home Care With Trajectories of Hospitalization Because of Suicide Attempts From Early to Late Adulthood. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e206639.
Topic 596 Version 21.0

References