Your activity: 80 p.v.
your limit has been reached. plz Donate us to allow your ip full access, Email: sshnevis@outlook.com

Ovine polyvalent crotalidae North and South American snake antivenom: Drug information

Ovine polyvalent crotalidae North and South American snake antivenom: Drug information
(For additional information see "Ovine polyvalent crotalidae North and South American snake antivenom: Patient drug information" and see "Ovine polyvalent crotalidae North and South American snake antivenom: Pediatric drug information")

For abbreviations, symbols, and age group definitions used in Lexicomp (show table)
Brand Names: US
  • CroFab
Pharmacologic Category
  • Antivenin
Dosing: Adult

Note: Clinicians are encouraged to contact their local poison control center or clinical toxicologist for consultation when treating any envenomed patient. Although tourniquets are not recommended (Kanaan 2015), antivenin therapy should be initiated prior to tourniquet removal in patients who present with one in place. Tourniquet removal should only occur after the patient is tolerating the full infusion rate without signs of anaphylaxis (Bush 2015).

Crotalid envenomation

Crotalid envenomation:

Initial dose: IV: 4 to 6 vials; treatment should begin as soon as possible and preferably within 6 hours of envenomation. Monitor for up to 1 hour following the infusion to determine if initial control has been achieved as evidenced by the arrest of local signs of envenomation (eg, leading edge of local injury is not progressing). Some clinicians recommend an initial dose of 8 to 12 vials for patients who present with immediately life-threatening effects (eg, shock, serious active bleeding) (Lavonas 2011b). Repeat with an additional 4 to 6 vials if control is not achieved with the initial dose. Continue to treat with 4- to 6-vial doses until local manifestations, coagulation tests, and systemic signs are normal. Maximum initial dose: 12 vials.

Maintenance dose: IV: Once control is achieved, administer 2 vials every 6 hours for up to 18 hours. Optimal dosing beyond 18 hours has not been established; however, treatment may be continued if deemed necessary based on the patient's condition. Note: As needed dosing (as opposed to scheduled maintenance dosing) has been associated with reduced length of stay and reduced antivenom used (Spyres 2018); consultation with a poison control center or clinical toxicologist is recommended prior to using this dosing strategy.

Continuous infusion (off label): In cases of late hematologic effects or in patients with medically significant bleeding complications from rattlesnake envenomation, the use of continuous IV infusion of antivenom may be of value. Reported rates of infusion has varied from 2 to 4 vials per 24 hours (Bush 2013).

Copperhead envenomation

Copperhead envenomation: Note: Dosage recommendations are based on use in crotalid envenomation and a multicenter study in the treatment of copperhead envenomation (Gerardo 2017).

Initial dose: IV: 4 to 6 vials; repeat if initial control is not achieved within 1 hour (Gerardo 2017; Lavonas 2004). Early treatment (within ~6 hours of envenomation) may be beneficial regarding time to recovery of limb function (Anderson 2019).

Maintenance dose: IV: Once control is achieved, administer 2 vials every 6 hours for up to 18 hours (Gerardo 2017). The use of scheduled maintenance doses in copperhead envenomed patients may not be required based on patient presentation and response to treatment; consultation with a clinical toxicologist or poison control center is recommended prior to discontinuation of therapy (Lavonas 2004).

Dosing: Kidney Impairment: Adult

There are no dosage adjustments provided in the manufacturer’s labeling.

Dosing: Hepatic Impairment: Adult

There are no dosage adjustments provided in the manufacturer’s labeling.

Dosing: Pediatric

(For additional information see "Ovine polyvalent crotalidae North and South American snake antivenom: Pediatric drug information")

Note: Clinicians are encouraged to contact their local poison control center or clinical toxicologist for consultation when treating any envenomed patient. Although tourniquets are not recommended (Kanaan 2015), antivenin therapy should be initiated prior to tourniquet removal in patients who present with one in place. Tourniquet removal should only occur after the patient is tolerating the full infusion rate without signs of anaphylaxis (Bush 2015).

Crotalid envenomation

Crotalid envenomation:

Note: Antivenom dosage is based on venom load and severity of symptoms and not on patient size; therefore, a reduced, weight-based antivenom dose in pediatric patients is not recommended (Behm 2003; Lavonas 2011a; Offerman 2002). Clinical trials included patients as young as 11 years of age. Use has been reported to be both safe and effective in children as young as 1 year of age (Johnson 2008; Schmidt 2005; Seifert 2009). Clinicians are encouraged to contact their local poison control center or clinical toxicologist for consultation when treating any envenomed patient, but especially pediatric patients.

Initial dose: Children and Adolescents: IV: 4 to 6 vials as soon as possible and preferably within 6 hours of snakebite; monitor for 1 hour following infusion to determine if initial control has been achieved as evidenced by arrest of local signs of envenomation (eg, leading edge of local injury is not progressing). Some clinicians recommend an initial dose of 8 to 12 vials in patients presenting with immediately life-threatening effects (eg, shock, respiratory distress, cardiovascular collapse, significant hemorrhage, or severe neurologic toxicity) (Goto 2009; Lavonas 2011a). If control is not achieved, repeat with additional dose of 4 to 6 vials until initial control is achieved and local manifestations, coagulation tests and systemic signs are normal. Maximum initial dose: 12 vials.

Maintenance dose: Begin once control of envenomation achieved:

Intermittent dosing: Children and Adolescents: IV: 2 vials every 6 hours for up to 18 hours. Optimal dosing beyond 18 hours has not been established; however, treatment may be continued if deemed necessary based on patient condition. Note: Based on experience in adult patients, "as needed" dosing (as opposed to scheduled maintenance dosing) has been associated with reduced length of stay and reduced antivenom used (Spyres 2018), consultation with a poison control center or clinical toxicologist is recommended prior to using this dosing strategy.

Continuous infusion: Adolescents ≥16 years: IV: Dosing regimens variable: Reported rates of infusion: 2 to 4 vials per 24 hours; a case series describing 5 patients (age range: 16 to 73 years) reported a mean dose: 3.1 ± 0.4 vials/day and mean duration of infusion: 6 ± 2 days (range: 4 to 14 days); in cases of late hematologic effects or in patients with medically significant bleeding complications from rattlesnake envenomation, the use of continuous intravenous infusion of antivenom may be of value. Consult poison control center or clinical toxicologist for use in pediatric patients (Bush 2013).

Copperhead envenomation

Copperhead envenomation:

Note: Dosage recommendations are based on use in crotalid envenomation and a multicenter study in the treatment of copperhead envenomation (Gerardo 2017).

Children and Adolescents:

Initial dose: IV: 4 to 6 vials; repeat if initial control is not achieved within 1 hour (Gerardo 2017; Lavonas 2004). Early treatment (within ~6 hours of envenomation) may be beneficial regarding time to recovery of limb function (Anderson 2019).

Maintenance dose: IV: 2 vials every 6 hours for up to 18 hours; begin once control is achieved (Gerardo 2017). The use of scheduled maintenance doses in copperhead envenomed patients may not be required based on patient presentation and response to treatment; consultation with a clinical toxicologist or poison control center is recommended prior to discontinuation of therapy (Lavonas 2004).

Dosing: Kidney Impairment: Pediatric

There are no dosage adjustments provided in the manufacturer's labeling.

Dosing: Hepatic Impairment: Pediatric

There are no dosage adjustments provided in the manufacturer's labeling.

Dosing: Older Adult

Refer to adult dosing.

Dosage Forms: US

Excipient information presented when available (limited, particularly for generics); consult specific product labeling.

Solution Reconstituted, Intravenous:

CroFab: (1 ea) [contains papain]

Generic Equivalent Available: US

No

Administration: Adult

IV: Administer IV over 60 minutes at a rate of 25 to 50 mL/hour for the first 10 minutes. If no allergic reaction is observed, increase rate to 250 mL/hour. Monitor closely. Immediate treatment for anaphylactoid and/or hypersensitivity reactions should be available during the infusion. Decreasing the rate of infusion may help control some infusion-related adverse effects (eg, fever, low back pain, wheezing and nausea).

Administration: Pediatric

Parenteral: IV:

Intermittent doses: IV infusion: Administer at an initial rate of 25 to 50 mL/hour for the first 10 minutes; if tolerated and no allergic reaction observed, then increase rate so that total dose infuses over 60 minutes, usually to 250 mL/hour. Continue to monitor closely. Immediate treatment for anaphylactoid and/or hypersensitivity reactions should be available during the infusion. Decreasing the rate of infusion may help control some infusion-related adverse effects, such as fever, nausea, low back pain, and wheezing.

Continuous IV infusion: Limited data available: In a case series, infusion rates were individualized and calculated based on delivery of vial doses over the day accounting for stability of preparations (Bush 2013).

Use: Labeled Indications

Crotalid envenomation: Management of adult and pediatric patients with North American crotalid envenomations (eg, rattlesnakes [Crotalus, Sistrurus], copperheads, and cottonmouth/water moccasins [Agkistrodon])

Use: Off-Label: Adult

Crotalid envenomation (other species [eg, South American rattlesnake])

Adverse Reactions

The following adverse drug reactions and incidences are derived from product labeling unless otherwise specified. Frequency not always defined.

Cardiovascular: Hypotension

Central nervous system: Chills

Dermatologic: Pruritus, skin rash, urticaria

Gastrointestinal: Anorexia, nausea

Hypersensitivity: Hypersensitivity reaction (5% to 19%), serum sickness (5%), anaphylactoid reaction, anaphylaxis

Respiratory: Asthma, cough, dyspnea, wheezing

Miscellaneous: Fever

<1%, postmarketing, and/or case reports: Angioedema, blood coagulation disorder (delayed, recurrent), chest discomfort, delayed hypersensitivity, dizziness, erythema, headache, hemorrhage, hyperhidrosis, laryngeal edema, musculoskeletal chest pain, swelling of lips, swelling (recurrent and refractory to treatment), swollen tongue, tachycardia, tachypnea, thrombocytopenia (refractory to treatment), tremor

Contraindications

Hypersensitivity to any component of the formulation (including papaya or papain), unless the benefits outweigh the risks and appropriate management for anaphylaxis is readily available

Warnings/Precautions

Concern related to adverse effects:

• Hypersensitivity reactions: Derived from sheep plasma; anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions are possible, especially in patients with known allergies to sheep protein. Immediate treatment (including epinephrine 1 mg/mL) for anaphylactoid and/or hypersensitivity reactions should be available prior to administration. In case of acute hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions, discontinue infusion and institute appropriate emergency treatment. Incidence of acute hypersensitivity reactions may be lower than previously thought (Buchanan 2009; Cannon 2008; Lavonas 2011b; Kleinschmidt 2018; Khobrani 2019). This product lacks the immunogenic Fc fragments and proteins found in the older equine-derived product. Sensitization may occur with repeated doses.

In addition, it is processed with papain and may cause hypersensitivity reactions in patients who are allergic to papaya, other papaya extracts, papain, chymopapain, or the pineapple-enzyme bromelain. There may also be cross allergenicity with dust mite and latex allergens. In one patient, anaphylaxis was associated with underlying galactose-α-1,3 galactose allergy (Rizer 2017).

Disease-related concerns:

• Crotalid envenomation: Should be used within 4 to 6 hours of the envenomation to prevent clinical deterioration and the development of coagulation abnormalities; however, the administration of antivenom may be beneficial even if treatment has been delayed (Bush 2013). Coagulation abnormalities are due directly to snake venom interference with the coagulation cascade. Recurrent coagulopathy occurs in ~50% of patients and may persist for 1 to 2 weeks or more; patients who have evidence of coagulopathy during the first 12 hours postantivenom treatment have an ~66% chance of recurrence, which typically occurs 2 to 14 days after completion of antivenom administration (Boyer 2001). Repeat dosing may be indicated (Miller 2010; Ruha 2011). Patients should be monitored for at least 1 week and evaluated for other preexisting conditions associated with bleeding disorders. In severe envenomations, a decrease in platelets may occur, lasting hours to several days. Blood products are generally ineffective as they are rapidly consumed by circulating venom.

Warnings: Additional Pediatric Considerations

Accumulation of thimerosal has been associated with neurological and renal toxicity; developing fetuses and young infants and children are most susceptible; the presence of thimerosal should not deter use as the risks of untreated crotalid envenomations far outweigh the risk of thimerosal exposure.

Metabolism/Transport Effects

None known.

Drug Interactions

There are no known significant interactions.

Pregnancy Considerations

Information related to the use of crotalidae polyvalent immune FAB (ovine) in pregnancy is limited (Brown 2013; Ghosh 2018; Moore 2019; Yano 2019).

In general, medications used as antidotes should take into consideration the health and prognosis of the mother; antidotes should be administered to pregnant patients if there is a clear indication for use and should not be withheld because of fears of teratogenicity (Bailey 2003).

Available evidence suggests the main adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with a venomous snakebite (eg, fetal loss, placental abruption, preterm labor) are due to the direct effects of the toxin and resulting maternal illness. Antivenom administration in pregnancy should be considered when otherwise clinically indicated using a venom-specific approach, extended fetal and maternal monitoring, supportive care, and treatment of anaphylaxis if needed (Brown 2013; Kanaan 2015).

Breastfeeding Considerations

It is not known if this product is present in breast milk. The manufacturer recommends caution be used if administered to a breastfeeding patient.

Monitoring Parameters

Vital signs; CBC, platelet count, prothrombin time, aPTT, fibrinogen levels, fibrin split products, clot retraction, bleeding and coagulation times, BUN, electrolytes, bilirubin; measure the diameter of the bite area/extremity at the leading edge of swelling and discoloration (repeat every 15 to 30 minutes); intake and output; signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis/allergy; signs and symptoms of delayed allergic reaction or serum sickness (rash, fever, myalgia, arthralgia). CBC, platelet counts, and clotting studies are evaluated at 6-hour intervals until patient is stable; patients who experience coagulopathy during hospitalization for initial treatment should be monitored ≥1 week to determine need for retreatment.

Mechanism of Action

A venom-specific fragment of IgG, which binds and neutralizes venom toxin, helping to remove the toxin from the target tissue and eliminate it from the body.

Pharmacokinetics

Onset of action: Stability of patient or reduction in symptoms may be seen within 1 hour of administration.

Distribution: Vd: Unbound Fab: 110 mL/kg (Seifert 2001).

Half-life elimination: 12 to 23 hours (based on limited data).

Excretion: Excretion of the venom:antibody complex is speculated to occur via the reticuloendothelial system (Dart 1997). The excretion of Crotalidae polyvalent immune FAB antivenom that is not bound (free) to venom components is eliminated via renal excretion (Gutierrez 2003).

Clearance: Unbound Fab: 5.9 mL/h/kg (Seifert 2001).

  1. Anderson VE, Gerardo CJ, Rapp-Olsson M, et al. Early administration of Fab antivenom resulted in faster limb recovery in copperhead snake envenomation patients. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2019;57(1):25-30. doi:10.1080/15563650.2018.1491982 [PubMed 30175628]
  2. Bailey B. Are there teratogenic risks associated with antidotes used in the acute management of poisoned pregnant women? Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2003;67(2):133-140. doi:10.1002/bdra.10007 [PubMed 12769509]
  3. Behm MO and Kearns GL, "Crotaline Fab Antivenom for Treatment of Children With Rattlesnake Envenomation," Pediatrics, 2003, 112(6 Pt 1):1458–9. [PubMed 14654633]
  4. Boyer LV, Seifert SA, and Cain JS, “Recurrence Phenomena After Immunoglobulin Therapy for Snake Envenomations: Part 2. Guidelines for Clinical Management With Crotaline Fab Antivenom," Ann Emerg Med, 2001, 37(2):196-201. [PubMed 11174239]
  5. Brown SA, Seifert SA, Rayburn WF. Management of envenomations during pregnancy. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013;51(1):3-15. doi:10.3109/15563650.2012.760127 [PubMed 23298218]
  6. Buchanan JA, Varney SM, Mlynarchek SL, et al, "Immediate Adverse Events (AEs) After Administration of Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Fav AV)," Clin Toxicol, 2009, 47(7):703.
  7. Bush SP, Kinlaw SB. Management of a pediatric snake envenomation after presentation with a tight tourniquet. Wilderness Environ Med. 2015;26(3):355-358. doi:10.1016/j.wem.2015.01.005 [PubMed 25792002]
  8. Bush SP, Seifert SA, Oakes J, et al. Continuous IV crotalidae polyvalent immune fab (ovine) (FabAV) for selected North American rattlesnake bite patients. Toxicon. 2013;69:29-37. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.02.008 [PubMed 23474267]
  9. Cannon R, Ruha AM, and Kashani J, "Acute Hypersensitivity Reactions Associated With Administration of Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab Antivenom," Ann Emerg Med, 2008, 51(4):407-11. [PubMed 18191286]
  10. Clark RF, Williams SR, Nordt SP, Boyer-Hassen LV. Successful treatment of crotalid-induced neurotoxicity with a new polyspecific crotalid Fab antivenom. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;30(1):54-57. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70111-2 [PubMed 9209226]
  11. CroFab (Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab, ovine origin) [prescribing information]. West Conshohocken, PA: BTG International; January 2018.
  12. Dart RC, Borron SW, Caravati EM, et al; Antidote Summit Authorship Group. Expert consensus guidelines for stocking of antidotes in hospitals that provide emergency care. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(3):386-394.e1. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.01.023 [PubMed 19406507]
  13. Dart RC, Goldfrank LR, Erstad BL, et al. Expert consensus guidelines for stocking of antidotes in hospitals that provide emergency care. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(3):314-325.e1. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.05.021 [PubMed 28669553]
  14. Dart RC, Seifert SA, Carroll L, et al. Affinity-Purified, Mixed Monospecific Crotalid Antivenom Ovine Fab for the Treatment of Crotalid Venom Poisoning. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;30(1):33-39. [PubMed 9209222]
  15. Gerardo CJ, Quackenbush E, Lewis B, et al. The efficacy of Crotalidae polyvalent immune fab (ovine) antivenom versus placebo plus optional rescue therapy on recovery from copperhead snake envenomation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(2):233-244.e3. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.034 [PubMed 28601268]
  16. Ghosh N, Henderson JA, Kim HG, Ancar FM. Rattlesnake envenomation in the third trimester of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):682-686. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002783. [PubMed 30095759]
  17. Goto CS and Feng SY. Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab for the Treatment of Pediatric Crotaline Envenomation. Pediatr Emer Care. 2009;25(4):273-282. [PubMed 19369845]
  18. Gutiérrez JM, León G, Lomonte B. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of immunoglobulin therapy for envenomation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(8):721-741. doi:10.2165/00003088-200342080-00002 [PubMed 12846594]
  19. Johnson PN, McGoodwin L, and Banner W Jr. Utilisation of Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) for Viperidae Envenomations in Children. Emerg Med J. 2008;25(12):793-798. [PubMed 19033492]
  20. Kanaan NC, Ray J, Stewart M, et al. Wilderness Medical Society practice guidelines for the treatment of pitviper envenomations in the United States and Canada. Wilderness Environ Med. 2015;26(4):472-487. doi:10.1016/j.wem.2015.05.007 [PubMed 26433731]
  21. Keating GM. Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab: In Patients With North American Crotaline Envenomation. BioDrugs. 2011;25(2):69-76. [PubMed 21443271]
  22. Khobrani M, Huckleberry Y, Boesen KJ, Aljabri A, Alharthi M, Patanwala AE. Incidence of allergic reactions to Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2019;57(3):164-167. doi:10.1080/15563650.2018.1504956 [PubMed 30260274]
  23. Kleinschmidt K, Ruha AM, Campleman S, Brent J, Wax P; ToxIC North American Snakebite Registry group. Acute adverse events associated with the administration of Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab antivenom within the North American Snakebite Registry. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2018;56(11):1115-1120. doi:10.1080/15563650.2018.1464175 [PubMed 29688079]
  24. Lavonas EJ, Gerardo CJ, O'Malley G, et al. Initial experience with Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab (ovine) antivenom in the treatment of copperhead snakebite. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43(2):200-206. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.08.009 [PubMed 14747809]
  25. Lavonas EJ, Kokko J, Schaeffer TH, et al. Short-Term Outcomes After Fab Antivenom Therapy for Severe Crotaline Snakebite. Ann Emerg Med. 2011b;579(2):128-37. [PubMed 20952098]
  26. Lavonas EJ, Ruha AM, Banner W, et al. Unified Treatment Algorithm for the Management of Crotaline Snakebite in the United States: Results of an Evidence-Informed Consensus Workshop. BMC Emerg Med. 2011a;11:2. [PubMed 21291549]
  27. Lynch MJ, Ritter SC, Cannon RD. Successful treatment of South American rattlesnake (Crotalus durissus terrificus) envenomation with Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab (CroFab). J Med Toxicol. 2011;7(1):44-46. doi:10.1007/s13181-010-0100-z [PubMed 20658221]
  28. Miller AD, Young MC, DeMott MC, et al. Recurrent Coagulopathy and Thrombocytopenia in Children Treated With Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab: A Case Series. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010;26(8):576-82. [PubMed 20693856]
  29. Moore EC, Porter LM, Ruha AM. Rattlesnake venom-induced recurrent coagulopathy in first trimester pregnant women - two cases. Toxicon. 2019;163:8-11. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.03.006 [PubMed 30880187]
  30. Offerman SR, Bush SP, Moynihan JA, et al. Crotaline Fab Antivenom for the Treatment of Children With Rattlesnake Envenomation. Pediatrics. 2002;110(5):968-971. [PubMed 12415038]
  31. Pizon AF, Riley BD, LoVecchio F, et al, "Safety and Efficacy of Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab in Pediatric Crotaline Envenomations," Acad Emerg Med, 2007, 14(4):373-6. [PubMed 17296804]
  32. Quan AN, Quan D, Curry SC. Improving Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab Reconstitution Times. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28(5):593-595. [PubMed 20579555]
  33. Rizer J, Brill K, Charlton N, King J. Acute hypersensitivity reaction to Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab (CroFab) as initial presentation of galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal) allergy. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2017;55(7):668-669. doi:10.1080/15563650.2017.1313981 [PubMed 28443380]
  34. Ruha AM, Curry SC, Albrecht C, "Late Hematologic Toxicity Following Treatment of Rattlesnake Envenomation With Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab Antivenom," Toxicon, 2011, 57(1):53-9. [PubMed 20920516]
  35. Schmidt JM, "Antivenom Therapy for Snakebites in Children: Is There Evidence?" Curr Opin Pediatr, 2005, 17(2):234-8. [PubMed 15800419]
  36. Seifert SA and Boyer LV, "Recurrence Phenomena After Immunoglobulin Therapy for Snake Envenomations: Part 1. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Immunoglobulin Antivenoms and Related Antibodies," Ann Emerg Med, 2001, 37(2):189-95. [PubMed 11174238]
  37. Seifert SA, Boyer LV, Benson BE, et al, "AAPCC Database Characterization of Native U.S. Venomous Snake Exposures, 2001-2005," Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2009, 47(4):327-35. [PubMed 19514880]
  38. Seifert SA, Boyer LV, Dart RC, et al, "Relationship of Venom Effects to Venom Antigen and Antivenom Serum Concentrations in a Patient With Crotalus atrox Envenomation Treated With a Fab antivenom. Ann Emerg Med 1997, 30(1):49-53. [PubMed 9209225]
  39. Spyres MB, Skolnik AB, Moore EC, Gerkin RD, Padilla-Jones A, Ruha AM. Comparison of antivenom dosing strategies for rattlesnake envenomation. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(6):e540-e544. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003079 [PubMed 29521714]
  40. Yano J, Zerden M, German B. Presumed copperhead snakebite and antivenom administration in the third trimester. Wilderness Environ Med. 2019;30(4):446-449. doi:10.1016/j.wem.2019.06.015 [PubMed 31699647]
  41. Yin S, Kokko J, Lavonas E, et al, "Factors Associated With Difficulty Achieving Initial Control With Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab Antivenom in Snakebite Patients," Acad Emerg Med, 2011, 18(1):46-52. [PubMed 21166732]
Topic 10129 Version 111.0