Your activity: 2 p.v.

Anesthesia for the patient with liver disease

Anesthesia for the patient with liver disease
Authors:
Randolph H Steadman, MD, MS
Victor W Xia, MD
Section Editor:
Stephanie B Jones, MD
Deputy Editor:
Marianna Crowley, MD
Literature review current through: Nov 2022. | This topic last updated: May 19, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Patients with liver disease frequently require surgery, and are at increased risk of intraoperative complications and postoperative morbidity and mortality. This topic will discuss perioperative risk and anesthetic management of patients with liver disease.

Epidemiology, diagnosis and management of various forms of liver disease, and preoperative risk assessment for patients with liver disease, are discussed separately. (See "Assessing surgical risk in patients with liver disease".)

PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION AND OPTIMIZATION

Screening for liver disease — The preoperative history and physical examination for any patient should include the risk factors, signs, and symptoms of liver disease. Routine screening with liver function tests (LFTs) is not recommended, due to its low yield and uncertain implications for patients with no known liver disease. (See "Assessing surgical risk in patients with liver disease", section on 'Screening for liver disease before surgery'.)

Preoperative evaluation for patients with known liver disease — Prior to surgery, the etiology, duration, and severity of hepatic dysfunction should be determined. Risk stratification and optimization of medical status should be performed preoperatively for elective surgery.

Risk stratification — A number of conditions are considered contraindications to elective surgery (table 1), including acute liver failure (previously termed fulminant hepatic failure) and acute viral or alcoholic hepatitis. Patients with mild to moderate chronic liver disease without cirrhosis usually tolerate surgery well. (See "Assessing surgical risk in patients with liver disease", section on 'Obstructive jaundice'.)

Risk scores for patients with cirrhosis — Several scoring systems have been developed to predict the risk of postoperative mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

The Child-Pugh classification has been used to assess the risk of non-shunt operations in patients with cirrhosis. One to three points are assigned to each of five parameters (encephalopathy, ascites, bilirubin, albumin, and prothrombin time [PT] or international normalized ratio [INR]). Patients with a score of 5 or 6 have Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis (well-compensated cirrhosis), those with a score of 7 to 9 have Child-Pugh class B cirrhosis (significant functional compromise), and those with a score of 10 to 15 have Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis (decompensated cirrhosis). (See "Cirrhosis in adults: Overview of complications, general management, and prognosis", section on 'Child-Pugh classification'.)

In studies conducted over multiple decades, the Child-Pugh score has correlated with perioperative mortality and morbidity. (See "Assessing surgical risk in patients with liver disease", section on 'Child-Pugh classification'.)

The Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was developed to predict short-term survival in patients awaiting liver transplant. The MELD score is increasingly used in other settings, including prediction of perioperative mortality in patients with cirrhosis who undergo non-transplant surgery.

The MELD score is a continuous scale (with higher values representing more severe liver disease) based on a formula that assigns weights to the patient’s serum bilirubin, creatinine, and INR. Multiple studies have evaluated the use of the MELD score for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis [1-6]. In general, a MELD score of 10 to 15 confers increased perioperative risk, and patients with MELD scores >15 should not undergo elective surgery. (See "Assessing surgical risk in patients with liver disease", section on 'MELD score and Mayo risk score'.)

In 2016, the MELD score was modified to include serum sodium concentration and to recognize hyponatremia as an independent prognostic factor that was not included in the original MELD score [7]. A single center retrospective study including 85 patients with cirrhosis who underwent emergency surgery found that the MELD-Na generated a slightly higher score compared with the original formula [8]. MELD-Na scores of 17, 19, and 12 correlated with increased risk of postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, and need for post-discharge transitional care, respectively. (See "Assessing surgical risk in patients with liver disease", section on 'MELD score and Mayo risk score' and "Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD)", section on 'MELD-Na Score'.)

The Mayo Risk Score is an online calculator designed to predict post-operative mortality in patients with cirrhosis, using the MELD parameters, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, and etiology of liver disease (calculator 1). It is based upon single center data from nearly 800 patients published in 2007 [2]. In a validation study, it was found to overestimate mortality [9].

The Veterans Outcomes and Costs Associated with Liver Disease-University of Pennsylvania Score (VOCAL-Penn Risk Score), was derived from data on nearly 3800 patients undergoing 4700 surgeries between 2008 and 2016 at 128 Veterans Affairs hospitals [10]. This score contained the elements of the Mayo Risk Score, plus surgery category (abdominal laparoscopic, abdominal open, abdominal wall, vascular, orthopedic and chest/cardiac), which improved the VOCAL-Penn model's discrimination versus the Mayo Risk Score (C-statistic 0.859 versus 0.766, respectively).

Risk associated with type of surgery — As the VOCAL-Penn Risk score illustrates, the location of the surgical procedure is an important risk factor for postoperative liver failure in patients with preexisting liver disease. Cardiac surgery, abdominal surgery, and hepatic resection are all associated with increased postoperative mortality compared with more peripheral surgery, presumably due to greater reductions in hepatic blood flow. Less invasive approaches, such as laparoscopy rather than laparotomy, or endoscopic stenting or percutaneous biliary drainage rather than cholecystectomy, may reduce risk. (See "Assessing surgical risk in patients with liver disease", section on 'Cardiac surgery' and "Assessing surgical risk in patients with liver disease", section on 'Hepatic resection' and "Assessing surgical risk in patients with liver disease", section on 'Abdominal surgery'.)

Laboratory evaluation — Preoperative laboratory testing for patients with liver disease should include those tests that are likely to impact management, including hemoglobin, white cell count, platelet count, electrolytes, glucose, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR), partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen, transaminase levels (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST]), bilirubin and albumin. Other blood tests may be indicated, based on patient comorbidities.

Imaging may be warranted if cholecystitis, primary or metastatic cancer, or hepatic injury is suspected. Volumetric studies are helpful for estimating the size of the remnant liver after liver resection.

Liver function tests — Liver biochemical and function tests are commonly called liver function tests (LFTs), though many of the tests are not direct measures of liver function, and these tests are not liver specific. LFTs include aminotransferases (most commonly ALT and AST), alkaline phosphatase, tests of synthetic function (ie, albumin and PT or INR), and bilirubin. (See "Approach to the patient with abnormal liver biochemical and function tests" and "Liver biochemical tests that detect injury to hepatocytes".)

Patients without known liver disease – Routine screening with LFTs is not recommended; regardless, these tests are sometimes performed preoperatively. If the results are less than twice the normal range, it is reasonable to repeat the abnormal tests to make sure they are not increasing. If the results are greater than twice the normal range, or increasing, elective surgery should be postponed and the patient should be evaluated further. (See "Assessing surgical risk in patients with liver disease", section on 'Patients in whom surgery is contraindicated'.)

Patients with known liver disease – Serum aminotransferases are elevated in most liver diseases and in disorders that involve the liver (such as various infections, acute and chronic heart failure, and metastatic carcinoma). The highest elevations occur in disorders associated with extensive hepatocellular injury, such as acute viral hepatitis, ischemic hepatitis (shock liver), and acute drug- or toxin-induced liver injury, all of which are contraindications to elective surgery.

Albumin, bilirubin, and PT are laboratory parameters included in the Child-Pugh classification of the severity of cirrhosis, and bilirubin, INR, sodium, and creatinine are parameters included in the MELD score. (See "Assessing surgical risk in patients with liver disease", section on 'Child-Pugh classification' and "Assessing surgical risk in patients with liver disease", section on 'MELD score and Mayo risk score'.)

Other organ systems — For patients with known liver disease, a comprehensive medical assessment should be performed, recognizing that nearly every organ system may be affected by liver disease, with implications for perioperative management. Preoperative optimization should be individualized and approached by a multidisciplinary team. There is little evidence to support specific goals for preoperative care for these patients.

Encephalopathy Hepatic encephalopathy is a multifaceted disorder that may occur in chronic liver disease. Metabolic factors can contribute to encephalopathy, some of which may be modified by anesthetic management. Hypoxia, hypovolemia, alkalemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, and hyponatremia can all precipitate hepatic encephalopathy, and should be avoided in patients with liver disease. Sedatives (particularly benzodiazepines) can exacerbate hepatic encephalopathy, and in addition, encephalopathic patients are particularly sensitive to sedatives and hypnotics. (See "Hepatic encephalopathy: Pathogenesis" and "Hepatic encephalopathy in adults: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis", section on 'Evaluation for precipitating causes'.)

Hematologic abnormalities Diminished hepatic function has both procoagulant and anticoagulant effects, resulting in rebalanced hemostasis. Patients with liver disease frequently have abnormalities in routine laboratory tests of coagulation, including prolongations of the PT, INR, and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), along with mild thrombocytopenia and elevated D-dimer, especially when liver synthetic function is more significantly impaired and portal pressures are increased. However, these tests are very poor at predicting the risk of bleeding in individuals with liver disease because they only reflect changes in procoagulant factors. Prolongation of the INR may reflect instability of the hemostatic balance, but not hypo- or hypercoagulability in cirrhosis. (See "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'Physiologic effects of hepatic dysfunction' and "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'Laboratory abnormalities'.)

In anticipation of surgery for patients with liver disease and abnormal hemostatic laboratory tests, we administer vitamin K for patients with suspected deficiency (eg, patients with poor nutrition, cirrhosis, cholestatic disease, antibiotic use). (See "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'General approach to managing bleeding'.)

In patients with microvascular bleeding, or those at risk of bleeding due to percutaneous procedures, both preoperatively and intraoperatively we transfuse platelets to achieve a platelet count ≥50,000/microL, and cryoprecipitate to maintain fibrinogen levels ≥200 mg/dL. We do not routinely administer fresh frozen plasma to correct the INR.

Where available, viscoelastic tests (ie, thromboelastography [TEG] or thromboelastometry) may be useful to guide preoperative correction of hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease. In a small trial, 60 patients with cirrhosis and significant coagulopathy were randomly assigned to TEG guided or standard laboratory guided transfusion of fresh frozen plasma and/or platelets in anticipation of invasive procedures [11]. TEG guidance resulted in reduced transfusion of blood products, without an increase in bleeding complications. (See "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'Major surgery' and 'Coagulation management' below.)

For patients who undergo closed cavity surgery (eg, craniotomy), perioperative hemostatic management should be individualized, and may include more aggressive efforts to correct the INR with cryoprecipitate or fresh frozen plasma.

Cardiovascular disease – Cardiovascular complications are common in patients with liver disease and are a major risk factor for postoperative mortality and morbidity. Patients with cirrhosis typically have a hyperdynamic circulation with low systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and high cardiac output (CO). Cardiovascular abnormalities increase with worsening hepatic function, and up to 50 percent of patients with advanced cirrhosis have features of cardiac dysfunction. The term "cirrhotic cardiomyopathy" has been used to describe a condition including normal to increased cardiac output and contractility at rest, but a blunted response to pharmacologic, physiologic, or pathologic stress that may result in overt heart failure [12,13]. Perioperative intravenous (IV) fluids should be managed carefully to avoid volume overload.

Patients with liver disease are as likely as age-matched controls to have coronary artery disease, but may not be symptomatic due to functional limitations associated with liver disease. Minimally invasive tests for coronary disease are commonly used to screen patients with two or more coronary risk factors. (See "Cirrhosis in adults: Overview of complications, general management, and prognosis", section on 'Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy'.)

Some forms of liver disease, including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [14] and hepatitis C [15,16] may be associated with an increased incidence of coronary artery disease and cardiac morbidity and mortality. (See "Extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C virus infection", section on 'Cardiac and cardiovascular disease'.)

Primary prophylaxis for esophageal variceal bleeding often includes the use of beta blockers, which may predispose patients to perioperative hypotension, and limit the utility of dobutamine stress testing due to inability to reach target heart rates. (See "Primary prevention of bleeding from esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis", section on 'Preventive strategies' and "Management of cardiac risk for noncardiac surgery", section on 'Beta blockers'.)

Patients with portal hypertension may develop portopulmonary hypertension (PPHTN). Thus, cirrhotic patients undergoing major surgery should be screened preoperatively with resting echocardiography. Severe PPHTN (ie, mean pulmonary artery pressure >50 mmHg) is a contraindication for liver transplant, and transplant should be delayed until pulmonary hypertension is treated. These patients are at risk for right heart failure, and like other patients with pulmonary hypertension, are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. (See "Evaluation of perioperative pulmonary risk", section on 'Pulmonary hypertension' and "Portopulmonary hypertension", section on 'Liver transplantation' and "Treatment and prognosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension in adults (group 1)", section on 'Surgical or periprocedural care'.)

Anesthetic management for patients with pulmonary hypertension is discussed separately. (See "Anesthesia for adults with congenital heart disease undergoing noncardiac surgery", section on 'Pulmonary arterial hypertension'.)

Pulmonary complications – Patients with ascites may develop shortness of breath, ventilation/perfusion mismatch, pleural effusion, and decreased lung capacity. Those with massive ascites may not tolerate lying supine for induction of anesthesia, or during procedures performed under monitored anesthesia care or regional anesthesia. Patients with encephalopathy are at increased risk for pulmonary aspiration.

Patients with chronic liver disease and portal hypertension may develop hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS). The pathogenic mechanisms for HPS have not been clearly delineated, but are thought to induce intrapulmonary vascular dilatations (IPVDs). IPVDs cause hypoxemia mostly via ventilation-perfusion mismatch and oxygen diffusion limitation and rarely via shunt. The etiology and pathogenesis of HPS is discussed in detail separately. (See "Hepatopulmonary syndrome in adults: Prevalence, causes, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Etiologies and pathogenesis'.)

Patients with mild to moderate HPS may be treated with supplemental oxygen, and may require high intraoperative inspired oxygen concentrations if they come to surgery. Patients with severe HPS are typically evaluated for liver transplant as transplantation improves HPS. (See "Hepatopulmonary syndrome in adults: Natural history, treatment, and outcomes", section on 'Treatment and prognosis'.)

Portal hypertension Many of the complications of cirrhosis are the result of portal hypertension, which can result in formation of varices, circulatory, functional and biochemical abnormalities, and ascites. During abdominal surgery, goals of fluid administration should be to decrease pressure in the portal system to reduce bleeding. (See 'Hemodynamic management' below.)

Renal dysfunction — Liver disease can cause a progressive decline in renal function, characterized by retention of sodium and free water, renal hypoperfusion, and decreased glomerular filtration, which can lead to hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Renal dysfunction is an important risk factor for mortality, and serum creatinine is one of the parameters in the MELD score. (See "Hepatorenal syndrome".)

Cirrhotic patients are also at high risk for more common causes of renal dysfunction, such as parenchymal renal disease, sepsis, nephrotoxicity, and hypovolemia. HRS is a diagnosis of exclusion, and other potentially treatable causes must be ruled out since therapies differ. Unlike these other etiologies for renal dysfunction, the use of potent vasoconstrictors (eg, norepinephrine or vasopressin) may be beneficial for patients with liver disease related renal dysfunction or HRS. The perioperative management of liver disease related renal dysfunction includes monitoring urinary output, avoidance of hyperkalemia and acidosis, and limiting exposure to nephrotoxins such as aminoglycosides. (See "Hepatorenal syndrome", section on 'Approach to therapy'.)

Electrolyte abnormalities Hyponatremia develops slowly in patients with cirrhosis and parallels the progression of the disease. In general, serum sodium should not be corrected in these patients unless the serum sodium drops below 120 mEq/L, or neurologic symptoms develop. If hyponatremia needs to be corrected, it should be corrected slowly to avoid central pontine myelinolysis. (See "Hyponatremia in patients with cirrhosis", section on 'Management' and "Osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS) and overly rapid correction of hyponatremia".)

Hypokalemia and metabolic alkalosis can occur with liver disease, and may trigger or exacerbate hepatic encephalopathy (see "Hyponatremia in patients with cirrhosis"). Hypokalemia should be corrected preoperatively, and ventilation should be managed to achieve a normal end tidal CO2. (See 'Ventilation' below.)

Pain – Pain is prevalent in patients with liver disease, and is chronic in over one-half of patients [17]; opioids are widely used in patients with liver disease [18]. Altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in these patients may make pain management extremely challenging [19]. (See 'Opioids' below.)

Abdominal pain is the most common complaint, and may be caused by ascites, hepatic capsular distension, and splenomegaly. A fibromyalgia-like syndrome, which is related to a pro-inflammatory state, can be found in patients with cirrhosis [20]. Pain-related sleep and mood disorders are also common in patients with liver disease.

MANAGEMENT OF ANESTHESIA

Monitoring — In addition to standard anesthesia monitors, we have a low threshold for placing an intraarterial catheter for patients with severe liver disease to allow continuous blood pressure monitoring, and to facilitate blood sampling. The decision is based on the severity of liver disease and systemic vasodilation, coexisting diseases of other organ systems, the type and duration of surgery, anticipated intraoperative blood loss, the need for intraoperative laboratory studies, and patient age.

The usefulness of central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring is controversial [21], and many clinicians have abandoned CVP monitoring in the setting of liver resection [22]. In our practice, we do not place a central venous catheter (CVC) exclusively for pressure monitoring, but may place a CVC for venous access, or for vasopressor administration.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a sensitive cardiac monitor, but placement of the TEE probe may be of concern in patients with esophageal varices and coagulopathy, and the use of TEE in these patients should be individualized. However, the risk of complications and esophageal hemorrhage in patients with severe liver disease appears to be low. In two large retrospective studies of TEE use during liver transplant, the incidence of major gastroesophageal injury was <0.86 percent [23,24]. In a small series of patients with esophageal varices, TEE universally aided in diagnosis and was not associated with bleeding complications, although transgastric views were avoided to minimize esophageal manipulation [25].

Choice of anesthetic technique — The choice of anesthetic technique for patients with liver disease should be based on the surgical procedure and patient factors, similar to patients without liver disease. Neuraxial anesthesia, general anesthesia, and monitored anesthesia care may be options. Specific concerns include the following:

Neuraxial anesthesia (ie, spinal or epidural) can cause systemic hypotension and reduced hepatic blood flow as a result of neuraxial block induced sympathectomy. Intravenous (IV) fluids and vasopressors are commonly administered to reverse such hypotension, but the literature on the effectiveness of vasopressors on hepatic blood flow in this setting is conflicting [26-28]. High thoracic neuraxial block (ie, T5) may reduce hepatic blood flow, and this effect may not be reversed with vasopressors.

Neuraxial anesthesia procedures are contraindicated in patients with severe coagulopathy and/or thrombocytopenia because of increased risk of spinal epidural hematoma.

Hepatic resection can cause new postoperative coagulopathy. Removal of an epidural catheter placed for postoperative pain control may cause epidural blood vessel injury and spinal epidural hematoma. The catheter should not be removed unless the platelet count and coagulation studies are at a level that would allow neuraxial needle insertion.

The precise laboratory values and platelet count necessary to safely perform neuraxial anesthesia is unknown, and practice varies. The decision to perform peripheral nerve blocks in patients with coagulopathy should be individualized; bleeding complications may occur [29]. (See "Overview of peripheral nerve blocks", section on 'Contraindications'.)

Effects of anesthetics on the liver — Anesthetic medications can affect the liver by influencing hepatic blood flow and/or by producing hepatotoxic byproducts. Drugs with high extraction ratios are significantly affected by alteration in hepatic blood flow, which can occur with hemodynamic changes or hepatic inflow clamping during liver resection.

Volatile anesthetics Halothane, which is used outside the United States, should not be used for patients with liver disease.

The other currently used volatile anesthetics (ie, isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane) may reduce hepatic blood flow, but are not associated with hepatic toxicity.

Hemodynamic effects – All volatile anesthetics decrease hepatic blood flow (HBF) to a degree. Isoflurane and sevoflurane result in very little reduction of hepatic blood flow at 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) [30], though at higher doses, isoflurane causes a dose dependent reduction in HBF. Desflurane can decrease HBF by 30 percent at 1 MAC [31]. Halothane (no longer used in the United States) produces a greater reduction in cardiac output (CO) and hepatic oxygen supply than the other volatile anesthetics [32]. The degree to which these hemodynamic changes take place in patients with advanced liver disease has not been well studied.

Hepatotoxicity As a general rule, the degree of hepatic metabolism of anesthetic agents correlates with the likelihood of a toxic reaction. Of the haloalkanes used in practice, halothane (available outside the United States) has been associated with the greatest risk of hepatotoxicity, including acute, severe hepatitis, "halothane hepatitis." Halothane hepatitis is discussed separately. (See "Inhalation anesthetic agents: Clinical effects and uses", section on 'Disadvantages and adverse effects'.)

The newer anesthetics, isoflurane and desflurane, undergo less metabolism to trifluoroacetyl chloride (TFA), which is thought to be involved in halothane hepatic toxicity, than halothane (20 percent for halothane, 0.2 percent for isoflurane, and 0.02 percent for desflurane) [33]. Hepatic injury is extremely rare, if it exists, with isoflurane and desflurane. Sevoflurane does not undergo metabolism to TFA and has not been associated with immune mediated hepatic injury.

Sevoflurane metabolism produces fluoride and hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP), which are conjugated by the liver and excreted by the kidney. There is no evidence that these metabolites or compound A, another metabolite produced in a reaction with carbon dioxide (CO2) absorbents, cause hepatic injury [34].

Nitrous oxide (N2O) N2O is not known to cause liver injury, though it may decrease hepatic blood flow mostly by sympathetic stimulation [35]. N2O can inhibit methionine synthase even after brief exposure, though the clinical significance of these effects in healthy patients is not clear [36]. Patients with vitamin B12 deficiency, such as some patients with cirrhosis, may be at increased risk for neurotoxicity with exposure to N2O [37,38]. (See "Maintenance of general anesthesia: Overview", section on 'Nitrous oxide gas'.)

IV anesthetics IV anesthetics (eg, propofol, etomidate, midazolam), when used for induction of anesthesia or for short procedures, do not appear to affect liver function, as long as CO and blood pressure (BP) are maintained.

Effects of liver disease on anesthetic drug administration — Liver disease can affect the pharmacokinetics of anesthetic drugs by changing drug metabolism, protein binding, and volume of distribution. In addition, efficiency of drug removal can be limited by reduction in hepatic blood flow due to portocaval shunting, hemodynamic changes, or reduced hepatic inflow during liver resection.

Selection of drugs and dose adjustments depend on the severity of liver disease. Patients with mild liver disease can usually be treated with a similar choice of drugs as those who are otherwise healthy. Susceptibility to adverse effects increases with worsening liver function due to altered pharmacokinetics and hemodynamic changes. Modifications (eg, dose reduction, titration to effect) should be considered for patients who have developed advanced chronic liver disease (eg, bridging fibrosis on biopsy) or cirrhosis, particularly when accompanied by portal hypertension (such as those with esophageal varices, ascites, or portal gastropathy/colopathy) or renal insufficiency.

In general, metabolism of drugs with high liver extraction ratios (eg, lidocaine, meperidine) is affected by reduction in hepatic blood flow. Metabolism of drugs with low extraction ratios (eg, midazolam) is affected more by protein binding and hepatocellular dysfunction.

Sedative hypnotics

Induction agents In clinical practice, clearance of standard induction doses of propofol, thiopental (outside the United States), etomidate, methohexital, and ketamine are similar in patients with liver disease and healthy patients [39-42]. Patients with liver disease are more sensitive to the pharmacodynamic effects of induction agents, and clinical recovery times may be prolonged after discontinuation of propofol infusions.

Benzodiazepines – Benzodiazepines are medications with low extraction ratios. Both elimination half-life and free drug are increased in patients with severe liver disease. Enhanced sedation and prolonged duration of action should be anticipated, especially with repeat doses. Reduced doses of midazolam should be administered, and titrated to effect.

Dexmedetomidine Dexmedetomidine is metabolized primarily in the liver. As a result, clearance is decreased, and half-life of elimination may be prolonged in patients with severe liver disease. Dosing may be limited by bradycardia. Although dexmedetomidine may be associated with decreased delirium and duration of mechanical ventilation, it has not been studied extensively in liver disease patients [43].

Opioids — Metabolism of opioids is reduced in patients with liver disease, and dosing intervals should be increased to avoid drug accumulation. The elimination of a single IV opioid bolus is less affected than a continuous infusion because of bolus redistribution to storage sites. Modifications of analgesics and pharmacokinetic changes in liver disease are shown in a table (table 2).

Fentanyl Elimination of a bolus dose of fentanyl is not appreciably altered in patients with cirrhosis [44], though with repeat administration or infusion, prolonged effects can occur.

Morphine Clearance of morphine may be delayed by 35 to 60 percent in patients with cirrhosis [44]. Morphine should be titrated to effect, with the dose and frequency reduced by 50 percent in patients with severe liver disease.

Hydromorphone Hydromorphone is metabolized by the liver. Elimination is impaired and the half-life is prolonged in patients with advanced chronic liver disease or cirrhosis. Hydromorphone should be administered in reduced doses, titrated to effect, at increased dosing intervals.

Meperidine Meperidine should be avoided for patients with cirrhosis or advanced chronic liver disease. The plasma clearance of both meperidine and its neurotoxic metabolite, normeperidine, are reduced after a single IV dose [45,46].

Remifentanil Remifentanil is rapidly hydrolyzed by blood and tissue esterases. The clearance and elimination and recovery from the effects of remifentanil are unchanged in patients with severe liver disease [47,48].

Other analgesics — The strategy for postoperative pain control usually incorporates a multimodal opioid sparing approach that may include acetaminophen, antidepressants, and anticonvulsants. Acetaminophen doses of 2 g/day are generally considered safe in liver disease patients; nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are considered less safe due to their renal toxicity and bleeding risk [17], optimal choice of drugs and dose in the surgical setting is not known. Administration of such medications in patients with liver disease is discussed separately and in a table (table 2). (See "Management of pain in patients with advanced chronic liver disease or cirrhosis".)

Neuromuscular blocking agents — Liver disease may affect the onset, metabolism, and duration of action of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs). NMBAs should be titrated to effect, and administration should be guided by monitoring with a peripheral nerve stimulator. The reversal agent sugammadex is excreted in the urine unchanged, and there is concern about the possible recurrence of neuromuscular blockade in patients with end-stage kidney disease that may accompany severe liver disease. However, a multicenter retrospective review of 158 surgical patients with end-stage kidney disease who received sugammadex reversal reported no cases of recurrence of neuromuscular blockade [49]. (See "Clinical use of neuromuscular blocking agents in anesthesia", section on 'Sugammadex' and "Monitoring neuromuscular blockade".)

Succinylcholine Succinylcholine is metabolized by plasma cholinesterase, an enzyme that may be reduced in patients with advanced liver disease. The duration of action of succinylcholine may be prolonged in such patients [50,51], though this is rarely of clinical significance. Mivacurium is also metabolized by plasma cholinesterase, and neuromuscular block may be prolonged in patients with advanced liver disease [52,53].

Rocuronium and vecuronium Both rocuronium and vecuronium are metabolized by the liver. Clearance, elimination, and duration of neuromuscular block are prolonged in patients with advanced liver disease [54,55]. Despite these changes, resistance to the initial dose of NMBA typically occurs due to elevated gamma-globulin concentrations and an increase in the volume of distribution (due to edema and/or ascites).

Atracurium and cisatracurium Atracurium and cisatracurium undergo organ-independent elimination, and their elimination half-life and duration of action are not affected by liver disease [56,57].

Hemodynamic management — Goals for hemodynamic management for patients with liver disease include maintenance of hepatic perfusion, and for patients who undergo abdominal surgery, decreasing portal pressure to minimize bleeding.

Goal blood pressure — The goal BP during induction and maintenance of anesthesia should be the patient's baseline. Many patients with liver disease have hyperdynamic circulation, characterized by low systemic vascular resistance (SVR), borderline hypotension, and elevated CO. These patients frequently require vasopressor support to avoid hypotension during induction and maintenance of anesthesia.

Vasopressors — Patients with liver disease have complex circulatory abnormalities including autonomic dysfunction and reduced responsiveness to vasoconstrictors (ie, angiotensin 2, norepinephrine, and vasopressin) [58]. In addition, patients with severe liver disease may be depleted of endogenous vasopressin [59]. These patients may require higher doses of the vasopressors that are usually administered during anesthesia (eg, phenylephrine or ephedrine). Norepinephrine and/or vasopressin may be required for BP support.

Intravenous fluids — In patients undergoing abdominal surgery, fluid restriction should be considered, with or without CVP monitoring, in order to lower portal pressures and reduce bleeding. In chronic liver disease, serum albumin function is quantitatively and qualitatively decreased [60]. We use albumin rather than crystalloid for perioperative volume expansion in liver disease patients with ascites or hypoalbuminemia to minimize postoperative edema. Specific indications for albumin include intravascular volume expansion after large-volume (4 to 5 L) paracentesis, in the presence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis to prevent worsening renal impairment, and in conjunction with splanchnic vasoconstrictors for type 1 hepatorenal syndrome [61-63].

Ventilation — Lung protective ventilation strategy (low tidal volume with PEEP and intermittent lung volume recruitment) is advocated for all patients by some investigators, and by this author. (See "Mechanical ventilation during anesthesia in adults", section on 'Lung protective ventilation during anesthesia'.)

Hypoxemia in liver disease patients may be related to ascites, pleural effusion, or atelectasis secondary to these conditions.

Coagulation management — In patients with microvascular bleeding, or those at risk of bleeding due to percutaneous procedures, both preoperatively and intraoperatively we transfuse platelets to achieve a platelet count ≥50,000/microL, and cryoprecipitate to maintain fibrinogen levels ≥200 mg/dL. We maintain a platelet count >100,000/microL for patients with active bleeding and for patients who undergo craniotomy.

During surgery, standard coagulation testing with PT or INR and platelet count is of limited value in patients with advanced liver disease. The INR does not provide an adequate assessment of hemostasis in cirrhosis, and the correlation between platelet count and clinical bleeding is weak, especially for counts >50,000/microL. Though these tests are routinely used during surgery, measurements of fibrinogen and viscoelastic testing may be of more value. (See "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'Laboratory abnormalities' and "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'General approach to managing bleeding' and "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'Major surgery'.)

Viscoelastic tests, thromboelastography (TEG), and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) are increasingly used in algorithms to diagnose and treat bleeding in high-risk patients [64]. These tests measure the complete process of clot formation, stabilization, and clot dissolution. In addition, the independent contribution of platelet and fibrinogen to final clot strength can be assessed. In general, studies of TEG and ROTEM in patients with liver disease have shown decreased use of blood products due to the ability of these devices to confirm relatively preserved hemostatic function despite a prolonged INR. However, evidence for the value of viscoelastic testing in liver disease remains limited. (See "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'Laboratory abnormalities'.)

Fibrinogen plays a central role in clot stabilization. Guidelines for management of patients with severe perioperative bleeding [65,66] and for patients with severe liver disease who undergo surgery [67] suggest maintaining the fibrinogen level 150 to 200 mg/dL [65,68]. These recommendations for higher levels of fibrinogen align with levels of fibrinogen required for optimal clot formation on viscoelastic testing [68]. Cryoprecipitate is preferred, rather than fresh frozen plasma, for administration of fibrinogen. (See "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'General approach to managing bleeding'.)

Abnormalities in platelet number and function in liver disease are in part compensated for by increased levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF), a platelet adhesive protein, and by decreased levels of ADAMTS13, the VWF-cleaving protease. Thrombin generation is preserved with platelet counts exceeding 50,000/microL, making this value a practical target in the setting of invasive procedures [69].

The threshold for red blood cell transfusion for patients with liver disease should be similar to the threshold for other patients, while considering the rate of bleeding and comorbidities (eg, cardiovascular disease). (See "Indications and hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion in the adult".)

Postoperative care — Patients with severe liver disease, significant comorbidities, or extensive intraoperative blood loss may require postoperative intensive care. Opioids and sedatives should be used cautiously in the postoperative period. IV fluids should be managed carefully to avoid ascites, edema, and/or heart failure [70].

Postoperative liver abnormalities — Mild elevations of liver enzymes (ie, less than twice normal) occur frequently after surgery, particularly after upper abdominal procedures. When such mild elevations occur, the tests should be repeated; increases are typically transient and of no clinical consequence. The newer volatile anesthetic agents rarely cause postoperative elevations of liver function tests (LFTs) [71,72].

LFT elevations more than twice normal suggest hepatocellular injury, which can be the result of hypoxemia, viral or bacterial insult, trauma, or chemical toxicity.

Postoperative jaundice is commonly caused by reabsorption of surgical or traumatic hematomas, or red blood cell transfusion. Massive intraoperative blood transfusion results in a large bilirubin load, which may overwhelm the liver.

ANESTHESIA FOR HEPATIC RESECTION — Open or laparoscopic liver resection may be performed for a variety of indications, including benign or malignant lesions and donation for transplant. (See "Overview of hepatic resection".)

Hepatic resection is performed with general anesthesia. Important issues for anesthesia for hepatic resection are discussed here.

Hemorrhage — There is always potential for sudden, rapid hemorrhage during hepatic resection, though a minority of patients require transfusion [73,74]. Blood loss depends partially on the extent of surgery; since the right lobe usually represents two-thirds of the liver mass, right lobe resection is associated with more extensive liver transection, blood loss, and alterations in clotting factor synthesis. A preoperative blood type and screen should be performed. We usually crossmatch 2 to 4 units of packed red blood cells prior to the start of surgery.

We place two large-bore (18 or 16 gauge) intravenous (IV) catheters. We also place an intraarterial catheter for continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring, and to facilitate blood sampling, for most patients who undergo hepatic resection. Additional monitoring is dictated by the patient's medical status.

Intraoperative cell salvage can be considered in patients at high risk of bleeding, though its use is controversial in cases of primary or metastatic malignancy [75]. (See "Surgical blood conservation: Blood salvage".)

Low central venous pressure anesthesia — We aim for euvolemia, towards hypovolemia, and avoid hypervolemia during hepatic resection. IV fluid management during hepatic resection is controversial. A strategy of restrictive fluid administration (with or without administration of vasodilators and/or diuretics), referred to as "low central venous pressure (CVP) anesthesia," has been suggested during these procedures to reduce blood loss. The goal is to lower the CVP during hepatic resection to reduce the pressure in hepatic and portal veins and the vena cava, which are often the sites of bleeding. In most studies, a CVP <5 cm H2O is used to define low CVP anesthesia, though CVCs are now rarely used intraoperatively to monitor volume status. (See "Intraoperative fluid management", section on 'Traditional static parameters'.)

The value and necessity of CVP monitoring and low CVP management in this setting are debated. Retrospective reviews of living related donor hepatectomies have reported that CVP monitoring did not reduce blood loss [22], and that blood loss did not correlate with CVP level [76,77]. However, a meta-analysis of five small randomized trials including 280 patients found that blood loss and transfusion were less with low CVP management for hepatectomy, compared with standard management (mean difference [MD] -392 mL for blood loss, MD -247 mL for transfusion) [78]. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies, and the overall quality of data was low. In another meta-analysis of eight randomized trials, low CVP was associated with less blood loss and lower risk of transfusion (odds ratio [OR] 0.65) than control patients with higher CVP [79].

In a randomized trial of 146 patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy, controlled CVP reduction reduced blood loss from 346 mL (±336 mL) to 188 mL (±162 mL) [80]. There were no deaths, no conversions to open procedures, and the incidence of complications was similar including presumptive venous air embolism, which occurred in eight and five patients in the low CVP and control groups, respectively.

The optimal methods for achieving a low CVP (eg, fluid restriction, vasodilators, diuretics) and the optimal goal CVP are not clear. The head-up position should not be used to reduce CVP, as the hepatic vein pressure does not change [81], and the head-up position may increase the risk of venous air embolism with a low CVP.

Pringle maneuver — The vascular inflow to the liver may be interrupted during hepatic transection to prevent or control bleeding. The Pringle maneuver typically consists of intermittent clamping of the hepatic artery and portal vein for periods of 15 to 20 minutes; however, prolonged clamping exceeding 120 minutes has been tolerated [82]. Total vascular exclusion, in which the venous outflow of the liver is occluded in addition to the inflow vessels, is advantageous for minimizing bleeding in resections involving hepatic veins and the inferior vena cava [83]. These maneuvers have the potential to decrease venous return and cardiac output.

Coagulopathy and epidural analgesia — Even patients with normal preoperative coagulation can develop coagulopathy after liver resection, with implications for neuraxial analgesic procedures. (See "Overview of hepatic resection", section on 'Coagulopathy and hemorrhage'.)

The severity of postoperative coagulopathy correlates with the extent of the resection, peaks on postoperative day 1 to 2, and may take up to five or more days to resolve [84,85]. For patients who have an epidural catheter placed for postoperative pain control after open hepatic resection, the catheter should not be removed while clotting parameters are abnormal. Catheter removal may cause epidural blood vessel injury and spinal epidural hematoma. At our center, we offer epidural analgesia for postoperative management when the future liver remnant is ≥60 to 70 percent of total liver volume, realizing that the extent of resection may change intraoperatively based upon intraoperative ultrasound.

Alternatives to epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control include intrathecal opioids and single-shot or continuous peripheral nerve blocks [86]. (See "Spinal anesthesia: Technique", section on 'Adjuvants' and "Epidural and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: Techniques", section on 'Opioids' and "Abdominal nerve block techniques".)

ANESTHESIA FOR TRANSHEPATIC PORTOSYSTEMIC SHUNT — Transhepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a percutaneous angiographic procedure that creates a shunt between the hepatic vein and the intrahepatic portal vein to decompress the portal system. After an internal jugular vein puncture, a needle catheter is passed through the vena cava into the hepatic vein. The needle is extruded and passed through the liver parenchyma to the portal vein. Accessing the portal vein may require multiple attempts, and the procedure may take several hours. (See "Comparison of methods for endovenous ablation for chronic venous disease".)

TIPS may be performed with monitored anesthesia care with sedation, or with general anesthesia. General anesthesia is preferred for patients who would rather be asleep, and for those who are unable to tolerate the supine position for the duration of the procedure. Since TIPS worsens encephalopathy, most patient who are scheduled for TIPS do not have significant encephalopathy. However, for patients with altered mental status, general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation may be preferred to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Important considerations for anesthesia include the following:

TIPS is usually performed for patients with severe or end stage liver disease, often with massive ascites. (See "Overview of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS)".)

They may be unable to tolerate lying flat, and are at risk for aspiration with induction of anesthesia or with sedation at a depth that compromises airway protective reflexes. For general anesthesia, rapid sequence induction and intubation is usually indicated.

These procedures are performed in the angiography suite, and the head of the operating table may be turned away from the anesthesiologist. Access to the airway is limited, with the face under sterile drapes.

Coagulopathy should be assessed and corrected before the procedure. Goals should be a platelet count >50,000/microL and fibrinogen >150 to 200 mg/dL, without attempts to correct the INR. Viscoelastic testing (ie, thromboelastography or thromboelastometry) may be used to guide therapy, if available. A blood type and screen should be performed prior to TIPS. (See "Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease", section on 'General approach to invasive procedures'.)

Volume resuscitation may be required prior to TIPS for patients who have had variceal hemorrhage. If large volume paracentesis (ie >5 L ascites removed) is performed prior to the procedure to facilitate portal vein puncture, albumin should be administered, rather than crystalloid, for IV volume repletion. (See "Ascites in adults with cirrhosis: Initial therapy", section on 'Large-volume paracentesis'.)

Either 5 percent or 25 percent albumin may administered. Twenty five percent albumin is preferred for patients with significant hyponatremia (ie, serum sodium <130), which is common in this patient population, since it contains less sodium than 5 percent albumin. This helps avoid a rapid rise in serum sodium, which is associated with osmotic demyelination syndrome.

Immediate, intra-procedure complications of TIPS include vascular injury, hemorrhage, pneumothorax, and dysrhythmia. (See "Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: Postprocedure care and complications".)

TIPS creates a rapid increase in venous return to the heart and can unmask previously undiagnosed cardiac dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension. Rapid hemodynamic deterioration, during the procedure or in the immediate postoperative period, is unusual, but may occur. (See "Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: Postprocedure care and complications", section on 'Cardiac failure'.)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Preoperative evaluation and management

The preoperative history and physical examination for any patient should include the risk factors, signs, and symptoms of liver disease. Routine screening with liver function tests (LFTs) is not recommended. (See 'Screening for liver disease' above.)

Nearly every organ system may be affected by liver disease, with implications for perioperative management. (See 'Other organ systems' above.)

Elective surgery should be postponed for patients with acute viral or alcoholic hepatitis and for patients with acute liver failure (table 1). (See 'Risk stratification' above.)

The prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR) very poorly predict bleeding in patients with liver disease. In anticipation of surgery, we do not routinely transfuse platelets, fresh frozen plasma or cryoprecipitate. For percutaneous procedures, we maintain fibrinogen levels ≥200 mg/dL and platelets of >50,000/microL. (See 'Other organ systems' above.)

Effects of anesthetics on the liver

Anesthetics can affect the liver by reducing hepatic blood flow, or by producing hepatotoxic byproducts.

The currently used volatile anesthetic agents (isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane) are not associated with hepatotoxicity. Halothane (used outside the United States) should not be administered to patients with liver disease because of the risk of hepatotoxicity, and reduction in cardiac output and hepatic oxygen supply. (See 'Effects of anesthetics on the liver' above.)

Intravenous (IV) anesthetics do not appear to affect liver function, as long as cardiac output (CO) and blood pressure (BP) are maintained. (See 'Effects of anesthetics on the liver' above.)

Effects of liver disease on pharmacokinetics – Liver disease can affect the pharmacokinetics of anesthetic drugs by changing drug metabolism, protein binding, and volume of distribution. In general, sedatives and opioids should be administered in small doses and titrated to effect (table 2).

Benzodiazepines – The half-life of elimination is increased in patients with liver disease; enhanced sedation and prolonged duration of action should be expected. (See 'Sedative hypnotics' above.)

Opioids – Metabolism may be reduced in patients with liver disease, particularly for morphine and hydromorphone. Elimination of fentanyl is not appreciably altered in patients with liver disease, unless repeat doses are administered. Elimination and recovery from remifentanil are unchanged by liver disease. (See 'Opioids' above.)

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) Duration of action of succinylcholine may be prolonged in patients with liver disease, but rarely to a clinically relevant degree. Clearance, elimination, and duration of action of rocuronium and vecuronium are prolonged in patients with liver disease. Metabolism of atracurium and cisatracurium are unaffected by liver disease. (See 'Neuromuscular blocking agents' above.)

Hemodynamic management – Goals for hemodynamic management include maintenance of hepatic perfusion and, for patients who undergo abdominal surgery, decreased portal pressure with restrictive fluid therapy to minimize bleeding. For patients with ascites or hypoalbuminemia, we administer albumin rather than crystalloids for perioperative volume expansion. (See 'Intravenous fluids' above.)

Patients with severe liver disease may require higher doses of vasopressors, and may require norepinephrine or vasopressin to maintain BP. (See 'Hemodynamic management' above.)

Monitoring hemostasis – During surgery, viscoelastic tests (ie, thromboelastography or thromboelastometry), fibrinogen levels, and platelet count are more useful than the PT/INR for monitoring hemostasis. We maintain a fibrinogen level of 1.5 to 2 gm/L with administration of cryoprecipitate. We also maintain a platelet count ≥50,000/microL for patients who undergo surgery and ≥100,000/microL for active bleeding and during craniotomy. (See 'Coagulation management' above.)

Hepatic resection – Anesthetic concerns for hepatic resection include the following (see 'Anesthesia for hepatic resection' above):

There is always potential for significant hemorrhage. (See 'Hemorrhage' above.)

Fluid management: The value and necessity of “low CVP” anesthesia and fluid management for reducing blood loss during hepatic resection are unclear. We aim for euvolemia, towards hypovolemia, and avoid hypervolemia during hepatic resection. (See 'Low central venous pressure anesthesia' above.)

Postoperative coagulopathy may occur after hepatic resection, and may affect the decision to place an epidural catheter for postoperative pain control because of the risk of spinal epidural hematoma. We offer epidural analgesia when the future liver remnant is predicted to be ≥60 to 70 percent of total liver volume. (See 'Coagulopathy and epidural analgesia' above.)

Transhepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) – TIPS may be performed with general anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care with sedation. Important anesthetic concerns include the following (see 'Anesthesia for transhepatic portosystemic shunt' above):

Patients who undergo TIPS often have massive ascites and are therefore at risk of aspiration and may be unable to lie flat.

Preoperative volume resuscitation may be required for patients who have had variceal bleeding. If preoperative large volume paracentesis is performed, fluid replacement should include albumin rather than crystalloids.

Intra-procedure complications of TIPS include vascular injury, hemorrhage, pneumothorax, and dysrhythmia.

The increase in venous return to the heart associated with TIPS can unmask cardiac dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension.

  1. Northup PG, Wanamaker RC, Lee VD, et al. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) predicts nontransplant surgical mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Ann Surg 2005; 242:244.
  2. Teh SH, Nagorney DM, Stevens SR, et al. Risk factors for mortality after surgery in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2007; 132:1261.
  3. Suman A, Barnes DS, Zein NN, et al. Predicting outcome after cardiac surgery in patients with cirrhosis: a comparison of Child-Pugh and MELD scores. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2:719.
  4. Farnsworth N, Fagan SP, Berger DH, Awad SS. Child-Turcotte-Pugh versus MELD score as a predictor of outcome after elective and emergent surgery in cirrhotic patients. Am J Surg 2004; 188:580.
  5. Perkins L, Jeffries M, Patel T. Utility of preoperative scores for predicting morbidity after cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2:1123.
  6. Befeler AS, Palmer DE, Hoffman M, et al. The safety of intra-abdominal surgery in patients with cirrhosis: model for end-stage liver disease score is superior to Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification in predicting outcome. Arch Surg 2005; 140:650.
  7. Nagai S, Chau LC, Schilke RE, et al. Effects of Allocating Livers for Transplantation Based on Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium Scores on Patient Outcomes. Gastroenterology 2018; 155:1451.
  8. Godfrey EL, Kueht ML, Rana A, Awad S. MELD-Na (the new MELD) and peri-operative outcomes in emergency surgery. Am J Surg 2018; 216:407.
  9. Kim SY, Yim HJ, Park SM, et al. Validation of a Mayo post-operative mortality risk prediction model in Korean cirrhotic patients. Liver Int 2011; 31:222.
  10. Mahmud N, Fricker Z, Hubbard RA, et al. Risk Prediction Models for Post-Operative Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis. Hepatology 2021; 73:204.
  11. De Pietri L, Bianchini M, Montalti R, et al. Thrombelastography-guided blood product use before invasive procedures in cirrhosis with severe coagulopathy: A randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology 2016; 63:566.
  12. Zardi EM, Abbate A, Zardi DM, et al. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56:539.
  13. Theocharidou E, Krag A, Bendtsen F, et al. Cardiac dysfunction in cirrhosis - does adrenal function play a role? A hypothesis. Liver Int 2012; 32:1327.
  14. Alkhouri N, Tamimi TA, Yerian L, et al. The inflamed liver and atherosclerosis: a link between histologic severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and increased cardiovascular risk. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55:2644.
  15. Butt AA, Xiaoqiang W, Budoff M, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection and the risk of coronary disease. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:225.
  16. Petta S, Maida M, Macaluso FS, et al. Hepatitis C Virus Infection Is Associated With Increased Cardiovascular Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Gastroenterology 2016; 150:145.
  17. Klinge M, Coppler T, Liebschutz JM, et al. The assessment and management of pain in cirrhosis. Curr Hepatol Rep 2018; 17:42.
  18. Rogal SS, Winger D, Bielefeldt K, Szigethy E. Pain and opioid use in chronic liver disease. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58:2976.
  19. Rakoski M, Goyal P, Spencer-Safier M, et al. Pain management in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2018; 11:135.
  20. Rogal SS, Bielefeldt K, Wasan AD, et al. Fibromyalgia symptoms and cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60:1482.
  21. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134:172.
  22. Niemann CU, Feiner J, Behrends M, et al. Central venous pressure monitoring during living right donor hepatectomy. Liver Transpl 2007; 13:266.
  23. Myo Bui CC, Worapot A, Xia W, et al. Gastroesophageal and hemorrhagic complications associated with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in patients with model for end-stage liver disease score 25 or higher. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015; 29:594.
  24. Markin NW, Sharma A, Grant W, Shillcutt SK. The safety of transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015; 29:588.
  25. Spier BJ, Larue SJ, Teelin TC, et al. Review of complications in a series of patients with known gastro-esophageal varices undergoing transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22:396.
  26. Kennedy WF Jr, Everett GB, Cobb LA, Allen GD. Simultaneous systemic and hepatic hemodynamic measurements during high peridural anesthesia in normal man. Anesth Analg 1971; 50:1069.
  27. Meierhenrich R, Wagner F, Schütz W, et al. The effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia on hepatic blood flow in patients under general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2009; 108:1331.
  28. Tanaka N, Nagata N, Hamakawa T, Takasaki M. The effect of dopamine on hepatic blood flow in patients undergoing epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1997; 85:286.
  29. McDonnell JG, O'Donnell B, Curley G, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2007; 104:193.
  30. Frink EJ Jr. The hepatic effects of sevoflurane. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:S46.
  31. Schindler E, Müller M, Zickmann B, et al. [Blood supply to the liver in the human after 1 MAC desflurane in comparison with isoflurane and halothane]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1996; 31:344.
  32. Gelman S, Dillard E, Bradley EL Jr. Hepatic circulation during surgical stress and anesthesia with halothane, isoflurane, or fentanyl. Anesth Analg 1987; 66:936.
  33. Njoku D, Laster MJ, Gong DH, et al. Biotransformation of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, and desflurane to trifluoroacetylated liver proteins: association between protein acylation and hepatic injury. Anesth Analg 1997; 84:173.
  34. Obata R, Bito H, Ohmura M, et al. The effects of prolonged low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia on renal and hepatic function. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:1262.
  35. Watkins PB, Seeff LB. Drug-induced liver injury: summary of a single topic clinical research conference. Hepatology 2006; 43:618.
  36. Nunn JF. Clinical aspects of the interaction between nitrous oxide and vitamin B12. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59:3.
  37. Sesso RM, Iunes Y, Melo AC. Myeloneuropathy following nitrous oxide anesthaesia in a patient with macrocytic anaemia. Neuroradiology 1999; 41:588.
  38. Hadzic A, Glab K, Sanborn KV, Thys DM. Severe neurologic deficit after nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:863.
  39. Servin F, Desmonts JM, Haberer JP, et al. Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of propofol in patients with cirrhosis. Anesthesiology 1988; 69:887.
  40. Duvaldestin P, Chauvin M, Lebrault C, et al. Effect of upper abdominal surgery and cirrhosis upon the pharmacokinetics of methohexital. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991; 35:159.
  41. Pandele G, Chaux F, Salvadori C, et al. Thiopental pharmacokinetics in patients with cirrhosis. Anesthesiology 1983; 59:123.
  42. van Beem H, Manger FW, van Boxtel C, van Bentem N. Etomidate anaesthesia in patients with cirrhosis of the liver: pharmacokinetic data. Anaesthesia 1983; 38 Suppl:61.
  43. Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial. JAMA 2009; 301:489.
  44. Tegeder I, Lötsch J, Geisslinger G. Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999; 37:17.
  45. Klotz U, McHorse TS, Wilkinson GR, Schenker S. The effect of cirrhosis on the disposition and elimination of meperidine in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1974; 16:667.
  46. Pond SM, Tong T, Benowitz NL, et al. Presystemic metabolism of meperidine to normeperidine in normal and cirrhotic subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 30:183.
  47. Dershwitz M, Hoke JF, Rosow CE, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil in volunteer subjects with severe liver disease. Anesthesiology 1996; 84:812.
  48. Navapurkar VU, Archer S, Gupta SK, et al. Metabolism of remifentanil during liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81:881.
  49. Adams DR, Tollinche LE, Yeoh CB, et al. Short-term safety and effectiveness of sugammadex for surgical patients with end-stage renal disease: a two-centre retrospective study. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:348.
  50. Thomas SD, Boyd AH. Prolonged neuromuscular block associated with acute fatty liver of pregnancy and reduced plasma cholinesterase. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1994; 11:245.
  51. Viby-Mogensen J, Hanel HK. Prolonged apnoea after suxamethonium: an analysis of the first 225 cases reported to the Danish Cholinesterase Research Unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1978; 22:371.
  52. Cook DR, Freeman JA, Lai AA, et al. Pharmacokinetics of mivacurium in normal patients and in those with hepatic or renal failure. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69:580.
  53. Devlin JC, Head-Rapson AG, Parker CJ, Hunter JM. Pharmacodynamics of mivacurium chloride in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Br J Anaesth 1993; 71:227.
  54. Hunter JM, Parker CJ, Bell CF, et al. The use of different doses of vecuronium in patients with liver dysfunction. Br J Anaesth 1985; 57:758.
  55. Magorian T, Wood P, Caldwell J, et al. The pharmacokinetics and neuromuscular effects of rocuronium bromide in patients with liver disease. Anesth Analg 1995; 80:754.
  56. De Wolf AM, Freeman JA, Scott VL, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium in patients with end-stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76:624.
  57. Ward S, Neill EA. Pharmacokinetics of atracurium in acute hepatic failure (with acute renal failure). Br J Anaesth 1983; 55:1169.
  58. Møller S, Henriksen JH. Neurohumoral fluid regulation in chronic liver disease. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1998; 58:361.
  59. Wagener G, Kovalevskaya G, Minhaz M, et al. Vasopressin deficiency and vasodilatory state in end-stage liver disease. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011; 25:665.
  60. Alves de Mattos A. Current indications for the use of albumin in the treatment of cirrhosis. Ann Hepatol 2011; 10 Suppl 1:S15.
  61. Bernardi M, Ricci CS, Zaccherini G. Role of human albumin in the management of complications of liver cirrhosis. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2014; 4:302.
  62. Runyon BA, AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee. Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. Hepatology 2009; 49:2087.
  63. Terg R, Gadano A, Cartier M, et al. Serum creatinine and bilirubin predict renal failure and mortality in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a retrospective study. Liver Int 2009; 29:415.
  64. Ganter MT, Spahn DR. Active, personalized, and balanced coagulation management saves lives in patients with massive bleeding. Anesthesiology 2010; 113:1016.
  65. Kozek-Langenecker SA, Ahmed AB, Afshari A, et al. Management of severe perioperative bleeding: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology: First update 2016. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017; 34:332.
  66. Rossaint R, Bouillon B, Cerny V, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition. Crit Care 2016; 20:100.
  67. Nadim MK, Durand F, Kellum JA, et al. Management of the critically ill patient with cirrhosis: A multidisciplinary perspective. J Hepatol 2016; 64:717.
  68. Spahn DR, Bouillon B, Cerny V, et al. Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma: an updated European guideline. Crit Care 2013; 17:R76.
  69. Tripodi A, Primignani M, Chantarangkul V, et al. Thrombin generation in patients with cirrhosis: the role of platelets. Hepatology 2006; 44:440.
  70. Senousy BE, Draganov PV. Evaluation and management of patients with refractory ascites. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15:67.
  71. Evans C, Evans M, Pollock AV. The incidence and causes of postoperative jaundice. A prospective study. Br J Anaesth 1974; 46:520.
  72. Suttner SW, Schmidt CC, Boldt J, et al. Low-flow desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia minimally affect hepatic integrity and function in elderly patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:206.
  73. Lentschener C, Benhamou D, Mercier FJ, et al. Aprotinin reduces blood loss in patients undergoing elective liver resection. Anesth Analg 1997; 84:875.
  74. Jones RM, Moulton CE, Hardy KJ. Central venous pressure and its effect on blood loss during liver resection. Br J Surg 1998; 85:1058.
  75. The administration of blood and blood components and the management of transfused patients. British Committee for Standards in Haematology, Blood Transfusion Task Force. Royal College of Nursing and the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Transfus Med 1999; 9:227.
  76. Kim YK, Chin JH, Kang SJ, et al. Association between central venous pressure and blood loss during hepatic resection in 984 living donors. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53:601.
  77. Chhibber A, Dziak J, Kolano J, et al. Anesthesia care for adult live donor hepatectomy: our experiences with 100 cases. Liver Transpl 2007; 13:537.
  78. Li Z, Sun YM, Wu FX, et al. Controlled low central venous pressure reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in hepatectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:303.
  79. Hughes MJ, Ventham NT, Harrison EM, Wigmore SJ. Central venous pressure and liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2015; 17:863.
  80. Pan YX, Wang JC, Lu XY, et al. Intention to control low central venous pressure reduced blood loss during laparoscopic hepatectomy: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Surgery 2020; 167:933.
  81. Sand L, Rizell M, Houltz E, et al. Effect of patient position and PEEP on hepatic, portal and central venous pressures during liver resection. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 55:1106.
  82. Torzilli G, Procopio F, Donadon M, et al. Safety of intermittent Pringle maneuver cumulative time exceeding 120 minutes in liver resection: a further step in favor of the "radical but conservative" policy. Ann Surg 2012; 255:270.
  83. Bismuth H, Castaing D, Garden OJ. Major hepatic resection under total vascular exclusion. Ann Surg 1989; 210:13.
  84. Matot I, Scheinin O, Eid A, Jurim O. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia in liver resection. Anesth Analg 2002; 95:1179.
  85. Borromeo CJ, Stix MS, Lally A, Pomfret EA. Epidural catheter and increased prothrombin time after right lobe hepatectomy for living donor transplantation. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:1139.
  86. Bell R, Ward D, Jeffery J, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Epidural Analgesia Versus Continuous Local Anesthetic Infiltration Via Abdominal Wound Catheter in Open Liver Resection. Ann Surg 2019; 269:413.
Topic 91242 Version 21.0

References