Your activity: 6 p.v.

Perioperative blood management: Strategies to minimize transfusions

Perioperative blood management: Strategies to minimize transfusions
Authors:
Thomas J Graetz, MD
Gregory Nuttall, MD
Aryeh Shander, MD, FCCM, FCCP, FASA
Section Editors:
Michael F O'Connor, MD, FCCM
Steven Kleinman, MD
Deputy Editors:
Nancy A Nussmeier, MD, FAHA
Jennifer S Tirnauer, MD
Literature review current through: Nov 2022. | This topic last updated: May 20, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — This topic reviews the general approach to perioperative blood management, including strategies to avoid or minimize transfusion of blood components during surgical and other invasive procedures.

Separate topics discuss specific strategies for blood management during cardiac surgical patients. (See "Blood management and anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass" and "Reversing anticoagulation and achieving hemostasis after cardiopulmonary bypass".)

Indications and risks associated with specific blood components as well as guidance for appropriate decisions regarding intraoperative transfusions are discussed separately. (See "Intraoperative transfusion of blood products in adults".)

Separate topic reviews also discuss general indications for blood product transfusions:

Red blood cells (RBCs) (See "Indications and hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion in the adult".)

Platelets (See "Platelet transfusion: Indications, ordering, and associated risks".)

Plasma (See "Clinical use of plasma components".)

GOALS OF PATIENT BLOOD MANAGEMENT — Patient blood management (PBM) is a patient-centered, systematic, evidence-based approach to improve patient outcomes by reducing unnecessary transfusion [1-7]. Managing anemia and reducing the risk of anemia are intended to reduce transfusions of RBCs, platelets, and plasma and in turn reduce risks of transfusion reactions and other transfusion complications [4,8,9]. This patient-centered multimodality and multidisciplinary approach focuses on clinical outcomes rather than use of blood products [6]. Cost saving is a side benefit. One retrospective study in Australia estimated substantial cost savings after implementation of preoperative screening and management of anemia and suboptimal iron stores in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery [10]. Techniques and strategies for optimal PBM span the entire perioperative period from preoperative assessment until discharge from the hospital (table 1) [4,11].

For major or complex surgical procedures with a known high risk of significant blood loss (eg, >500 to 1000 mL), advanced discussions with the surgical team, a hemostasis expert, and/or the patient's primary clinician may identify opportunities to implement preoperative or intraoperative measures to avoid allogeneic transfusion, such as delay of an elective procedure to treat certain causes of anemia, preoperative autologous blood donation, or intraoperative blood salvage, acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH), or use of antifibrinolytics or other hemostatic products [6,12]. (See 'Preoperative strategies' below and 'Intraoperative strategies' below.)

Since the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in many regional blood inventory shortages due to decreased donations, perioperative PBM is critically important to aid in balancing supply and demand for blood components [4,13-16].

A comprehensive discussion of other strategies to minimize blood loss is presented separately. (See "The approach to the patient who declines blood transfusion", section on 'Minimize blood loss'.)

PREOPERATIVE STRATEGIES — The preanesthetic consultation provides an opportunity to assess and address risks for bleeding and to evaluate possible interventions to minimize the need for transfusions (table 1) [4,17-20]. Certain disorders (eg, anemia), surgical procedures (eg, cardiac surgery, liver transplantation), and medications that affect hemostasis are associated with increased potential for bleeding and transfusion.

Elective surgical procedures — It may be appropriate to postpone an elective procedure when there is a reversible cause of anemia or coagulopathy that can be corrected in a reasonable period of time (algorithm 1).

Selective laboratory testing

Hemoglobin or complete blood count – A baseline hemoglobin measurement (typically a component of a complete blood count [CBC]) is obtained in patients undergoing selected major surgery surgical procedures that have significant expected blood loss (eg, procedures with >10 percent chance of needing a transfusion or >500 mL blood loss) and in individuals likely to have preoperative anemia (due to a known underlying condition), unless the scheduled procedure is minor. Anemia should be addressed and should alert clinicians to perform an evaluation and appropriately manage the patient. (See 'Treatment of anemia' below.)

For patients with known or suspected medical conditions who will undergo intermediate- to high-risk surgical procedures, additional preoperative laboratory testing may be necessary (table 2). (See "Preoperative evaluation for anesthesia for noncardiac surgery", section on 'Preoperative testing'.)

Ideally, a baseline CBC is obtained approximately four weeks prior to scheduled major elective surgery. This allows adequate time for appropriate treatment of anemia, such as replacement of iron stores in individuals with iron deficiency [21]. In some cases, elective surgery may need to be delayed (algorithm 1). (See "Indications and hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion in the adult", section on 'Hospital-wide oversight programs/patient blood management'.)

By contrast, a CBC or hemoglobin measurement is not necessary for patients undergoing minor surgery unless the history suggests anemia. (See "Preoperative medical evaluation of the healthy adult patient", section on 'Complete blood count'.)

Screening tests for bleeding disorders – For patients with a personal history, family history, or physical examination suggesting the presence of a bleeding disorder, appropriate screening tests should be obtained. These often include, but are not limited to, a platelet count and screening tests of coagulation (prothrombin time [PT] with international normalized ratio [INR] and activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT]) [17,22,23]. In some cases, liver function tests or tests of renal function (creatinine) may also be obtained. (See "Approach to the adult with a suspected bleeding disorder".)

If indicated, such screening should be done early enough to allow time for diagnosis and treatment of causes of hemostatic abnormalities. A hematology consultation is typically necessary. In selected cases (eg, patients with significant prior bleeding episodes or recent decrease in hemoglobin level or need for transfusion), it is appropriate to obtain a consultation even if screening tests are normal. However, we do not obtain screening tests of coagulation unless a bleeding disorder is suspected, in accord with the recommendations of the American Society of Anesthesiologists [24], the British Committee for Standards in Hematology [25], and the European Society of Anaesthesia [26]. (See "Preoperative assessment of hemostasis", section on 'Laboratory testing' and "Preoperative assessment of hemostasis", section on 'Medical and hematologic consultations'.)

Routine screening for thrombocytopenia is not indicated, as isolated thrombocytopenia is rare and usually identified before preoperative testing [27]. (See "Preoperative assessment of hemostasis", section on 'Routine screening'.)

Testing for individuals receiving anticoagulants – Individuals receiving anticoagulants typically have recent laboratory testing available that should be reviewed (eg, PT/INR for those on warfarin, creatinine for those on a dabigatran or a direct factor Xa inhibitor). This information may factor into decisions regarding the preoperative timing of anticoagulant discontinuation. (See "Perioperative management of patients receiving anticoagulants".)

Typing and crossmatching tests – Typing and crossmatching tests to ensure availability of appropriate blood products are necessary before procedures with large expected blood loss; the blood bank should be notified of the approximate number of units that are likely to be required based on known blood loss associated with the specific procedure as well as the potential for greater than average blood loss that may occur or may be poorly tolerated in certain patients (eg, those with comorbidities).

Treatment of anemia — Anemia is a highly prevalent risk factor for morbidity and mortality in surgical patients and is independently associated with increased risk of transfusion [1,19,20,28-31]. Chronic anemia can be a marker for other comorbidities in addition to being a direct cause of morbidity and mortality [32]. (See "Indications and hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion in the adult", section on 'Impact of anemia on morbidity and mortality'.)

Depending on the cause and degree of anemia, the urgency of the procedure, and the expected amount of blood loss and other risk factors, surgery may be postponed to diagnose the cause and correct anemia when feasible, in order to minimize the risk of perioperative transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) (algorithm 1) [4,18-20,28-30,33-37].

While many patients with preoperative anemia have iron deficiency anemia or anemia of chronic disease/anemia of inflammation, other causes of anemia include folate and vitamin B12 deficiencies [30]. For patients who have unknown or complex causes of anemia, input is sought from a consultant with expertise in anemia management. (See "Anemia of chronic disease/anemia of inflammation", section on 'ESAs' and "Approach to the child with anemia" and "Diagnostic approach to anemia in adults".)

Iron deficiency anemia — Iron deficiency anemia is a surprisingly common condition across various surgical and other patient populations [1,4,19,29,30,38-41]. Even among patients whose anemia is attributed to other causes (eg, chronic kidney disease or inflammation), some degree of iron deficiency may be present. Individuals with iron deficiency should be treated with iron rather than transfusion, unless the anemia is extremely severe and there is risk of organ ischemia, as discussed separately. If iron is administered, sufficient time should be allowed for effective treatment of anemia before surgery (typically two to four weeks for partial correction and six to eight weeks for full correction). In individuals with unexplained iron deficiency, determination of the underlying cause is an essential part of management. (See "Causes and diagnosis of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia in adults" and "Treatment of iron deficiency anemia in adults".)

Oral iron replacement can be initiated in an iron-deficient patient if at least four to six weeks of time is available before planned surgery. Intravenous (IV) iron is an option if there is less than four to six weeks until semi-elective surgery, and for patients who cannot tolerate oral iron or do not have a response (eg, due to poor absorption) [19,20,29,33,37,42-44]. In this setting, IV iron can replenish body iron stores more rapidly and effectively than oral iron therapy; however, time is still required for the iron to be incorporated into developing RBCs and for the hemoglobin level to increase, and available trials have not been adequately powered to determine whether rates of transfusion are lower [30,41,44-46]. Details regarding decision-making and treatment are discussed separately. (See "Treatment of iron deficiency anemia in adults", section on 'Perioperative'.)

Use of erythropoietin — Erythropoietin (EPO) can increase the red cell mass and therefore the hemoglobin level, potentially reducing patients' exposures to allogeneic transfusion in certain patient-specific and surgery-specific settings [30]. Administration of EPO typically should include supplemental iron to avoid functional iron deficiency which may occur in face of increased erythropoiesis.

EPO for treatment of anemia can be used in the following settings for scheduled surgical procedures [1]:

For patients with anemia of chronic disease/anemia of inflammation undergoing a scheduled major noncardiac surgical procedure with expected blood loss >500 mL if hemoglobin is <12 g/dL [47]. Clinical judgment is used for patients with hemoglobin levels between 12 and 13 g/dL. (See "Anemia of chronic disease/anemia of inflammation".)

For patients with anemia of chronic disease/anemia of inflammation undergoing cardiac surgery if hemoglobin <13 g/dL. Our approach is consistent with guidelines from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA), and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, which recommend consideration of preoperative EPO administration with concomitant IV iron for anemic cardiac surgical patients, even if iron deficiency or iron deficiency anemia is absent [36,48]. (See "Preoperative evaluation for anesthesia for cardiac surgery", section on 'Anemia'.)

For patients for whom blood transfusion is not an option, as described separately. (See "The approach to the patient who declines blood transfusion", section on 'Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs/EPO)' and "The approach to the patient who declines blood transfusion", section on 'Optimize red blood cell production'.)

Our general approach does not take the place of the judgment of the surgeon, anesthesiologist, internist, or hematologist regarding likelihood of avoiding transfusion and the risks and benefits of EPO administration for an individual patient. We typically begin EPO therapy three weeks before an elective procedure and provide three injections of 40,000 units or 300 to 600 units/kg of epoetin alfa once weekly, together with supplemental iron to avoid functional iron deficiency. If less than three weeks is available, we still administer EPO prior to the surgical procedure as it may still provide benefit.

Potential adverse effects of EPO include venous thromboembolism, hypertension, and possible adverse outcomes in patients with cancer being treated with curative intent, and it is reasonable to avoid EPO in individuals with severe uncontrolled hypertension or those with cancer receiving chemotherapy with curative intent. (See "The approach to the patient who declines blood transfusion", section on 'Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs/EPO)' and "Role of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the treatment of anemia in patients with cancer".):

There is significant heterogeneity among published studies with respect to dosing and timing of preoperative EPO administration, the presence, cause, and severity of preoperative anemia and/or iron deficiency, whether iron therapy was concomitantly administered, and the types of surgical procedures studied [30]. Data regarding benefits and risks of preoperative EPO administration are summarized as follows:

A 2020 meta-analysis of randomized trials that included 1880 anemic patients (hemoglobin <13 g/dL for males or <12 g/dL for nonpregnant females) undergoing noncardiac surgery (primarily orthopedic, gastrointestinal, and gynecological surgery) compared administration of preoperative EPO plus iron therapy with placebo or standard of care (with or without iron) [49]. Preoperative EPO plus iron reduced the need for RBC transfusion (risk ratio [RR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.80).

A 2019 meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing preoperative administration of EPO versus placebo (32 trials; 4750 patients, mostly orthopedic and cardiac surgery) found reduced blood transfusions in the EPO groups [50]. Decreased blood transfusions were seen in the entire population (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.73; 28 trials), as well as the subgroups undergoing cardiac surgery (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.47-0.73; nine trials) and major orthopedic surgery (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.28-0.46; five trials). In addition, the EPO group had increased hemoglobin levels. There was no increase in the incidence of thromboembolic events with EPO.

Another 2019 randomized trial in elective cardiac surgical patients with preoperative anemia or isolated iron deficiency noted reduced RBC transfusions from a median of one to zero units in those who received preoperative subcutaneous EPO administered together with IV iron, subcutaneous vitamin B12, and oral folic acid on the day before surgery, compared with those receiving placebo drugs (odds ratio [OR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.98) [51]. Post-hoc analysis of this trial confirmed that such "quadruple anemia treatment" significantly increased reticulocyte count on postoperative days 1,3, and 5 in patients with or without preoperative iron deficiency [52]. However, it is unknown whether administration of IV iron without EPO would have been equally effective in patients with iron deficiency, or whether giving vitamin B12 and folate conferred any additional benefit.

A 2018 randomized trial in orthopedic surgical patients with hemoglobin 10 to 13 g/dL before hip or knee arthroplasty reported greater iron stores and improved erythropoiesis after treatment with weekly EPO plus concomitant administration of IV iron for three weeks before surgery, compared with treatment with EPO plus oral iron for the same period [46].

Anemia associated with chronic kidney disease — Management of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD; with or without hemodialysis) may include iron and/or EPO. (See "Treatment of anemia in nondialysis chronic kidney disease", section on 'Treatment' and "Treatment of anemia in patients on dialysis", section on 'Treatment'.)

Details of therapy should be discussed with the patient's primary nephrologist. In particular, we try to avoid transfusion when possible in any patient on a transplant waiting list, as transfusion-induced sensitization may increase antibody levels and reduce the likelihood of eventual successful renal transplantation. However, transfusion should not be withheld from an individual awaiting a kidney transplant if indicated to treat more severe symptomatic anemia. These issues are discussed in detail separately. (See "Medical management of the dialysis patient undergoing surgery", section on 'Anemia'.)

Preoperative autologous blood donation — Use of preoperative autologous donation (PAD) has been declining, but it may be offered as a blood conservation option for candidates in relatively good health who are not anemic and are undergoing surgical procedures with significant expected blood loss. The exact threshold may differ slightly at different institutions; an approximate range is expected loss of >500 mL or >1000 mL [53]. Recombinant human EPO may be used as an adjunct [18]. Reasons for the decline in use include high wastage of unused PAD units, increased risk of anemia and risk of needing transfusion, expense, and inconvenience [53]. (See "Surgical blood conservation: Preoperative autologous blood donation".)

Management of thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction

Thrombocytopenia – For individuals with known thrombocytopenia, a discussion with the consulting hematologist or the patient's primary clinician should focus on determining a safe platelet count for the proposed procedure and appropriate interventions to raise the platelet count to a safe level if needed. (See "Platelet transfusion: Indications, ordering, and associated risks", section on 'Preparation for an invasive procedure'.)

For patients who are found to have a low platelet count, causes of thrombocytopenia are evaluated prior to elective surgery. Depending on the type and urgency of the surgical procedure and the cause and degree of thrombocytopenia, surgery may be postponed and/or therapy may be given to increase the platelet count before the procedure. Suggested platelet count thresholds for various common invasive procedures are discussed in a separate topic. (See "Platelet transfusion: Indications, ordering, and associated risks", section on 'Preparation for an invasive procedure'.)

Immune thrombocytopenia – For some elective procedures in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), properly-timed glucocorticoids and/or intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) can be used to raise the platelet count before surgery. The table shows the expected time to first response for various ITP treatments (table 3). If time is not an issue, we generally use the agent that has previously been effective for the individual patient. (See "Initial treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in adults", section on 'Surgery or delivery'.)

Data are limited for the use of other approaches such as administration of a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) prior to surgery in individuals with ITP [54]. Indications and the time to expected response are discussed separately. (See "Clinical applications of thrombopoietic growth factors", section on 'Use of TPO receptor agonists' and "Second-line and subsequent therapies for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in adults", section on 'TPO receptor agonists'.)

Liver disease – In contrast with ITP, there is evidence that individuals with liver disease who have significant thrombocytopenia and are undergoing an elective procedure with a high bleeding risk can be treated with a properly-timed TPO-RA prior to the procedure. Details are available in a separate topic. (See "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'Invasive procedures'.)

Platelet dysfunction – The functional status of platelets is also important in decisions regarding platelet transfusion before or during surgery. Some studies suggest that results of platelet function tests better predict surgical bleeding than the platelet count [55,56]. However, there is insufficient evidence to incorporate these tests as part of routine preoperative assessment.

Topics addressing further management of patients with specific disorders of platelet function include:

Uremic platelet dysfunction – Many, but not all uremic patients have a bleeding diathesis; some are actually hypercoagulable. (See "Uremic platelet dysfunction", section on 'Treatment of bleeding'.)

Other congenital or acquired disorders of platelet function – (See "Congenital and acquired disorders of platelet function".)

Management of medications affecting hemostasis — Some patients undergoing surgery are taking medications intended to reduce the risk of thrombosis (eg, warfarin or another anticoagulant, aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor such as clopidogrel). In some cases, medications taken for other indications may alter hemostasis (eg, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], herbal medications).

Appropriate perioperative management of a patient taking a specific medication depends on the indication for which the agent was prescribed, the underlying thrombotic risk, the planned surgical procedure, and other factors that affect bleeding risk [1]. Discontinuation of antithrombotic medications is often appropriate, with the details of timing typically determined using institutional or other guidelines as well as consultation with the surgeon and the prescribing clinician. These management decisions are discussed in separate topics:

Antiplatelet agents (eg, aspirin, other antiplatelet agents, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents) – (See "Perioperative medication management", section on 'Medications affecting hemostasis'.)

Anticoagulants – (See "Perioperative management of patients receiving anticoagulants".)

Herbal medications that affect hemostasis (eg, ginkgo biloba, garlic) – (See "Perioperative medication management", section on 'Herbal medications'.)

Management of specific hemostatic disorders — Perioperative management of patients with inherited or acquired disorders that affect hemostasis is discussed in UpToDate topics for the specific disease. The most common examples are noted below.

Liver disease – Patients with liver disease may have abnormalities in routine laboratory tests of coagulation, especially when liver synthetic function is significantly impaired and portal pressures are increased. These include prolongation of the PT, INR, and aPTT, as well as mild thrombocytopenia and elevated D-dimer. Furthermore, both quantitative and qualitative platelet disorders are a consequence of not only chronic, but also acute liver damage. However, individuals with hepatic insufficiency also have abnormalities that may increase the risk of thrombosis. Consequently, laboratory abnormalities are poor predictors of bleeding risk. (See "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'Laboratory abnormalities'.)

Perioperative management of hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease is discussed separately. (See "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'Invasive procedures'.)

Other acquired disorders of hemostasis

Vitamin K deficiency – Vitamin K deficiency may develop in individuals with reduced oral intake or decreased absorption due to conditions such as cystic fibrosis, biliary atresia, sclerosing cholangitis, cholestasis, or intestinal diseases with malabsorption. Significant vitamin K deficiency will prolong the PT. Vitamin K deficiency can be treated with vitamin K, which may take one or more days to be effective, or with an unactivated prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) if needed for emergency surgery with a significant bleeding risk. (See "Overview of vitamin K", section on 'Vitamin K deficiency'.)

Disseminated intravascular coagulation – (See "Evaluation and management of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in adults", section on 'Treatment'.)

Acquired coagulation factor inhibitors (eg, autoantibodies against factors II, V, VII, VIII [acquired hemophilia A], IX, XI, or XIII) – (See "Acquired inhibitors of coagulation".)

Inherited conditions affecting hemostasis

Hemophilia – (See "Treatment of bleeding and perioperative management in hemophilia A and B", section on 'Elective surgery' and "Treatment of bleeding and perioperative management in hemophilia A and B", section on 'Urgent/emergency surgery'.)

Other congenital coagulation factor deficiencies (eg, factors XIII, XI, X, VII, V, II [prothrombin], fibrinogen) – (See "Rare inherited coagulation disorders", section on 'Invasive procedure/surgery' and "Disorders of fibrinogen", section on 'Management'.)

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) – (See "von Willebrand disease (VWD): Treatment of minor bleeding, use of DDAVP, and routine preventive care", section on 'Minor bleeding and minor surgery' and "von Willebrand disease (VWD): Treatment of major bleeding and major surgery", section on 'Overview of approach'.)

Other congenital platelet disorders that cause platelet dysfunction or thrombocytopenia – (See "Congenital and acquired disorders of platelet function", section on 'Therapy' and "Diagnostic approach to the adult with unexplained thrombocytopenia", section on 'Causes of thrombocytopenia'.)

Consents and advanced directives — Patient preferences and acceptance or declining various blood components and/or blood conservation modalities should be discussed in the preoperative period. Related consents and advanced directives should be obtained and documented in the preoperative period to ensure that acceptable options for optimal care are provided [1,57-59].

Certain patients may decline transfusions, or appropriate blood products may be limited or unavailable for other reasons (eg, previously transfused patients with multiple alloantibodies or incompatible cross-matching for other reasons, wounded soldiers on the battlefield, surgical procedure performed in areas of limited blood supply). These situations pose additional challenges for treatment of severe anemia, and for cases in which significant blood loss is likely [58-60].

There may be substantial variability in acceptance of various components and factors, necessitating discussion of specific transfusion decisions on an individual basis before invasive interventions [58,59,61]. As an example, acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) may be a good option for some Jehovah Witnesses who will usually consent to ANH if the blood is maintained in a contiguous circuit with the circulation. (See 'Acute normovolemic hemodilution' below.)

Specific arrangements regarding acceptable alternatives should be made in advance to allow provision of the most effective care while respecting the patient's preferences, values, and their right of self-determination [58-60,62]. (See "The approach to the patient who declines blood transfusion", section on 'Be clear about the patient's wishes'.)

Evidence suggests that neither hemoglobin-based nor chemical-based oxygen carriers (eg, perfluorocarbon) are acceptable alternatives to transfusion, but these strategies have been employed in rare cases when blood components were not an option [63]. Strategies to optimize preoperative red cell mass and minimize blood loss in patients who decline blood transfusions are presented separately. (See "The approach to the patient who declines blood transfusion" and "Oxygen carriers as alternatives to red blood cell transfusion".)

Urgent and emergency surgical procedures — For urgent or emergency surgery, it may be impossible to correct all factors adversely affecting baseline hemoglobin, coagulation, bleeding, and the potential need for transfusion of blood products [1]. For example, it is not possible to correct iron deficiency anemia before emergency surgery [64], because iron must be incorporated into developing blood cells. Specific issues may include the following:

Hemorrhage – When blood loss is rapid or extensive, or when the hemoglobin level drops below a defined threshold, RBC transfusion may be necessary in the preoperative period. Perioperative indications for transfusion of RBCs are discussed in detail separately. (See "Intraoperative transfusion of blood products in adults", section on 'Red blood cells' and "Indications and hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion in the adult", section on 'Thresholds for specific patient populations'.)

In patients with major bleeding and coagulopathy (eg, due to trauma), goal-directed replacement of blood components and coagulation factors is recommended [65,66]. For those requiring massive transfusion of blood components (RBCs, plasma products, platelets), administration of crystalloid solutions should be monitored and minimized as much as possible throughout the perioperative period to avoid dilutional coagulopathy [67,68]. (See "Anesthesia for adult trauma patients", section on 'Specific blood products and other therapies' and "Coagulopathy in trauma patients", section on 'Thromboelastography-based transfusion' and "Massive blood transfusion".)

Anticoagulants – Anticoagulant reversal may be necessary before an emergency procedure [69,70]. However, not all individuals and surgical settings require reversal, especially if thrombotic risk from an underlying condition is high and bleeding risk of the surgery is low. (See "Perioperative management of patients receiving anticoagulants".)

Strategies for anticoagulant reversal for an urgent or emergency procedure are discussed in detail in separate topic reviews:

Warfarin or other vitamin K antagonist (table 4 and table 5) – (See "Perioperative management of patients receiving anticoagulants" and "Management of warfarin-associated bleeding or supratherapeutic INR".)

A 4-component PCC product is the preferred therapy for a patient who is receiving a vitamin K antagonist and requires immediate reversal of anticoagulation for urgent surgery, including in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage [71]. In comparative studies with plasma in this setting, PCC has been associated with a more rapid correction of the INR and reversal of anticoagulation [71]. Concomitant vitamin K also needs to be administered because the half-life of PCCs is short.

Details and supporting data are available in separate topics:

-Intracerebral hemorrhage – (See "Reversal of anticoagulation in intracranial hemorrhage".)

-Prosthetic heart valve – (See "Anticoagulation for prosthetic heart valves: Management of bleeding and invasive procedures".)

-All other patients – (See "Management of warfarin-associated bleeding or supratherapeutic INR", section on 'Treatment of bleeding'.)

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and direct factor Xa inhibitors) (table 6 and table 7) – (See "Perioperative management of patients receiving anticoagulants" and "Management of bleeding in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants".)

Heparin – (See "Heparin and LMW heparin: Dosing and adverse effects", section on 'Reversal'.)

Fondaparinux – (See "Fondaparinux: Dosing and adverse effects", section on 'Management and prevention of bleeding'.)

Thrombocytopenia – Platelet transfusions may be required for emergency major surgery in which there is insufficient time to raise the platelet count by treating the underlying condition responsible for thrombocytopenia (eg, use of IVIG in an individual with ITP). In such cases, platelets are often transfused if the count is <50,000/microL, although a higher transfusion threshold may be used in selected cases (eg, <100,000/microL for neurosurgical or ocular procedures). Platelet transfusion is usually not necessary for minor invasive procedures such as placement of a central venous catheter unless the platelet count is <20,000/microL [72-74]. (See "Platelet transfusion: Indications, ordering, and associated risks", section on 'Preparation for an invasive procedure'.)

Perioperative management of patients receiving antiplatelet therapy is discussed separately [75]. (See "Congenital and acquired disorders of platelet function".)

INTRAOPERATIVE STRATEGIES — Minimally invasive surgical techniques have been developed; these may decrease blood loss and need for transfusion compared with conventional open surgical procedures [4]. Other intraoperative strategies involving surgical and anesthetic care are discussed below.

Transfusion thresholds — For most patients who do not have significant intraoperative blood loss(those with blood loss <500 mL), we use a restrictive transfusion threshold (typically defined as transfusion restricted to those with hemoglobin <7 g/dL, or in some cases, <8 g/dL) [1]. Details are summarized in the table and discussed separately. (See "Intraoperative transfusion of blood products in adults", section on 'Red blood cells' and "Indications and hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion in the adult".)

However, if significant bleeding (>500 mL blood loss or bleeding at a rate such that the hemoglobin level does not accurately reflect the patient's clinical status) and bleeding cannot be immediately stopped, fluid replacement and transfusions may be used, with the number of units individualized according to the anticipated hemoglobin based on the amount of bleeding. (See "Intraoperative fluid management", section on 'Choosing fluid: Crystalloid, colloid, or blood'.)

Fluid management — To replace lost blood volume, transfusions should only be used if the hemoglobin is sufficiently low and the patient exhibits clinical signs of acute anemia (see 'Transfusion thresholds' above). Until the hemoglobin drops below the transfusion threshold, we typically administer fluid as necessary to maintain normovolemia, using either a balanced electrolyte crystalloid solution administered on a 1.5:1 basis, or a colloid solution administered on a 1:1 basis with an equal volume of colloid to volume of lost blood.

Administration of standardized large volumes of crystalloid solution (eg, a fixed volume or traditional liberal approach to fluid therapy) should be avoided since this is associated with dilutional anemia and coagulopathy, which may lead to transfusions and tissue edema-related adverse outcomes. (See "Intraoperative fluid management", section on 'Avoid traditional liberal or fixed-volume approaches'.)

Maintenance of normothermia — Hypothermia is avoided throughout the perioperative period in noncardiac surgical patients. Hypothermia causes coagulopathy due to impairment of platelet aggregation and reduced activity of enzymes in the coagulation cascade [76-78]. This combination of platelet and enzyme impairment typically reduces clot formation and increases perioperative blood loss and the need for transfusion [78-80]. In one meta-analysis, even mild (eg, 1°C) hypothermia increased blood loss by approximately 20 percent (figure 1) [78].

A blood warmer should be used for transfusion of all thawed or refrigerator-temperature blood products (eg, red blood cell [RBC] units, plasma products, cryoprecipitate) to avoid hypothermia <36°C, which can lead to coagulopathy, bleeding, and additional transfusions [76,81-83]. If necessary, other fluid and patient warming devices are routinely employed to maintain perioperative normothermia [84-87]. These may include warming all intravenous fluids with a commercially available blood warming device and application of upper- and lower-body forced-air warming devices and blankets. Prevention of perioperative hypothermia is discussed further in other topics:

(See "Perioperative temperature management", section on 'Intraoperative hypothermia'.)

(See "Massive blood transfusion", section on 'Hypothermia'.)

(See "Coagulopathy in trauma patients", section on 'Hypothermia'.)

Surgical blood conservation techniques

Electrosurgery devices — Adequate hemostasis during surgical dissection can be achieved by employing electrocautery to control bleeding from small vessels in most cases, as well as standard suturing techniques for larger vessels. These techniques are discussed separately. (See "Overview of electrosurgery", section on 'Cutting and coagulation currents'.)

Topical hemostatic agents and tissue adhesives — In selected cases, topical hemostatic agents, tissue adhesives, fibrin sealants, and autologous platelet gels are used as adjuncts to standard techniques and electrocautery to control bleeding. Topical application of agents that enhance coagulation allows dosing at the application site without systemic exposure. The mechanism of action, indications, and clinical applications of these adjuncts are reviewed separately. (See "Overview of topical hemostatic agents and tissue adhesives".)

Intraoperative blood salvage — Unlike preoperative autologous donation (PAD) and acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH), in which patient's blood is collected prior to occurrence of surgical blood loss, intraoperative blood salvage (also known as blood recovery) focuses on retrieving and salvaging blood that has already been shed and is otherwise lost. The collected blood is washed or filtered and returned back to the patient as transfusion is needed. Blood salvage is generally safe and associated with a very low incidence of adverse events [88]. The technique can be used during surgery to retrieve intraoperative blood loss. Benefits are most significant in procedures with high blood losses (≥1000 mL) [89,90]. In cardiac surgery, reinfusion of mediastinal blood after washing may be considered as part of a multimodal blood conservation strategy, particularly for patients who will not accept allogeneic blood products [91,92]. Details regarding patient selection, specific indications, technical considerations, advantages, and potential complications of intraoperative blood salvage are discussed separately. (See "Surgical blood conservation: Blood salvage" and "Techniques to reduce blood loss during abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy", section on 'Intraoperative blood salvage'.)

Acute normovolemic hemodilution — ANH is a blood conservation technique appropriate for selected patients with normal initial hemoglobin levels who are expected to lose two or more units of blood (typically ≥1000 mL) during surgery. The technique involves removal of blood from a patient shortly after induction of anesthesia, with maintenance of normovolemia using crystalloid and/or colloid replacement fluid. Details regarding technical considerations are addressed separately. (See "Surgical blood conservation: Acute normovolemic hemodilution".)

The ANH technique is safe and generally used in healthy, young adults but can be used in other populations, especially those needing extracorporeal circulation. ANH with the blood maintained in a contiguous circuit with the circulation may also be a good option if blood transfusions are not an option; however, the patient's wishes must be determined prior to the procedure [93]. (See 'Consents and advanced directives' above and "Surgical blood conservation: Acute normovolemic hemodilution", section on 'Patient selection'.)

Use of hemostatic agents

Overview of indications for hemostatic agents — Hemostatic agents may be used to reduce the risk of bleeding or to treat excessive bleeding due to an anticoagulant or other cause of impaired hemostasis. In most cases, use is guided by clinical experience rather than high-quality clinical trials.

Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and other surgical procedures with significant blood loss – The most commonly used intraoperative agents are antifibrinolytic agents, which have multiple mechanisms of action. These are routinely used in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), orthopedic surgery, and other surgical procedures associated with significant blood loss. Randomized trials that support this practice are cited below. (See 'Antifibrinolytic agents' below.)

Significant blood loss and/or consumptive coagulopathy – In surgical patients with significant blood loss or consumptive coagulopathy (eg, disseminated intravascular coagulation), plasma and/or fibrinogen concentrate may be used to replace lost or consumed clotting factors. (See "Clinical use of plasma components", section on 'Indications' and "Intraoperative transfusion of blood products in adults", section on 'Plasma' and "Plasma derivatives and recombinant DNA-produced coagulation factors", section on 'Fibrinogen' and 'Fibrinogen concentrate (versus cryoprecipitate)' below.)

Specific clotting factor deficiencies, uremia, or anticoagulants – Individual clotting factors, prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs), and/or desmopressin (DDAVP) are generally reserved for those with specific factor deficiencies, uremic platelet dysfunction, or those receiving anticoagulants that require immediate reversal for urgent or emergency surgery. When needed, these agents are typically initiated preoperatively rather than intraoperatively, although additional doses may be used intraoperatively in emergency cases and for longer procedures. (See "Plasma derivatives and recombinant DNA-produced coagulation factors", section on 'Clotting factor products' and 'Desmopressin' below and "Intraoperative transfusion of blood products in adults".)

Refractory bleeding – In rare cases with unexplained persistent bleeding, an activated PCC such as factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) may be used to treat life-threatening coagulopathy, with the understanding that there are no high quality data to support this practice, and these agents have potentially devastating thrombotic risks. (See 'Recombinant activated factor VII' below.)

Many of these conditions can coexist (eg, cardiac surgery with low fibrinogen). In such cases, the products administered ideally should treat the specific deficiency. If a large blood volume is lost, then plasma (or whole blood) may be the most appropriate choice. If there is isolated fibrinogen deficiency, then a source of fibrinogen (cryoprecipitate or a fibrinogen concentrate) can be used and is likely to carry a lower risk of adverse events. (See 'Fibrinogen concentrate (versus cryoprecipitate)' below.)

Antifibrinolytic agents — Antifibrinolytic agents have multiple effects that prevent fibrinolysis by plasmin, thereby supporting hemostasis. These agents include epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and tranexamic acid (TXA). They are increasingly being used prophylactically to reduce surgical blood loss and transfusion, with many studies supporting their efficacy [93-96], and professional society guidelines recommending their use [1,18,35,36,47,91,97,98].

Availability of these agents varies across institutions and regions. In the United States, EACA is more commonly used during cardiac surgery due to the higher cost of TXA and the reported association of TXA with postoperative seizures at higher doses [93,99-101]. However, TXA is commonly used in most other countries for cardiac and other surgical procedures [18,98,102-104]. A 2022 trial that randomly assigned 9535 noncardiac surgical patients to TXA (1 g at the start and end of surgery) or placebo found a reduction in a composite bleeding outcome (life-threatening bleeding, major bleeding, or bleeding into a critical organ) in the TXA arm (9.1 versus 11.7 percent; hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.87) [105]. The primary safety outcome (myocardial injury, nonhemorrhagic stroke, peripheral arterial thrombosis, or symptomatic proximal venous thromboembolism within 30 days postoperatively) was similar in the TXA group (14.2 percent) versus the placebo group (13.9 percent).

Aprotinin is an antifibrinolytic agent that is no longer available in the United States. Although aprotinin was effective in reducing surgical bleeding and transfusion rates, it was associated with increased mortality in cardiac surgery patients in a large trial, leading to its withdrawal and suspension [106]. Subsequent studies have noted increased bleeding and transfusions following worldwide withdrawal of aprotinin [107]. A reevaluation of the prior reports has led to its reintroduction in Europe for use in selected patients [108,109].

Indications and uses for antifibrinolytic agents – An antifibrinolytic agent is routinely used in the following settings:

Cardiac surgical procedures that include CPB. (See "Blood management and anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass", section on 'Antifibrinolytic administration'.)

Major orthopedic surgery (eg, total knee, hip, or shoulder arthroplasty, spine surgery). (See "Anesthesia for total knee arthroplasty", section on 'Antifibrinolytics' and "Total hip arthroplasty", section on 'Minimizing blood loss' and "Anesthesia for elective spine surgery in adults", section on 'Antifibrinolytics'.)

Other major noncardiac surgical procedures that are likely to incur clinically significant blood loss (eg, liver transplantation or resection, selected trauma patients) [105]. (See "Liver transplantation: Anesthetic management", section on 'Administration of antifibrinolytic agents' and "Coagulopathy in trauma patients", section on 'Management of fibrinolysis'.)

Postpartum hemorrhage. (See "Postpartum hemorrhage: Medical and minimally invasive management", section on 'Administer tranexamic acid'.)

Dosing – Dosing and timing of EACA or TXA administration is procedure-specific and institution-specific since dose regimens have not been standardized for intraoperative uses of either agent [93,110,111]. TXA dosing should be reduced in patients with end-stage kidney disease or moderate to severe renal insufficiency [112,113]. Most experience in surgical populations is with intravenous use; oral and topical administration of TXA have also been reported in orthopedic surgery and cardiac surgery [114-116].

Details regarding dosing of antifibrinolytic agents for specific surgical procedures and situations are available in separate topics:

(See "Blood management and anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass", section on 'Antifibrinolytic administration'.)

(See "Anesthesia for elective spine surgery in adults", section on 'Antifibrinolytics'.)

(See "Anesthesia for total knee arthroplasty", section on 'Antifibrinolytics'.)

(See "Initial management of moderate to severe hemorrhage in the adult trauma patient", section on 'Antifibrinolytic agents' and "Coagulopathy in trauma patients", section on 'Management of fibrinolysis' and "Anesthesia for adult trauma patients", section on 'Specific blood products and other therapies'.)

(See "Postpartum hemorrhage: Medical and minimally invasive management", section on 'Administer tranexamic acid'.)

Risks

Prothrombotic effects – Although the risk of thrombotic events is generally low, individual patient-specific and procedure-specific risks for bleeding and transfusion should be considered rather than using antifibrinolytic agents indiscriminately in all bleeding patients [93-95,117]. Similar to previous meta-analyses of TXA use, a larger 2021 meta-analysis that included 125,550 patients participating in 216 randomized trials noted that TXA was not associated with overall risk for thromboembolic events, nor for specific risks for venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolic events, myocardial infarction or ischemia, or cerebral infarction or ischemia [117]. A 2022 randomized trial that included 9535 noncardiac surgical patients noted similar cardiovascular safety outcomes for TXA compared with placebo [105]. The lysine analogue antifibrinolytic agents (TXA and EACA) appear to be safe even in cancer patients who are generally at increased risk of thromboembolic events [118]. Some evidence suggests reduced risk of such events [93].

Seizures – TXA has been associated with postoperative seizures after cardiac surgery, and this risk may be dose-related [93,99-101,119,120].

Hypotension or arrhythmias with rapid injection – Rapid intravenous administration of EACA should be avoided since this may induce hypotension, as well as bradycardia or other arrhythmias [121].

Desmopressin — Desmopressin (DDAVP) increases plasma levels of von Willebrand factor, factor VIII, and tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) by causing these factors to be released from platelets and endothelial cells.

Indications and uses – In consultation with a hematologist, DDAVP is administered prophylactically for minor surgery or treatment of mild bleeding in selected patients with von Willebrand disease (vWD) or mild hemophilia A for whom a positive response to the drug has been demonstrated previously [122] (table 8). (See "Treatment of bleeding and perioperative management in hemophilia A and B", section on 'DDAVP for mild hemophilia A' and "von Willebrand disease (VWD): Treatment of minor bleeding, use of DDAVP, and routine preventive care", section on 'DDAVP'.)

DDAVP has also been administered to treat clinically significant intraoperative microvascular bleeding in patients with acquired platelet defects due to uremia or acquired von Willebrand syndrome (eg, due to chronic aortic stenosis or presence of a left ventricular assist device) [48,123]. (See "Acquired von Willebrand syndrome", section on 'Treatment of acute bleeding' and "Uremic platelet dysfunction", section on 'Acute life-threatening bleeding'.)

DDAVP may be beneficial in certain other settings (eg, intractable microvascular bleeding due to hypothermia, acidosis, aspirin use, CPB), but reduction in transfused RBC volume is small and unlikely to be clinically significant compared with placebo [36,124,125]. Generalized perioperative use is not warranted [18,36,48]. (See "Coagulopathy in trauma patients", section on 'Pharmaceutical hemostatic agents' and "Reversing anticoagulation and achieving hemostasis after cardiopulmonary bypass", section on 'Desmopressin (DDAVP)'.)

Dosing – The DDAVP dose is 0.3 mcg/kg, administered intravenously by slow infusion over 30 minutes to minimize hypertension, hypotension, and flushing (table 8). Tachyphylaxis typically develops after the second dose.

Risks – In addition to hypertension, hypotension, and flushing, possible adverse side effects include fluid overload, hyponatremia (which may cause seizures if close attention to free water restriction is not used), and rare thrombotic events (table 8). Monitoring of serum sodium is prudent in patients receiving more than one or two doses.

Fibrinogen concentrate (versus cryoprecipitate) — Virally-inactivated human fibrinogen concentrates have been developed from human pooled plasma for use in individuals with fibrinogen deficiency and/or dysfunction (eg, RiaSTAP, Fibryga, Haemocomplettan). Fibrinogen concentrate is expected to have a lower risk of infectious complications compared with cryoprecipitate [126]. (See "Intraoperative transfusion of blood products in adults", section on 'Cryoprecipitate' and "Clinical use of Cryoprecipitate", section on 'Risks and adverse events'.)

Indications and uses – In a patient with a low plasma fibrinogen level (typically, below 150 to 200 mg/dL) or a fibrinogen disorder, treatment with a fibrinogen concentrate is appropriate to treat or prevent bleeding during surgery [36,127]. (See "Disorders of fibrinogen", section on 'Fibrinogen concentrate: Dosing and monitoring'.)

It may also be reasonable to administer fibrinogen concentrate to treat excessive bleeding and coagulopathy if a low fibrinogen concentration (eg, <150 to 200 mg/dL, with higher fibrinogen thresholds during pregnancy) is documented or strongly suspected in certain surgical settings (eg, cardiac surgery with CPB, thoracic aortic surgery, liver transplantation, severe postpartum hemorrhage with disseminated intravascular coagulation, trauma surgery) [36,48,128-140]. Studies in these settings have found that administration of fibrinogen concentrate can reduce transfusions of blood components, but have reached different conclusions regarding more clinically important outcomes such as survival. One 2020 meta-analysis in patients undergoing any type of surgery noted that blood loss was reduced in the first 12 postoperative hours but the mean difference was only -135 mL (95% CI -183 to -87 mL, 13 trials; 900 patients) [141]. Further details are presented in separate topics. (See "Anesthesia for adult trauma patients", section on 'Treatment of hemorrhagic shock' and "Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) during pregnancy: Management and prognosis", section on 'Blood products' and "Reversing anticoagulation and achieving hemostasis after cardiopulmonary bypass", section on 'Cryoprecipitate versus fibrinogen concentrate'.)

Administration of fibrinogen concentrate is more common in European countries where cryoprecipitate is not available, compared with the United States [139]. The European Society of Anesthesia guidelines suggest use of fibrinogen concentrate to maintain a target fibrinogen concentration >150 to 200 mg/dL in patients with significant bleeding [98]. Similarly, the Hemostasis and Transfusion Scientific subcommittee of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA) recommends consideration of administration of fibrinogen concentrate in cardiac surgical patients with microvascular bleeding after CPB to maintain physiologic fibrinogen activity based on viscoelastic coagulation testing [142]. Proponents argue that the baseline concentration of fibrinogen is relatively low, and there are no fibrinogen stores to be mobilized; thus, fibrinogen is the first coagulation protein to become critically low during intraoperative bleeding [48]. However, guidelines do not suggest aiming for supranormal fibrinogen levels [142]. Also, administration of fibrinogen concentrate as a single agent will only raise the fibrinogen level, and will not address other coagulation factor deficiencies.

Dosing – The dose of fibrinogen concentrate is calculated according to the target fibrinogen concentration. (See "Disorders of fibrinogen", section on 'Fibrinogen concentrate: Dosing and monitoring'.)

Risks – Thromboembolic complications can occur, particularly in pregnant patients or in those with a thrombotic fibrinogen variant. Overcorrection of fibrinogen deficiency should be avoided to minimize this risk. While caution is warranted, most studies have not reported increased risk of thrombotic events [134,138]. Dosing is typically monitored with POC testing and monitoring of plasma fibrinogen level [132,133]. (See "Intraoperative transfusion of blood products in adults".)

Prothrombin complex concentrate — Different Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) vary in their factor contents. All PCCs contain factors II, IX and X. Those that do not contain therapeutic levels of factor VII are known as 3-factor PCCs, while those containing factor VII are labeled as 4-factor PCCs (table 9). If the only available PCC is a 3-factor product, then supplemental factor VII may be administered. Most PCC preparations contain low doses of heparin as well as variable amounts of protein C and protein S. Advantages of PCCs over fresh frozen plasma (FFP) include rapid administration in a small volume, resulting in more rapid reversal of the anticoagulant effect and avoidance of volume overload and transfusion reactions [36,48,71,128,143-148]. (See "Intraoperative transfusion of blood products in adults", section on 'Plasma' and "Plasma derivatives and recombinant DNA-produced coagulation factors", section on 'PCCs'.)

In contrast with standard 4-component PCCs, activated PCC (aPCC; eg, FEIBA) contain activated factor VII (table 9) [143]. aPCC have a greater prothrombotic risk than unactivated PCC and are only rarely used. (See "Plasma derivatives and recombinant DNA-produced coagulation factors", section on 'PCCs'.)

Indications and uses

Reversing warfarin – As noted above, an unactivated PCC is typically used to treat patients who have bleeding associated with warfarin or another vitamin K antagonist and/or who require emergency surgery, particularly those presenting with intracranial hemorrhage [71].

Intractable bleeding in cardiac, hepatic, and trauma surgery – Off-label intraoperative use of PCCs has been reported for treatment of patients with intractable coagulopathic bleeding after cardiac surgery with CPB [36]. However, prospective data are limited regarding the safety, efficacy, and dosing of PCCs for this use. Other sources of coagulopathy, such as hypofibrinogenemia, thrombocytopenia, platelet disorders, or surgical sources of bleeding are treated before considering use of a PCC product [143].

Limited data from observational studies of off-label use of unactivated 4-factor or 3-factor PCC products in patients with excessive bleeding and coagulopathy after cardiac surgery show that these products may decrease risk for further RBC transfusions; details are presented in a separate topic. (See "Reversing anticoagulation and achieving hemostasis after cardiopulmonary bypass", section on 'Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) products'.)

In a propensity score-matched retrospective study of 60 pairs of patients undergoing liver transplantation, PCC use was associated with significantly decreased RBC and FFP transfusion requirements, and no thromboembolic events were noted [149].

In trauma patients with findings of trauma-induced coagulopathy, limited data (mostly observational) suggest that administration of 4-factor PCC, alone or in combination with fibrinogen concentrate or FFP, can reduce transfusion of RBCs and other blood components [150-154]. These uses of PCC and fibrinogen concentrate are off label in the United States.

Rare use of aPCC – aPCC products such as FEIBA are only rarely used in selected patients (eg, reversal of fondaparinux in selected individuals). FEIBA should not be used to reverse warfarin anticoagulation. (See "Fondaparinux: Dosing and adverse effects", section on 'Bleeding/emergency surgery'.)

Dosing – The dose is tailored to the individual patient's needs based on clinical indications and laboratory testing, but usually are 1000 to 2000 units. (See "Management of warfarin-associated bleeding or supratherapeutic INR", section on 'PCC products'.)

Ideally, point-of-care (POC) laboratory tests such as thromboelastography are obtained to monitor overall hemostatic function, along with standard laboratory testing that includes prothrombin time (PT), INR, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and fibrinogen level. (See "Coagulopathy in trauma patients", section on 'Diagnosis' and "Intraoperative transfusion of blood products in adults".)

Risks – Data for intraoperative safety of PCC are limited [98,143,155,156]. aPCC products such as FEIBA are thought to have a greater prothrombotic risk because they contain activated factor VII.

Prothrombotic risk increases with repeat or excessive dosing. This risk extends well into the postoperative period. (See "Management of warfarin-associated bleeding or supratherapeutic INR", section on 'PCC products'.)

Special considerations in individuals with hemophilia and an inhibitor are discussed separately. (See "Treatment of bleeding and perioperative management in hemophilia A and B", section on 'Inhibitors'.)

Some PCC products contain heparin and should not be used in an individual with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Recombinant activated factor VII

Indications and uses – Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is licensed for prevention of surgical bleeding in patients with hemophilia who have developed an inhibitor to factor VIII or factor IX, as discussed separately. (See "Treatment of bleeding and perioperative management in hemophilia A and B", section on 'Inhibitors'.)

rFVIIa has been used off-label in selected non-hemophilic patients with bleeding related to trauma or as a hemostatic agent in patients with intractable bleeding [36,157,158]. (See "Recombinant factor VIIa: Administration and adverse effects", section on 'Off-label uses'.)

Information regarding efficacy of rFVIIa is largely anecdotal. Systematic reviews have not found a great impact on morbidity and mortality, although transfusion requirements may be reduced [159-162]. (See "Recombinant factor VIIa: Administration and adverse effects", section on 'General evidence for off-label use'.)

Dosing – Cautious dosing of rFVIIa is advised since optimal dosing for off-label use is unknown. Administration can be started with small incremental doses of 10 to 30 mcg/kg approximately every 15 minutes to a total dose of up to 90 mcg/kg. Selected patients with massive coagulopathic bleeding may be given an initial dose of 90 mcg/kg. Dosing practices vary widely because data are lacking regarding optimal dosing and there are no laboratory tests to monitor drug effect or efficacy. (See "Recombinant factor VIIa: Administration and adverse effects", section on 'General approach to administration'.)

Risks – An increased risk of arterial thromboembolic events has been noted in some trials, particularly in patients with intracranial hemorrhage and those undergoing cardiac surgery [159-162]. Risk for thrombotic complications may be less when a low dose (eg, 10 to 30 mcg/kg) is used [160,163]. Off-label use of rFVIIa may be associated with increased mortality and morbidity (eg, renal failure), especially in older patients and when higher doses are administered [48,157,160,164,165].

POSTOPERATIVE STRATEGIES — Restrictive transfusion thresholds and individualized goal-directed treatment of coagulopathy with bleeding remain important in the postoperative period [4,166].

Close monitoring for bleeding — Postoperative bleeding is associated with mortality risk and increased health care costs [167]. During the first few hours following the surgery, patients should be closely monitored to detect signs of persistent bleeding of unacceptable quantity and tempo [4]. Medical causes of bleeding should be investigated and treated. Return to the operating room for surgical re-exploration and intervention may be necessary based on the amount, tempo, presumed location of bleeding, and potential for a surgical cause [168].

Minimize phlebotomy — Excessive diagnostic blood draws should be avoided since this can contribute significantly to blood loss and development of hospital-acquired anemia [4,35,169]. Perioperative blood sampling for laboratory tests should be minimized (eg, by using smaller collection tubes when feasible). Standing orders for laboratory tests are generally avoided; rather, tests are ordered if indicated. (See "The approach to the patient who declines blood transfusion", section on 'Minimize blood loss'.)

Postoperative blood salvage — Postoperative blood salvage (also known as blood recovery) is rare in modern clinical practice. (See "Surgical blood conservation: Blood salvage", section on 'Postoperative blood salvage'.)

Management of postoperative anemia — Postoperative anemia is common due to exacerbation of pre-existing anemia, blood loss during surgery, and excessive postoperative phlebotomies [30,168,170,171]. Anemia may be further aggravated by reduced erythropoietin (EPO) production due to inflammatory mediators, blunted bone marrow response to EPO, and decreased iron availability, similar to patients with critical illness [168,172,173]. Anemia may significantly impact postoperative recovery and is associated with increased risk of mortality and morbidity, delayed hospital discharge, and increased costs [170].

Diagnosis and treatment – When anemia is noted in the postoperative period, a diagnostic workup is performed to determine its cause, as illustrated in the algorithm (algorithm 2), incorporating information from the workup done in the preoperative period (eg, iron studies) [168,174]. As with preoperative anemia, postoperative anemia should not be overlooked or neglected [4,37,168]. Treatment strategies include:

Treat iron deficiency – Since postoperative anemia is usually due to surgical blood loss, iron studies are usually appropriate, especially if anemia and/or microcytosis persist for more than one to two weeks. Treatment of postoperative iron deficiency anemia may involve administration of intravenous iron in patients who cannot take oral medications [37,175-179]. (See "Causes and diagnosis of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia in adults" and "Treatment of iron deficiency anemia in adults".)

Red blood cell transfusion – Transfusion may be necessary if postoperative hemoglobin is below a threshold (<7 to 8 g/dL in most populations), if there is severe ongoing bleeding with expected severe anemia, or if there are signs of hemodynamic instability or tissue hypoxia thought to be due to severe anemia. (See "Indications and hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion in the adult", section on 'Thresholds for specific patient populations'.)

Monitor resolution – All patients with postoperative anemia should have planned follow-up to determine if anemia has resolved or persists (algorithm 2).

ANEMIA CLINICAL VIGNETTES — The following hypothetical clinical case examples illustrate the principles discussed in this topic:

Emergency surgery requiring transfusion – A 40 year old woman presents to the emergency department following a motor vehicle crash and requires emergency splenectomy. As she arrives in the operating room, report comes from the emergency department that her complete blood count (CBC) is abnormal with mild pancytopenia (white blood count 3000/microL; hemoglobin 8 g/dL; platelet count 70,000/microL). Surgery is performed, with point of care testing revealing a decrease in hemoglobin to 6 g/dL; hemostasis is maintained. She receives a total of two units of red blood cells intraoperatively, administered in one unit increments with hemoglobin determination after the first unit showing a hemoglobin of 6.2 g/dl. Postoperatively she is evaluated by the consulting hematologist to evaluate the cause of pancytopenia.

This case illustrates a setting in which the need for emergency surgery does not allow sufficient time to perform a full evaluation of the cause of anemia; clinical judgment determines that transfusion of one unit at a time may be required in the short term; and specialist evaluation is required prior to discharge from the hospital.

Correction of iron deficiency prior to elective surgery – A 52 year old man with no underlying medical conditions except for chronic knee pain due to a prior sports injury is seen two weeks preoperatively for knee replacement surgery. His report of recent fatigue and mild dyspnea on exertion prompts testing of his hemoglobin level, which is found to be low at 10 g/dL. Review of his CBC reveals microcytosis (mean corpuscular volume [MCV], 79 fL), and iron studies reveal iron deficiency with a ferritin level of 10 ng/mL, consistent with iron deficiency anemia. He is treated with iron and undergoes colonoscopy, which identifies a large bleeding polyp that is removed. Iron replacement is continued. Four weeks later, his hemoglobin has risen to 14 g/dL with resolution of his fatigue and dyspnea.

After treatment of iron deficiency anemia, he undergoes knee replacement, with antifibrinolytic therapy administered during the procedure. Blood loss is approximately 500 mL, and his postoperative hemoglobin level is 12 g/dL. Transfusion is unnecessary and thus avoided. With the help of a new primary care doctor, he continues iron to completely replete iron stores, and he undergoes regular screening colonoscopy. (See "Causes and diagnosis of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia in adults" and "Treatment of iron deficiency anemia in adults".)

This case illustrates the importance of treating correctable causes of anemia in the preoperative period to minimize the likelihood of transfusion, the use of intraoperative antifibrinolytic therapy, and the need for postoperative follow-up. Surgical blood loss may have been further reduced by implementing blood cell salvage techniques.

Chronic inflammatory conditions causing anemia – A 65 year old woman with type 2 diabetes mellitus has been highly adherent with therapy and eats a well-balanced diet but continues to have mild anemia due to her underlying diabetes and high body mass index (ie, anemia of chronic disease/anemia of inflammation). Her primary clinician has performed iron studies and testing for vitamin B12 deficiency and found her levels to be adequate. She has decided to pursue laparoscopic bariatric surgery and is seen two weeks preoperatively. The preoperative evaluation includes review of her CBC obtained one week earlier by her primary clinician, who documents a mild anemia with a hemoglobin of 11.5 g/dL with normal red blood cell indices. Discussion regarding possible postponement of surgery included the patient, primary care clinician, surgeon, and anesthesiologist, resulting in a decision to proceed as scheduled in order to help treat the underlying conditions that may be contributing to her anemia. Appropriate intraoperative strategies are used to avoid exacerbation of anemia (eg, fluid and temperature management, fastidious hemostasis during surgical dissection). No transfusions are administered.

This case illustrates the need for individual evaluation of patients with chronic conditions that result in anemia, in order to exercise good clinical judgment regarding decisions to proceed with a specific surgical procedure.

Importantly, the underlying cause of the anemia is addressed in each of these cases. What differs is the decision regarding whether to proceed with surgery as planned or to delay surgery to allow treatment of anemia.

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Transfusion and patient blood management".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Patient blood management – Patient blood management (PBM) is a patient-centered, systematic, evidence-based approach involving multidisciplinary strategies to improve patient outcomes by managing anemia, minimizing bleeding, and reducing transfusion of blood components (table 1). (See 'Goals of patient blood management' above.)

Preoperative strategies – The preanesthetic consultation addresses risks for bleeding and possible interventions to minimize transfusions. The history focuses on comorbidities and bleeding history. A baseline hemoglobin is obtained for patients undergoing major surgery with expected significant blood loss (>10 percent chance of requiring transfusion or >500 mL blood loss), those >65 years old (except for minor procedures), or if preoperative anemia is suspected (algorithm 1). Additional laboratory testing for patients with a possible bleeding disorder includes prothrombin time (PT) with international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and platelet count. (See 'Preoperative strategies' above.)

Anemia – Depending on the cause, severity, urgency of the procedure, and anticipated blood loss, surgery is postponed when feasible to provide appropriate treatment (algorithm 1). (See 'Treatment of anemia' above.)

-Iron – Iron deficiency (with or without anemia) should be treated with iron, typically two to four weeks before surgery. Intravenous (IV) iron is an option if more urgent correction is needed or if oral iron is not well tolerated or ineffective. (See 'Iron deficiency anemia' above.)

-Erythropoietin – Decisions to administer erythropoietin (EPO) are individualized. For anemia of chronic disease/anemia of inflammation, we typically administer preoperative EPO (with supplemental iron to avoid functional iron deficiency) if hemoglobin is <12 g/dL before scheduled noncardiac surgery with expected blood loss >500 mL, or if hemoglobin <13 g/dL before cardiac surgery. (See 'Use of erythropoietin' above.)

-Transfusions – For urgent or emergency surgery, it may not be possible to treat all conditions contributing to anemia; transfusions may be needed in some cases. (See 'Urgent and emergency surgical procedures' above.)

Thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction – Safe platelet counts for most surgery are >50,000/microL (>100,000/microL for neurosurgery or ocular surgery). For immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), the platelet count may be raised using glucocorticoids or intravenous immune globulin (IVIG). For other causes of thrombocytopenia or if there is insufficient time to treat the underlying cause, platelet transfusions may be needed. (See 'Management of thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction' above and "Platelet transfusion: Indications, ordering, and associated risks".)

Antithrombotic medications – Preoperative discussions with the surgeon and primary clinician determine management based on bleeding risk for the procedure versus thrombosis risk if anticoagulants are discontinued or reversed. (See 'Management of specific hemostatic disorders' above and 'Management of medications affecting hemostasis' above and "Perioperative management of patients receiving anticoagulants".)

Advance directives – Patient preferences and acceptance of transfusions and/or blood conservation modalities should be discussed and documented. (See 'Consents and advanced directives' above.)

Intraoperative strategies – Restrictive transfusion thresholds should be used in stable patients. Intraoperative strategies include avoiding large volumes of crystalloid solution, avoiding hypothermia, and using electrosurgery or topical hemostatic agents when appropriate. Blood conservation techniques such as intraoperative blood salvage or acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) may be appropriate in selected cases. (See 'Fluid management' above and 'Maintenance of normothermia' above and 'Surgical blood conservation techniques' above.)

Antifibrinolytic agents are routinely used in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and selected noncardiac surgical procedures associated with significant blood loss. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) are generally reserved for emergency reversal of warfarin (table 9); desmopressin (DDAVP) is used for uremic platelet dysfunction (table 8). (See 'Use of hemostatic agents' above.)

Postoperative strategies – Patients should be monitored for persistent bleeding. Blood sampling should be minimized. For postoperative anemia, a diagnostic workup is performed and treatment initiated as appropriate (algorithm 2). (See 'Postoperative strategies' above.)

  1. Tibi P, McClure RS, Huang J, et al. STS/SCA/AmSECT/SABM Update to the Clinical Practice Guidelines on Patient Blood Management. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 35:2569.
  2. Shander A, Hardy JF, Ozawa S, et al. A Global Definition of Patient Blood Management. Anesth Analg 2022; 135:476.
  3. Hameed I, Cifu AS, Geirsson A. Blood Management in High-risk Surgery. JAMA 2022; 327:578.
  4. Spahn DR, Muñoz M, Klein AA, et al. Patient Blood Management: Effectiveness and Future Potential. Anesthesiology 2020; 133:212.
  5. Palmer AJR, Gagné S, Fergusson DA, et al. Blood Management for Elective Orthopaedic Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102:1552.
  6. Desai N, Schofield N, Richards T. Perioperative Patient Blood Management to Improve Outcomes. Anesth Analg 2018; 127:1211.
  7. Society for the Advancement of Blood Management (SABM). Available at: https://www.sabm.org/ (Accessed on July 11, 2018).
  8. Meybohm P, Herrmann E, Steinbicker AU, et al. Patient Blood Management is Associated With a Substantial Reduction of Red Blood Cell Utilization and Safe for Patient's Outcome: A Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study With a Noninferiority Design. Ann Surg 2016; 264:203.
  9. Irving AH, Harris A, Petrie D, et al. Impact of patient blood management guidelines on blood transfusions and patient outcomes during cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 160:437.
  10. Trentino KM, Mace H, Symons K, et al. Associations of a Preoperative Anemia and Suboptimal Iron Stores Screening and Management Clinic in Colorectal Surgery With Hospital Cost, Reimbursement, and Length of Stay: A Net Cost Analysis. Anesth Analg 2021; 132:344.
  11. Shander A, Goodnough LT. Objectives and limitations of bloodless medical care. Curr Opin Hematol 2006; 13:462.
  12. Shander A, Isbister J, Gombotz H. Patient blood management: the global view. Transfusion 2016; 56 Suppl 1:S94.
  13. Shander A, Goobie SM, Warner MA, et al. Essential Role of Patient Blood Management in a Pandemic: A Call for Action. Anesth Analg 2020; 131:74.
  14. Gehrie EA, Frank SM, Goobie SM. Balancing Supply and Demand for Blood during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Anesthesiology 2020; 133:16.
  15. Pandemics and patient blood management (PBM), Produced by the Committee on Patient Blood Management updeated March 27, 2020. American Society of Anesthesiologists https://www.https://www.asahq.org/in-the-spotlight/coronavirus-covid-19-information/pandemics-and-patient-blood-management (Accessed on July 20, 2020).
  16. Baron DM, Franchini M, Goobie SM, et al. Patient blood management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:1105.
  17. Muñoz M, Gómez-Ramírez S, Kozek-Langeneker S. Pre-operative haematological assessment in patients scheduled for major surgery. Anaesthesia 2016; 71 Suppl 1:19.
  18. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Management. Practice guidelines for perioperative blood management: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Management*. Anesthesiology 2015; 122:241.
  19. Muñoz M, Acheson AG, Auerbach M, et al. International consensus statement on the peri-operative management of anaemia and iron deficiency. Anaesthesia 2017; 72:233.
  20. Steinbicker AU. Role of anesthesiologists in managing perioperative anemia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2019; 32:64.
  21. Okocha O, Dand H, Avram MJ, Sweitzer B. An Effective and Efficient Testing Protocol for Diagnosing Iron-deficiency Anemia Preoperatively. Anesthesiology 2020; 133:109.
  22. Levy JH, Szlam F, Wolberg AS, Winkler A. Clinical use of the activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time for screening: a review of the literature and current guidelines for testing. Clin Lab Med 2014; 34:453.
  23. Loizou E, Mayhew DJ, Martlew V, Murthy BVS. Implications of deranged activated partial thromboplastin time for anaesthesia and surgery. Anaesthesia 2018; 73:1557.
  24. Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters, Apfelbaum JL, Connis RT, et al. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology 2012; 116:522.
  25. Chee YL, Crawford JC, Watson HG, Greaves M. Guidelines on the assessment of bleeding risk prior to surgery or invasive procedures. British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Br J Haematol 2008; 140:496.
  26. De Hert S, Imberger G, Carlisle J, et al. Preoperative evaluation of the adult patient undergoing non-cardiac surgery: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28:684.
  27. Matzek LJ, Hanson AC, Schulte PJ, et al. The Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Preoperative Thrombocytopenia in Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery: An Observational Cohort Study. Anesth Analg 2021; 132:836.
  28. Dhir A, Tempe DK. Anemia and Patient Blood Management in Cardiac Surgery-Literature Review and Current Evidence. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:2726.
  29. Munting KE, Klein AA. Optimisation of pre-operative anaemia in patients before elective major surgery - why, who, when and how? Anaesthesia 2019; 74 Suppl 1:49.
  30. Warner MA, Shore-Lesserson L, Shander A, et al. Perioperative Anemia: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management Throughout the Spectrum of Perioperative Care. Anesth Analg 2020; 130:1364.
  31. Hare GMT, Mazer CD. Anemia: Perioperative Risk and Treatment Opportunity. Anesthesiology 2021; 135:520.
  32. Ganz T. Anemia of Inflammation. N Engl J Med 2019; 381:1148.
  33. Ellermann I, Bueckmann A, Eveslage M, et al. Treating Anemia in the Preanesthesia Assessment Clinic: Results of a Retrospective Evaluation. Anesth Analg 2018; 127:1202.
  34. Guinn NR, Guercio JR, Hopkins TJ, et al. How do we develop and implement a preoperative anemia clinic designed to improve perioperative outcomes and reduce cost? Transfusion 2016; 56:297.
  35. Burns CD, Brown JP, Corwin HL, et al. Special Report From the Society for the Advancement of Blood Management: The Choosing Wisely Campaign. Anesth Analg 2019; 129:1381.
  36. Raphael J, Mazer CD, Subramani S, et al. Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Improvement Advisory for Management of Perioperative Bleeding and Hemostasis in Cardiac Surgery Patients. Anesth Analg 2019; 129:1209.
  37. Shander A, Kaufman M, Goodnough LT. How I treat anemia in the perisurgical setting. Blood 2020; 136:814.
  38. Kotzé A, Harris A, Baker C, et al. British Committee for Standards in Haematology Guidelines on the Identification and Management of Pre-Operative Anaemia. Br J Haematol 2015; 171:322.
  39. Rineau E, Stoyanov A, Samson E, et al. Patient Blood Management in Major Orthopedic Surgery: Less Erythropoietin and More Iron? Anesth Analg 2017; 125:1597.
  40. Lim J, Miles L, Litton E. Intravenous Iron Therapy in Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Surgery: A Narrative Review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:1439.
  41. Muñoz M, Gómez-Ramírez S, Besser M, et al. Current misconceptions in diagnosis and management of iron deficiency. Blood Transfus 2017; 15:422.
  42. Lin DM, Lin ES, Tran MH. Efficacy and safety of erythropoietin and intravenous iron in perioperative blood management: a systematic review. Transfus Med Rev 2013; 27:221.
  43. Keeler BD, Dickson EA, Simpson JA, et al. The impact of pre-operative intravenous iron on quality of life after colorectal cancer surgery: outcomes from the intravenous iron in colorectal cancer-associated anaemia (IVICA) trial. Anaesthesia 2019; 74:714.
  44. Richards T, Baikady RR, Clevenger B, et al. Preoperative intravenous iron to treat anaemia before major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT): a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 396:1353.
  45. Shander A, Muñoz M, Spahn DR. Intravenous iron for severe iron deficiency anaemia. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121:342.
  46. Biboulet P, Bringuier S, Smilevitch P, et al. Preoperative Epoetin-α with Intravenous or Oral Iron for Major Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology 2018; 129:710.
  47. Mueller MM, Van Remoortel H, Meybohm P, et al. Patient Blood Management: Recommendations From the 2018 Frankfurt Consensus Conference. JAMA 2019; 321:983.
  48. Pagano D, Milojevic M, Meesters MI, et al. 2017 EACTS/EACTA Guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 53:79.
  49. Kaufner L, von Heymann C, Henkelmann A, et al. Erythropoietin plus iron versus control treatment including placebo or iron for preoperative anaemic adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 8:CD012451.
  50. Cho BC, Serini J, Zorrilla-Vaca A, et al. Impact of Preoperative Erythropoietin on Allogeneic Blood Transfusions in Surgical Patients: Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2019; 128:981.
  51. Spahn DR, Schoenrath F, Spahn GH, et al. Effect of ultra-short-term treatment of patients with iron deficiency or anaemia undergoing cardiac surgery: a prospective randomised trial. Lancet 2019; 393:2201.
  52. Rössler J, Hegemann I, Schoenrath F, et al. Efficacy of quadruple treatment on different types of pre-operative anaemia: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:1039.
  53. Vassallo R, Goldman M, Germain M, et al. Preoperative autologous blood donation: Waning indications in an era of improved blood safety. Transfus Med Rev 2015; 29:268.
  54. Al-Samkari H, Marshall AL, Goodarzi K, Kuter DJ. Romiplostim for the management of perioperative thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol 2018; 182:106.
  55. Mishra PK, Thekkudan J, Sahajanandan R, et al. The role of point-of-care assessment of platelet function in predicting postoperative bleeding and transfusion requirements after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Card Anaesth 2015; 18:45.
  56. Ranucci M, Baryshnikova E For The Surgical And Clinical Outcome Research Score Group. The interaction between preoperative platelet count and function and its relationship with postoperative bleeding in cardiac surgery. Platelets 2017; 28:794.
  57. Nagarsheth NP, Gupta N, Gupta A, et al. Responses of advanced directives by Jehovah's Witnesses on a gynecologic oncology service. J Blood Med 2015; 6:17.
  58. Klein AA, Bailey CR, Charlton A, et al. Association of Anaesthetists: anaesthesia and peri-operative care for Jehovah's Witnesses and patients who refuse blood. Anaesthesia 2019; 74:74.
  59. Guinn NR, Resar LMS, Frank SM. Perioperative Management of Patients for Whom Transfusion Is Not an Option. Anesthesiology 2021; 134:939.
  60. Tan GM, Guinn NR, Frank SM, Shander A. Proceedings From the Society for Advancement of Blood Management Annual Meeting 2017: Management Dilemmas of the Surgical Patient-When Blood Is Not an Option. Anesth Analg 2019; 128:144.
  61. Husarova V, Donnelly G, Doolan A, et al. Preferences of Jehovah's Witnesses regarding haematological supports in an obstetric setting: experience of a single university teaching hospital. Int J Obstet Anesth 2016; 25:53.
  62. Shander A, Goodnough LT. Management of anemia in patients who decline blood transfusion. Am J Hematol 2018; 93:1183.
  63. Jahr JS, Guinn NR, Lowery DR, et al. Blood Substitutes and Oxygen Therapeutics: A Review. Anesth Analg 2021; 132:119.
  64. Boyd-Carson H, Shah A, Sugavanam A, et al. The association of pre-operative anaemia with morbidity and mortality after emergency laparotomy. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:904.
  65. Spahn DR, Bouillon B, Cerny V, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition. Crit Care 2019; 23:98.
  66. Blaine KP, Steurer MP. Viscoelastic Monitoring to Guide the Correction of Perioperative Coagulopathy and Massive Transfusion in Patients with Life-Threatening Hemorrhage. Anesthesiol Clin 2019; 37:51.
  67. Bolliger D, Görlinger K, Tanaka KA. Pathophysiology and treatment of coagulopathy in massive hemorrhage and hemodilution. Anesthesiology 2010; 113:1205.
  68. Chatrath V, Khetarpal R, Ahuja J. Fluid management in patients with trauma: Restrictive versus liberal approach. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2015; 31:308.
  69. Langer A, Connors JM. Assessing and Reversing the Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Coagulation. Anesthesiology 2020; 133:223.
  70. Tao J, Oprea AD. Updates in periprocedural management of direct oral anticoagulants. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2020; 33:423.
  71. Levy JH, Douketis J, Steiner T, et al. Prothrombin Complex Concentrates for Perioperative Vitamin K Antagonist and Non-vitamin K Anticoagulant Reversal. Anesthesiology 2018; 129:1171.
  72. Zeidler K, Arn K, Senn O, et al. Optimal preprocedural platelet transfusion threshold for central venous catheter insertions in patients with thrombocytopenia. Transfusion 2011; 51:2269.
  73. Estcourt LJ, Malouf R, Doree C, et al. Prophylactic platelet transfusions prior to surgery for people with a low platelet count. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 9:CD012779.
  74. Estcourt LJ, Desborough M, Hopewell S, et al. Comparison of different platelet transfusion thresholds prior to insertion of central lines in patients with thrombocytopenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015.
  75. Filipescu DC, Stefan MG, Valeanu L, Popescu WM. Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy in noncardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2020; 33:454.
  76. Wolberg AS, Meng ZH, Monroe DM 3rd, Hoffman M. A systematic evaluation of the effect of temperature on coagulation enzyme activity and platelet function. J Trauma 2004; 56:1221.
  77. Valeri CR, Khabbaz K, Khuri SF, et al. Effect of skin temperature on platelet function in patients undergoing extracorporeal bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 104:108.
  78. Rajagopalan S, Mascha E, Na J, Sessler DI. The effects of mild perioperative hypothermia on blood loss and transfusion requirement. Anesthesiology 2008; 108:71.
  79. Reed RL 2nd, Johnson TD, Hudson JD, Fischer RP. The disparity between hypothermic coagulopathy and clotting studies. J Trauma 1992; 33:465.
  80. Lester ELW, Fox EE, Holcomb JB, et al. The impact of hypothermia on outcomes in massively transfused patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2019; 86:458.
  81. Meng ZH, Wolberg AS, Monroe DM 3rd, Hoffman M. The effect of temperature and pH on the activity of factor VIIa: implications for the efficacy of high-dose factor VIIa in hypothermic and acidotic patients. J Trauma 2003; 55:886.
  82. Lier H, Krep H, Schroeder S, Stuber F. Preconditions of hemostasis in trauma: a review. The influence of acidosis, hypocalcemia, anemia, and hypothermia on functional hemostasis in trauma. J Trauma 2008; 65:951.
  83. Kermode JC, Zheng Q, Milner EP. Marked temperature dependence of the platelet calcium signal induced by human von Willebrand factor. Blood 1999; 94:199.
  84. John M, Ford J, Harper M. Peri-operative warming devices: performance and clinical application. Anaesthesia 2014; 69:623.
  85. Perl T, Bräuer A, Quintel M. Prevention of perioperative hypothermia with forced-air warming systems and upper-body blankets. Surg Technol Int 2006; 15:19.
  86. Madrid E, Urrútia G, Roqué i Figuls M, et al. Active body surface warming systems for preventing complications caused by inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 4:CD009016.
  87. Sessler DI. Perioperative thermoregulation and heat balance. Lancet 2016; 387:2655.
  88. DeAndrade D, Waters JH, Triulzi DJ, et al. Very low rate of patient-related adverse events associated with the use of intraoperative cell salvage. Transfusion 2016; 56:2768.
  89. Carless PA, Henry DA, Moxey AJ, et al. Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; :CD001888.
  90. Meybohm P, Choorapoikayil S, Wessels A, et al. Washed cell salvage in surgical patients: A review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials under PRISMA. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e4490.
  91. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservation Guideline Task Force, Ferraris VA, Brown JR, et al. 2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91:944.
  92. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservation Guideline Task Force, Ferraris VA, Ferraris SP, et al. Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83:S27.
  93. Levy JH, Koster A, Quinones QJ, et al. Antifibrinolytic Therapy and Perioperative Considerations. Anesthesiology 2018; 128:657.
  94. Gausden EB, Qudsi R, Boone MD, et al. Tranexamic Acid in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31:513.
  95. Amer KM, Rehman S, Amer K, Haydel C. Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Orthopaedic Fracture Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Literature Review. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31:520.
  96. Guo P, He Z, Wang Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e0587.
  97. Task Force on Patient Blood Management for Adult Cardiac Surgery of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA), Boer C, Meesters MI, et al. 2017 EACTS/EACTA Guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:88.
  98. Kozek-Langenecker SA, Afshari A, Albaladejo P, et al. Management of severe perioperative bleeding: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30:270.
  99. Gerstein NS, Brierley JK, Windsor J, et al. Antifibrinolytic Agents in Cardiac and Noncardiac Surgery: A Comprehensive Overview and Update. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 31:2183.
  100. Myles PS, Smith JA, Forbes A, et al. Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Coronary-Artery Surgery. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:136.
  101. Takagi H, Ando T, Umemoto T, All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence (ALICE) group. Seizures associated with tranexamic acid for cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2017; 58:633.
  102. World Health Organization (WHO). 63rd World Health Assembly: Availability, safety and quality of blood products. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA63/A63_R12-en.pdf (Accessed on November 16, 2018).
  103. WOMAN Trial Collaborators. Effect of early tranexamic acid administration on mortality, hysterectomy, and other morbidities in women with post-partum haemorrhage (WOMAN): an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2017; 389:2105.
  104. CRASH-2 trial collaborators, Shakur H, Roberts I, et al. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 376:23.
  105. Devereaux PJ, Marcucci M, Painter TW, et al. Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery. N Engl J Med 2022; 386:1986.
  106. Fergusson DA, Hébert PC, Mazer CD, et al. A comparison of aprotinin and lysine analogues in high-risk cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:2319.
  107. Walkden GJ, Verheyden V, Goudie R, Murphy GJ. Increased perioperative mortality following aprotinin withdrawal: a real-world analysis of blood management strategies in adult cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39:1808.
  108. Hébert PC, Fergusson DA, Hutton B, et al. Regulatory decisions pertaining to aprotinin may be putting patients at risk. CMAJ 2014; 186:1379.
  109. Royston D, De Hert S, van der Linden J, et al. A special article following the relicence of aprotinin injection in Europe. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2017; 36:97.
  110. Goobie SM, Frank SM. Tranexamic Acid: What Is Known and Unknown, and Where Do We Go From Here? Anesthesiology 2017; 127:405.
  111. Spence J, Long S, Tidy A, et al. Tranexamic Acid Administration During On-Pump Cardiac Surgery: A Survey of Current Practices Among Canadian Anesthetists Working in Academic Centers. Anesth Analg 2017; 125:1863.
  112. Jerath A, Yang QJ, Pang KS, et al. Tranexamic Acid Dosing for Cardiac Surgical Patients With Chronic Renal Dysfunction: A New Dosing Regimen. Anesth Analg 2018; 127:1323.
  113. Andersson L, Eriksson O, Hedlund PO, et al. Special considerations with regard to the dosage of tranexamic acid in patients with chronic renal diseases. Urol Res 1978; 6:83.
  114. Luo W, Sun RX, Jiang H, Ma XL. The efficacy and safety of topical administration of tranexamic acid in spine surgery: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2018; 13:96.
  115. Wang F, Zhao KC, Zhao MM, Zhao DX. The efficacy of oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss after primary total knee and hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e12270.
  116. Habbab LM, Semelhago L, Lamy A. Topical Use of Tranexamic Acid in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 68:212.
  117. Taeuber I, Weibel S, Herrmann E, et al. Association of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid With Thromboembolic Events and Mortality: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression. JAMA Surg 2021; :e210884.
  118. Montroy J, Fergusson NA, Hutton B, et al. The Safety and Efficacy of Lysine Analogues in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Transfus Med Rev 2017; 31:141.
  119. Zhou ZF, Zhang FJ, Huo YF, et al. Intraoperative tranexamic acid is associated with postoperative stroke in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0177011.
  120. Couture P, Lebon JS, Laliberté É, et al. Low-Dose Versus High-Dose Tranexamic Acid Reduces the Risk of Nonischemic Seizures After Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 31:1611.
  121. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/getFile.cfm?setid=1c5bc1dd-e9ec-44c1-9281-67ad482315d9&type=pdf&name=1c5bc1dd-e9ec-44c1-9281-67ad482315d9 (version 9.2017) (Accessed on December 06, 2017).
  122. Leebeek FWG, Eikenboom JCJ. Von Willebrand's Disease. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:701.
  123. Tiede A, Rand JH, Budde U, et al. How I treat the acquired von Willebrand syndrome. Blood 2011; 117:6777.
  124. Desborough MJ, Oakland K, Brierley C, et al. Desmopressin use for minimising perioperative blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 7:CD001884.
  125. Desborough MJ, Oakland KA, Landoni G, et al. Desmopressin for treatment of platelet dysfunction and reversal of antiplatelet agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15:263.
  126. Sørensen B, Bevan D. A critical evaluation of cryoprecipitate for replacement of fibrinogen. Br J Haematol 2010; 149:834.
  127. Callum J, Farkouh ME, Scales DC, et al. Effect of Fibrinogen Concentrate vs Cryoprecipitate on Blood Component Transfusion After Cardiac Surgery: The FIBRES Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019; 322:1966.
  128. Ghadimi K, Welsby IJ. Pro: Factor Concentrates are Essential for Hemostasis in Complex Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:558.
  129. Jensen NH, Stensballe J, Afshari A. Comparing efficacy and safety of fibrinogen concentrate to cryoprecipitate in bleeding patients: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60:1033.
  130. Rahe-Meyer N, Solomon C, Hanke A, et al. Effects of fibrinogen concentrate as first-line therapy during major aortic replacement surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2013; 118:40.
  131. Wikkelsø A, Lunde J, Johansen M, et al. Fibrinogen concentrate in bleeding patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD008864.
  132. Schöchl H, Nienaber U, Hofer G, et al. Goal-directed coagulation management of major trauma patients using thromboelastometry (ROTEM)-guided administration of fibrinogen concentrate and prothrombin complex concentrate. Crit Care 2010; 14:R55.
  133. Holcomb JB, Minei KM, Scerbo ML, et al. Admission rapid thrombelastography can replace conventional coagulation tests in the emergency department: experience with 1974 consecutive trauma patients. Ann Surg 2012; 256:476.
  134. Fominskiy E, Nepomniashchikh VA, Lomivorotov VV, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Fibrinogen Concentrate in Surgical Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2016; 30:1196.
  135. Neerman-Arbez M, Casini A. Clinical Consequences and Molecular Bases of Low Fibrinogen Levels. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19.
  136. Morrison GA, Koch J, Royds M, et al. Fibrinogen concentrate vs. fresh frozen plasma for the management of coagulopathy during thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2019; 74:180.
  137. Maeda T, Miyata S, Usui A, et al. Safety of Fibrinogen Concentrate and Cryoprecipitate in Cardiovascular Surgery: Multicenter Database Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33:321.
  138. Li JY, Gong J, Zhu F, et al. Fibrinogen Concentrate in Cardiovascular Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesth Analg 2018; 127:612.
  139. Levy JH, Goodnough LT. How I use fibrinogen replacement therapy in acquired bleeding. Blood 2015; 125:1387.
  140. Chen W, Shen J, Zhang Y, et al. A randomised controlled trial of fibrinogen concentrate during scoliosis surgery. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:1476.
  141. Ng KT, Yap JLL, Kwok PE. The effect of fibrinogen concentrate on postoperative blood loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth 2020; 63:109782.
  142. Erdoes G, Koster A, Meesters MI, et al. The role of fibrinogen and fibrinogen concentrate in cardiac surgery: an international consensus statement from the Haemostasis and Transfusion Scientific Subcommittee of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology. Anaesthesia 2019; 74:1589.
  143. Ghadimi K, Levy JH, Welsby IJ. Prothrombin Complex Concentrates for Bleeding in the Perioperative Setting. Anesth Analg 2016; 122:1287.
  144. Smith MM, Ashikhmina E, Brinkman NJ, Barbara DW. Perioperative Use of Coagulation Factor Concentrates in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 31:1810.
  145. Goldhammer JE, Herman CR. A Split From Conventional Blood Component Therapy? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:168.
  146. Sun GH, Patel V, Moreno-Duarte I, et al. Intraoperative Administration of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Reduces Blood Requirements in Cardiac Transplantation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:161.
  147. Bhatt HV, Subramaniam K. PRO: Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Should Be Used in Preference to Fresh Frozen Plasma for Hemostasis in Cardiac Surgical Patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:1062.
  148. Grottke O, Schulman S. Four-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for the Management of Patients Receiving Direct Oral Activated Factor X Inhibitors. Anesthesiology 2019; 131:1153.
  149. Srivastava P, Agarwal A, Jha A, et al. Utility of prothrombin complex concentrate as first-line treatment modality of coagulopathy in patients undergoing liver transplantation: A propensity score-matched study. Clin Transplant 2018; 32:e13435.
  150. Jehan F, Aziz H, OʼKeeffe T, et al. The role of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in coagulopathy of trauma: A propensity matched analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2018; 85:18.
  151. Schöchl H, Nienaber U, Maegele M, et al. Transfusion in trauma: thromboelastometry-guided coagulation factor concentrate-based therapy versus standard fresh frozen plasma-based therapy. Crit Care 2011; 15:R83.
  152. Innerhofer P, Westermann I, Tauber H, et al. The exclusive use of coagulation factor concentrates enables reversal of coagulopathy and decreases transfusion rates in patients with major blunt trauma. Injury 2013; 44:209.
  153. Innerhofer P, Fries D, Mittermayr M, et al. Reversal of trauma-induced coagulopathy using first-line coagulation factor concentrates or fresh frozen plasma (RETIC): a single-centre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Haematol 2017; 4:e258.
  154. Zeeshan M, Hamidi M, Kulvatunyou N, et al. 3-Factor Versus 4-Factor PCC in Coagulopathy of Trauma: Four is Better Than Three. Shock 2019; 52:23.
  155. Fries D. The early use of fibrinogen, prothrombin complex concentrate, and recombinant-activated factor VIIa in massive bleeding. Transfusion 2013; 53 Suppl 1:91S.
  156. Weber CF, Görlinger K, Meininger D, et al. Point-of-care testing: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of efficacy in coagulopathic cardiac surgery patients. Anesthesiology 2012; 117:531.
  157. Goodnough LT, Levy JH. The Judicious Use of Recombinant Factor VIIa. Semin Thromb Hemost 2016; 42:125.
  158. Peralta MR, Chowdary P. The use of new procoagulants in blunt and penetrating trauma. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2019; 32:200.
  159. Yank V, Tuohy CV, Logan AC, et al. Systematic review: benefits and harms of in-hospital use of recombinant factor VIIa for off-label indications. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154:529.
  160. Levi M, Levy JH, Andersen HF, Truloff D. Safety of recombinant activated factor VII in randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:1791.
  161. Lin Y, Stanworth S, Birchall J, et al. Recombinant factor VIIa for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; :CD005011.
  162. Simpson E, Lin Y, Stanworth S, et al. Recombinant factor VIIa for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; :CD005011.
  163. Brase J, Finger B, He J, et al. Analysis of Outcomes Using Low-Dose and Early Administration of Recombinant Activated Factor VII in Cardiac Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102:35.
  164. Alfirevic A, Duncan A, You J, et al. Recombinant factor VII is associated with worse survival in complex cardiac surgical patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 98:618.
  165. Harper PC, Smith MM, Brinkman NJ, et al. Outcomes Following Three-Factor Inactive Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Versus Recombinant Activated Factor VII Administration During Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:151.
  166. Will ND, Kor DJ, Frank RD, et al. Initial Postoperative Hemoglobin Values and Clinical Outcomes in Transfused Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery. Anesth Analg 2019; 129:819.
  167. Bellomy ML, Engoren MC, Martin BJ, et al. The Attributable Mortality of Postoperative Bleeding Exceeds the Attributable Mortality of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism. Anesth Analg 2021; 132:82.
  168. Muñoz M, Acheson AG, Bisbe E, et al. An international consensus statement on the management of postoperative anaemia after major surgical procedures. Anaesthesia 2018; 73:1418.
  169. Salisbury AC, Reid KJ, Alexander KP, et al. Diagnostic blood loss from phlebotomy and hospital-acquired anemia during acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171:1646.
  170. Koch CG, Li L, Sun Z, et al. From Bad to Worse: Anemia on Admission and Hospital-Acquired Anemia. J Patient Saf 2017; 13:211.
  171. Hatton SP, Smith AF. Postoperative anaemia: balancing the risks of anaemia and transfusion. Anaesthesia 2018; 73:1313.
  172. van Iperen CE, Gaillard CA, Kraaijenhagen RJ, et al. Response of erythropoiesis and iron metabolism to recombinant human erythropoietin in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 2000; 28:2773.
  173. Muñoz M, García-Erce JA, Remacha ÁF. Disorders of iron metabolism. Part II: iron deficiency and iron overload. J Clin Pathol 2011; 64:287.
  174. Shander A, Goodnough LT. From Tolerating Anemia to Treating Anemia. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170:125.
  175. Khalafallah AA, Yan C, Al-Badri R, et al. Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose versus standard care in the management of postoperative anaemia: a prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Haematol 2016; 3:e415.
  176. Kim YW, Bae JM, Park YK, et al. Effect of Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose on Hemoglobin Response Among Patients With Acute Isovolemic Anemia Following Gastrectomy: The FAIRY Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017; 317:2097.
  177. Holm C, Thomsen LL, Norgaard A, Langhoff-Roos J. Single-dose intravenous iron infusion or oral iron for treatment of fatigue after postpartum haemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial. Vox Sang 2017; 112:219.
  178. Holm C, Thomsen LL, Langhoff-Roos J. Intravenous iron isomaltoside treatment of women suffering from severe fatigue after postpartum hemorrhage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 32:2797.
  179. Xu H, Duan Y, Yuan X, et al. Intravenous Iron Versus Placebo in the Management of Postoperative Functional Iron Deficiency Anemia in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Valvular Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33:2941.
Topic 94347 Version 40.0

References