Your activity: 6 p.v.

Cardiovascular risks of hypertension

Cardiovascular risks of hypertension
Authors:
Michael J Bloch, MD, FACP, FASH, FSVM, FNLA
Jan Basile, MD
Section Editors:
George L Bakris, MD
Bernard J Gersh, MB, ChB, DPhil, FRCP, MACC
Deputy Editor:
John P Forman, MD, MSc
Literature review current through: Nov 2022. | This topic last updated: Jul 19, 2021.

INTRODUCTION — Hypertension is quantitatively the most important modifiable risk factor for premature cardiovascular disease [1]; it is more common than cigarette smoking, dyslipidemia, and diabetes, which are the other major risk factors (table 1). Hypertension accounts for an estimated 54 percent of all strokes and 47 percent of all ischemic heart disease events globally [2]. (See "Overview of established risk factors for cardiovascular disease".)

The impact of hypertension on the risk for cardiovascular disorders and the impact of cardiovascular risk on therapeutic decisions in the treatment of hypertension are discussed in this topic. The effects of different antihypertensive drugs and of different blood pressure goals on cardiovascular outcomes are presented elsewhere:

(See "Choice of drug therapy in primary (essential) hypertension".)

(See "Goal blood pressure in adults with hypertension".)

IMPACT OF HYPERTENSION ON CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE — Hypertension increases the risk for a variety of cardiovascular diseases [3-5], including stroke, coronary artery disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation [6], and peripheral vascular disease.

The risk for both coronary disease and stroke increases progressively with incremental increases in blood pressure above 115/75 mmHg, as shown in numerous epidemiologic studies (figure 1A-B) [7-12]. For each 20/10 mmHg increase in systolic/diastolic blood pressure, there is a doubling of coronary heart- and stroke-related mortality. However, these observations do not prove a causal relationship, since increasing blood pressure could be a marker for other risk factors such as increasing body weight, which is associated with dyslipidemia, glucose intolerance, and the metabolic syndrome. The best evidence for a causal role of increasing blood pressure in cardiovascular complications is an improvement in outcome as blood pressure is reduced with antihypertensive therapy [13]. (See "Goal blood pressure in adults with hypertension".)

The increase in cardiovascular risk has primarily been described in terms of elevated systolic pressure in older adults [14] and elevation in both systolic and diastolic pressure in younger individuals. Pulse pressure, which is the difference between the systolic and diastolic blood pressures and is determined primarily by large artery stiffness, is also a strong predictor of risk [14]. Conversely, isolated diastolic hypertension, in which the diastolic pressure is elevated but the systolic pressure is normal, is uncommon and not associated with a higher cardiovascular risk [15]. (See "Increased pulse pressure".)

Out-of-office blood pressure measurements may predict cardiovascular risk better than routine clinic measurements, a fact that has led to increased reliance upon home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) to make the diagnosis of hypertension [5,16]. These issues are presented elsewhere:

(See "Overview of hypertension in adults", section on 'Making the diagnosis of hypertension'.)

(See "Blood pressure measurement in the diagnosis and management of hypertension in adults".)

(See "Out-of-office blood pressure measurement: Ambulatory and self-measured blood pressure monitoring".)

Impact of hypertension on specific cardiovascular disorders — The magnitude of the association between hypertension and cardiovascular disease varies according to the specific cardiovascular outcome. In one large cohort study, for example, hypertension (which was defined as a blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg) increased the relative risk of stroke (by 3.8 and 2.6 in men and women, respectively). In addition, heart failure was increased (by 4.0 and 3.0 in men and women, respectively) and to a greater degree than the relative risk of coronary heart disease (by 2.0 and 2.2, respectively) [17].

Projections have been made for the expected decrease in morbidity and mortality resulting from a 10 mmHg reduction in systolic pressure using data from 48 randomized trials performed over the past 50 years. Although not proving cause-and-effect, the estimated benefit from this degree of blood pressure lowering is a 26 percent relative reduction in risk of stroke, a 16 percent relative reduction in risk of coronary disease, and a 26 percent relative reduction in risk of heart failure [18]; this estimated relative risk reduction is present regardless of preexisting cardiovascular disease or the initial blood pressure level (including in those with normal blood pressure). Despite similar relative risk reductions, absolute benefits of blood pressure lowering are greater among those with higher baseline cardiovascular risk and higher baseline blood pressure.

As noted above, the best evidence for a causal role of increasing blood pressure in cardiovascular complications is an improvement in outcome as blood pressure is reduced with antihypertensive therapy [13,18]. (See "Goal blood pressure in adults with hypertension".)

Additive effects of hypertension and other risk factors — The different cardiovascular risk factors have an additive effect on the likelihood of developing coronary heart disease and other cardiovascular outcomes [19,20]. In addition to hypertension, the major risk factors are older age, elevated plasma and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, a low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, and cigarette smoking. Thus, individual patients who have significant hypertension but none or few of the other risk factors are at relatively lower overall risk than patients with less hypertension but more of the other risk factors (figure 2) [19,21]. (See "Overview of established risk factors for cardiovascular disease".)

Multiple risk prediction models using these and other risk factors have been developed, most notably the Framingham risk score [19,20]. The ability of the Framingham risk criteria to predict cardiovascular disease has been widely reproduced [22-24], but the degree of cardiovascular risk related to the Framingham risk criteria may not apply to all patient populations [25-27]. Other risk factors have been proposed to improve upon the Framingham risk assessment, including C-reactive protein, brain natriuretic peptide, echocardiography, and other studies for detecting subclinical vascular disease [28-30]. However, none have been proven to add significantly to the Framingham scoring, and they are probably not cost effective.

Other risk prediction models exist, including one developed by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) that incorporated data from multiple patient cohorts and includes risk of all cardiovascular events, including stroke, rather than coronary heart disease alone (calculator 1) [31].

A detailed discussion on estimation of cardiovascular risk in an individual without known disease is presented elsewhere. (See "Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment for primary prevention in adults: Our approach".)

APPLICATION OF RISK ASSESSMENT TO THERAPEUTIC DECISIONS

Use of baseline cardiovascular risk to guide treatment decisions — A central question in the care of hypertensive patients is whether or not treatment decisions (eg, use of antihypertensive medications, goal blood pressure) should be applied uniformly to the entire hypertensive population or, instead, tailored according to a patient's risk for future cardiovascular events. The benefit a patient receives from blood pressure lowering depends upon the balance between the absolute (rather than relative) reduction in risk for adverse outcomes and the potential harms and burdens of antihypertensive therapy. (See "Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment for primary prevention in adults: Our approach" and "Cardiovascular disease risk assessment for primary prevention: Risk calculators".)

Although the relative cardiovascular risk reduction appears to be the same regardless of the baseline cardiovascular risk, the absolute number of cardiovascular events prevented by therapy is significantly greater in the population with higher baseline cardiovascular risk. This concept is presented in detail elsewhere. (See "Goal blood pressure in adults with hypertension".)

A group from New Zealand, for example, took various cardiovascular risk factors into account in determining the overall risk status of individual patients, including their level of blood pressure, age, gender, and other factors (figure 2) [21]. They then examined the evidence of benefits of antihypertensive therapy from the clinical trials and considered the costs of such therapy. They concluded that antihypertensive therapy could be justified only if the risk for a major cardiovascular event over the next five years was 10 percent or greater or if the level of blood pressure was so high as to mandate therapy regardless of overall risk status (≥170/100 mmHg).

Several professional organizations have recommended that markers of overall cardiovascular risk be incorporated in treatment decisions [32-34]. As an example, guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) suggest initiating hypertensive medications in higher-risk individuals at lower blood pressures than those with lower overall cardiovascular risk [5]. Details of our approach are presented elsewhere. (See "Goal blood pressure in adults with hypertension".)

Current risk versus prior risk — In addition to the specific patient population [25], another problem with the use of such data is that the risk status that is currently assessed may not reflect what was previously present. This is an important issue because it is the prior risk status that is more likely to be responsible for the current health of the individual.

As an example, although blood pressure at the time of risk assessment (current blood pressure) is typically used in most prediction algorithms, this does not accurately reflect an individual's past blood pressure experience; the use of long-term, average blood pressure is more accurate. This is supported by the following observations:

In a study of 3560 individuals, the presence of elevated blood pressure before age 35 years was associated with coronary calcification (which is a strong predictor of future coronary heart disease) later in life. This association was observed after adjusting for blood pressure and other coronary risk factors that were present after age 35 years [35].

A report from the Framingham Heart Study found that recent and remote antecedent blood pressure (systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure) predicted cardiovascular risk incrementally over current blood pressure [36]. This effect was seen in men and women, younger and older subjects, and lower and higher blood pressure groups.

In another study, 1604 men whose risk status was first assessed when they were aged 45 to 64 years and free of clinically obvious cardiovascular disease were then reassessed 25 years later when they were aged 70 to 90 years [37]. Most patients changed their risk status over this time period, moving forward or backward. When the current risk status of the 342 subjects who developed cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, angina, coronary bypass surgery, angioplasty, or stroke) during the follow-up period was compared with that of the 279 who remained healthy, there were few differences. However, the results were different when the original risk status was used. Those patients who remained healthy had significantly lower blood pressure (121/79 versus 134/83 mmHg) and plasma cholesterol levels (211 versus 226 mg/dL [5.45 versus 5.84 mmol/L]) 25 years before.

Based upon these data, clinicians need to be cautious about only using current cardiovascular risk estimates to predict subsequent events [37].

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

Beyond the Basics topics (see "Patient education: High blood pressure in adults (Beyond the Basics)" and "Patient education: High blood pressure treatment in adults (Beyond the Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Hypertension is quantitatively the most important risk factor for premature cardiovascular disease; it is more common than cigarette smoking, dyslipidemia, and diabetes, which are the other major risk factors (table 1). (See 'Introduction' above.)

Hypertension increases the risk for a variety of cardiovascular diseases, including stroke, coronary artery disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and peripheral vascular disease. The risk for both coronary disease and stroke increases progressively with incremental increases in blood pressure above 115/75 mmHg, as shown in numerous epidemiologic studies (figure 1A-B). However, the best evidence for a causal role of increasing blood pressure in cardiovascular complications is an improvement in outcome with antihypertensive therapy. (See 'Impact of hypertension on cardiovascular disease' above.)

The magnitude of the association between hypertension and cardiovascular disease varies according to the specific cardiovascular outcome. Using data from multiple studies, a 10 mmHg reduction in systolic pressure is projected to produce a 26 percent relative reduction in risk of stroke, a 16 percent relative reduction in risk of coronary disease, and a 26 percent relative reduction in risk of heart failure. (See 'Impact of hypertension on specific cardiovascular disorders' above.)

The different cardiovascular risk factors have an additive effect on the likelihood of developing coronary heart disease and other cardiovascular outcomes. Multiple risk prediction models using these and other risk factors have been developed, including one developed by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) that incorporated data from multiple patient cohorts and includes risk of all cardiovascular events, including stroke, rather than coronary heart disease alone (calculator 1). (See 'Additive effects of hypertension and other risk factors' above.)

The benefit a patient receives from blood pressure lowering depends upon the balance between the absolute (rather than relative) reduction in risk for adverse outcomes and the potential harms and burdens of antihypertensive therapy. We, and several professional organizations, recommend that markers of overall cardiovascular risk be incorporated in treatment decisions. (See 'Application of risk assessment to therapeutic decisions' above.)

  1. GBD 2017 Risk Factor Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392:1923.
  2. Lawes CM, Vander Hoorn S, Rodgers A, International Society of Hypertension. Global burden of blood-pressure-related disease, 2001. Lancet 2008; 371:1513.
  3. Flint AC, Conell C, Ren X, et al. Effect of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes. N Engl J Med 2019; 381:243.
  4. Rapsomaniki E, Timmis A, George J, et al. Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1·25 million people. Lancet 2014; 383:1899.
  5. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2018; 71:e13.
  6. Angeli F, Reboldi G, Verdecchia P. Hypertension, inflammation and atrial fibrillation. J Hypertens 2014; 32:480.
  7. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360:1903.
  8. Son JS, Choi S, Kim K, et al. Association of Blood Pressure Classification in Korean Young Adults According to the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines With Subsequent Cardiovascular Disease Events. JAMA 2018; 320:1783.
  9. Yano Y, Reis JP, Colangelo LA, et al. Association of Blood Pressure Classification in Young Adults Using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline With Cardiovascular Events Later in Life. JAMA 2018; 320:1774.
  10. Pastor-Barriuso R, Banegas JR, Damián J, et al. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse pressure: an evaluation of their joint effect on mortality. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139:731.
  11. Pletcher MJ, Bibbins-Domingo K, Lewis CE, et al. Prehypertension during young adulthood and coronary calcium later in life. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149:91.
  12. Shen L, Ma H, Xiang MX, Wang JA. Meta-analysis of cohort studies of baseline prehypertension and risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2013; 112:266.
  13. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration, Ninomiya T, Perkovic V, et al. Blood pressure lowering and major cardiovascular events in people with and without chronic kidney disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2013; 347:f5680.
  14. Staessen JA, Gasowski J, Wang JG, et al. Risks of untreated and treated isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: meta-analysis of outcome trials. Lancet 2000; 355:865.
  15. McEvoy JW, Daya N, Rahman F, et al. Association of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension as Defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Guideline With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes. JAMA 2020; 323:329.
  16. Siu AL, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for high blood pressure in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163:778.
  17. Kannel WB. Blood pressure as a cardiovascular risk factor: prevention and treatment. JAMA 1996; 275:1571.
  18. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration. Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis. Lancet 2021; 397:1625.
  19. Wilson PW. Established risk factors and coronary artery disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Hypertens 1994; 7:7S.
  20. Kannel WB, Wolf PA. Framingham Study insights on the hazards of elevated blood pressure. JAMA 2008; 300:2545.
  21. Jackson R, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, et al. Treatment with drugs to lower blood pressure and blood cholesterol based on an individual's absolute cardiovascular risk. Lancet 2005; 365:434.
  22. Lloyd-Jones DM, Evans JC, Levy D. Hypertension in adults across the age spectrum: current outcomes and control in the community. JAMA 2005; 294:466.
  23. Frost PH, Davis BR, Burlando AJ, et al. Coronary heart disease risk factors in men and women aged 60 years and older: findings from the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. Circulation 1996; 94:26.
  24. Lowe LP, Greenland P, Ruth KJ, et al. Impact of major cardiovascular disease risk factors, particularly in combination, on 22-year mortality in women and men. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:2007.
  25. Bastuji-Garin S, Deverly A, Moyse D, et al. The Framingham prediction rule is not valid in a European population of treated hypertensive patients. J Hypertens 2002; 20:1973.
  26. Conroy RM, Pyörälä K, Fitzgerald AP, et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J 2003; 24:987.
  27. Zambon A, Arfè A, Corrao G, Zanchetti A. Relationships of different types of event to cardiovascular death in trials of antihypertensive treatment: an aid to definition of total cardiovascular disease risk in hypertension. J Hypertens 2014; 32:495.
  28. Simon A, Chironi G, Levenson J. Performance of subclinical arterial disease detection as a screening test for coronary heart disease. Hypertension 2006; 48:392.
  29. Olsen MH, Wachtell K, Nielsen OW, et al. N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide predicted cardiovascular events stronger than high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in hypertension: a LIFE substudy. J Hypertens 2006; 24:1531.
  30. Cuspidi C, Meani S, Valerio C, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiovascular risk stratification: impact and cost-effectiveness of echocardiography in recently diagnosed essential hypertensives. J Hypertens 2006; 24:1671.
  31. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014; 129:S1.
  32. Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension, Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. Blood Press 2013; 22:193.
  33. Gabb GM, Mangoni AA, Anderson CS, et al. Guideline for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in adults - 2016. Med J Aust 2016; 205:85.
  34. Leung AA, Nerenberg K, Daskalopoulou SS, et al. Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension. Can J Cardiol 2016; 32:569.
  35. Sipahi I, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, et al. Effects of normal, pre-hypertensive, and hypertensive blood pressure levels on progression of coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:833.
  36. Vasan RS, Massaro JM, Wilson PW, et al. Antecedent blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Heart Study . Circulation 2002; 105:48.
  37. Benfante R, Hwang LJ, Masaki K, Curb JD. To what extent do cardiovascular risk factor values measured in elderly men represent their midlife values measured 25 years earlier? A preliminary report and commentary from the Honolulu Heart Program. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 140:206.
Topic 3850 Version 23.0

References