Your activity: 66 p.v.
your limit has been reached. plz Donate us to allow your ip full access, Email: sshnevis@outlook.com

Care of the uncircumcised penis in infants and children

Care of the uncircumcised penis in infants and children
Author:
Duncan Wilcox, MD
Section Editors:
Laurence S Baskin, MD, FAAP
Jan E Drutz, MD
Deputy Editor:
Laurie Wilkie, MD, MS
Literature review current through: Dec 2022. | This topic last updated: Jun 21, 2021.

INTRODUCTION — The care and complications of the uncircumcised penis will be reviewed here. The procedures, risks, benefits, and complications of circumcision are discussed separately. (See "Neonatal circumcision: Techniques" and "Neonatal circumcision: Risks and benefits" and "Complications of circumcision".)

NORMAL ANATOMY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE FORESKIN — The foreskin (prepuce) is the redundant skin that typically extends approximately 1 cm beyond the glans (picture 1 and figure 1). It provides protection to the urethral meatus and glans penis.

The normal foreskin begins to develop as an epithelial fold that grows inward from the base of the glans penis at eight to nine weeks gestation with normal completion by 4 to 4.5 months gestation. The squamous epithelial lining of the inner prepuce is contiguous with the glans penis, resulting in the normal circumferentially initial adhesions between the inner layer of the prepuce and the glabrous epithelium of the glans penis.

FORESKIN RETRACTION — Separation of the foreskin from the glans penis occurs by desquamation and begins late in gestation, but remains incomplete in most male infants at birth. Only approximately 4 percent of males have a completely retractable foreskin at birth, and in more than half of newborn males, the foreskin cannot be retracted far enough to visualize the urethral meatus [1].

After birth, penile growth and physiologic erection aid in the desquamation process and the formation of keratinized pearls (smegma) between the layers, which loosens the adhesions and allows retraction of the preputial skin.

Phimosis — Phimosis is defined as an inability to retract the foreskin. The incidence of fully retractable foreskin increases with age as the rate of phimosis decreases [2-4]. This was illustrated in a study of 2149 Taiwanese school boys, which reported the incidence of the following five categories of preputial anatomy for three different age groups based on grade level; first, fourth, and seventh grade [2]:

Fully retractable: 8, 21, and 58 percent, respectively

Partial retraction with part of the glans penis visible: 40, 41, and 29 percent, respectively

Partial phimosis with only the urethral meatus visible and none of the glans penis: 33, 25, and 7 percent, respectively

Phimosis with nonvisualization of the meatus and glans: 17, 10, and 1 percent, respectively

Circumcised: 3, 4, and 5 percent, respectively

Phimosis is divided into physiologic and pathologic forms.

Physiologic phimosis, which is seen in almost all newborn males, is due to the normal development of congenital adhesions between the foreskin and glans. Physical examination reveals a pliant unscarred preputial orifice [5]. (See 'Physiologic phimosis' below.)

Pathologic phimosis is defined as foreskin that is truly nonretractable secondary to distal scarring of the prepuce, such as occurs with preputial fibrosis due to infection and inflammation. This scarring often appears as a contracted white fibrous ring around the preputial orifice (picture 2) [5]. The reported incidence of pathologic phimosis ranges from 0 to 16 percent [6]. Differences in cohort age and the definition of pathologic phimosis are responsible for this great rate variability.

It is important for primary care clinicians to be able to distinguish between physiologic and pathologic phimosis so that unnecessary referrals to pediatric urologists can be avoided for the patient and his family. Based on the results of the above study and other reports, it appears that the incidence of pathologic phimosis that requires intervention is very low, especially in preadolescent and adolescent males [2,7,8].

ROUTINE CARE AND HYGIENE — It is important to educate both parents and caregivers on the routine care and hygiene of the uncircumcised male infant [9]. Optimal education reduces anxiety and unnecessary referrals to subspecialists [5,10] and, perhaps, lowers the risk of pathologic phimosis [11].

Evidence-based guidelines directing preputial care do not exist, but the following approach to routine care is based on expert opinions and observational studies [1,5,12].

In the newborn and infant, the foreskin requires no special care other than what is provided to the rest of the body. The penis should be washed regularly when a bath is given. Soap can be used provided it is nonirritant and safe for the child's age.

Frequent diaper changes to prevent diaper rash and decrease skin irritation.

Avoid forcible retraction because tearing may cause bleeding, and can result in fibrosis and the development of pathologic phimosis. Gentle retraction of the foreskin with diaper changes and bathing will allow gradual and progressive retraction of the foreskin over the glans. As the foreskin naturally begins to retract, cleaning and then drying underneath the foreskin can be performed. After bathing, the retracted foreskin should always be pulled down to its normal position covering the glans penis. Failure to do so may result in paraphimosis (when the foreskin is retracted behind the glans penis and cannot be returned to its normal position), which results in venous and lymphatic congestion of the glans (picture 3). (See "Paraphimosis: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment".)

As the boy becomes older, he should be instructed on retraction of the foreskin, regular cleaning and drying of the glans, and returning the foreskin to its normal position.

During the newborn examination and well-child visits, assessment should include evaluation of the urinary stream and include the following questions:

Is the urinary stream strong?

Is the urinary stream straight? If the answer is no, is there any dribbling or spraying noted?

Does the foreskin balloon out when voiding?

Does the infant/child appear comfortable while voiding?

If the answer to any of these questions is no, except for ballooning, a more in-depth assessment should be performed including, if possible, direct observation of the urinary stream. In some cases, urinary stream abnormalities may be due to complications of the foreskin. (See 'Pathologic conditions' below.)

ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS — Several conditions can be seen in uncircumcised boys; some are benign and only require reassurance to patients and parents/caregivers, and others are complications that require intervention.

Benign conditions — Benign conditions that do not usually require intervention, but only reassurance, include:

Physiologic phimosis

Preputial cysts due to smegma

Transient ballooning of the foreskin

Physiologic phimosis — As discussed previously, physiologic phimosis is present in almost all newborn males. Although the spontaneous resolution of physiologic phimosis is high, the rate is variable so it is not possible to set an age by which the foreskin should be normally retractile [2,3,13]. School-age boys without a fully retractable foreskin and their parents/caregivers should be counseled that there is normally a wide range of retractability rate, and over time, there is a very high likelihood physiologic phimosis will spontaneously resolve. The clinician should also reinforce proper preputial hygiene; patients and/or parents/caregivers can be taught to perform gentle stretch exercises [10]. A four- to eight-week course of topical corticosteroids (eg, 0.05% betamethasone cream) applied directly to the preputial outlet twice daily speeds up the natural process of obtaining foreskin retractility [5,9-11,14]. (See 'Recurrent urinary infection' below.)

Smegma and preputial cysts — Desquamated epithelial cells that are trapped under the foreskin are referred to as smegma [5]. In boys without a fully retractable foreskin, smegma may form white lumps under the foreskin, often referred to as preputial cysts. Preputial cysts are benign and usually are located around the corona. They aid in the process of separation between the foreskin and the glans penis and are extruded once the foreskin becomes more retractable.

Foreskin ballooning — Transient ballooning of the foreskin during voiding is usually benign [5]. However, if urinary retention can only be resolved after applying manual pressure, the parent or caregiver should seek medical attention. In all other cases, parents/caregivers should be assured this is a benign condition that will resolve over time as there is increasing retractability of the foreskin.

Pathologic conditions — Complications of the foreskin that typically require intervention include:

Pathologic phimosis

Paraphimosis

Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs)

Severe/recurrent balanoposthitis

Balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO)

Frenulum breve

In a 2014 Danish review of 181 males requiring surgical intervention for foreskin complications, phimosis was the indication for almost all of the patients (n = 172, 95 percent) and the remaining nine patients had frenulum breve, which was mainly symptomatic during erection [15]. A quarter of the patients (n = 46) were suspected of having BXO before surgery, and 31 patients (17 percent) had at least one episode of balanitis (swelling of the glans penis).

Pathologic phimosis — Pathologic phimosis is defined as foreskin that is truly nonretractable secondary to distal scarring of the prepuce, such as that which occurs with preputial fibrosis due to trauma, infection, and/or inflammation. A fibrotic preputial ring (cicatrix) may form from scarring due to forcible retraction or following episodes of balanoposthitis. Cicatrix may also occur from scarring after circumcision. (See "Complications of circumcision", section on 'Cicatrix'.)

Symptoms of pathologic phimosis include:

Secondary nonretractability of the foreskin after retractibility at an earlier age

Irritation or bleeding from the preputial orifice

Dysuria

Painful erection

Recurrent balanoposthitis

Chronic urinary retention with ballooning that is only resolved with manual compression

Pathologic phimosis increases the risk of other foreskin complications including paraphimosis, recurrent urinary tract infections, recurrent/severe balanoposthitis, and BXO [15].

Management — When pathologic phimosis is present, pediatric urologic consultation should be sought. Several options exist for treatment of pathologic phimosis, and families should never be counseled that their child "needs" a circumcision without considering more conservative interventions. In our practice, we initially treat pathologic phimosis with 0.05% betamethasone cream applied twice a day directly on and around the phimotic ring for six weeks and stretching exercises (gentle retraction of the foreskin) performed several times a day. In patients who fail topical corticosteroid therapy, surgical options are presented to the patient/family/caregiver, and the choice of intervention is based on the clinical findings and the patient/family/caregiver preference.

Stretching exercises of the prepuce have been reported to have some success in treating pathologic phimosis. In one study that compared stretching and topical corticosteroids with a control group with stretching alone, 60 of 90 children in the control group responded with resolution of phimosis using a protocol of retraction as far back as the appearance of stricture for one minute, performed four times daily for one to three months [10].

Topical corticosteroids, usually administered concomitantly with routine stretching exercises, are effective in most boys with pathologic phimosis. Betamethasone cream (0.05%) is the topical agent most frequently used; other agents include 0.25, 0.1, and 0.5% triamcinolone and 0.05% fluticasone propionate [10,11,16-18].

In two case series, the daily application of 0.05% betamethasone cream for at least four weeks resulted in complete resolution of phimosis in over 90 percent of patients [10,11].

In one study of 137 boys (median age 5.4), the administration of topical corticosteroid applied twice a day, and stretching exercises, which were started five days after the initial application, resulted in a 90 percent rate of retractable foreskin [11]. In this study, half of the patients had a phimotic but retractable prepuce, one-third had a nonretractable phimotic ring, and one-third had a pinpoint opening. There were no differences in the response rate among the three groups.

In another study of 247 boys referred for surgical treatment for phimosis (mean age 7.6 years), the protocol of betamethasone cream applied twice a day for 15 days and then once a day for 15 more days, and stretching exercises started seven days after the first application of betamethasone, resulted in a 77 percent resolution rate after one protocol cycle, and an additional 20 percent of patients had resolution after a second course [10]. There were no differences in response rate based on the phimosis grade; grade 1: fully nonretractable, grade 2: partial or complete exposure of the glans with a lacerated foreskin, and grade 3: phimotic ring.

Although rarely used, alternative surgical procedures to circumcision include preputioplasty (surgical release of the scarred tissue), preputial balloon dilation, and various prepuce preserving plastic surgical procedures designed to widen the preputial ring.

Circumcision. (See "Neonatal circumcision: Techniques" and "Neonatal circumcision: Risks and benefits".)

Paraphimosis — Paraphimosis is caused by foreskin entrapment behind the coronal sulcus, which may result in venous and lymphatic congestion of the glans, and ultimately arterial compromise (picture 3). Paraphimosis is a medical emergency and its clinical features and management are discussed separately. (See "Paraphimosis: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment".)

Recurrent urinary infection — There is a 4- to 10-fold increased risk of UTI in uncircumcised versus circumcised male infants. In boys with recurrent UTI or who have UTI and/or evidence of genitourinary abnormality (eg, renal scarring and vesicoureteral reflux), circumcision may be considered as a potential intervention to decrease the risk of future UTI [19-24].

Balanoposthitis — Balanoposthitis is an inflammatory condition of the glans penis and the foreskin (picture 4). Of note, balanitis is inflammation of only the glans. Although the etiology is multifactorial in children, balanoposthitis typically results from poor hygiene that is sometimes complicated by secondary infection. In severe cases, patients may be unable to void, in which case bladder catheterization is indicated. In patients with urinary obstruction, in whom bladder catheterization is unsuccessful, dorsal slit procedure or incision of a constricting band resulting in phimosis may be required. In patients with recurrent balanoposthitis, pathologic phimosis may be an underlying contributing factor, which should be corrected. (See 'Pathologic phimosis' above.)

The epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and acute management of balanoposthitis are discussed separately. (See "Balanitis and balanoposthitis in children and adolescents: Clinical manifestations, evaluation, and diagnosis" and "Balanitis and balanoposthitis in children and adolescents: Management".)

Balanitis xerotica obliterans — Balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO) is a chronic atrophic dermatitis of unknown etiology. It is the genital analog of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus and is characterized by white atrophic plaques on the glans penis and foreskin [25]. These plaques eventually enlarge and coalesce into a sclerotic mass with resultant adhesions, phimosis, and meatal stenosis. Because it is uncommon in children, BXO disorder is rarely diagnosed by pediatricians (picture 5).

Although topical corticosteroids have been used to treat BXO, the results are poor except in mild cases [26]. In patients with pathologic phimosis and/or meatal involvement, circumcision is the preferred intervention as it is curative in most patients. However, if after circumcision BXO is persistent, then meatal reconstruction and/or a dermatology consult may be necessary.

In one case series from Children's Hospital Boston over a 10-year period from 1992 to 2002, none of the 41 patients (mean age 10.6 years) with pathologically confirmed BXO were diagnosed prior to referral [27]. In this cohort of patients, 19 patients underwent curative or repeat circumcision, 11 with BXO involvement of the urethral meatus underwent circumcision with meatotomy or meatoplasty, and 9 patients required extensive plastic surgery, including two who received buccal mucosa grafts.

Frenulum breve — Frenulum of the penis is an elastic band of tissue under the glans penis that connects to the foreskin and helps contract it over the glans. In males with frenulum breve, the frenulum is too short, and thus restricts the movement of the foreskin. This condition is typically more symptomatic during an erection as the short frenulum pulls the glans ventrally with erection, leading to pain. In severe cases, during sexual stimulation the frenulum can rupture, leading to discomfort and bleeding [15].

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Uncircumcised penis".)

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

Basics topics (see "Patient education: Should I have my baby circumcised? (The Basics)" and "Patient education: Care of the uncircumcised penis in babies and children (The Basics)")

Beyond the Basics topics (see "Patient education: Circumcision in baby boys (Beyond the Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Anatomy – The foreskin (prepuce) typically extends approximately 1 cm beyond the glans and provides protection to the urethral meatus and glans penis (picture 1 and figure 1). At birth, almost all male infants do not have a retractable foreskin because of the normal circumferential adhesions between the foreskin and the glans penis. After birth, penile growth and physiologic erection aid in the desquamation process that loosens the adhesions and leads to progressive foreskin retraction. (See 'Normal anatomy and development of the foreskin' above and 'Foreskin retraction' above.)

Phimosis – Phimosis is defined as an inability to retract the foreskin and is divided in two forms. (See 'Phimosis' above.)  

Physiologic phimosis – Physiologic phimosis due to the normal congenital adhesions between the foreskin and glans seen in almost all normal male newborn infants. This condition normally resolves throughout childhood with an incidence of approximately 1 percent in seventh grade boys.

Pathologic phimosis – Pathologic phimosis is due to scarring of the foreskin leading to a true nonretractable foreskin (picture 2).

Routine care – Routine care of the uncircumcised penis encompasses the following (see 'Routine care and hygiene' above):

Routine washing – The penis should be washed routinely during the normal bathing of any male infant or boy.

Avoid forcible retraction – As the foreskin naturally begins to retract, cleaning and then drying underneath the foreskin can be performed. The foreskin should NOT be forcibly retracted and should always be pulled down to its normal position covering the glans after drying.

Frequent diaper changes – In any child who is not toilet trained, frequent diaper changes can prevent diaper rash and foreskin/urethra irritation.

Voiding history – During routine well-child visits, a voiding history should be included to uncover any urinary stream abnormality.

Benign conditions – Benign conditions seen in uncircumcised males include physiologic phimosis, preputial cysts due to smegma, and transient ballooning of the foreskin that resolves without manual pressure. Parents/caregivers should be reassured that these are normal variations/findings that generally do not need any intervention. (See 'Benign conditions' above.)

Pathologic conditions – Complications that typically require intervention include (see 'Pathologic conditions' above):

Pathologic phimosis – Pathologic phimosis increases the risk of other foreskin complications, such as paraphimosis, recurrent/severe balanoposthitis, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Although several treatment options are available, we suggest initial treatment with a topical corticosteroid (eg, 0.05% betamethasone cream twice daily) along with gentle retraction (Grade 2B). Other options include stretch exercises alone and corrective surgery including circumcision. (See 'Pathologic phimosis' above.)

Paraphimosis – Paraphimosis, a medical emergency, is caused by foreskin entrapment behind the coronal sulcus, which may result in venous and lymphatic congestion of the glans and ultimately arterial compromise (picture 3). (See "Paraphimosis: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment".)

Recurrent urinary tract infections – The risk of recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) is 4- to 10-fold greater in uncircumcised versus circumcised male infants. In boys with recurrent UTI, or who have UTI and evidence of genitourinary abnormality (eg, renal scarring and vesicoureteral reflux), circumcision may be considered as a potential intervention to decrease the risk of future UTI. (See "Urinary tract infections in children: Epidemiology and risk factors", section on 'Lack of circumcision'.)

Balanoposthitis – Balanoposthitis, inflammation of the glans penis and the foreskin (picture 4), typically results from poor hygiene that is sometimes complicated by secondary infection. In severe cases, patients may be unable to void, in which case bladder catheterization is indicated. In patients with urinary obstruction, in whom bladder catheterization is unsuccessful, dorsal slit procedure or incision of a constricting band resulting in phimosis may be required. (See "Balanitis and balanoposthitis in children and adolescents: Clinical manifestations, evaluation, and diagnosis" and "Balanitis and balanoposthitis in children and adolescents: Management".)

Balanitis xerotica obliterans – Balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO) is a chronic atrophic dermatitis characterized by white atrophic plaques on the glans and prepuce (picture 5). These plaques eventually enlarge and coalesce into a sclerotic mass with resultant adhesions, pathologic phimosis, and meatal stenosis. In these patients, we suggest circumcision because other treatment options have not been effective (Grade 2C). (See 'Balanitis xerotica obliterans' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT — The editorial staff at UpToDate acknowledge Jason Wilson, MD, who contributed to an earlier version of this topic review.

  1. Baskin LS. Circumcision. In: Handbook of Pediatric Urology, 2nd ed, Baskin LS, Kogan BA (Eds), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2005. p.1.
  2. Hsieh TF, Chang CH, Chang SS. Foreskin development before adolescence in 2149 schoolboys. Int J Urol 2006; 13:968.
  3. Yang C, Liu X, Wei GH. Foreskin development in 10 421 Chinese boys aged 0-18 years. World J Pediatr 2009; 5:312.
  4. Wan S, Wang Y, Gu S. Epidemiology of male genital abnormalities: a population study. Pediatrics 2014; 133:e624.
  5. McGregor TB, Pike JG, Leonard MP. Pathologic and physiologic phimosis: approach to the phimotic foreskin. Can Fam Physician 2007; 53:445.
  6. Van Howe RS. Cost-effective treatment of phimosis. Pediatrics 1998; 102:E43.
  7. Shankar KR, Rickwood AM. The incidence of phimosis in boys. BJU Int 1999; 84:101.
  8. GAIRDNER D. The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision. Br Med J 1949; 2:1433.
  9. Steadman B, Ellsworth P. To circ or not to circ: indications, risks, and alternatives to circumcision in the pediatric population with phimosis. Urol Nurs 2006; 26:181.
  10. Zampieri N, Corroppolo M, Camoglio FS, et al. Phimosis: stretching methods with or without application of topical steroids? J Pediatr 2005; 147:705.
  11. Orsola A, Caffaratti J, Garat JM. Conservative treatment of phimosis in children using a topical steroid. Urology 2000; 56:307.
  12. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Male circumcision. Pediatrics 2012; 130:e756.
  13. Metcalfe PD, Elyas R. Foreskin management: Survey of Canadian pediatric urologists. Can Fam Physician 2010; 56:e290.
  14. Moreno G, Corbalán J, Peñaloza B, Pantoja T. Topical corticosteroids for treating phimosis in boys. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; :CD008973.
  15. Sneppen I, Thorup J. Foreskin Morbidity in Uncircumcised Males. Pediatrics 2016; 137.
  16. Letendre J, Barrieras D, Franc-Guimond J, et al. Topical triamcinolone for persistent phimosis. J Urol 2009; 182:1759.
  17. Zavras N, Christianakis E, Mpourikas D, Ereikat K. Conservative treatment of phimosis with fluticasone proprionate 0.05%: a clinical study in 1185 boys. J Pediatr Urol 2009; 5:181.
  18. Palmer LS, Palmer JS. The efficacy of topical betamethasone for treating phimosis: a comparison of two treatment regimens. Urology 2008; 72:68.
  19. Wiswell TE, Roscelli JD. Corroborative evidence for the decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics 1986; 78:96.
  20. Wiswell TE, Smith FR, Bass JW. Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics 1985; 75:901.
  21. Wiswell TE, Geschke DW. Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics 1989; 83:1011.
  22. Singh-Grewal D, Macdessi J, Craig J. Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90:853.
  23. To T, Agha M, Dick PT, Feldman W. Cohort study on circumcision of newborn boys and subsequent risk of urinary-tract infection. Lancet 1998; 352:1813.
  24. Schoen EJ, Colby CJ, Ray GT. Newborn circumcision decreases incidence and costs of urinary tract infections during the first year of life. Pediatrics 2000; 105:789.
  25. Nguyen ATM, Holland AJA. Balanitis xerotica obliterans: an update for clinicians. Eur J Pediatr 2020; 179:9.
  26. Vincent MV, Mackinnon E. The response of clinical balanitis xerotica obliterans to the application of topical steroid-based creams. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40:709.
  27. Gargollo PC, Kozakewich HP, Bauer SB, et al. Balanitis xerotica obliterans in boys. J Urol 2005; 174:1409.
Topic 14539 Version 32.0

References