Your activity: 14 p.v.

Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: General use

Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: General use
Authors:
Donald Cutlip, MD
Thomas Levin, MD
Section Editor:
Stephan Windecker, MD
Deputy Editor:
Nisha Parikh, MD, MPH
Literature review current through: Nov 2022. | This topic last updated: Oct 06, 2020.

INTRODUCTION — Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) disrupts the coronary endothelium, leading to the exposure of subendothelial tissue factors to blood. Intracoronary thrombosis may result during or soon after the procedure. In addition, metal (which is procoagulant) stents can trigger thrombus formation. Stent thrombosis can be a life-threatening event. (See "Coronary artery stent thrombosis: Clinical presentation and management" and "Coronary artery stent thrombosis: Incidence and risk factors".)

Aggressive antithrombotic therapy with aspirin, platelet P2Y12 receptor blockers, and parenteral anticoagulants is used to decrease the risk of early intracoronary thrombosis; a minority of patients may be candidates for a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Recommendations for the use of these agents in stable patients before and within the first few days of stent placement will be the focus of this topic. The studies supporting these recommendations are presented separately. (See "Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Clinical studies".)

The discussion of the long-term use of aspirin and platelet P2Y12 receptor blockers to prevent late and very late stent thrombosis is found elsewhere. (See "Long-term antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery stenting in stable patients".)

The use of antithrombotic therapy in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is discussed elsewhere. (See "Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Antiplatelet therapy" and "Acute non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: Early antiplatelet therapy" and "Anticoagulant therapy in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes" and "Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Management of anticoagulation".)

OUR APPROACH — We prescribe antithrombotic therapy to stable patients undergoing elective PCI with stenting in the following sequential manner:

We load all patients scheduled for stenting, including those taking low-dose maintenance aspirin, with full-dose aspirin (325 mg) given at least two hours prior to the PCI. Following the initial loading dose, patients are then treated with maintenance low-dose aspirin (75 to 100 mg) along with a P2Y12 receptor blocker.

For patients who have previously undergone diagnostic coronary angiography and in whom a decision has been made to proceed with PCI, we give clopidogrel 600 mg as a single loading dose 24 hours or more (but at least two hours) before the procedure. We then give clopidogrel 75 mg daily until the PCI. For patients who are undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography and who may receive PCI with stenting at the same procedure, we withhold clopidogrel until a decision to proceed with stenting has been made.

Ticagrelor is a reasonable alternative for some elective patients when the loading dose is 180 mg and the maintenance dose is 90 mg twice daily.

After the decision to proceed with PCI, we give unfractionated heparin (table 1) using a weight-adjusted bolus of 60 international units/kg, unless heparin has previously been administered for a radial artery access diagnostic procedure. Additional heparin is administered to achieve an activated clotting time (ACT) between 250 to 350 seconds (depending upon the ACT device). Although we prefer heparin, bivalirudin is a reasonable alternative for patients at high bleeding risk or those with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; we give a loading dose of 0.75 mg/kg and an infusion according to renal function (table 1). In uncomplicated procedures, the heparin or bivalirudin is stopped at the end of the procedure. For femoral access, sheath removal should be accomplished when the ACT falls to less than 150 to 180 for heparin (or two hours after discontinuation for bivalirudin) or a vascular closure device can be used immediately when there is suitable vascular anatomy.

For patients who are at high risk for acute stent thrombosis based on angiographic criteria (visible thrombus, persistent dissection, postprocedure Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade <3), we add a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. We start eptifibatide (table 1) with a 180 mcg/kg intravenous bolus given twice, 10 min apart (maximum dose of 22.6 mg each bolus). We then start an infusion of 2 mcg/kg/min (maximum dose of 15 mg/hour) after first bolus. The drug is continued for 2 to 18 hours; the duration depends on balancing the risks for thrombosis and bleeding.

ASPIRIN — All patients with coronary artery disease should receive aspirin. Aspirin is specifically recommended for patients undergoing coronary stenting, based primarily upon data from early randomized trials of aspirin or aspirin plus dipyridamole compared with placebo in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary (balloon) angioplasty (PTCA) [1,2]. (See "Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Clinical studies", section on 'Aspirin' and "Aspirin for the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease".)

We load all patients, including those taking low-dose maintenance aspirin, with 325 mg, preferably given at least two hours before the procedure.

For aspirin allergic patients, we usually recommend desensitization therapy before the stent procedure. Patients who cannot tolerate long-term aspirin are usually treated with clopidogrel. (See "Prevention of cardiovascular disease events in those with established disease (secondary prevention) or at very high risk", section on 'Antiplatelet therapy'.)

For these aspirin-allergic patients who need to undergo PCI prior to desensitization, the optimal approach is not known. Our experts use one of the following two approaches, which have not been formally evaluated, in patients who cannot be desensitized before the procedure:

Administer a P2Y12 receptor blocker alone. With this approach, some experts prefer the more potent agents prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel.

Administer an intravenous glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonist during the procedure.

When the patient is stable, an evaluation for possible aspirin desensitization can be performed by an allergy expert. (See "Introduction of aspirin to patients with aspirin hypersensitivity requiring cardiovascular interventions", section on 'Indications for urgent aspirin therapy'.)

P2Y12 RECEPTOR BLOCKERS — A P2Y12 receptor blocker (usually clopidogrel) is given to all patients either before or at the time of elective coronary artery stenting to reduce the risk of periprocedural and early (within 30 days) stent thrombosis. The efficacy of these agents has been demonstrated in numerous randomized trials. (See "Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Clinical studies", section on 'P2Y12 receptor blockers'.)

Clopidogrel is the preferred platelet P2Y12 receptor blocker in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing PCI, although there is a role for ticagrelor based on studies of long-term safety and efficacy such as the TWILIGHT trial.

We suggest pretreatment (prior to PCI) with clopidogrel for most stable patients whose coronary anatomy is known from a recent diagnostic coronary angiogram. When clopidogrel is chosen, we give a loading dose of 600 mg. It should be given preferably 24 hours or more (but at least two hours) before scheduled or anticipated PCI in most patients. Our recommendation to pretreat with clopidogrel in some patients is based on one randomized trial (CREDO) (see "Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Clinical studies", section on 'Clopidogrel' and "Acute non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: Early antiplatelet therapy"). For stable patients whose coronary anatomy is not known and who are scheduled for diagnostic coronary angiography with possible PCI, we suggest withholding the P2Y12 receptor blocker until after diagnostic coronary angiography, as many patients will either not have disease that needs revascularization or will have disease that requires coronary artery bypass surgery. In these situations, the patient will have been unnecessarily exposed to clopidogrel if it is given prior to angiography.

For patients in whom a decision is made to treat with ticagrelor, we give a loading dose of 180 mg using the same time protocol as described directly above for clopidogrel. If the patient needs to be switched from ticagrelor to clopidogrel near the time of discharge, often due to inability to pay for ticagrelor, we give a loading dose of 600 mg.

Prasugrel has not been extensively evaluated in patients with stable disease undergoing PCI. Its role in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or in patients at high ischemic risk is discussed elsewhere. (See "Acute non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: Early antiplatelet therapy", section on 'Summary and recommendations' and "Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Antiplatelet therapy", section on 'Summary and recommendations' and "Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Antiplatelet therapy", section on 'Patients receiving primary PCI' and "Acute non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: Early antiplatelet therapy".)

Clopidogrel has been extensively evaluated in patients undergoing elective stent implantation and is the focus of the discussion below. Other P2Y12 receptor blockers include:

Ticlopidine was the first widely used thienopyridine for the prevention of stent thrombosis. In early randomized trials of patients receiving bare metal stents, ticlopidine significantly lowered the risk of stent thrombosis at 30 days when given with aspirin. However, hematologic side effects, such as neutropenia and thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome, limit its use. (See "Drug-induced neutropenia and agranulocytosis", section on 'Ticlopidine'.)

Cangrelor is an intravenous P2Y12 receptor blocker that has been compared with either clopidogrel or placebo in three trials that have included patients with stable coronary disease. (See "Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Clinical studies", section on 'Cangrelor'.)

Cangrelor was approved for use by the United States Food and Drug Administration in June of 2015 as an adjunct to PCI in patients who have not been treated with a P2Y12 platelet inhibitor and who are not being given a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor [3,4]. We believe it is reasonable to use cangrelor in patients not previously loaded with an oral P2Y12 receptor blocker.

Evidence regarding timing and dose — A 2012 meta-analysis evaluated the optimal timing of clopidogrel using data from six randomized trials and nine observational studies [5]. The principal analysis was limited to the randomized trials (approximately 8600 patients), in which 25 percent of patients had elective PCI. Clopidogrel pretreatment, compared with treatment after catheterization, was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in mortality (absolute risk 1.54 versus 1.97 percent, respectively, odds ratio [OR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.57-1.11), but was associated with a lower risk of a secondary composite endpoint of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or urgent revascularization (9.83 versus 12.35 percent, OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.89). Bleeding rates were comparable (3.57 versus 3.08 percent).

The majority of the stable patients in the meta-analysis came from the CREDO trial, in which 2116 patients with stable angina were randomly assigned to clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose) or no pretreatment [6]. Clopidogrel loading was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in risk (6.8 versus 8.3 percent; relative risk reduction 18.5 percent, 95% CI -14.2 to 41.8) in the combined endpoint of death, MI, or urgent target vessel revascularization at 28 days. Additional details of CREDO are presented separately. (See "Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Clinical studies", section on 'Timing and dose'.)

The PRAGUE-8 (stable angina) and ARMYDA-5 PRELOAD (61 percent stable angina) trials demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety with clopidogrel 600 mg given either before (mean of 19 and 6 hours, respectively, in the two trials) or after elective coronary arteriography (CAG) but before PCI. (See "Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Clinical studies", section on 'Timing and dose'.)

The possible efficacy of higher loading doses, such as 900 or even 1200 mg, is discussed separately. (See "Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Clinical studies", section on 'Timing and dose'.)

Patients who undergo PCI with stenting must be properly informed of the importance of compliance to recommendations made regarding long-term dual antiplatelet therapy. Most patients will be discharged on clopidogrel 75 mg daily for a variable minimum duration depending on stent type and aspirin 75 to 100 mg daily. (See "Long-term antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery stenting in stable patients", section on 'Duration and Type of Antiplatelet Treatment'.)

Patients already taking clopidogrel — Our experts feel the evidence is not robust enough to make a strong suggestion for or against clopidogrel reloading. They suggest clopidogrel reloading with 600 mg of clopidogrel in patients on long-term clopidogrel therapy either who undergo PCI at the time of ACS or who are at high risk of stent thrombosis. (See "Coronary artery stent thrombosis: Incidence and risk factors", section on 'Risk factors'.)

The issue of whether patients who are receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy require an additional loading dose before PCI to reduce periprocedural events has not been well studied. Two randomized trials that included both stable and ACS patients taking clopidogrel for at least seven days have attempted to address this issue:

In the RELOAD trial, 166 patients were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel reloading with 900, 600, or 300 mg [7]. The primary outcome was the relative change, compared with baseline, in the inhibition or residual platelet function at four hours after dosing. The 900 mg dose produced a significantly greater reduction in platelet function compared with either of the lower doses.

In the ARMYDA-4 RELOAD trial, 503 patients were randomly assigned to receive either clopidogrel 600 mg or placebo loading four to eight hours before PCI [8]. There was no significant difference in the primary combined endpoint of the 30-day incidence of death, MI, or target vessel revascularization (6.7 versus 8.8 percent, respectively). Almost all of the events were attributable to a rise in biomarker. There were no episodes of major bleeding in either group. The clinical relevance of this finding remains to be determined. In the subset of patients with ACS there was a significant benefit (6.4 versus 16.3 percent; OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.32-0.90).

Possible coronary artery bypass graft surgery — An occasional stable patient may need coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) soon after catheterization. The 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guideline on CABG recommended that clopidogrel should be discontinued for at least five days before CABG, based on the recognition of an increase in perioperative bleeding in patients taking clopidogrel [9]. The management of platelet P2Y12 receptor blocker therapy in patients needing urgent or emergent CABG is discussed separately. (See "Acute non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: Early antiplatelet therapy", section on 'Possible early CABG'.)

Problems with clopidogrel use

Resistance/nonresponse to clopidogrel is discussed separately. (See "Clopidogrel resistance and clopidogrel treatment failure".)

Use with proton pump inhibitors – Gastrointestinal bleeding is a risk of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, particularly in the time around placement of an intracoronary stent when other antithrombotic therapy may be used. (See 'Bleeding' below.)

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been recommended for the prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients at high risk for clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding. However, reports in 2008 and 2009 have raised concerns that some, but not necessarily all, PPIs interfere with the ability of clopidogrel to inhibit platelet function and thereby increase the likelihood of coronary artery stent thrombosis, MI, or cardiovascular death. (See "Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention", section on 'Prevention' and "Aspirin for the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease" and "NSAIDs (including aspirin): Primary prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity".)

Our recommendations for the use of PPIs in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, including those patients who have undergone PCI, are presented elsewhere. (See "Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention", section on 'Summary and recommendations'.)

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) – Some case reports have described an association between clopidogrel and thrombotic microangiopathy (a thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-like syndrome of hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia that may be life-threatening) [10]. However, some experts do not believe this is a causal association. Additional information and an approach to the evaluation and management of a patient with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia are presented separately. (See "Drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy (DITMA)", section on 'Drugs associated with DITMA' and "Diagnostic approach to suspected TTP, HUS, or other thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)".)

Hypersensitivity – Hypersensitivity to clopidogrel develops in 1 to 4 percent of patients and typically appears between 5 and 10 days after initiation of therapy. The most common presentation is an erythematous, macular, pruritic rash, which typically begins on the face, chest, or abdomen, then spreads and becomes confluent (picture 1). Given the importance of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy in patients who receive intracoronary stents, those who develop an apparent hypersensitivity to clopidogrel need the issue addressed in a timely manner. We suggest referring these patients to a specialist in the care of patients with medication allergies. This issue is discussed in detail elsewhere. (See "Hypersensitivity reactions to clopidogrel".)

GP IIb/IIIa INHIBITORS — For patients pretreated with clopidogrel and aspirin, we do not routinely give a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor. There is no evidence that doing so improves outcomes, and it increases the risk of periprocedural bleeding. (See "Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Clinical studies", section on 'GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors'.)

Similarly, for patients who have not received the recommended dose and timing of clopidogrel before PCI, we do not routinely add a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. While there is some rationale for doing so, based upon its known immediate antiplatelet effect, studies such as ISAR-REACT and in a subgroup analysis from the ESPRIT trial found no benefit when patients were pretreated with high-dose (600 mg) clopidogrel at least two hours before the procedure [11-13]. (See "Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Clinical studies", section on 'Timing and dose'.)

We limit the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors during elective PCI to patients with lesions having higher thrombotic risk or suboptimal angiographic result. Our use in these scenarios is based on our clinical experience, as no studies have directly addressed this issue. In addition, we believe this is a reasonable approach, as GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have some role in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

The timing and dose of these drugs are presented separately (table 1). The optimal duration of treatment with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors for those patients who have received adequate pretreatment with clopidogrel has not been well studied. In such patients, experts vary between discontinuation after PCI to as long as recommended in the package inserts for each drug.

Risk for bleeding — The risk of a major bleeding complication, including gastrointestinal bleeding after PCI, in patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel is mildly increased in those who have received GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The risk is particularly increased in older adults, women, or those with renal insufficiency. (See 'Bleeding' below and "Acute non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: Early antiplatelet therapy".)

Thrombocytopenia — Abciximab and eptifibatide, but not tirofiban, have been associated with an increased risk of thrombocytopenia. This subject is discussed separately. (See "Drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia".)

Choice of agent — We use tirofiban or eptifibatide for elective PCI when indicated. Abciximab is no longer marketed in the United States, Canada, and many European countries.

ANTICOAGULANTS — We treat all patients undergoing elective PCI with anticoagulant therapy. Based on the evidence presented below, we prefer unfractionated heparin for most patients (table 1). (See 'Summary and recommendations' below.)

Heparin — The practice of giving intravenous unfractionated heparin before PCI to prevent intracoronary or device-related thrombosis was initiated when percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was the procedure of choice (ie, before the stent era) and prior to the routine use of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor blocker [14]. The rationale for anticoagulation is that the procedure is associated with factors that predispose to thrombosis: stasis within the coronary artery and catheters and exposure of the clotting elements of the blood to an injured endothelium and to catheters and wires. There are no randomized trials of patients undergoing PCI in which unfractionated heparin (or other anticoagulant) has been compared with placebo.

Dosing and monitoring — For PCI, the optimal dose of heparin is that which balances the risks of thrombosis and bleeding [15]. There are no randomized trials comparing different heparin doses or activated clotting time (ACT) goals in patients with stable coronary artery disease and who have been pretreated with aspirin and a thienopyridine. Thus, current recommendations for dosing and monitoring, including those from societal guidelines, are based upon older studies and observational evidence.

Monitoring of heparin effect is usually performed in an attempt to avoid over- or under-anticoagulation. When chosen, monitoring is usually performed using the ACT since the partial thromboplastin time often becomes infinitely prolonged at the high heparin concentrations that are attained in these procedures [16,17].

For patients undergoing PCI, we use an initial intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) bolus of 70 to 100 units/kg up to a maximum of 10,000 units (with additional boluses if needed to achieve an activated clotting time [ACT] target >250 seconds) if a glycoprotein inhibitor is not used [18]. The ACT is targeted at 250 to 300 seconds, and it is checked 10 minutes after the bolus.

The recommendation for 100 international units/kg as the upper limit of the heparin bolus range was supported by findings in the ISAR-REACT 3A study, in which elective PCI with stenting was performed in over 2500 stable patients pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel; all patients were given a heparin bolus of 100 international units/kg [19]. Outcomes were compared with those of the heparin (140 international units/kg) cohort in ISAR-REACT 3 trial. The rate of the primary composite endpoint (death, myocardial infarction [MI], urgent target vessel revascularization within 30 days, or major bleeding) was similar in both groups, and there was a trend toward a lower rate of bleeding at the lower dose. (See "Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Clinical studies", section on 'Bivalirudin'.)

Use with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors — For patients who receive a glycoprotein inhibitor, we use UFH 50 to 70 units/kg up to a maximum of 7,000 units (with additional boluses if needed to achieve an ACT target >200 seconds). The ACT is targeted at 200 to 250 seconds, and it is checked 10 minutes after the bolus. These recommendations are based upon the following observations [20-22]:

In the ESPRIT trial, 2064 patients were randomly assigned to eptifibatide or placebo prior to PCI; all patients received stents [20]. The incidence of death or MI at 48 hours was 5.5, 6.1, and 6.1 percent for patients treated with eptifibatide with an ACT of <244, 244 to 292, or >292 seconds, respectively. The risk of major bleeding was lowest in the low-ACT group, though the differences were not statistically significant.

A meta-analysis of four trials (CREDO, TARGET, REPLACE-1, and REPLACE-2) included 8369 patients with ACT data; 93 percent received a stent, and 89 percent received a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor [22]. The incidence of death, MI, or target vessel revascularization was similar for patients with ACT <256, 257 to 296, 297 to 347, and >348 (6.2, 6.8, 6.0, and 5.7 percent, respectively). The incidence of major or minor bleeding at 48 hours increased with increasing quartile of ACT. In a multivariate analysis, the risk of bleeding increased with increasing ACT up to 356 seconds, with a nonsignificant decline in risk at higher ACT values.

Postprocedural management — Postprocedural heparin is not recommended in patients with an uncomplicated procedure [23,24]. There is no evidence that prolonged use of postprocedural heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin prevents stent thrombosis or restenosis, and postprocedural heparin is associated with increased bleeding and vascular complications [25,26].

Sheath removal should be accomplished when the ACT falls to less than 150 to 180 seconds after the procedure to reduce the incidence of complications at the access site.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia — When heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is present or suspected, possible substitutions for heparin are argatroban, lepirudin, and bivalirudin, although only argatroban is approved as adjunctive therapy for PCI in this setting. Low-molecular-weight heparin is contraindicated in such patients. (See "Management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia".)

Enoxaparin — Although seemingly safe and as effective as unfractionated heparin [27], the clinical role of low-molecular-weight heparin in stable patients remains uncertain. It seems reasonable and is probably safer to continue enoxaparin than switching to heparin once it has been initiated for any reason, depending on timing and number of prior doses. (See "Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Clinical studies", section on 'Low molecular weight heparin'.)

Dosing of low-molecular-weight heparin has been based upon patient weight without laboratory monitoring. Enoxaparin does not reliably prolong the ACT at the doses used in PCI [28,29].

Bivalirudin — The relative efficacy and safety of bivalirudin compared with heparin has not been well studied in patients undergoing elective PCI who are treated using current antiplatelet drug recommendations (see 'P2Y12 receptor blockers' above and 'GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors' above). Many studies, including REPLACE-2, ISAR-REACT 3, and ACUITY have compared these two anticoagulants; however, the studies included patients who had acute coronary syndromes (ACS), were treated with routine GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (which we do not recommend), or received a high-dose heparin regimen. (See "Antithrombotic therapy for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Clinical studies", section on 'Bivalirudin' and "Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Management of anticoagulation", section on 'Fibrinolytic therapy with or without planned PCI'.)

A 2014 meta-analysis of 16 trials of stable and ACS patients found an increase in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, MI, ischemia driven revascularization, and stent thrombosis) up to 30 days (risk ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17) [30]. In contrast, the rates of protocol-defined major bleeding were lower with bivalirudin. In the trials comparing bivalirudin with heparin monotherapy (no GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor), there was no significant difference in the bleeding rates. However, the wide diversity of patients and protocols in these studies included in the meta-analysis prevent us from relying on its conclusions.

Until this issue is studied further, we prefer heparin in most patients, but believe that bivalirudin is a reasonable alternative, particularly for patients at high bleeding risk or those with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. (See "Management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia", section on 'Bivalirudin'.)

BLEEDING — The prolonged use of antithrombotic therapy with dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel) or, on occasion, dual antiplatelet therapy and warfarin, can lead to major bleeding, usually in the form of gastrointestinal bleeding, and minor bleeding. This issue is discussed in detail elsewhere. (See "Periprocedural bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention" and "Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention".)

PATIENTS TAKING LONG-TERM ORAL ANTICOAGULATION — The management of periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is challenging because of competing risks. Interrupting anticoagulation for this procedure transiently increases the risk of thromboembolism, while continuing therapy may increase risk for bleeding. Furthermore, if bleeding occurs, anticoagulant therapy may still need to be interrupted, increasing the risk for thromboembolism. We try to minimize any interruption of oral anticoagulation with use of radial access and other bleeding avoidance strategies. This issue is discussed separately. (See "Periprocedural management of antithrombotic therapy in patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulation and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention".)

PATIENTS UNDERGOING BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY — We estimate that a small number of patients (<5 percent) who undergo PCI do not receive a stent and are treated with balloon angioplasty. For those patients in whom stenting is intended, preprocedural aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor are appropriate.

No randomized trials have directly addressed the optimal long-term antiplatelet strategy in patients who undergo PCI but do not receive a stent. Some experts, including the authors of the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease section of the 2012 American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis guidelines, suggest one month of dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel) due to concerns about an increase in thrombotic potential caused by iatrogenic plaque rupture [31].

While balloon angioplasty does disrupt the integrity of the vascular endothelium, acute intracoronary thrombosis rarely occurs after 48 hours. Thus, the theoretical benefit from one month of dual antiplatelet therapy must be weighed against the increased risk of bleeding during this time. Based on limited evidence, we suggest one month of dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel) in patients not at high risk of bleeding or planned surgery within 30 days; for those with either of these, we suggest dual antiplatelet therapy for at least 48 hours.

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Percutaneous coronary intervention".)

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

Beyond the Basics topic (see "Patient education: Stenting for the heart (Beyond the Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Appropriate antithrombotic therapy using antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs is essential to minimize the risk of coronary artery stent thrombosis while limiting complications of major bleeding. However, even with proper timing and dosing, the risk of stent thrombosis and other ischemic complications, as well as major bleeding, including gastrointestinal bleeding, persists. (See "Long-term antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery stenting in stable patients" and 'Bleeding' above.)

All patients with coronary artery disease should receive long-term daily aspirin for secondary prevention. For stable patients in whom percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting is scheduled or anticipated, we load all patients, including those taking low-dose maintenance aspirin, with 325 mg, preferably given at least two hours before the procedure. (See 'Aspirin' above.)

For most stable patients in whom PCI with stenting is scheduled, we suggest pretreatment with clopidogrel (Grade 2B). The dose of clopidogrel is 600 mg, and it should be given at least two hours before the procedure. (See 'Our approach' above.)

Ticagrelor (rather than clopidogrel) is chosen for a minority of patients, such as those who will be switched to ticagrelor monotherapy after three months of dual antiplatelet therapy. (See 'P2Y12 receptor blockers' above.)

For stable patients who are scheduled to undergo diagnostic coronary angiography with possible PCI, we suggest not giving clopidogrel until after coronary angiography when the decision to perform PCI is made (Grade 2B). For those in whom a decision is made to proceed with PCI after angiography and who have not received pretreatment, clopidogrel 600 mg should be given as soon as possible. (See 'Our approach' above.)

For patients in whom there is a high likelihood of proceeding to PCI after angiography, it is reasonable to pretreat with clopidogrel.

For stable patients undergoing PCI who have been taking clopidogrel 75 mg per day, we suggest clopidogrel reloading in those at high risk of stent thrombosis (Grade 2C). Until further data are available, we suggest using 600 mg. (See 'Patients already taking clopidogrel' above.)

For all patients undergoing elective PCI, we recommend anticoagulant therapy with either unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin (Grade 1B). We suggest heparin rather than bivalirudin (Grade 2C). (See 'Anticoagulants' above.)

For patients who by angiographic criteria are at high risk for a stent thrombosis, we suggest the addition of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy (Grade 2C). The doses and timing are presented separately (table 1). (See 'GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors' above.)

For patients who undergo PCI without stent placement (balloon angioplasty alone) and who are not at high risk of bleeding or planned surgery within 30 days, we suggest dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for 30 days after the procedure (Grade 2C). For patients at high bleeding risk or in whom surgery is anticipated within 30 days, dual antiplatelet therapy for less than 30 days or single antiplatelet therapy are reasonable options. (See 'Patients undergoing balloon angioplasty' above.)

  1. Schwartz L, Bourassa MG, Lespérance J, et al. Aspirin and dipyridamole in the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1988; 318:1714.
  2. Lembo NJ, Black AJ, Roubin GS, et al. Effect of pretreatment with aspirin versus aspirin plus dipyridamole on frequency and type of acute complications of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65:422.
  3. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm452172.htm (Accessed on June 23, 2015).
  4. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2015/204958Orig1s000ltr.pdf (Accessed on June 23, 2015).
  5. Bellemain-Appaix A, O'Connor SA, Silvain J, et al. Association of clopidogrel pretreatment with mortality, cardiovascular events, and major bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2012; 308:2507.
  6. Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann JT 3rd, et al. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288:2411.
  7. Collet JP, Silvain J, Landivier A, et al. Dose effect of clopidogrel reloading in patients already on 75-mg maintenance dose: the Reload with Clopidogrel Before Coronary Angioplasty in Subjects Treated Long Term with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (RELOAD) study. Circulation 2008; 118:1225.
  8. Di Sciascio G, Patti G, Pasceri V, et al. Clopidogrel reloading in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention on chronic clopidogrel therapy: results of the ARMYDA-4 RELOAD (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2010; 31:1337.
  9. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2011; 124:2610.
  10. Bennett CL, Connors JM, Carwile JM, et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with clopidogrel. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1773.
  11. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Schühlen H, et al. A clinical trial of abciximab in elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with clopidogrel. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:232.
  12. Kandzari DE, Berger PB, Kastrati A, et al. Influence of treatment duration with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel before percutaneous coronary revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:2133.
  13. Puma JA, Banko LT, Pieper KS, et al. Clinical characteristics predict benefits from eptifibatide therapy during coronary stenting: insights from the Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor With Integrilin Therapy (ESPRIT) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:715.
  14. Popma JJ, Weitz J, Bittl JA, et al. Antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. Chest 1998; 114:728S.
  15. Chew DP, Bhatt DL, Lincoff AM, et al. Defining the optimal activated clotting time during percutaneous coronary intervention: aggregate results from 6 randomized, controlled trials. Circulation 2001; 103:961.
  16. Hirsh J, Warkentin TE, Raschke R, et al. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing considerations, monitoring, efficacy, and safety. Chest 1998; 114:489S.
  17. Oltrona L, Eisenberg PR, Lasala JM, et al. Association of heparin-resistant thrombin activity with acute ischemic complications of coronary interventions. Circulation 1996; 94:2064.
  18. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2011; 124:e574.
  19. Schulz S, Mehilli J, Neumann FJ, et al. ISAR-REACT 3A: a study of reduced dose of unfractionated heparin in biomarker negative patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 2010; 31:2482.
  20. Tolleson TR, O'Shea JC, Bittl JA, et al. Relationship between heparin anticoagulation and clinical outcomes in coronary stent intervention: observations from the ESPRIT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41:386.
  21. EPILOG Investigators. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1689.
  22. Brener SJ, Moliterno DJ, Lincoff AM, et al. Relationship between activated clotting time and ischemic or hemorrhagic complications: analysis of 4 recent randomized clinical trials of percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2004; 110:994.
  23. www.acc.org/qualityandscience/clinical/statements.htm (Accessed on September 18, 2007).
  24. Popma JJ, Berger P, Ohman EM, et al. Antithrombotic therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126:576S.
  25. Rabah M, Mason D, Muller DW, et al. Heparin after percutaneous intervention (HAPI): a prospective multicenter randomized trial of three heparin regimens after successful coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34:461.
  26. Friedman HZ, Cragg DR, Glazier SM, et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of prolonged versus abbreviated intravenous heparin therapy after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24:1214.
  27. Bhatt DL, Lee BI, Casterella PJ, et al. Safety of concomitant therapy with eptifibatide and enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Coronary Revascularization Using Integrilin and Single bolus Enoxaparin Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41:20.
  28. Linkins LA, Julian JA, Rischke J, et al. In vitro comparison of the effect of heparin, enoxaparin and fondaparinux on tests of coagulation. Thromb Res 2002; 107:241.
  29. Henry TD, Satran D, Knox LL, et al. Are activated clotting times helpful in the management of anticoagulation with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin? Am Heart J 2001; 142:590.
  30. Cavender MA, Sabatine MS. Bivalirudin versus heparin in patients planned for percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2014; 384:599.
  31. Vandvik PO, Lincoff AM, Gore JM, et al. Primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141:e637S.
Topic 1576 Version 52.0

References