Your activity: 48 p.v.
your limit has been reached. plz Donate us to allow your ip full access, Email: sshnevis@outlook.com

Basic mechanisms and pathophysiology of allergic contact dermatitis

Basic mechanisms and pathophysiology of allergic contact dermatitis
Author:
Anthony Gaspari, MD
Section Editor:
Joseph Fowler, MD
Deputy Editor:
Rosamaria Corona, MD, DSc
Literature review current through: Nov 2022. | This topic last updated: Dec 21, 2020.

INTRODUCTION — Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common inflammatory skin disease presenting with pruritic, eczematous lesions. ACD results from a T cell-mediated, delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction elicited by the contact of the skin with the offending chemical in individuals who have been previously sensitized to the same chemical. ACD is common in the general population and is the most frequent occupational skin disease. Its etiology may be suggested by the body sites of involvement, history of exposure, and morphology and distribution of the skin lesions.

This topic will discuss the immune mechanisms and pathophysiology of ACD. The clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management of ACD are discussed separately. (See "Clinical features and diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis" and "Management of allergic contact dermatitis".)

OVERVIEW — The understanding of the cellular and molecular pathogenesis of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) has expanded dramatically. In addition to CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, other cell types such as natural killer T (NKT) cells, natural killer cells, innate lymphoid cells, and T regulatory cells have emerged as critical participants (table 1). In the elicitation phase, Langerhans cells appear to play a role in the development of immune tolerance rather than hypersensitivity reaction (as was once thought). B cells also appear to be important during the initiation of ACD by secreting IgM antibody in response to NKT cell-derived interleukin (IL)-4, leading to complement activation and immune cell chemotaxis. As new mechanisms and molecules emerge as a result of advances in the understanding of ACD, new pharmacologic targets will become apparent.

HAPTEN-PROTEIN BINDING — Hapten binding is the initial step in the development of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Contact allergens are low molecular weight (<500 Daltons) chemicals called haptens, which are able to penetrate the stratum corneum barrier of the skin. Haptens are not immunogenic by themselves, but they can be efficiently recognized by the immune system after binding to a skin protein carrier. Haptens may be naturally occurring substances such as urushiol found in the resin of poison ivy, synthetic compounds, dyes, fragrances, drugs, or heavy metal salts.

The binding of haptens to skin proteins (protein haptenation) involves the formation of a covalent bond between the electrophilic components of the hapten and the amino acid nucleophilic side chains of the target proteins within the skin [1]. Examples of chemicals containing electrophilic components are aldehydes, ketones, amides, or halogenated compounds. Metal cations (eg, nickel [NIi]2+, one of the most common ACD-associated haptens; and chromium [Cr]3+) are also well-known electrophiles. Some haptens that are not normally electrophilic (prohaptens) can be converted to protein-reactive species via oxidation or metabolic transformation by epidermal keratinocytes and/or dendritic cells [1]. Additional factors influencing the sensitizing ability of haptens include lipophilicity, tridimensional chemical structure, and protein-binding affinity.

The most reactive nucleophilic side chains of proteins are found on lysine, cysteine, and histidine. The protein nucleophilicity is influenced by the microenvironment pH and protein location within the epithelium [1].

THE SENSITIZATION (AFFERENT) PHASE — The sensitization phase occurs after the first contact of the skin with a hapten and leads to the generation of hapten-specific T cells in the regional lymph nodes. Langerhans cells (LC) and dermal dendritic cells (DC) may be involved in the clinically inapparent sensitization phase. Both LCs and dermal DCs are professional antigen-presenting cells and express major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II molecules, which are required for the activation of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, respectively. (See "Antigen-presenting cells" and "The adaptive cellular immune response: T cells and cytokines".)

LCs are bone marrow-derived, immature epidermal DCs which express langerin (CD207), a C-type lectin associated with the Birbeck granules. Immature LCs form a dense network in the epidermis, where they scan the environment by extending and retracting their dendrites and take up antigens with high efficiency [2]. LCs are able to initiate an adaptive immune response by capturing, processing, and presenting antigens to naïve T cells in the paracortical areas of lymph nodes [3].

In the sensitization phase of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), the hapten-protein complex is engulfed and processed by LCs, which subsequently migrate to the draining lymph nodes where they present the hapten–peptide–MHC complexes to naïve, allergen-specific T cells (priming). This process results in clonal expansion of hapten-specific memory/effector T cells, which circulate throughout the body and are subsequently recruited from the circulation into the skin during the elicitation phase [4]. (See 'The elicitation (efferent) phase' below.)

After cutaneous exposure to the sensitizing hapten, epidermal LC density decreases by approximately 50 percent in the following 24 hours as a result of migration to the regional lymph nodes [5-9]. During migration, LCs undergo a process of maturation and acquire the surface phenotype of a functionally mature dendritic cell. Cytokines released by keratinocytes, in particular interleukin (IL)-1, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and IL-18, regulate the migration and functional maturation of dendritic cells. In addition to morphologic changes and decreased ability to capture additional antigen, mature LCs exhibit increased expression of CD83 (a marker for LC maturation), adhesion molecules such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and co-stimulatory molecules including CD40, CD80, and CD86 [10-15]. The expression of these markers is specific to hapten-exposed LCs, since dermal irritants, which also trigger LC migration, do not result in similar LC surface marker changes [14]. The increased expression of these signaling molecules on the cell surface of LCs is important for efficient activation/proliferation of T cells in the local lymph nodes.

Twenty-four hours after sensitization by cutaneous application of a strong hapten, lymph nodes of mice contain LCs and can transfer sensitization if implanted into allergen-naïve mice [10]. However, studies in LC-depleted mice indicate that contact sensitization is not abrogated in the absence of LCs [16]. A population of langerin+ dermal DCs is thought to induce contact sensitization in the absence of epidermal LCs, which supports the idea that LC may be dispensable in ACD, since there are other cutaneous antigen-presenting cells that can subserve this function [17,18].

At the end of the afferent phase, hapten-specific T cells that have been primed by hapten bearing DCs are found in the lymph nodes, in the blood, and in the skin. Upon re-exposure to the same hapten, T cells will be activated and massively recruited in the skin (the elicitation phase).

THE ELICITATION (EFFERENT) PHASE — The clinical manifestations of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) are the result of a T cell-mediated inflammatory reaction occurring in the skin upon re-exposure to the offending hapten (elicitation phase) and mediated by the activation of hapten-specific T cells in the skin.

The inflammatory reaction occurs 48 to 72 hours after exposure. As in the sensitization phase, haptens enter the epidermis and react with endogenous proteins. The hapten-protein complexes are then taken up by the antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and presented to the antigen-primed T cells recruited in the epidermis and dermis.

Although LCs are capable of functioning as APCs, they are not required during the elicitation phase of ACD. Mice depleted in epidermal LCs by treatment with topical corticosteroids or exposure to UVB radiation show a paradoxically higher cutaneous hypersensitivity response compared with control animals, indicating that LCs are dispensable in the elicitation phase and may be involved in the regulation of ACD [19]. (See 'Regulatory mechanisms of allergic contact dermatitis' below.)

Other cell types that may function as APCs include mast cells, infiltrating macrophage, and keratinocytes [20]. Keratinocytes, which constitutively express major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I, have been shown to also inducibly express MHC class II and exhibit APC-like properties in response to hapten exposure [21]. Instead of inducing T cell activation, class II MHC-bearing keratinocytes induce hapten-specific Th1-lymphocyte clonal anergy, a type of T cell tolerance, which may play a role in limiting the magnitude and duration of ACD [22,23].

The primary effector cells of ACD appear to be CD8+ Tc1 cells [24-28]. Experimental studies in mice indicated that MHC class I-restricted CD8+ T cells infiltrate the skin as early as six hours after the hapten challenge and induce keratinocyte apoptosis via the perforin/granzyme or the Fas/FasL pathway [29,30]. Activated T cells release type 1 cytokines, including IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha. Both cytokines are potent activators of keratinocytes and promote the up-regulation of intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAM-1) and MHC class II molecules and the release of chemokines, resulting in a massive recruitment of mononuclear and polymorphonuclear cells and amplification of the inflammatory response [4].

MHC class I knockout mice, which are deficient in CD8+ T cells, or mice acutely depleted in vivo of CD8+ T cells are unable to develop a hypersensitivity reaction to the cutaneous application of the strong hapten dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) [24]. Conversely, MHC class II-deficient mice, which are deficient in CD4+ T cells, develop a strong reaction to DNFB, supporting the hypothesis that CD8+ T cells are primed in the absence of CD4+ T cells and mediate the cutaneous hypersensitivity response.

The role of hapten-specific CD4+ T cells is not completely understood. CD4+ T cells appear in the site of challenge at a later time than CD8+ T cells and may have distinct roles in the inflammatory process [31]. CD4+ Th1 cells, producing high amounts of IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha, display cytotoxic activity against keratinocytes expressing MHC class II molecules and may cooperate with CD8+ T cells in amplifying the inflammatory response. By contrast, other subsets of CD4+ T cells may have a regulatory function (such as FoxP3+ and CD4+ T regulatory cells).

The afferent and efferent phases of ACD are illustrated in the figure (figure 1). The cell types involved in ACD and their functions are summarized in the table (table 1).

For many years, the convention has been that skin-associated lymphoid tissue involves transient populations of lymphocytes in the skin, circulating lymphocytes in the blood, and stable populations of lymphocytes in local lymph nodes. However, it is now recognized that there are also populations of skin resident T cells that persist long term in the skin (called effector memory T cells). This population of memory T cells provides local and rapid immune responses to pathogens and haptens, such as those that occur in ACD. In addition to ACD, these long-lived, resident T lymphocytes are relevant to other dermatologic diseases, such as psoriasis, cutaneous T cell lymphoma, and fixed drug eruption [32].

THE INNATE IMMUNITY IN ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS — Innate immune cells (dendritic cells [DC], mast cells, natural killer [NK], NKT-cells) play a critical role in allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) (table 1). Innate lymphoid cells are lymphoid cells that are distinct from conventional lymphocytes in that they lack antigen receptors, are distinct from other innate cell types, and can play a regulatory role in allergic diseases [33]. They reside in the skin and other tissues and are emerging as another cell type that may play an important role in the early events of ACD, as their numbers are increased in positive patch tests to nickel [34,35]. In addition, antigen-presenting cells (macrophages, DC, monocytes, and B lymphocytes) express membrane-bound innate immune receptors called pattern recognition receptors (PPR), which include the toll-like receptor (TLR) family. TLRs are transmembrane receptors that recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns such as cell wall components (eg, bacterial endotoxin), proteins, and nucleic acids of bacteria, parasites, viruses, and fungi [36]. TLRs also recognize damage-associated molecular patterns, which are released during cell necrosis [37]. TLR signaling results in changes in the transcription factors that regulate a multitude of genes, including those encoding important proinflammatory cytokines. (See "Toll-like receptors: Roles in disease and therapy".)

In mouse models of contact hypersensitivity, TLR2 and TLR4 recognize low molecular weight breakdown products of hyaluronic acid that are produced by reactive oxygen species in response to exposure to haptens [38-42]. In humans, the TLR4 (hTLR4) has been identified as the receptor for nickel, which is the most common cause of ACD [43]. Binding of nickel to hTLR4 requires the presence of two nonconserved histidines (H) in H456 and H458 in the extracellular domain of hTLR4. The binding of nickel to hTLR4 triggers a signal transduction cascade via the nuclear factor for the kappa light chain enhancer in B cells, resulting in the production of proinflammatory cytokines and the activation of DC early in the afferent phase of ACD. Because mice lack H456 and H458, they do not develop contact hypersensitivity to nickel. Other metal salts, such as cobalt and palladium, that can induce ACD have also been demonstrated to trigger TLR4 activation similar to nickel [44]. These data suggest a novel mechanism for the "adjuvancy" (or immune-activating properties) of common allergens.

In 2006, it was discovered that mice devoid of conventional T cells and B cells demonstrated substantial contact hypersensitivity responses to 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene and oxazolone (two strong, experimental contact allergens) [45]. The response was dependent on natural killer cells specific to these allergens and long lasting, demonstrating for the first time that innate immune cells could substitute for conventional T cells in mediating contact hypersensitivity. This was a surprising observation, considering that natural killer cells do not express an antigen receptor, as do T cells and B cells.

REGULATORY MECHANISMS OF ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS — Regulatory T cells (Treg) may have a role in the sensitization and elicitation phase of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and in the downregulation of the inflammatory response that was initially attributed to the clearance of the hapten from the skin [46,47]. Tregs are a heterogeneous cell population that includes natural Tregs (CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ cells) and inducible Tregs (Tr1- and Th3-cells) [4,48]. The skin contains predominantly inducible Tregs, which can be triggered by Langerhans cells or dermal dendritic cells [49,50]. Following exposure to a contact allergen, Tregs can lower or suppress the process of sensitization [50-53]. During the elicitation phase, they can suppress effector T cells in the lymph nodes and inhibit the influx of leukocytes through IL-10 or CD39 mechanisms [54,55]. Tregs may also be involved in the control and eventual termination of the inflammatory response in ACD [56].

MECHANISMS OF TISSUE DAMAGE IN ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS — In the early phase of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), tissue damage is mostly due to CD8+ T cell-induced apoptosis of keratinocytes bearing the hapten-protein complex on MHC class I molecules, via the perforin/granzyme or the Fas/FasL pathway. The induction of keratinocyte apoptosis is accompanied by a rapid cleavage of CH1 intercellular adhesion molecules (E-cadherins). The loss of intercellular adhesion and the infiltration of lymphocytes in the epidermis are responsible for the intercellular edema and vesiculation as well as the typical spongiotic appearance of the epidermis in ACD [57].

Type 1 cytokines, released by infiltrating CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, in particular IFN-gamma, stimulate keratinocytes to release cytokines and chemokines, resulting in the massive recruitment of activated T cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and eosinophils that form the cellular inflammatory infiltrate in the dermis.

SUMMARY

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a delayed type hypersensitivity reaction elicited by the contact of the skin with the offending chemical in individuals who have been previously sensitized to the same chemical. The understanding of the cellular and molecular pathogenesis of ACD has expanded dramatically. In addition to CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, other cell types, such as natural killer T (NKT) cells and T regulatory cells, have emerged as critical participants (table 1). (See 'Overview' above.)

Hapten binding is the initial step in the development of ACD. Haptens are low molecular weight (<500 Daltons) chemicals that are able to penetrate the stratum corneum of the skin. Haptens are not immunogenic by themselves but can be efficiently recognized by the immune system after binding to a skin protein carrier. (See 'Hapten-protein binding' above.)

In the clinically inapparent sensitization phase, Langerhans cells and dermal dendritic cells initiate an adaptive immune response by capturing, processing, and presenting antigens to naïve T cells in the paracortical areas of lymph nodes. In the elicitation phase, the clinical manifestations of ACD are the result of a T cell-mediated inflammatory reaction occurring in the skin upon re-exposure to the offending hapten and mediated by the activation of hapten-specific T cells in the skin. The primary effector cells of ACD appear to be CD8+ cells (figure 1). (See 'The sensitization (afferent) phase' above and 'The elicitation (efferent) phase' above.)

  1. Divkovic M, Pease CK, Gerberick GF, Basketter DA. Hapten-protein binding: from theory to practical application in the in vitro prediction of skin sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 53:189.
  2. Kaplan DH, Kissenpfennig A, Clausen BE. Insights into Langerhans cell function from Langerhans cell ablation models. Eur J Immunol 2008; 38:2369.
  3. Katz SI, Tamaki K, Sachs DH. Epidermal Langerhans cells are derived from cells originating in bone marrow. Nature 1979; 282:324.
  4. Vocanson M, Hennino A, Rozières A, et al. Effector and regulatory mechanisms in allergic contact dermatitis. Allergy 2009; 64:1699.
  5. Bergstresser PR, Toews GB, Streilein JW. Natural and perturbed distributions of Langerhans cells: responses to ultraviolet light, heterotopic skin grafting, and dinitrofluorobenzene sensitization. J Invest Dermatol 1980; 75:73.
  6. Weinlich G, Heine M, Stössel H, et al. Entry into afferent lymphatics and maturation in situ of migrating murine cutaneous dendritic cells. J Invest Dermatol 1998; 110:441.
  7. Steinbrink K, Kolde G, Sorg C, Macher E. Induction of low zone tolerance to contact allergens in mice does not require functional Langerhans cells. J Invest Dermatol 1996; 107:243.
  8. Larsen CP, Steinman RM, Witmer-Pack M, et al. Migration and maturation of Langerhans cells in skin transplants and explants. J Exp Med 1990; 172:1483.
  9. Lukas M, Stössel H, Hefel L, et al. Human cutaneous dendritic cells migrate through dermal lymphatic vessels in a skin organ culture model. J Invest Dermatol 1996; 106:1293.
  10. Moodycliffe AM, Shreedhar V, Ullrich SE, et al. CD40-CD40 ligand interactions in vivo regulate migration of antigen-bearing dendritic cells from the skin to draining lymph nodes. J Exp Med 2000; 191:2011.
  11. Nuriya S, Yagita H, Okumura K, Azuma M. The differential role of CD86 and CD80 co-stimulatory molecules in the induction and the effector phases of contact hypersensitivity. Int Immunol 1996; 8:917.
  12. Zhou LJ, Tedder TF. A distinct pattern of cytokine gene expression by human CD83+ blood dendritic cells. Blood 1995; 86:3295.
  13. Lehé CL, Jacobs JJ, Hua CM, et al. Subtoxic concentrations of allergenic haptens induce LC migration and maturation in a human organotypic skin explant culture model: a novel method for identifying potential contact allergens. Exp Dermatol 2006; 15:421.
  14. Aiba S, Terunuma A, Manome H, Tagami H. Dendritic cells differently respond to haptens and irritants by their production of cytokines and expression of co-stimulatory molecules. Eur J Immunol 1997; 27:3031.
  15. Toebak MJ, Gibbs S, Bruynzeel DP, et al. Dendritic cells: biology of the skin. Contact Dermatitis 2009; 60:2.
  16. Bennett CL, van Rijn E, Jung S, et al. Inducible ablation of mouse Langerhans cells diminishes but fails to abrogate contact hypersensitivity. J Cell Biol 2005; 169:569.
  17. Poulin LF, Henri S, de Bovis B, et al. The dermis contains langerin+ dendritic cells that develop and function independently of epidermal Langerhans cells. J Exp Med 2007; 204:3119.
  18. Bursch LS, Wang L, Igyarto B, et al. Identification of a novel population of Langerin+ dendritic cells. J Exp Med 2007; 204:3147.
  19. Grabbe S, Steinbrink K, Steinert M, et al. Removal of the majority of epidermal Langerhans cells by topical or systemic steroid application enhances the effector phase of murine contact hypersensitivity. J Immunol 1995; 155:4207.
  20. Grabbe S, Schwarz T. Immunoregulatory mechanisms involved in elicitation of allergic contact hypersensitivity. Immunol Today 1998; 19:37.
  21. Nakano Y. Antigen-presenting cell function of epidermal cells activated by hapten application. Br J Dermatol 1998; 138:786.
  22. Gaspari AA, Jenkins MK, Katz SI. Class II MHC-bearing keratinocytes induce antigen-specific unresponsiveness in hapten-specific Th1 clones. J Immunol 1988; 141:2216.
  23. Gaspari AA, Katz SI. Induction of in vivo hyporesponsiveness to contact allergens by hapten-modified Ia+ keratinocytes. J Immunol 1991; 147:4155.
  24. Bour H, Peyron E, Gaucherand M, et al. Major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted CD8+ T cells and class II-restricted CD4+ T cells, respectively, mediate and regulate contact sensitivity to dinitrofluorobenzene. Eur J Immunol 1995; 25:3006.
  25. Martin S, Lappin MB, Kohler J, et al. Peptide immunization indicates that CD8+ T cells are the dominant effector cells in trinitrophenyl-specific contact hypersensitivity. J Invest Dermatol 2000; 115:260.
  26. Vocanson M, Hennino A, Cluzel-Tailhardat M, et al. CD8+ T cells are effector cells of contact dermatitis to common skin allergens in mice. J Invest Dermatol 2006; 126:815.
  27. Gocinski BL, Tigelaar RE. Roles of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in murine contact sensitivity revealed by in vivo monoclonal antibody depletion. J Immunol 1990; 144:4121.
  28. Vocanson M, Hennino A, Chavagnac C, et al. Contribution of CD4(+ )and CD8(+) T-cells in contact hypersensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2005; 1:75.
  29. Akiba H, Kehren J, Ducluzeau MT, et al. Skin inflammation during contact hypersensitivity is mediated by early recruitment of CD8+ T cytotoxic 1 cells inducing keratinocyte apoptosis. J Immunol 2002; 168:3079.
  30. Kehren J, Desvignes C, Krasteva M, et al. Cytotoxicity is mandatory for CD8(+) T cell-mediated contact hypersensitivity. J Exp Med 1999; 189:779.
  31. Traidl C, Sebastiani S, Albanesi C, et al. Disparate cytotoxic activity of nickel-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cell subsets against keratinocytes. J Immunol 2000; 165:3058.
  32. Clark RA. Skin-resident T cells: the ups and downs of on site immunity. J Invest Dermatol 2010; 130:362.
  33. Morita H, Moro K, Koyasu S. Innate lymphoid cells in allergic and nonallergic inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 138:1253.
  34. Dyring-Andersen B, Geisler C, Agerbeck C, et al. Increased number and frequency of group 3 innate lymphoid cells in nonlesional psoriatic skin. Br J Dermatol 2014; 170:609.
  35. Kim HS, Jang JH, Lee MB, et al. A novel IL-10-producing innate lymphoid cells (ILC10) in a contact hypersensitivity mouse model. BMB Rep 2016; 49:293.
  36. Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 2006; 124:783.
  37. Sloane JA, Blitz D, Margolin Z, Vartanian T. A clear and present danger: endogenous ligands of Toll-like receptors. Neuromolecular Med 2010; 12:149.
  38. Martin SF, Dudda JC, Bachtanian E, et al. Toll-like receptor and IL-12 signaling control susceptibility to contact hypersensitivity. J Exp Med 2008; 205:2151.
  39. Martin SF, Esser PR, Weber FC, et al. Mechanisms of chemical-induced innate immunity in allergic contact dermatitis. Allergy 2011; 66:1152.
  40. Scheibner KA, Lutz MA, Boodoo S, et al. Hyaluronan fragments act as an endogenous danger signal by engaging TLR2. J Immunol 2006; 177:1272.
  41. Termeer C, Benedix F, Sleeman J, et al. Oligosaccharides of Hyaluronan activate dendritic cells via toll-like receptor 4. J Exp Med 2002; 195:99.
  42. Stern R, Kogan G, Jedrzejas MJ, Soltés L. The many ways to cleave hyaluronan. Biotechnol Adv 2007; 25:537.
  43. Schmidt M, Raghavan B, Müller V, et al. Crucial role for human Toll-like receptor 4 in the development of contact allergy to nickel. Nat Immunol 2010; 11:814.
  44. Rachmawati D, Bontkes HJ, Verstege MI, et al. Transition metal sensing by Toll-like receptor-4: next to nickel, cobalt and palladium are potent human dendritic cell stimulators. Contact Dermatitis 2013; 68:331.
  45. O'Leary JG, Goodarzi M, Drayton DL, von Andrian UH. T cell- and B cell-independent adaptive immunity mediated by natural killer cells. Nat Immunol 2006; 7:507.
  46. Cavani A, Nasorri F, Ottaviani C, et al. Human CD25+ regulatory T cells maintain immune tolerance to nickel in healthy, nonallergic individuals. J Immunol 2003; 171:5760.
  47. Reduta T, Stasiak-Barmuta A, Laudańska H. CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD2+high regulatory T cells in disseminated and localized forms of allergic contact dermatitis: relation to specific cytokines. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2011; 49:255.
  48. Honda T, Miyachi Y, Kabashima K. Regulatory T cells in cutaneous immune responses. J Dermatol Sci 2011; 63:75.
  49. Yoshiki R, Kabashima K, Sugita K, et al. IL-10-producing Langerhans cells and regulatory T cells are responsible for depressed contact hypersensitivity in grafted skin. J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129:705.
  50. Ring S, Karakhanova S, Johnson T, et al. Gap junctions between regulatory T cells and dendritic cells prevent sensitization of CD8(+) T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125:237.
  51. Dubois B, Chapat L, Goubier A, et al. Innate CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells are required for oral tolerance and inhibition of CD8+ T cells mediating skin inflammation. Blood 2003; 102:3295.
  52. Ring S, Enk AH, Mahnke K. ATP activates regulatory T Cells in vivo during contact hypersensitivity reactions. J Immunol 2010; 184:3408.
  53. Honda T, Otsuka A, Tanizaki H, et al. Enhanced murine contact hypersensitivity by depletion of endogenous regulatory T cells in the sensitization phase. J Dermatol Sci 2011; 61:144.
  54. Ring S, Schäfer SC, Mahnke K, et al. CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress contact hypersensitivity reactions by blocking influx of effector T cells into inflamed tissue. Eur J Immunol 2006; 36:2981.
  55. Ring S, Oliver SJ, Cronstein BN, et al. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress contact hypersensitivity reactions through a CD39, adenosine-dependent mechanism. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 123:1287.
  56. Tomura M, Honda T, Tanizaki H, et al. Activated regulatory T cells are the major T cell type emigrating from the skin during a cutaneous immune response in mice. J Clin Invest 2010; 120:883.
  57. Trautmann A, Altznauer F, Akdis M, et al. The differential fate of cadherins during T-cell-induced keratinocyte apoptosis leads to spongiosis in eczematous dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 2001; 117:927.
Topic 13653 Version 9.0

References