Your activity: 26 p.v.
your limit has been reached. plz Donate us to allow your ip full access, Email: sshnevis@outlook.com

Anesthesia for noncardiac surgery in adults with a ventricular assist device

Anesthesia for noncardiac surgery in adults with a ventricular assist device
Author:
Michael Manning, MD, PhD
Section Editors:
Jonathan B Mark, MD
Donna Mancini, MD
Deputy Editors:
Nancy A Nussmeier, MD, FAHA
Todd F Dardas, MD, MS
Literature review current through: Nov 2022. | This topic last updated: Oct 31, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are a treatment option for patients with advanced heart failure. Patients supported with a VAD may require noncardiac surgery for a variety of indications. (See "Treatment of advanced heart failure with a durable mechanical circulatory support device" and "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices".)

Key considerations for anesthesia for noncardiac surgery in patients with VADs are reviewed here. Other topics discuss the indications, implantation procedures, medical management, and emergency care for patients with a durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device:

(See "Treatment of advanced heart failure with a durable mechanical circulatory support device".)

(See "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices" and "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices".)

(See "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices".)

(See "Anesthesia for placement of ventricular assist devices".)

GOALS FOR MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT — A VAD performs as a supplemental cardiac pump by taking blood returning to a failing ventricle and ejecting it downstream, either into the ascending aorta in the case of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), or into the pulmonary artery in the case of a right ventricular assist device (RVAD).

A VAD may be implanted in a patient eligible for cardiac transplantation until a donor organ is available (ie, bridge to transplantation) or in a patient who is not currently eligible for transplantation but may become eligible [1,2]. In some patients, a durable VAD is implanted for permanent ventricular support (ie, destination therapy) [2,3]. (See "Treatment of advanced heart failure with a durable mechanical circulatory support device", section on 'Indications'.)

Short-term devices are also available for rapid implantation when mechanical circulatory support is acutely needed for survival (ie, bridge to recovery). Such patients are generally not candidates for elective noncardiac surgical procedures. (See "Short-term mechanical circulatory assist devices".)

TYPES OF CONTINUOUS-FLOW DEVICES — Since 2010, all newly implanted VADs have been continuous-flow devices [4,5].

Device components — Continuous-flow devices unload the failing ventricle through the action of an axial or centrifugal impeller that rotates at high speeds [4,6-9]. Device components include an impeller pump, connected by a small driveline to a system controller that is typically externalized to the upper abdomen. The system is typically powered by wearable batteries or by an external alternating current power source. These nonpulsatile devices are placed in the thoracic cavity with blood flowing through an inflow cannula in the apex of the left ventricle (LV) to the pump and returning back to the circulation through an outflow cannula in the ascending aorta.

Specific devices — The HeartMate 3 (picture 1) and HeartWare HVAD (figure 1) are the devices most likely to be encountered in a patient presenting for elective or urgent noncardiac surgery [10]. The HeartMate 3 is the only device currently available for implantation [4,6-9,11,12]. (See "Treatment of advanced heart failure with a durable mechanical circulatory support device", section on 'Specific devices'.)

PREANESTHETIC CONSULTATION — Preoperative discussion with knowledgeable clinicians having training in mechanical circulatory support (eg, a specialized VAD team) is extremely important. This facilitates awareness of potential patient-specific and device-specific problems and avoidance of pitfalls that may arise in the perioperative period, as well as coordination of care in the postoperative period [4,13].

Device-specific issues — Issues specific for the implanted device should be noted. These include the type of device, implantation date, pump speed, pump flow, pump power, and pulsatility index (table 1). (See "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Device interrogation' and 'Monitoring VAD parameters' below.)

The location of the externalized driveline on the abdominal wall is also noted, and that site is examined for any sign of infection. Previous history of difficulties with VAD function, any VAD-related complications (eg, thromboembolism, infection, mucosal bleeding), and adequacy of device function for the individual patient's current clinical status should be noted [4].

Patient-specific issues — Assessment of the patient's preoperative clinical condition includes assessment of the patient’s cardiovascular history, current health, and urgency and extent of the surgery to be performed [14].

Perioperative problems and management issues may include:

Cardiovascular comorbidity (eg, original indication for VAD implantation, presence of right heart failure, aortic insufficiency, arrhythmias, physical activity level). In particular, right heart failure is often present after implantation of an LVAD [4,6-9]. Right heart failure may be exacerbated by decreases in left ventricular (LV) pressure and size after VAD implantation, leading to interventricular septal bowing and distortion of right ventricular (RV) geometry and mechanics, particularly if the patient had underlying biventricular dysfunction. The current left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has much less meaning in the presence of a LVAD [15]. (See "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Right heart failure' and "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Exercise performance'.)

Hematologic abnormalities and risk of perioperative thrombosis or, conversely, coagulopathy and risk of bleeding requiring transfusion. The patient's anticoagulation regimen should be reviewed. Thromboembolism remains one of the most serious complications of VAD implantation [8,11,16]. All types of VADs require some type of anticoagulation, which should be noted in the history, and the presence of anemia or coagulopathy identified on preoperative laboratory tests. (See "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Antithrombotic therapy' and "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Thrombosis' and "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Bleeding'.)

Although the level of anticoagulation may be decreased toward the lower limit of the manufacturer's recommendation during the perioperative period or bridging therapy with heparin may be employed, we do not give reversal agents to VAD-supported patients for most elective surgical procedures [17-19]. Exceptions include neurologic procedures and some ophthalmologic procedures. The anesthesiologist, VAD management team, and surgeon should collaborate to plan a safe anticoagulation plan during the perioperative period, which may include a heparin bridge in selected patients. (See "Perioperative management of patients receiving anticoagulants".)

Presence of a pacemaker and/or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Generally, perioperative considerations regarding pacemakers and ICDs do not differ in VAD-supported patients [13,20,21]. (See "Perioperative management of patients with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator".)

However, defibrillator pads must be positioned on an area of the chest that is not directly over the device or driveline. The best options are lateral pad placement on opposite sides of the chest or anterior-posterior placement in the center of the chest and on the back. (See "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Ventricular arrhythmias'.)

Pulmonary comorbidity (eg, pulmonary hypertension, preexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, recent changes in oxygen requirements or decreased activity). (See "Evaluation of perioperative pulmonary risk" and "Strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications in adults".)

Neurologic comorbidity (eg, abnormal mental status, prior cerebrovascular accident or embolic stroke). (See "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Stroke'.)

Renal comorbidity (eg, renal insufficiency, requirement for dialysis, urinary tract infection).

Hepatic comorbidity (eg, liver insufficiency, congestive hepatopathy, coagulopathy). (See "Congestive hepatopathy".)

Presence of diabetes and difficulties with glycemic control. (See "Perioperative management of blood glucose in adults with diabetes mellitus".)

Infectious complications (eg, related to VAD implantation). (See "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Infection'.)

Planning for postoperative care — Planning for the immediate postoperative period includes arrangements for transfer to the most appropriate location to deliver postoperative care. Ideally, patients with a VAD recover in a monitored environment with telemetry and staff specifically trained in emergency care of such patients. In many institutions, personnel in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) may not be trained to deliver emergency care to a VAD patient; thus, recovery from surgery and anesthesia in the intensive care unit (ICU) may be appropriate. (See "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices".)

SELECTION OF ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUE — Patients supported with a VAD receive general anesthesia for most surgical interventions. Due to the need for continuing anticoagulation, neuraxial anesthetic techniques are generally contraindicated in most VAD patients. (See 'Management of hypotension' below.)  

However, placement of a peripheral nerve block with ultrasound guidance is relatively safe in patients receiving chronic anticoagulation therapy, and such techniques may be particularly useful in surgical procedures involving upper or lower extremities. Sedation with monitored anesthesia care is usually a good choice when feasible (eg, endoscopy procedures).

INTRAOPERATIVE ANESTHETIC MANAGEMENT — Intraoperative management of a patient supported by a VAD includes hemodynamic and VAD monitoring and management, anesthetic management, and support for potential complications such as cardiac arrest. Given the complexity of management of these patients, involvement of a cardiac anesthesiologist and cardiologist or surgeon with expertise in VAD management is recommended.

Management of the VAD power source — All patients with an implanted VAD are transported within the hospital with the VAD under battery power, including transport to the preoperative holding area, the operating room, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), or intensive care unit (ICU). Upon arrival to a destination, the VAD should be promptly switched from battery power and connected to the power base unit of the device, which is connected to a wall electrical power outlet. Typically, the battery packs are simultaneously connected to a power source to allow recharging.

In the event that a power base unit is not available, a patient's VAD can remain on battery power for several hours. However, a backup battery should always be available, and it is best to connect the VAD to an external power outlet to save battery power.

Intraoperative monitoring

Monitoring VAD parameters — VAD parameters may be monitored on a console or by accessing the patient controller. Second- and third-generation nonpulsatile VADs provide continuous displays of pump speed (revolutions per minute [RPM]), flow (L/minute), power (watts [W]), and the dimensionless pulsatility index (PI) (table 1) [4,6]. (See 'Device-specific issues' above and "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Device interrogation'.)

Pump speed – Pump speed is measured in rotations per minute (RPM), and adjustment during noncardiac surgery is rarely required.

Pump flow – Pump flow is measured in liters/minute (L/min) and is dependent upon the pump speed setting and the pressure gradients across the pump (ie, preload and afterload). Pump flows are calculated from the pump speed and power use, with higher pump speeds and power resulting in higher displayed flows. However, these flows are only estimates and are not measured by a flow sensor [4]. In one study conducted in a HeartMate II VAD at normal flows between 4 and 6 L/min, the displayed flow versus the actual flow measured with an ultrasonic flow probe on the outflow graft varied up to 1 L/min [22]. This is partly due to the varying parallel contribution to total cardiac output produced by the native LV in combination with VAD flow [4]

Pump power – Pump power is measured in watts (W). Generally, there is a linear relationship between pump power and pump flow. Increases in LV preload and high pump speed settings increase pump flow and increase power consumption. The presence of aortic insufficiency also necessitates increased power consumption to generate increased pump flow. An abrupt increase in power output may indicate pump thrombosis or malfunction.

Reductions in power consumption are typically due to reduced preload with reduced pump speed but may also occur with inflow cannula obstruction.

Pulsatility index – The PI is a dimensionless measure of the extent of LV pulsatility. The pulsatility index is inversely related to the amount of assistance provided by the pump. A low pulsatility index typically indicates either low intravascular volume or minimal native cardiac function. It is affected by left ventricular preload, afterload, contractility, heart rate and rhythm, and also VAD pump speed.

Noninvasive blood pressure and pulse oximetry — With continuous-flow VADs, there is often no palpable pulse and minimal arterial pulse pressure; thus, automated noninvasive blood pressure (BP) monitors (eg, oscillometry, Doppler method) do not function in approximately one-half of VAD-supported patients. (See "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Physical examination'.)

If current VAD settings allow some level of pulsatility, and there is optimal intravascular volume, then noninvasive BP and pulse oximetry readings may remain reliable throughout the perioperative period. Even a small pulse pressure (eg, 10 to 15 mmHg) typically allows use of standard noninvasive BP and pulse oximetry monitoring, which may be acceptable for minor surgical procedures (eg, colonoscopy, bronchoscopy, transesophageal echocardiography [TEE]). However, we do not reduce pump flow to allow increased pulsatility due to risk of thrombus formation [23,24].

Alternatively, use of a manual BP cuff with a handheld Doppler to detect distal blood flow can provide reasonably accurate BP measurements. Although this technique requires more effort and may be somewhat cumbersome, it does work well for relatively short cases such as endoscopic procedures. However, use of an intra-arterial catheter is the optimal method to monitor BP in these patients, as noted below. (See 'Intra-arterial catheter' below and "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Initial clinical assessment'.)

Intra-arterial catheter — We often insert an intra-arterial catheter for accurate and continuous measurement of BP, particularly if significant fluid shifts or blood loss is anticipated or if accuracy of noninvasive BP measurements is uncertain. This is necessary because intraoperative hypovolemia and/or vasodilatation will further reduce pulsatility in patients with continuous flow devices, with consequent reduction in efficacy of noninvasive monitors. Furthermore, if the accuracy of noninvasive BP measurement is uncertain at any time during surgery, we insert an intra-arterial catheter since this provides the most accurate and continuous BP monitoring [18,19]. The intra-arterial catheter also allows rapid access to obtain arterial blood gases (ABGs), which is particularly important when pulse oximetry is inaccurate due to lack of pulsatility. (See "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Initial clinical assessment'.)

Placement of an intra-arterial catheter may be difficult using palpation alone and is typically facilitated with ultrasound guidance. As noted above (see 'Noninvasive blood pressure and pulse oximetry' above), we do not alter pump flow to achieve greater palpability during placement of an intra-arterial catheter. (See "Intra-arterial catheterization for invasive monitoring: Indications, insertion techniques, and interpretation", section on 'Use of ultrasound guidance'.)

Transesophageal echocardiography — Availability of equipment and personnel to use TEE is useful in major surgical procedures and serves as a partial substitute for pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) monitoring in selected patients. (See 'Central venous or pulmonary artery catheter' below.)

TEE is also valuable to evaluate the following conditions, particularly in unstable patients:

Intravascular volume status – (see 'Fluid and hemodynamic management' below)

Right ventricular (RV) function

Aortic valve opening

Aortic valve regurgitation

Interventricular septal shifts

Correct position of the VAD cannulae

In the event of severe hypotension or cardiac arrest, TEE is employed to rapidly determine the most likely cause. (See 'Management of hypotension' below and 'Management of cardiac arrest' below and "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Quick-look echocardiogram'.)

Central venous or pulmonary artery catheter — A PAC may provide useful information to guide intraoperative fluid management and avoid increases in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in patients with a history of pulmonary hypertension or unsupported moderate or severe right heart dysfunction, particularly during major surgical procedures with anticipated large fluid shifts or blood loss. A central venous catheter (CVC) may be inserted rather than a PAC in patients without significant right heart dysfunction, with use of the central venous pressure (CVP) to monitor intravascular volume status and right heart function. A CVC also provides large-bore access for infusion of intravenous fluids or blood and vasoactive infusions when these needs are anticipated. (See "Anesthesia for noncardiac surgery in patients with pulmonary hypertension or right heart failure", section on 'Monitoring'.)

Positioning considerations — Hemodynamic effects of surgical positioning may impact VAD function. Placement of the patient in lateral decubitus with one-lung ventilation may result in hypoxia and/or hypercarbia due to development of a shunt, thereby increasing PVR, limiting preload to the VAD, and leading to acute RV failure.

Reverse Trendelenburg position decreases venous return to the heart, whereas Trendelenburg position increases venous return. These effects should be anticipated and managed since maintenance of a consistent and adequate preload volume is important to maintain appropriate VAD output [25]. (See 'Fluid and hemodynamic management' below.)

For patients supported by the total artificial heart with external lines connected to a pulsatile air pump, care must be taken to avoid compression of these conduits. (See "Treatment of advanced heart failure with a durable mechanical circulatory support device", section on 'Types of durable MCS devices'.)

Induction and maintenance of general anesthesia — The decision to perform endotracheal intubation or use a supraglottic airway in a VAD-supported patient is based on the usual criteria for airway management, as well as the type of VAD. Many LVAD-supported patients develop telangiectasias on mucosal surfaces, with epistaxis being a frequent complication. Thus, care should be taken to avoid significant trauma during intubation or other airway interventions. (See "Airway management for induction of general anesthesia".)

Continuous flow VADs are relatively small in size and typically have an intrathoracic location. In such patients, impaired gastric emptying would not be anticipated, and general anesthesia may be conducted without rapid sequence induction.

Considerations for selection and dosing of agents for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia include the degree of dysfunction of the unassisted RV, as well as effects of each agent on major organs that may have been compromised by circulatory insufficiency that necessitated placement of a VAD (eg, brain, kidneys, liver). (See "General anesthesia: Intravenous induction agents" and "Maintenance of general anesthesia: Overview".)

Fluid and hemodynamic management — Maintenance of hemodynamic stability in a patient with a LVAD depends on providing adequate preload, maintaining afterload, maintaining adequate heart rate and rhythm, adjusting pump speed as needed, and preventing any hemodynamic changes that would compromise RV function [4]. These are the main determinates of flow through the pump (ie, the pressure gradient across the pump) and total pump output.

Generally, a reasonable target for intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) is within approximately 10 percent of the patient's normal MAP, but no lower than 70 to 80 mmHg.

Strategies to maintain hemodynamic stability — Specific strategies to maintain optimal hemodynamic values include the following (table 2):

Maintain intravascular volume status – Maintenance of intravascular volume status is necessary to provide adequate preload for optimal VAD function. A VAD will only pump the volume delivered to it [25]. Thus, factors that decrease preload will decrease pump flow and LV output. Such factors include anesthetic agents, dehydration, hemorrhage, and lateral decubitus and reverse Trendelenburg position.

Also, high intrathoracic pressures due to excessively large tidal volumes or high intra-abdominal pressures (eg, due to CO2 insufflation during laparoscopy) may decrease venous return, thereby decreasing volume delivered to the VAD [25].

When VAD flow exceeds the available LV preload, the walls of the LV near the inflow conduit can collapse and limit VAD inflow. Although the VAD may temporarily decrease its speed to compensate for decreased preload in these circumstances, such a suction event may precipitate ventricular arrhythmias or hemodynamic deterioration [26-28]. (See "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Quick-look echocardiogram'.)

Maintain optimal afterload – VAD flow is sensitive to changes in afterload [4]. Increases in afterload (eg, systemic arterial hypertension) will decrease pump flow and reduce VAD output. Severely increased afterload may lead to stasis within the VAD and acutely increase risk of thrombus formation, particularly if anticoagulation is inadequate during the perioperative period. Thus, appropriate depth of anesthesia should be achieved prior to noxious stimuli such as laryngoscopy or skin incision, and adequate analgesia should be ensured during and after the operation has concluded.

Hypotension should also be avoided. In the setting of euvolemia, vasopressors are often used to maintain MAP at 70 to 80 mmHg. Since vasoplegia is common after VAD implantation, phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and/or vasopressin are commonly used to treat hypotension during induction (table 3) [9] (see 'Management of hypotension' below). Although reduced afterload increases pump flow, significant or prolonged hypotension may injure perfusion-dependent end-organs [4]. In one retrospective study, MAP <70 mmHg for greater than 20 minutes was associated with acute kidney injury in patients with a nonpulsatile VAD [29].

Maintain adequate heart rate and rhythm – Arrhythmias causing clinically significant tachycardia or bradycardia interfere with optimal VAD function and can reduce pump flow. Management of arrhythmias in these patients is similar to that for patients without a VAD. (See "Arrhythmias during anesthesia".)

Maintain RV function – Adequate RV function must be assured by minimizing PVR since output from the RV determines the volume ultimately ejected by a left-sided VAD [16]. Thus, increases in PVR due to hypoxemia, hypercarbia, pain, alpha-agonist vasopressors, hypothermia, and/or acidosis should be avoided.

Also, although adequate preload is desirable, overaggressive fluid resuscitation is avoided since this may cause RV distention and worsen RV function [4].

RV dysfunction is most directly diagnosed using TEE. If increasing CVP and/or hypotension with increasing vasopressor requirements are present, as well as low PI and low flow/power on the VAD monitor, then RV failure should be suspected and further investigated with TEE. Treatment may require inotropic support (eg, milrinone, epinephrine) in addition to vasopressor agents to treat hypotension. In some cases, pulmonary vasodilator therapy may be necessary. (See "Anesthesia for noncardiac surgery in patients with pulmonary hypertension or right heart failure", section on 'Hemodynamic management'.)

Consult with VAD expert regarding pump speed adjustments – Blood flow through the VAD is proportional to the pump speed, with higher RPMs generating more flow [4]. For patients at risk for significant fluid shifts or who are hypotensive, we recommend consultation with a cardiologist or surgeon with VAD expertise to determine whether VAD pump speed should be adjusted. If hypotension occurs and is not attributable to decreased preload or afterload, but rather to low pump speed or RV dysfunction, then increasing pump speed may be corrective [6]. However if there is significant RV dysfunction, inotropic support of the RV may be required. (See 'Monitoring VAD parameters' above.)

Increased pump speed with diminished pulsatility has been implicated in causing aortic valve thrombosis, particularly in the setting of interrupted or reduced anticoagulation (eg, the perioperative setting). However, this typically does not occur in the brief time period required to accomplish a surgical intervention. Also, as noted above, when VAD flow exceeds available preload, inflow suction may cause LV wall collapse.

Management of hypotension — VAD parameters are checked on the VAD monitor console to determine which of the following strategies should be implemented in a hypotensive patient (see 'Monitoring VAD parameters' above and "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Approach to hypotension in the conscious patient'):

If low pump flow is noted on the VAD monitor, this is typically due to low preload that may cause collapse of the LV wall due to suction. Treatment is volume administration. (See 'Monitoring VAD parameters' above.)

Other causes of low pump flow are RV failure, inflow or outflow cannula obstruction or thrombosis, or rare causes such as cardiac tamponade or pneumothorax. TEE examination is the most effective means to determine the cause. (See "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Low flow' and "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Approach to hypotension in the conscious patient'.)

If high pump flow is noted on the VAD monitor, check the power reading (see "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'High flow'):

If power is normal, high flow may indicate a low systemic vascular resistance; thus, a vasopressor should be administered to increase vascular tone (afterload) and maintain MAP at 70 to 80 mmHg. Patients with end-stage heart disease requiring VAD insertion may have resistant hypotension or vasoplegia due to preoperative use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, heparin, or calcium channel blockers; thus, phenylephrine, norepinephrine and/or vasopressin are typically selected for first-line vasopressor therapy (table 3) [9]. (See "Hemodynamic management during anesthesia in adults", section on 'Vasopressor and positive inotropic agents'.)

A sudden increase in power may indicate device thrombosis or malfunction and should prompt an evaluation for the cause (eg, TEE, invasive hemodynamic assessment). (See "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Echocardiographic ramp test' and "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Approach to hypotension in the conscious patient'.)

Management of cardiac arrest — Recognition of intraoperative cardiac arrest may be difficult or challenging in patients with a continuous flow VAD who are sedated or anesthetized, particularly if there is no intra-arterial catheter for BP monitoring. Similar to patients without a VAD, the first step in managing suspected cardiac arrest is to ensure adequacy of the airway and breathing. Insertion of an intra-arterial catheter is necessary to establish accurate BP readings and to obtain ABGs. Defibrillator pads are positioned on an area of the chest that is not directly over the device or driveline (either bilaterally on the sides of the chest or anterior-posterior placement in the center of the chest and on the back). Further management is discussed in separate topics. (See "Emergency care of adults with mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Approach to the unconscious patient' and "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Technical problems and device failure'.).

Emergence and extubation — After emergence from anesthesia, extubation criteria are the same as in patients without a VAD (see "Extubation following anesthesia"). Prolonged tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation should be avoided if possible to decrease the risk of respiratory infection.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT — Postoperative management should be conducted in a fully monitored setting. Noninvasive and invasive monitoring (if present) are continued until major bleeding, fluid shifts, and severe pain have been managed, and implanted devices have been checked (eg, the VAD itself and pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [ICD]).

Management of the VAD power source – After transport from the operating room and upon arrival to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) or other monitored care setting, such as the intensive care unit (ICU), the VAD is promptly connected to an external power outlet and the battery packs are simultaneously connected to allow recharging. (See 'Management of the VAD power source' above.)

Maintenance of hemodynamic stability – Similar to the intraoperative period, hemodynamic stability in the postoperative period is maintained by providing adequate preload, maintaining afterload, adjusting pump speed as needed, ensuring an adequate heart rate and rhythm, and preventing any hemodynamic changes that would compromise function of the right ventricle (RV) [4]. (See 'Fluid and hemodynamic management' above.)

Pain management – The goals of pain management are to achieve adequate analgesia while maintaining hemodynamic stability. Hypertension associated with pain should be avoided since this may increase afterload and decrease pump output. However, over-sedation with opioids or other sedative-analgesics must also be avoided, since this may lead to hypercarbia, hypoxia, increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and RV dysfunction.

Pacemaker/ICD management – Reinstitution of prior pacemaker or ICD settings should be assured shortly after the patient's arrival in the PACU, ICU, or other monitored care setting. Since maintenance of adequate rhythm and rate is necessary for proper VAD function, patients with a pacemaker or ICD should have the device interrogated by the electrophysiology team and reprogrammed if necessary. (See "Perioperative management of patients with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator", section on 'Postoperative management'.)

Resumption of anticoagulation – Patients supported by VADs require anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy to reduce the risk of thrombotic complications such as device thrombosis and embolic stroke. These agents are resumed when feasible (depending on the type of surgery and amount of postoperative bleeding). (See "Management of long-term mechanical circulatory support devices", section on 'Antithrombotic therapy'.)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Goals for mechanical circulatory support – A long-term ventricular assist device (VAD) may be implanted in a candidate for cardiac transplantation to support a chronically failing ventricle (ie, bridge to transplantation), achieve substantial improvement in end-organ function (ie, bridge to candidacy), or for permanent ventricular support (ie, destination therapy).

Types of continuous flow devices – Most VADs are miniaturized continuous-flow devices that work by unloading the failing ventricle through the action of an axial or centrifugal impeller rotating at very high speeds. (See 'Goals for mechanical circulatory support' above.)

Preanesthetic consultation

Device-specific issues – Device-specific issues including the type of device (figure 2 and figure 1 and picture 1), implantation date, VAD parameters, and location of the externalized driveline on the abdominal wall are assessed. In addition, adequacy of device function for the individual patient's current clinical status, prior difficulty with VAD function, and VAD-related complications are noted. (See 'Device-specific issues' above.)

Patient-specific issues – The extent of end-organ impairment, presence of post-implantation complications, and the current surgical problem are noted. Hematologic abnormalities (eg, history of thromboembolism or coagulopathy, chronic administration of anticoagulants, anemia), right ventricular (RV) failure, presence of a pacemaker and/or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), or pulmonary, neurologic, renal, hepatic, or infectious comorbidities are often present. (See 'Patient-specific issues' above.)

Selection of anesthetic technique – General anesthesia is necessary for most surgical interventions. However, sedation with monitored anesthesia care or placement of a peripheral nerve block with ultrasound guidance are good choices for selected procedures. Due to the need for anticoagulation, neuraxial anesthetic techniques are contraindicated in most VAD patients. (See 'Selection of anesthetic technique' above.)

Intraoperative management

Management of power source – VAD patients are transported within the hospital with the device functioning on battery power. When the patient arrives at their hospital destination, the VAD should be connected to a power base unit that plugs into a standard wall electrical power outlet and simultaneously recharges the device batteries. (See 'Management of the VAD power source' above.)

Monitoring - Intraoperative monitoring for VAD patients includes (see 'Intraoperative monitoring' above):

-VAD parameters (table 1). (See 'Monitoring VAD parameters' above.)

-With continuous-flow devices, there is often no palpable pulse and minimal pulse pressure. Thus, automated noninvasive blood pressure (BP) monitors (eg, oscillometry, Doppler method) and pulse oximeters may not be functional unless a small pulse pressure (eg, 10 to 15 mmHg) is present. (See 'Noninvasive blood pressure and pulse oximetry' above.)

-It is often necessary to insert an intra-arterial catheter for accurate and continuous measurement of BP and ready access to obtain arterial blood gases, particularly if significant fluid shifts or blood loss is anticipated or if accuracy of noninvasive BP measurements is uncertain. (See 'Intra-arterial catheter' above.)

-Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is valuable, particularly in unstable patients, to evaluate intravascular volume status, position of the VAD cannulae, aortic valve opening, aortic insufficiency, or interventricular septal shift. (See 'Transesophageal echocardiography' above.)

-A pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) may provide useful information to guide intraoperative fluid management and avoid increases in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in patients with a history of pulmonary hypertension or unsupported moderate or severe right heart dysfunction. A central venous catheter (CVC) may be inserted rather than a PAC in patients without significant right heart dysfunction, with use of the central venous pressure (CVP) to monitor intravascular volume status. (See 'Central venous or pulmonary artery catheter' above.)

Fluid and hemodynamic management – Maintenance of hemodynamic stability depends on providing adequate preload, maintaining afterload, ensuring adequate heart rate and rhythm, adjusting pump speed as needed, and preventing any hemodynamic changes that compromise device function (table 2). (See 'Fluid and hemodynamic management' above.)

Postoperative management – Immediate postoperative considerations include maintaining adequate intravascular volume status and optimal hemodynamics, reinstitution of prior pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator settings and achieving adequate analgesia. (See 'Postoperative management' above.)

  1. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1435.
  2. Stevenson LW, Rose EA. Left ventricular assist devices: bridges to transplantation, recovery, and destination for whom? Circulation 2003; 108:3059.
  3. Stevenson LW, Miller LW, Desvigne-Nickens P, et al. Left ventricular assist device as destination for patients undergoing intravenous inotropic therapy: a subset analysis from REMATCH (Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance in Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure). Circulation 2004; 110:975.
  4. Chung M. Perioperative Management of the Patient With a Left Ventricular Assist Device for Noncardiac Surgery. Anesth Analg 2018; 126:1839.
  5. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, et al. Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015; 34:1495.
  6. Dalia AA, Cronin B, Stone ME, et al. Anesthetic Management of Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: An Update for Anesthesiologists. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:1001.
  7. Sladen RN. New Innovations in Circulatory Support With Ventricular Assist Device and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy. Anesth Analg 2017; 124:1071.
  8. Stone ME, Pawale A, Ramakrishna H, Weiner MM. Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy-Recent Advances and Outcomes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:2019.
  9. Desai SR, Hwang NC. Advances in Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Mechanical Circulatory Support. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:1193.
  10. Brown TA, Kerpelman J, Wolf BJ, McSwain JR. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between General Anesthesiologists and Cardiac Anesthesiologists in the Management of Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients in Noncardiac Surgeries and Procedures. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:2104.
  11. Miller LW, Rogers JG. Evolution of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy for Advanced Heart Failure: A Review. JAMA Cardiol 2018; 3:650.
  12. Mehra MR, Uriel N, Naka Y, et al. A Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device - Final Report. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:1618.
  13. Garatti A, Bruschi G, Colombo T, et al. Noncardiac surgical procedures in patient supported with long-term implantable left ventricular assist device. Am J Surg 2009; 197:710.
  14. Deitchman AR, McCurdy MT, Fargaly H, et al. Microcirculatory Coherence in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33:2608.
  15. Cyrille NB, Tran AL, Benito Gonzalez T, et al. Predictors and Outcomes of Right Ventricular Failure in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 31:1132.
  16. Slaughter MS, Pagani FD, Rogers JG, et al. Clinical management of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices in advanced heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010; 29:S1.
  17. Rossi M, Serraino GF, Jiritano F, Renzulli A. What is the optimal anticoagulation in patients with a left ventricular assist device? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 15:733.
  18. Ivie RMJ, Maniker RB, Alexander JK, Sobol JB. Perioperative management of patients with left ventricular assist devices undergoing repair of hip fracture. J Clin Anesth 2019; 56:24.
  19. Fegley MW, Gupta RG, Elkassabany N, et al. Elective Total Knee Replacement in a Patient With a Left Ventricular Assist Device-Navigating the Challenges With Spinal Anesthesia. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 35:662.
  20. Park SJ, Tector A, Piccioni W, et al. Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: a new look at survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129:9.
  21. Riha H, Netuka I, Kotulak T, et al. Anesthesia management of a patient with a ventricular assist device for noncardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 14:29.
  22. Slaughter MS, Bartoli CR, Sobieski MA, et al. Intraoperative evaluation of the HeartMate II flow estimator. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009; 28:39.
  23. Duero Posada JG, Moayedi Y, Alhussein M, et al. Outflow Graft Occlusion of the HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device. Circ Heart Fail 2017; 10.
  24. Klotz S, Karluss A, Stock S, et al. HeartMate III Left Ventricular Assist Device Thrombosis Triggered by an Automatic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shock. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 104:e421.
  25. Aggarwal A, Kurien S, Coyle L, et al. Evaluation and management of emergencies in patients with mechanical circulatory support devices. Prog Transplant 2013; 23:119.
  26. Vollkron M, Voitl P, Ta J, et al. Suction events during left ventricular support and ventricular arrhythmias. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007; 26:819.
  27. Nakahara S, Chien C, Gelow J, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias after left ventricular assist device. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2013; 6:648.
  28. Peberdy M, Guck J, Ornato J, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults and children with mechanical circulatory support: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017; 135:e1115.
  29. Mathis MR, Sathishkumar S, Kheterpal S, et al. Complications, Risk Factors, and Staffing Patterns for Noncardiac Surgery in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices. Anesthesiology 2017; 126:450.
Topic 112627 Version 6.0

References