Your activity: 6 p.v.

Transabdominal ultrasonography of the small and large intestine

Transabdominal ultrasonography of the small and large intestine
Author:
Christoph F Dietrich, MD, MBA
Section Editor:
John R Saltzman, MD, FACP, FACG, FASGE, AGAF
Deputy Editor:
Kristen M Robson, MD, MBA, FACG
Literature review current through: Dec 2022. | This topic last updated: Feb 21, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Transabdominal ultrasonography is most commonly used to obtain images of hepatobiliary, urogenital, and pelvic structures. Its utility for imaging the alimentary gastrointestinal tract is less well established, principally because of technical difficulties in obtaining quality images of these regions. However, improvements in ultrasound technology and increasing familiarity with ultrasonographic findings in a variety of gastrointestinal disorders are broadening its applications. Society guidelines regarding the use of gastrointestinal ultrasound are available [1].

An advantage of ultrasound imaging compared with endoscopy and contrast radiography is that it permits evaluation of the transmural aspects of inflammatory or neoplastic pathology within its surrounding structures [2]. This can provide an important contribution for diagnosis and monitoring of disease activity. Other advantages are that it is widely available, noninvasive, can be performed without preparation, and lacks radiation exposure (which may be particularly desirable in patients such as pregnant women) [3,4].

On the other hand, important limitations of ultrasonography are that the alimentary tract cannot be visualized over its entire length, many of the findings are nonspecific, and obtaining and interpreting the images is operator-dependent. Furthermore, ultrasound is far less useful in patients with obesity in whom high-frequency scanning may not be possible.

This topic review will provide an overview of transabdominal ultrasonography of the small and large bowel, while summarizing its use in a variety of gastrointestinal disorders.

Society guidelines and position papers on gastrointestinal ultrasound have been published, and our approach is generally consistent with society guidance [3,5-8].

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS — Imaging of the alimentary tract requires high-frequency (5 to 17 MHz), high-resolution linear or convex array transducers, a great deal of scanning experience, and patience. The standardized evaluation should optimally take place preprandially since images from filled intestines can be difficult to interpret, particularly when motility is being evaluated. On the other hand, under emergency conditions, such as ileus (eg, due to obstruction, an incarcerated hernia, or intussusception), appendicitis, or diverticulitis, the exam may be performed postprandially.

The ileocecal region and the sigmoid colon can be identified by ultrasound imaging in most patients. Landmarks in the ileocecal region are the right iliac artery and vein, while landmarks in the sigmoid region are the left iliac artery and vein. The remaining colonic segments can also be evaluated adequately by continuous scanning in many patients. The rectum and distal parts of the colon cannot always be displayed satisfactorily.

Intestinal wall thickness and sonomorphology — A central element of alimentary tract imaging is the correct estimation of intestinal wall thickness. A number of different reference values for defining normal have been proposed (ranging from 1 to 5 mm). In our experience, the normal intestinal tract thickness in the terminal ileum, cecum, and right and left colon is <2 mm when examined with graded compression in adults [9] and children [10,11]. It is important to appreciate that a contracted intestinal segment can be misinterpreted as a thickened wall. In addition to the wall thickness, its overall echo texture and appearance within surrounding structures should be considered when interpreting the results.

High-resolution transducers usually permit visualization of the five layers of the colonic and stomach walls (table 1) [12,13]. Imaging of the walls of the small intestine usually requires it to be filled with liquid. The small and large intestines can be distinguished by scanning the haustra of the colon and the circular folds of Kerckring in the small intestine [14]. In unclear cases, scanning of the intestines during various filling stages can be helpful. The specific appearance of these features can also help to establish a diagnosis. As an example, widening of the spaces between the Kerckring folds can be seen in patients with villous atrophy (such as celiac disease).

Assessment of abdominal lymphadenopathy — Conventional ultrasound can be used to evaluate abdominal lymph nodes (LNs). It has the advantages of high-resolution, real-time evaluation, and relatively low cost. Methods such as elastography can help identify benign versus malignant lymph nodes [15]. Indications for transcutaneous ultrasound (TUS) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) include the detection and characterization of lymph nodes and guidance for LN biopsy [16,17]. Advances in ultrasound technology, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS), and real-time elastography, show potential to improve the accuracy of ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lymph nodes. As with TUS and EUS, CEUS and CE-EUS have been used for the guidance of fine-needle aspiration and assessment of treatment response [16].

Color Doppler imaging — A number of authors have described the utility of color Doppler imaging during standard ultrasound examination in a variety of gastrointestinal disorders, particularly in patients with Crohn disease [18-25], celiac disease [26-31], and mesenteric artery stenosis [32-36]. However, experience with these imaging modalities is limited, and their accuracy has not been well defined [37,38]. As a result, their role in diagnosis of or in monitoring disease activity remains unclear. A promising approach is combining mesenteric inflow by Duplex scanning (systolic and diastolic velocities, resistance index) with visualization of the end-organ vascularity by color Doppler imaging [39].

Acute inflammation of the intestinal wall (such as in patients with Crohn disease, celiac disease) is accompanied by increased perfusion of the mesentery, which can be displayed non-quantitatively with color duplex, with or without the administration of echo-enhancing agents (CEUS using agents such as SonoVue). In patients with Crohn disease, the perfusion pattern may facilitate differentiation of inflammatory from cicatricial-fibrostenosis and a correlation with endoscopically active Crohn disease [40]. However, technical factors (eg, depth of penetration, pressure and equipment used) may influence the ability to make this distinction [41,42]. (See 'Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)' below.)

Mesenteric Doppler ultrasonography has been advocated as a reasonably accurate screening modality for the detection of high-grade superior mesenteric artery stenoses. Sensitivity exceeding 90 percent and a negative predictive value of close to 99 percent has been reported in patients with more than a 50 percent stenosis of the superior mesenteric or celiac arteries. As a result, it is reasonable to pursue other etiologies of abdominal pain after a negative study. A positive study should be followed by angiography, which can further establish the feasibility of revascularization. (See "Chronic mesenteric ischemia".)

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) — CEUS uses echo-enhancing agents such as SonoVue (which contains sulphur hexafluoride). In patients with Crohn disease, CEUS enables quantification of bowel wall vascularity [43], however, whether this correlates well with histologic findings is unclear [44,45]. (See "Contrast echocardiography: Contrast agents, safety, and imaging technique", section on 'Second-generation contrast agents'.)

CEUS can also be used to evaluate disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease because it can visualize microvascularity of the tissue surrounding the intestines [46]. In patients with inflammation, three bowel wall perfusion patterns are seen with CEUS: submucosal enhancement, inward transparietal enhancement, and outward transparietal enhancement [40]. Disease activity can be further quantified using time intensity curve analysis [47,48]. The quantitative measurements of bowel enhancement obtained by CEUS have been shown to correlate with endoscopic severity and histopathologic findings [49,50]. CEUS may also be effective in the recognition of predominantly cicatricial stenoses in patients with Crohn disease [51]. Finally, CEUS can be used as part of the evaluation for postoperative recurrence of Crohn disease [52].

Use of CEUS to evaluate inflammatory bowel disease activity and other conditions of the gastrointestinal tract is discussed separately. (See "Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Gastrointestinal applications outside of the liver", section on 'Gastrointestinal tract'.)

There are reports of off-label extravascular or intracavitary administration of ultrasound contrast agents (UCA) to improve sonographic assessment. No standard dosage of UCA has been established so far for intracavitary injection. The range reported is 0.1 to 1 mL SonoVue (most commonly just a few drops) diluted in 10 mL or more of 0.9 percent saline; a higher content of SonoVue may be needed for high-frequency ultrasound probes. CEUS detection and classification of fistulas, whatever the initial disease, has been proven to be effective. In principle, UCA can be instilled into any sonographically accessible physiologic or pathologic body cavity to assess morphology of the cavity and potential communications with adjacent structures or organs. Clinical applications include evaluation of abscesses [53], intestinal and other fistulas [54], gastroesophageal reflux and hiatal hernia [55,56], the gastric lumen, Zenker's diverticulum [57], and intestinal stenoses [58,59].

Elastography — Elastography is a noninvasive method in which tissue stiffness can be imaged as a color map or shear wave velocity. The ultrasound probe is used to palpate the tissue. It is usually done transcutaneously but can be applied intraoperatively or via an endoscope [60]. The tissue deformation produced (ie, strain) is assessed by following the way the speckle in the image moves, usually with a tracking algorithm that analyzes the radio-frequency data. The data can then be used to form an image that is coded in color or grayscale to show the pattern of strain, which is inversely related to tissue stiffness. Therefore, strain elastography (SE) allows assessment and visualization of relative elasticity differences. The area to be evaluated is defined by a region of interest in a similar way to color Doppler imaging [16,61,62]. SE may show the layered structure of the gastrointestinal wall. SE is used to assess the firmness of focal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract [58]. SE can help determine if a stenosis is caused by inflammation or fibrosis since fibrotic stenoses appear stiff and inflammatory stenoses appear soft [63,64]. Furthermore, patients with active Crohn disease have a higher strain ratio between the inflamed and normal regions than patients in remission [65]. In a study on inflammatory bowel disease, the findings on elastography were significantly correlated with the endoscopic findings [66]. Ultrasound elastography has been used as a technique for differentiating fibrosis from inflammation [67]. (See "Noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: Ultrasound-based elastography", section on 'Principles behind ultrasound-based elastography'.)

ADDITIONAL SONOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION TECHNIQUES — A number of modifications of standard ultrasound techniques continue to be developed:

One of these, hydrocolonic ultrasonography, involves the retrograde instillation of water into the colon, which helps to provide excellent images of the colonic wall morphology [68-70]. However, its clinical utility is unclear.

Transrectal, transvaginal, and other perineal ultrasound techniques can provide detailed information about perineal structures [71]. We have found these approaches to be particularly helpful in the initial evaluation of patients with perineal fistulas [72]. However, they are of limited value in patients with deep or complex fistulas [73,74]. Although endorectal ultrasound with elastography can quantify anal sphincter elastic properties, its role in the evaluation of patients with fecal incontinence is unclear [75,76].

Point of care ultrasound has been studied using small, handheld ultrasound devices with promising results [77].

APPENDICITIS — Ultrasonography has been used successfully in diagnosing acute appendicitis primarily in children, but also in adults [7,78,79] (table 2). (See "Acute appendicitis in adults: Clinical manifestations and differential diagnosis" and "Acute appendicitis in children: Diagnostic imaging" and "Acute appendicitis in adults: Diagnostic evaluation".)

The normal outer appendiceal diameter (with and without) compression was measured in 205 consecutive children without clinical signs of appendicitis, [80]. The mean age of the children included in the study was nine years. The appendix was visualized in 142 of 205 children (69 percent). The mean appendiceal diameter without and with compression was 4.2 +/- 0.9 mm and 3.5 +/- 0.8 mm, respectively, with 54 percent of the appendices appearing in the mid-pelvic location. Age, weight, and height all affected the visualization rate of the normal appendix.

Sonographic signs of appendicitis include (image 1 and image 2):

Noncompressible appendix with a diameter of >6 mm

Focal pain over appendix with compression

Appendicolith

Changes of echogenicity (which might be hyper- or hypoechoic) of inflamed periappendiceal fat

Fluid in the right lower quadrant

In a retrospective review of 304 consecutive patients, the highest sensitivity (99 percent) and specificity (95 percent) for making a diagnosis of appendicitis were a mean outer diameter of ≥7 mm or wall thickness >1.7 mm, resulting in one (0.5 percent) false-negative and six (3 percent) false-positive studies [81].

In some patients, the whole length of the appendix (up to 10 cm or more) can be visualized. Obstruction of the appendix (eg, by an appendicolith, neoplasia or, in endemic areas, parasites) can be identified in some patients.

Inflammation of the appendiceal wall may be followed by localized ischemia (which may be visualized by color Doppler imaging) and necrosis. Complications of acute appendicitis (perforation and abscess formation with or without generalized peritonitis and pylephlebitis) can also be detected during ultrasonography.

EPIPLOIC APPENDAGITIS — Epiploic appendagitis (also known as appendicitis epiploica) is a rarely recognized disease of the colonic epiploicae [82-91]. Its main clinical feature is acute abdominal pain that is often mistaken for appendicitis or diverticulitis.

On abdominal ultrasound, the inflamed appendage appears as a noncompressible, solid, hyperechoic ovoid mass with a subtle hypoechoic rim located at the point of maximal tenderness. The inflamed fatty mass is fixed to the colon and often also to the parietal peritoneum during inspiration and expiration. Doppler studies typically reveal absence of blood flow in the appendage and normal blood flow in the hyperechoic inflamed fat surrounding the appendage. (See "Epiploic appendagitis", section on 'Abdominal ultrasound'.)

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may show a central area of no enhancement with moderately increased vascularization around the avascular necrotic appendage [92]. The transverse colon is rarely involved. Ultrasonography can establish the diagnosis [93], although computed tomography is more commonly used.

DIVERTICULITIS — The diagnosis of diverticulitis is usually established based upon the history, physical examination, and the results of imaging tests, most commonly computed tomography scanning. However, high-resolution, graded, compression ultrasonography continues to be widely used in many centers to evaluate patients with suspected diverticulitis [94,95]. Reported sensitivities range from 84 to 98 percent and specificities from 80 to 99 percent (table 3) [96-104]. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of acute diverticulitis in adults".) It can also be used to assess the resolution of the disease.

Typical ultrasonographic features seen in patients with acute diverticulitis include:

A hypoechoic peridiverticular inflammatory reaction

Mural and peridiverticular abscess formation with or without gas bubbles

Bowel wall thickening (segmental mural thickening greater than 3 to 4 mm) at the point of maximal tenderness

Normal-appearing diverticula in the surrounding segments

A prominent muscularis layer (a general feature of diverticulosis)

Ultrasonography can also identify the major complications of diverticulitis, including obstruction, peritonitis (with ascites and sometimes diffuse peritoneal thickening and scattered loculated fluid collections), and fistula and abscess formation (image 3). Fistulas appear as hypoechoic areas next to inflamed diverticula with extraluminal air bubbles extending in the bladder, vagina, or abdominal wall.

Once the diagnosis has been established, ultrasonography can be used to facilitate percutaneous drainage of localized abscesses, thereby downstaging complicated diverticulitis, avoiding emergency surgery, and permitting single stage elective surgical resection. (See "Acute colonic diverticulitis: Medical management".)

CROHN DISEASE — Transabdominal ultrasonography is useful for the detection of bowel wall thickening and for determining the extent of involved segments in active Crohn disease [105] (image 4). Ultrasound reliably depicts both bowel-related and mesenteric features of Crohn disease, and ultrasound findings correlate strongly with magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) findings [106].

Several studies comparing the value of ultrasonography with endoscopic and radiologic results in Crohn disease have found a sensitivity between 73 and 96 percent and a specificity between 90 and 100 percent (table 4 and table 5) [70,107-129]. Sonographic features of the colon include (asymmetric) segmental bowel wall thickening corresponding to endoscopic signs of disease activity, namely ulcerations, edema, hyperemia, and polypoid mucosal changes with pathologically thickened skip areas adjacent to areas of normal-appearing mucosa (cobblestone appearance). This pattern is different from the continuous involvement observed in ulcerative colitis, which can also be identified by ultrasonography (table 6) [70,115-117,130].

Lymph node enlargement is a common ultrasonographic finding in patients with Crohn disease (25 percent of 240 patients in one series [131]). In one report, lymph node enlargement was more frequent in young patients and in the presence of septic complications such as fistulas and abscesses [131]. The finding of lymph node enlargement was of limited valued in assessing disease activity.

Ultrasonography can also detect complications such as fistulas (image 5), abscesses, carcinoma, and ileus. As discussed above, the addition of color Doppler imaging can help to distinguish active disease from a post-inflammatory stricture. Estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography for detecting fistulas have ranged between 50 to 89 and 90 to 95 percent, respectively [132]. Estimates of the sensitivity and specificity for detecting abscesses have ranged between 71 to 100 and 77 to 94 percent, respectively [118,130,133-135].

A prospective study suggested that routine ultrasonography in patients with Crohn disease can reveal unexpected pathologic findings that have therapeutic implications [136]. The study included 255 patients with Crohn disease who underwent regular ultrasonography irrespective of symptoms and disease activity. Patients with abnormal findings underwent further evaluation with additional radiologic and endoscopic imaging and treatment as needed.

Of 17 patients with inactive disease, ultrasonography revealed four with an enteroenteric fistula, seven with a mesenteric or perirectal fistula, and six with transmural mesenteric inflammation without a fistula. Ultrasonography of the remaining abdominal organs revealed pathological findings with further diagnostic implications in 25 of 255 (10 percent) patients and with therapeutic implications in 9 of 255 (4 percent).

ULCERATIVE COLITIS — The diagnosis of ulcerative colitis is usually established by the patient's history and typical endoscopic appearance of the mucosa and histology. (See "Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and prognosis of ulcerative colitis in adults".)

Treatment is based in part upon the extent of disease. Thus, it is useful at the initial presentation to document the extent of inflammation, which can be accomplished by combining flexible sigmoidoscopy and ultrasonography. Early sonographic signs of active ulcerative colitis include a thickened hypoechoic mucosa layer, corresponding to the endoscopic findings of engorgement of the erythematous mucosa with petechiae, exudates, and friability. More severe cases may be associated with transmural bowel wall thickening corresponding to the endoscopic findings of exudates and ulcerations (image 6). Patients with fulminant disease may have sonographically transmural inflammation, an appearance similar to Crohn disease.

However, the clinical and sonographic findings at initial presentation and during exacerbations are not specific to ulcerative colitis, and may be seen in a number of other disorders, including colitis due to drugs (such as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, retinoic acid, gold, and possibly oral contraceptives), infectious colitis (due to Clostridioides [formerly Clostridium] difficile, Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Aeromonas, and Escherichia coli O157:H7), and other chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (such as Crohn disease and ischemic colitis) [137]. The differential diagnosis is broader in patients who are immunocompromised. Thus, sonographic findings should be used to complement other clinical and laboratory features of the presentation.

INFECTIOUS ENTEROCOLITIS — Various bacteria are associated with acute infectious enterocolitis. The most frequently encountered agents include Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Yersinia species, and enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic E. coli. Shigellosis is uncommon in Europe and the United States [138,139]. (See "Approach to the adult with acute diarrhea in resource-rich settings".)

The sonographic differentiation of individual bacterial infections is not possible, although the images obtained may point toward the final diagnosis. All forms of secretory small bowel derived diarrhea can initially present with a fluid-filled small bowel [140]. Most of these infections are associated with intestinal wall thickening, with preservation of the wall layers (image 7) [2,140-144]. Prominent mesenteric lymph nodes are frequently seen (table 7).

Salmonella enteritis — The pathogenesis of diarrhea in Salmonella gastroenteritis results from complex interactions between bacterial products and host cells. Salmonellae selectively attach to specialized epithelial cells overlying Peyer's patches in the colon known as M cells [145]. These cells are an important portal of entry of Salmonellae and other pathogens into the submucosal lymphoid system. Involvement of the submucosal lymphoid system explains the occasional disparity between the sonographic findings of a thickened bowel but with endoscopically normal-appearing mucosa [143,146-151]. Thickening of the mucosa with a feathery appearance is typical [152]. (See "Nontyphoidal Salmonella: Gastrointestinal infection and carriage".)

Campylobacter enteritis — The diagnosis of Campylobacter enteritis (either as a small bowel or large bowel pathogen) cannot be made on clinical and sonographic grounds alone. However, the presence of severe abdominal pain with diarrhea and sonographic findings of ileocecitis may suggest the diagnosis [143,149,150,153].

Yersiniosis — Although there are no distinct clinical, radiologic, or hematologic findings that are pathognomonic for Yersiniosis, sonographic findings of ileocecitis may be suggestive, especially in patients with mesenteric lymphadenopathy. However, lymph nodes are almost always enlarged with other bacterial infections as well. Another suggestive finding is thickening of the distal ileum, which corresponds to the presence of the dense inflammatory infiltrate, which is typical of Yersiniosis [140-143,149,150,154,155].

Enterohemorrhagic E. coli — Enterohemorrhagic E. coli, most notably E. coli O157:H7, is a relatively common, but probably under-recognized, cause of infectious colitis. Sonographic signs include thickening of the bowel wall, especially the right colon. The sonographic diagnosis of colitis without identifiable infectious agents should raise suspicion for the infection, whose confirmation requires specialized cultures that may not be performed as part of routine stool cultures. (See "Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: Microbiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, and prevention".)

Shigella — Shigella is the classic cause of colonic or dysenteric diarrhea, mostly documented as a foodborne disease. As few as 10 organisms can initiate disease, and person-to-person spread is feasible. Ultrasonography may show signs similar to ulcerative colitis. (See "Shigella infection: Treatment and prevention in adults".)

Vibrio cholerae — V. cholerae infection is uncommon in Europe and the United States. This organism is associated with small bowel diarrheal illnesses. Sonographically detectable bowel wall thickening is rarely recognized but may be prominent in patients with severe disease with edema of the bowel wall. Fluid-filled small bowel due to secretory mechanisms induced by the toxin may be the only sonographically detectable sign.

Intestinal tuberculosis — The incidence of intestinal tuberculosis increased with the AIDS pandemic. As with Crohn disease, all regions of the intestine may be involved, although the ileocecal region is affected in up to 90 percent of patients. Both sides of the ileocecal valve are typically inflamed, preventing it from closing satisfactorily [156].

The ultrasound image displays a hyperechoic (sometimes asymmetrically thickened) mucosa with loss of folds and unclear demarcation from (sometimes asymmetrically) thickened submucosa, so that a pseudo-polypoid image prevails. Short stenoses, mesenteric hyperechoic inflammatory signs, fistulas, and abscesses can be seen on the ultrasound image. Other characteristic signs include severe mesenteric lymphadenopathy (sometimes more than 10 hyperechoic round to oval-shaped lymph nodes are detected) and a distended ileocecal valve, with asymmetric (sometimes tumorous) thickening, especially affecting the medial cecal wall. Patients with peritoneal tuberculosis may also have ascites and thickening of the peritoneum.

The differential diagnosis includes Crohn disease, lymphoma, carcinoma of the cecum, and amebiasis. Less common diseases such as syphilitic gummas of the cecum, actinomycosis, or other opportunistic infections (eg, cytomegalovirus [CMV] infection, or atypical mycobacterial infection) can also produce similar sonographic findings.

Whipple's disease — Whipple's disease is characterized by accumulation of macrophages in the lamina propria with intensely PAS-positive intracellular material. The etiologic agent was identified in 1992 as Tropheryma whipplei, which is closely related to many other soil-borne actinomycetes. (See "Whipple's disease".)

Ultrasonography may reveal duodenal and small bowel wall thickening due to edema [157], ascites, and mesenteric lymphadenopathy [158-164]. Whipple's disease appears sonographically similar to intestinal Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection in patients with AIDS presenting the so-called "white bowel" caused by intestinal lymphedema [165].

Virus-related enteritis — Rotaviruses [166,167], norovirus (Norwalk agent), enteric adenoviruses, astroviruses, and coronaviruses are among the leading causes of diarrhea in children, but are of less importance in adults. Fluid-filled small bowel due to secretory mechanisms may be the only sonographically detectable sign.

Cytomegalovirus colitis — Typical sonographic features of CMV infection include hypoechoic transmural thickening (similar to Crohn disease) accompanied by an echo-rich mesenteric inflammatory reaction. Although the entire intestine may be affected [168], special attention should be given to the ileocecal region, the ascending colon, and the duodenum in immunocompromised patients.

The exact cause of the above sonographic features is unclear. One possibility is that the changes are the result of occlusive vasculitis, which could explain similarities with Crohn disease. CMV lesions of the intestinal wall are often found in conjunction with mucosal Kaposi's sarcoma in patients with AIDS. By ultrasound image, Kaposi's sarcoma is often detected as a hypoechoic enlargement of the mucosa with a distinct delimitation from the submucosa.

Giardia lamblia — Sonographic changes in the development of G. lamblia infection are nonspecific. Thickening of the intestinal wall does not occur. Patients who have developed significant malabsorption may have a liquid-filled jejunum/ileum with hypermotility. Sonographic detection of nonenlarged mesenteric lymph nodes (<17 mm) with normal echogenicity may occasionally be seen. (See "Giardiasis: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis".)

Amebiasis — Amebic colitis, with its various signs and extraintestinal manifestations, cannot be distinguished sonographically from other inflammatory diseases of the colon [169,170]. Nevertheless, suggestive sonographic findings (eg, an ameboma or a liver abscess) should be sought.

Cyclospora — Cyclospora cayetanensis is another cause of infectious diarrhea that has been identified in both sporadic cases and in outbreak settings. Sonographic signs are nonspecific, with fluid-filled small bowel in the absence of bowel wall thickening. (See "Cyclospora infection".)

ANTIBIOTIC-ASSOCIATED COLITIS — Most patients with antibiotic-related diarrhea do not have colitis, and thus have no detectable sonographic abnormalities. On the other hand, patients who develop pseudomembranous colitis, or much less commonly, penicillin-induced colitis, may have sonographic abnormalities [138,139].

Pseudomembranous colitis — The most common finding in patients with pseudomembranous colitis caused by C. difficile is symmetric mucosal wall thickening, which is often most prominent in the left colon [171-180]. However, sonographic findings are insufficiently specific to distinguish pseudomembranous colitis from other bacterial causes of colitis (table 8) [172,181,182]. In severe cases, the colonic wall thickening is asymmetric and may resemble an intestinal lymphoma (image 8). Other sonographic features of severe infection include transmural inflammatory reactions, free pericolic fluid, and intramural gas echoes.

Penicillin-induced segmental hemorrhagic colitis — A characteristic sonographic feature of penicillin-induced segmental hemorrhagic colitis is the appearance of partially asymmetric wall thickening of the colon (typically in the right colon) with loss of intestinal wall layers due to edema and bleeding (table 8) [172,181-183]. Relative hypovascularization can be detected with color Doppler ultrasound examination. The surrounding colon may appear normal.

NEUTROPENIC ENTEROCOLITIS — Neutropenic enterocolitis (typhlitis) is a potentially fatal complication of severe neutropenia [184-186]. It typically affects the ileocecal region, which on ultrasound may reveal a distinct hyperechoic edematous hemorrhagic thickening of the intestinal wall. The presence of intramural gas and pericolic free fluid should raise concerns about imminent perforation. (See "Neutropenic enterocolitis (typhlitis)".)

ACUTE GRAFT VERSUS HOST DISEASE — Acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) of the gastrointestinal tract is one of the major complications of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Conventional B-mode ultrasonography and color Doppler imaging were used in combination to assess the extent, severity, course and prognosis of aGvHD of the gastrointestinal tract in 12 patients with suspected intestinal and/or severe cutaneous aGvHD [39,187]. The structure and thickness of the bowel wall and blood flow pattern in the superior mesenteric artery and bowel wall were useful for detection of aGvHD even before symptoms developed. All patients had thickened bowel wall segments, particularly in the ileocecal region. Four patients had ischemic bowel wall lesions as evidenced by a high-resistance flow pattern in the superior mesenteric artery; these patients did not respond to immunosuppressive therapy and ultimately died. Intestinal biopsy and histologic confirmation maybe necessary to confirm a diagnosis of aGvHD. A multiparametric approach has been proposed [188]. (See "Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and grading of acute graft-versus-host disease".)

CYSTIC FIBROSIS — Stenosing fibrosis of the colon in association with cystic fibrosis was first described in 1994 [189]. Its pathogenesis is controversial [189-196]. One hypothesis is that the fibrosis is due to use of high doses of pancreatic enzymes. However, similar intestinal wall changes have also been observed in patients who were not taking pancreatic enzymes. Furthermore, stenosing fibrosis has not been described in patients taking high doses of pancreatic enzymes for other disorders (such as alcoholic pancreatitis).

The characteristic ultrasound image shows the accentuation and thickening of the submucosa, which appears echogenic. Intestinal wall thickening is mainly found in the cecum and, slightly less pronounced, in the ascending colon, hepatic flexure, and the terminal ileum [197]. These changes are seldom detected in the sigmoid or distal colon.

INTUSSUSCEPTION — The classic ultrasound image of intussusception is a "bull's eye lesion," representing layers of the intestine within the intestine [148,196-201]. In addition, a lack of perfusion in the intussusceptum detected with color duplex imaging may indicate the development of ischemia [202-205].

CELIAC DISEASE — The main feature on ultrasound suggesting celiac disease is widening of the spaces between the Kerckring's folds (table 9 and table 10) [206-208]. Other suggestive features include dilation (>25mm) of the affected jejunal loops with irregular, "looser-appearing" Kerckring's folds, a distinct increase in fluid content vivid peristalsis, and mesenteric lymphadenopathy. In addition, gas and chyme within the intestinal lumen may produce coarse hyperechoic images, like laundry in the drum of a washing machine (hence the term "laundry phenomenon") [8]. As a result, it can be extremely difficult to obtain sharp pictures of the enteral content [206]. The laundry phenomenon is a typical finding in disorders associated with villous atrophy.

Wall thickening of the intestinal wall is usually not observed. Exceptions are patients with hypoalbuminemia, who may have edematous wall thickening similar to that seen in patients with vasculitis [157].

Mesenteric lymph nodes are usually less than 17 mm and have an echo pattern similar to that of the liver [181]. An increased size of the lymph nodes, irregular echogenicity, or a cluster-like distribution pattern may indicate the development of an intestinal lymphoma. Much less frequently, ultrasonography may reveal the development of carcinoma of the small intestine.

BENIGN AND MALIGNANT TUMORS OF THE SMALL AND LARGE INTESTINE — B-cell lymphoma, metastases (image 9), and benign tumors of the small intestine are infrequent. Their sonographic appearance is usually that of a hypoechoic masses emanating from the intestinal wall [209-213]. The sonographic diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors has been reported [214,215]. Hematomas of the intestinal wall cannot be reliably differentiated from tumors.

Polyps, colon cancers, carcinoid tumors, and metastases appear on ultrasonography as hypoechoic masses. However, their identification can be difficult. Although mesenteric lymph nodes may be seen, the sensitivity and specificity of transabdominal ultrasonography is insufficient to be used for staging.

ISCHEMIC COLITIS — Ultrasonography, including color duplex imaging, can facilitate the identification of ischemic-hemorrhagic and secondary inflammatory or necrotic thickenings of the intestinal wall in patients with ischemic colitis [32,33,36,216-226]. The presence of color Doppler signals does not exclude ischemic colitis. A slightly symmetrical hypoechoic wall thickening is often an indication of the nonobstructive form of ischemic colitis with chronic compensated changes. In contrast, asymmetric wall thickening with an ileus may be seen in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia.

Duplex imaging reliably evaluates the velocity profile in the celiac trunk and the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries. Color duplex and, in some cases, additional echo-enhancing agents may be helpful in the evaluation of intestinal wall perfusion and in the identification of the mesenteric vessels. Systolic velocities of >250 to 300 cm/s are sensitive indicators of severe mesenteric arterial stenosis. However, the clinical significance of these findings is not always clear since ultrasonography does not permit the evaluation of the compensatory collateral circulation (which often requires angiography).

AMYLOIDOSIS — Ultrasound features in patients with amyloidosis of the small intestine include asymmetric circular bowel wall thickening with distinct deposits (submucosal masses) with diminished peristalsis and dilatation [2,227-230]. (See "Gastrointestinal amyloidosis: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management".)

VASCULITIS — Most patients with gastrointestinal manifestations of a systemic vasculitis have other symptoms suggesting the diagnosis (see "Overview of and approach to the vasculitides in adults"). Imaging studies, such as ultrasonography, computed tomography scanning, or barium studies, are frequently normal. When they are abnormal, they usually have nonspecific findings such as a thickened, edematous bowel wall [157] unless mesenteric infarction has occurred.

The sequelae of systemic vasculitis involving the gastrointestinal tract are usually due to inflammation and mesenteric ischemia, which may be identified by color Doppler ultrasonography. The onset of clinical manifestations may be acute and severe (eg, mesenteric infarction) or chronic. Chronic mesenteric ischemia may be associated with a variety of sonographic findings including bowel wall thickening and small bowel obstruction secondary to strictures, resembling Crohn disease or intussusception. Ultrasonography can also detect perforation with ascites and free (peritoneal) air.

RADIATION ENTERITIS — Sonographic changes of radiation enteritis are usually characterized by a slight symmetrical thickening of the intestinal wall. Stenotic intestinal segments may be suggested by hypertrophy of the muscular layer. Bowel wall thickening may be seen in those with radiation colitis, although the finding is nonspecific [231-235].

SARCOIDOSIS — Sarcoidosis of the small bowel, appendix, and the colon is rare [208,236-240]. The most common symptoms are nonbloody diarrhea and abdominal pain. Sonographic signs are nonspecific, showing thickened bowel wall of the small and/or large intestine. Ultrasonography may be helpful for monitoring the therapeutic response.

BOWEL WALL THICKENING DUE TO HEMATOMA — A bowel wall hematoma typically occurs in patients who are coagulopathic. On ultrasonography, the hematoma may be recognized as echo-poor circumscribed bowel wall thickening. A similar picture may be seen in Schonlein Henoch Purpura involving the gastrointestinal tract and with small or large bowel tumors.

FUNCTIONAL DISORDERS — Ultrasound provides a useful tool for visualization of gastrointestinal motility since it is a real-time imaging methodology in contrast to other imaging methods. However, its role in this setting has not yet been well defined [241,242].

Intragastric maldistribution of a meal in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease assessed by three-dimensional ultrasonography [243], strain (Doppler) imaging of the stomach [244], and other new modalities are under investigation [58].

RECTAL AND PERINEAL DISORDERS — Perineal ultrasound (PNUS) is an effective, inexpensive, easily available, but still rarely applied diagnostic tool. In addition to demonstration of anatomy, PNUS can be helpful for detecting a variety of pathological conditions of the rectum and perineum, such as transmural inflammation, fistulas, and abscesses in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [5]. PNUS is more flexible than endorectal ultrasound (ERUS), particularly when oblique processes of transsphincteric fistulae are to be examined. For staging of perirectal tumors, PNUS can be used as a complement to conventional ERUS. A valuable extension of the diagnostic application of PNUS is its supportive role during invasive interventions, such as drainage of fluids or targeted puncture of tissue lesions [73,74].

OTHER USES — Positioning of enteral feeding tubes using bedside sonograms may be an alternative to radiologic placement, especially in patients without extensive abdominal surgery [245].

Transabdominal ultrasound, in addition to established endoscopic ultrasound, may help in identifying and characterizing submucosal lesions of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, but experience is limited [246].

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Transabdominal ultrasonography is most commonly used to obtain images of hepatobiliary, urogenital, and pelvic structures. Improvements in ultrasound technology and increasing familiarity with ultrasonographic findings in a variety of gastrointestinal disorders are broadening its applications for evaluating the small and large intestine. (See 'Introduction' above.)

An advantage of ultrasound imaging compared with endoscopy and contrast radiography is that it permits evaluation of the transmural aspects of inflammatory or neoplastic pathology within its surrounding structures. This can provide an important contribution for diagnosis and monitoring of disease activity. Other advantages are that it is widely available, noninvasive, and can be performed without preparation.

Limitations of ultrasonography are that the alimentary tract cannot be visualized over its entire length, many of the findings are nonspecific, and obtaining and interpreting the images is highly operator-dependent.

Transabdominal ultrasound can be used to evaluate a number of conditions including:

Appendicitis (see 'Appendicitis' above)

Epiploic appendagitis (see 'Epiploic appendagitis' above)

Diverticulitis (see 'Diverticulitis' above)

Inflammatory bowel disease (see 'Crohn disease' above and 'Ulcerative colitis' above)

Infectious enterocolitis (see 'Infectious enterocolitis' above)

Intussusception (see 'Intussusception' above)

Tumors (see 'Benign and malignant tumors of the small and large intestine' above)

Celiac disease (see 'Celiac disease' above)

  1. Nylund K, Maconi G, Hollerweger A, et al. EFSUMB Recommendations and Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 2017; 38:273.
  2. Dietrich CF, Brunner V, Lembcke B. [Intestinal ultrasound in rare small and large intestinal diseases]. Z Gastroenterol 1998; 36:955.
  3. Atkinson NS, Bryant RV, Dong Y, et al. WFUMB Position Paper. Learning Gastrointestinal Ultrasound: Theory and Practice. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016; 42:2732.
  4. Atkinson NSS, Bryant RV, Dong Y, et al. How to perform gastrointestinal ultrasound: Anatomy and normal findings. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23:6931.
  5. Nuernberg D, Saftoiu A, Barreiros AP, et al. EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3: Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound. Ultrasound Int Open 2019; 5:E34.
  6. Maconi G, Nylund K, Ripolles T, et al. EFSUMB Recommendations and Clinical Guidelines for Intestinal Ultrasound (GIUS) in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Ultraschall Med 2018; 39:304.
  7. Dirks K, Calabrese E, Dietrich CF, et al. EFSUMB Position Paper: Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS) in Acute Appendicitis and Diverticulitis. Ultraschall Med 2019; 40:163.
  8. Dietrich CF, Hollerweger A, Dirks K, et al. EFSUMB Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS) Task Force Group: Celiac sprue and other rare gastrointestinal diseases ultrasound features. Med Ultrason 2019; 21:299.
  9. Allgayer H, Braden B, Dietrich CF. Transabdominal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease. Conventional and recently developed techniques--update. Med Ultrason 2011; 13:302.
  10. Chiorean L, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Braden B, et al. Ultrasonographic imaging of inflammatory bowel disease in pediatric patients. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:5231.
  11. Chiorean L, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Braden B, et al. Transabdominal ultrasound for standardized measurement of bowel wall thickness in normal children and those with Crohn's disease. Med Ultrason 2014; 16:319.
  12. Meckler U, Caspary WF, Clement T, et al. [Sonography in Crohn disease--the conclusions of an experts' group]. Z Gastroenterol 1991; 29:355.
  13. Meckler U, Herzog P. [Sonographic structure of the intestinal wall--significance for the diagnosis of inflammatory intestinal diseases]. Ultraschall Med 1989; 10:152.
  14. Grønlund D, Poulsen JL, Sandberg TH, et al. Established and emerging methods for assessment of small and large intestinal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017; 29.
  15. Chiorean L, Barr RG, Braden B, et al. Transcutaneous Ultrasound: Elastographic Lymph Node Evaluation. Current Clinical Applications and Literature Review. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016; 42:16.
  16. Cui XW, Jenssen C, Saftoiu A, et al. New ultrasound techniques for lymph node evaluation. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:4850.
  17. Dietrich CF, Hocke M, Jenssen C. [Ultrasound for abdominal lymphadenopathy]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2013; 138:1001.
  18. Angerson WJ, Allison MC, Baxter JN, Russell RI. Neoterminal ileal blood flow after ileocolonic resection for Crohn's disease. Gut 1993; 34:1531.
  19. Britton I, Maguire C, Adams C, et al. Assessment of the role and reliability of sonographic post-prandial flow response in grading Crohn's disease activity. Clin Radiol 1998; 53:599.
  20. Ludwig D, Wiener S, Brüning A, et al. Mesenteric blood flow is related to disease activity and risk of relapse in Crohn's disease: a prospective follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:2942.
  21. Silván Delgado M, Juanco Pedregal C, Parra Blanco JA, Barreda González M. Usefulness of Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of patients with active Crohn's disease. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 1997; 89:677.
  22. van Oostayen JA, Wasser MN, Griffioen G, et al. Activity of Crohn's disease assessed by measurement of superior mesenteric artery flow with Doppler ultrasound. Neth J Med 1998; 53:S3.
  23. van Oostayen JA, Wasser MN, van Hogezand RA, et al. Doppler sonography evaluation of superior mesenteric artery flow to assess Crohn's disease activity: correlation with clinical evaluation, Crohn's disease activity index, and alpha 1-antitrypsin clearance in feces. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:429.
  24. van Oostayen JA, Wasser MN, van Hogezand RA, et al. Activity of Crohn disease assessed by measurement of superior mesenteric artery flow with Doppler US. Radiology 1994; 193:551.
  25. Spalinger J, Patriquin H, Miron MC, et al. Doppler US in patients with crohn disease: vessel density in the diseased bowel reflects disease activity. Radiology 2000; 217:787.
  26. Aliotta A, Pompili M, Rapaccini GL, et al. Doppler ultrasonographic evaluation of blood flow in the superior mesenteric artery in celiac patients and in healthy controls in fasting conditions and after saccharose ingestion. J Ultrasound Med 1997; 16:85.
  27. Alvarez D, Vazquez H, Bai JC, et al. Superior mesenteric artery blood flow in celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38:1175.
  28. Arienti V, Califano C, Brusco G, et al. Doppler ultrasonographic evaluation of splanchnic blood flow in coeliac disease. Gut 1996; 39:369.
  29. Bolondi L, Li Bassi S, Gaiani S, et al. Changes in mesenteric venous flow due to celiac sprue. Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37:925.
  30. Ertem D, Tüney D, Baloglu H, Pehlivanoglu E. Superior mesenteric artery blood flow in children with celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998; 26:140.
  31. Giovagnorio F, Picarelli A, Di Giovambattista F, Mastracchio A. Evaluation with Doppler sonography of mesenteric blood flow in celiac disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:629.
  32. Danse EM, Laterre PF, Van Beers BE, et al. Early diagnosis of acute intestinal ischaemia: contribution of colour Doppler sonography. Acta Chir Belg 1997; 97:173.
  33. Danse EM, Van Beers BE, Goffette P, et al. Diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia by color Doppler sonography. Color Doppler sonography and acute intestinal ischemia. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1996; 59:140.
  34. Patriquin HB, Garcier JM, Lafortune M, et al. Appendicitis in children and young adults: Doppler sonographic-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:629.
  35. Siegel MJ, Friedland JA, Hildebolt CF. Bowel wall thickening in children: differentiation with US. Radiology 1997; 203:631.
  36. Teefey SA, Roarke MC, Brink JA, et al. Bowel wall thickening: differentiation of inflammation from ischemia with color Doppler and duplex US. Radiology 1996; 198:547.
  37. Clautice-Engle T, Jeffrey RB Jr, Li KC, Barth RA. Power Doppler imaging of focal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract: comparison with conventional color Doppler imaging. J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15:63.
  38. Ruess L, Blask AR, Bulas DI, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease in children and young adults: correlation of sonographic and clinical parameters during treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:79.
  39. Klein SA, Martin H, Schreiber-Dietrich D, et al. A new approach to evaluating intestinal acute graft-versus-host disease by transabdominal sonography and colour Doppler imaging. Br J Haematol 2001; 115:929.
  40. Migaleddu V, Scanu AM, Quaia E, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic evaluation of inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 2009; 137:43.
  41. Dietrich CF, Jedrzejczyk M, Ignee A. Sonographic assessment of splanchnic arteries and the bowel wall. Eur J Radiol 2007; 64:202.
  42. Braden B, Ignee A, Hocke M, et al. Diagnostic value and clinical utility of contrast enhanced ultrasound in intestinal diseases. Dig Liver Dis 2010; 42:667.
  43. Fröhlich E, Muller R, Cui XW, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantification of tissue perfusion. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34:179.
  44. Schreyer AG, Finkenzeller T, Gössmann H, et al. Microcirculation and perfusion with contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in Crohn's disease: first results with linear contrast harmonic imaging (CHI). Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2008; 40:143.
  45. Wilkens R, Hagemann-Madsen RH, Peters DA, et al. Validity of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Enterography in the Assessment of Transmural Activity and Fibrosis in Crohn's Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2018; 12:48.
  46. Ripollés T, Martínez-Pérez MJ, Paredes JM, et al. The Role of Intravenous Contrast Agent in the Sonographic Assessment of Crohn's Disease Activity: Is Contrast Agent Injection Necessary? J Crohns Colitis 2019; 13:585.
  47. Dietrich CF, Averkiou MA, Correas JM, et al. An EFSUMB introduction into Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-US) for quantification of tumour perfusion. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33:344.
  48. Cui XW, Ignee A, Jedrzejczyk M, Dietrich CF. Dynamic Vascular Pattern (DVP), a quantification tool for contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51:427.
  49. Girlich C, Jung EM, Huber E, et al. Comparison between preoperative quantitative assessment of bowel wall vascularization by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and operative macroscopic findings and results of histopathological scoring in Crohn's disease. Ultraschall Med 2011; 32:154.
  50. Ripollés T, Martínez MJ, Paredes JM, et al. Crohn disease: correlation of findings at contrast-enhanced US with severity at endoscopy. Radiology 2009; 253:241.
  51. Ripollés T, Rausell N, Paredes JM, et al. Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterisation of intestinal inflammation in Crohn's disease: a comparison with surgical histopathology analysis. J Crohns Colitis 2013; 7:120.
  52. Paredes JM, Ripollés T, Cortés X, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: usefulness in the assessment of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease. J Crohns Colitis 2013; 7:192.
  53. Ignee A, Jenssen C, Cui XW, et al. Intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound in abscess drainage--feasibility and clinical value. Scand J Gastroenterol 2016; 51:41.
  54. Xu EJ, Zhang M, Li K, et al. Intracavitary Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Management of Post-Surgical Gastrointestinal Fistulas. Ultrasound Med Biol 2018; 44:502.
  55. Farina R, Pennisi F, La Rosa M, et al. Contrast-enhanced colour-Doppler sonography versus pH-metry in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children. Radiol Med 2008; 113:591.
  56. Wang JY, Luo Y, Wang WY, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue mixed with oral gastrointestinal contrast agent to evaluate esophageal hiatal hernia: Report of three cases and a literature review. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9:2679.
  57. Cui XW, Ignee A, Baum U, Dietrich CF. Feasibility and usefulness of using swallow contrast-enhanced ultrasound to diagnose Zenker's diverticulum: preliminary results. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41:975.
  58. Piscaglia F, Nolsøe C, Dietrich CF, et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33:33.
  59. Maconi G, Radice E, Bareggi E, Porro GB. Hydrosonography of the gastrointestinal tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193:700.
  60. Kim SH, Yoo IK, Kwon CI, et al. Utility of EUS elastography in the diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors: a pilot study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:172.
  61. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34:238.
  62. Dietrich CF, Cantisani V. Current status and perspectives of elastography. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83:403.
  63. Stidham RW, Xu J, Johnson LA, et al. Ultrasound elasticity imaging for detecting intestinal fibrosis and inflammation in rats and humans with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 2011; 141:819.
  64. Dillman JR, Stidham RW, Higgins PD, et al. US elastography-derived shear wave velocity helps distinguish acutely inflamed from fibrotic bowel in a Crohn disease animal model. Radiology 2013; 267:757.
  65. Rustemovic N, Cukovic-Cavka S, Brinar M, et al. A pilot study of transrectal endoscopic ultrasound elastography in inflammatory bowel disease. BMC Gastroenterol 2011; 11:113.
  66. Ishikawa D, Ando T, Watanabe O, et al. Images of colonic real-time tissue sonoelastography correlate with those of colonoscopy and may predict response to therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis. BMC Gastroenterol 2011; 11:29.
  67. Ślósarz D, Poniewierka E, Neubauer K, Kempiński R. Ultrasound Elastography in the Assessment of the Intestinal Changes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2021; 10.
  68. Dixit R, Chowdhury V, Kumar N. Hydrocolonic sonography in the evaluation of colonic lesions. Abdom Imaging 1999; 24:497.
  69. Elewaut AE, Afschrift M. Hydrocolonic sonography: a novel screening method for the detection of colon disease? Bildgebung 1995; 62:230.
  70. Limberg B, Osswald B. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease by hydrocolonic sonography. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89:1051.
  71. Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging, Levy AD, Liu PS, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Anorectal Disease. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 18:S268.
  72. Nuernberg D, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. [Current status of ultrasound in gastroenterology--bowel and upper gastrointestinal tract--part 1]. Z Gastroenterol 2007; 45:629.
  73. Maconi G, Ardizzone S, Greco S, et al. Transperineal ultrasound in the detection of perianal and rectovaginal fistulae in Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:2214.
  74. Dietrich CF, Barreiros AP, Nuernberg D, et al. [Perianal ultrasound]. Z Gastroenterol 2008; 46:625.
  75. Allgayer H, Ignee A, Zipse S, et al. Endorectal ultrasound and real-time elastography in patients with fecal incontinence following anorectal surgery: a prospective comparison evaluating short- and long-term outcomes in irradiated and non-irradiated patients. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50:1281.
  76. Allgayer H, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. Endosonographic elastography of the anal sphincter in patients with fecal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010; 45:30.
  77. Nielsen MB, Cantisani V, Sidhu PS, et al. The Use of Handheld Ultrasound Devices - An EFSUMB Position Paper. Ultraschall Med 2019; 40:30.
  78. Eng KA, Abadeh A, Ligocki C, et al. Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of US, CT, and MRI as Second-Line Imaging Tests after an Initial US. Radiology 2018; 288:717.
  79. Moris D, Paulson EK, Pappas TN. Diagnosis and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Adults: A Review. JAMA 2021; 326:2299.
  80. Ozel A, Orhan UP, Akdana B, et al. Sonographic appearance of the normal appendix in children. J Clin Ultrasound 2011; 39:183.
  81. Goldin AB, Khanna P, Thapa M, et al. Revised ultrasound criteria for appendicitis in children improve diagnostic accuracy. Pediatr Radiol 2011; 41:993.
  82. Daar AS. Acute primary epiploic appendagitis. Br J Clin Pract 1981; 35:333, 335.
  83. Lee MP. Small bowel obstruction due to epiploic appendagitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85:771.
  84. Legome EL, Sims C, Rao PM. Epiploic appendagitis: adding to the differential of acute abdominal pain. J Emerg Med 1999; 17:823.
  85. Mollà E, Ripollés T, Martínez MJ, et al. Primary epiploic appendagitis: US and CT findings. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:435.
  86. Rao PM, Novelline RA. Case 6: primary epiploic appendagitis. Radiology 1999; 210:145.
  87. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Wittenberg J, Warshaw AL. Misdiagnosis of primary epiploic appendagitis. Am J Surg 1998; 176:81.
  88. Rao PM, Wittenberg J, Lawrason JN. Primary epiploic appendagitis: evolutionary changes in CT appearance. Radiology 1997; 204:713.
  89. Rioux M, Langis P. Primary epiploic appendagitis: clinical, US, and CT findings in 14 cases. Radiology 1994; 191:523.
  90. Rosen P, Berlin RD, Poore GP. Appendagitis masquerading as appendicitis. J Emerg Med 1999; 17:903.
  91. Vinson DR. Epiploic appendagitis: a new diagnosis for the emergency physician. Two case reports and a review. J Emerg Med 1999; 17:827.
  92. Görg C, Egbring J, Bert T. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of epiploic appendagitis. Ultraschall Med 2009; 30:163.
  93. Zadeh ES, Kindermann J, Dietrich CF, et al. Clinical Awareness and Acceptance of Sonographically Diagnosed Epiploic Appendagitis (EA): A Retrospective Analysis of EA in a Single Tertiary Academic Referral Center. Ultrasound Int Open 2020; 6:E87.
  94. Leifeld L, Germer CT, Böhm S, et al. [S2k guidelines diverticular disease/diverticulitis]. Z Gastroenterol 2014; 52:663.
  95. Lembcke BJ, Strobel D, Dirks K, et al. Statement of the section internal medicine of the DEGUM - ultrasound obtains pole position for clinical imaging in acute diverticulitis. Ultraschall Med 2015; 36:191.
  96. Federmann G. [Sonography in the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis]. Chirurg 1989; 60:415.
  97. Pradel JA, Adell JF, Taourel P, et al. Acute colonic diverticulitis: prospective comparative evaluation with US and CT. Radiology 1997; 205:503.
  98. Schwerk WB, Schwarz S, Rothmund M. Sonography in acute colonic diverticulitis. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35:1077.
  99. Schwerk WB, Schwarz S, Rothmund M, Arnold R. [Colon diverticulitis: imaging diagnosis with ultrasound--a prospective study]. Z Gastroenterol 1993; 31:294.
  100. Verbanck J, Lambrecht S, Rutgeerts L, et al. Can sonography diagnose acute colonic diverticulitis in patients with acute intestinal inflammation? A prospective study. J Clin Ultrasound 1989; 17:661.
  101. Zielke A, Hasse C, Nies C, et al. Prospective evaluation of ultrasonography in acute colonic diverticulitis. Br J Surg 1997; 84:385.
  102. Chou YH, Chiou HJ, Tiu CM, et al. Sonography of acute right side colonic diverticulitis. Am J Surg 2001; 181:122.
  103. Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Rettenbacher T, et al. Colonic diverticulitis: diagnostic value and appearance of inflamed diverticula-sonographic evaluation. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1956.
  104. Moll R, Mittelkötter U, Reith HB, et al. [Which imaging in case of sigmoid diverticulitis? The value of ultrasound (Conventional B-mode in combination with hydrocolonsonography and colour flow Doppler) in comparison to the well-established modalities like contrast enema and helical computertomography]. Zentralbl Chir 2002; 127:297.
  105. Kunze G, Seitz K, Mauch M, Petersen F. Clinical Ultrasound in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Ultraschall Med 2019; 40:132.
  106. Gonzalez-Montpetit E, Ripollés T, Martinez-Pérez MJ, et al. Ultrasound findings of Crohn's disease: correlation with MR enterography. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:156.
  107. Bozkurt T, Richter F, Lux G. Ultrasonography as a primary diagnostic tool in patients with inflammatory disease and tumors of the small intestine and large bowel. J Clin Ultrasound 1994; 22:85.
  108. Faure C, Belarbi N, Mougenot JF, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of inflammatory bowel disease in children: comparison with ileocolonoscopy. J Pediatr 1997; 130:147.
  109. Khaw KT, Saverymuttu SH, Joseph AE. Correlation of 111indium WBC scintigraphy with ultrasound in the detection and assessment of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Radiol 1990; 42:410.
  110. Pradel JA, David XR, Taourel P, et al. Sonographic assessment of the normal and abnormal bowel wall in nondiverticular ileitis and colitis. Abdom Imaging 1997; 22:167.
  111. Reimund JM, Jung-Chaigneau E, Chamouard P, et al. [Diagnostic value of high resolution sonography in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1999; 23:740.
  112. Andreoli A, Cerro P, Falasco G, et al. Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of postsurgical recurrence of Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93:1117.
  113. Brignola C, Belloli C, Iannone P, et al. Comparison of scintigraphy with indium-111 leukocyte scan and ultrasonography in assessment of X-ray-demonstrated lesions of Crohn's disease. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38:433.
  114. DiCandio G, Mosca F, Campatelli A, et al. Sonographic detection of postsurgical recurrence of Crohn disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 146:523.
  115. Hata J, Haruma K, Suenaga K, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87:443.
  116. Hollerbach S, Geissler A, Schiegl H, et al. The accuracy of abdominal ultrasound in the assessment of bowel disorders. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998; 33:1201.
  117. Limberg B. Diagnosis of acute ulcerative colitis and colonic Crohn's disease by colonic sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1989; 17:25.
  118. Maconi G, Bollani S, Bianchi Porro G. Ultrasonographic detection of intestinal complications in Crohn's disease. Dig Dis Sci 1996; 41:1643.
  119. Pedersen BH, Grønvall S, Dorph S, et al. The value of dynamic ultrasound scanning in Crohn's disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986; 21:969.
  120. Sheridan MB, Nicholson DA, Martin DF. Transabdominal ultrasonography as the primary investigation in patients with suspected Crohn's disease or recurrence: a prospective study. Clin Radiol 1993; 48:402.
  121. Solvig J, Ekberg O, Lindgren S, et al. Ultrasound examination of the small bowel: comparison with enteroclysis in patients with Crohn disease. Abdom Imaging 1995; 20:323.
  122. Sonnenberg A, Erckenbrecht J, Peter P, Niederau C. Detection of Crohn's disease by ultrasound. Gastroenterology 1982; 83:430.
  123. Stiatti A, Martinuzzi A, Bartolini M, et al. [Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory intestinal disease]. Radiol Med 1990; 80:301.
  124. Parente F, Maconi G, Bollani S, et al. Bowel ultrasound in assessment of Crohn's disease and detection of related small bowel strictures: a prospective comparative study versus x ray and intraoperative findings. Gut 2002; 50:490.
  125. Miao YM, Koh DM, Amin Z, et al. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assessmentof active bowel segments in Crohn's disease. Clin Radiol 2002; 57:913.
  126. Potthast S, Rieber A, Von Tirpitz C, et al. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in Crohn's disease: a comparison. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:1416.
  127. Schmidt T, Reinshagen M, Brambs HJ, et al. [Comparison of conventional enteroclysis, intestinal ultrasound and MRI-enteroclysis for determining changes in the small intestine and complications in patients with Crohn's disease]. Z Gastroenterol 2003; 41:641.
  128. Parente F, Greco S, Molteni M, et al. Oral contrast enhanced bowel ultrasonography in the assessment of small intestine Crohn's disease. A prospective comparison with conventional ultrasound, x ray studies, and ileocolonoscopy. Gut 2004; 53:1652.
  129. Castiglione F, Mainenti PP, De Palma GD, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of small bowel Crohn's disease: direct comparison of bowel sonography and magnetic resonance enterography. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19:991.
  130. Pera A, Cammarota T, Comino E, et al. Ultrasonography in the detection of Crohn's disease and in the differential diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Digestion 1988; 41:180.
  131. Maconi G, Di Sabatino A, Ardizzone S, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of sonographic detection of enlarged regional lymph nodes in Crohn's disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005; 40:1328.
  132. Maconi G, Sampietro GM, Russo A, et al. The vascularity of internal fistulae in Crohn's disease: an in vivo power Doppler ultrasonography assessment. Gut 2002; 50:496.
  133. Gasche C, Moser G, Turetschek K, et al. Transabdominal bowel sonography for the detection of intestinal complications in Crohn's disease. Gut 1999; 44:112.
  134. Orsoni P, Barthet M, Portier F, et al. Prospective comparison of endosonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in anorectal fistula and abscess complicating Crohn's disease. Br J Surg 1999; 86:360.
  135. Seitz K, Reuss J. [Sonographic detection of fistulas in Crohn disease]. Ultraschall Med 1986; 7:281.
  136. Hirche TO, Russler J, Schröder O, et al. The value of routinely performed ultrasonography in patients with Crohn disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37:1178.
  137. Smith RL, Taylor KM, Friedman AB, et al. Systematic Review: Clinical Utility of Gastrointestinal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis, Assessment and Management of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohns Colitis 2020; 14:465.
  138. Dietrich CF, Lembcke B, Jenssen C, et al. Intestinal Ultrasound in Rare Gastrointestinal Diseases, Update, Part 2. Ultraschall Med 2015; 36:428.
  139. Dietrich CF, Lembcke B, Jenssen C, et al. Intestinal ultrasound in rare gastrointestinal diseases, update, part 1. Ultraschall Med 2014; 35:400.
  140. Petit P, Vidal V, Chaumoitre K, et al. [Atypical sonographic findings of bacterial colitis]. J Radiol 2000; 81:47.
  141. Matsumoto T, Iida M, Sakai T, et al. Yersinia terminal ileitis: sonographic findings in eight patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156:965.
  142. Puylaert JB. Mesenteric adenitis and acute terminal ileitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 1986; 161:691.
  143. Puylaert JB, Bodewes HW, Vermeijden RJ, et al. [Bacterial ileocecitis, a "new" disease]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1991; 135:2176.
  144. Quillin SP, Siegel MJ. Gastrointestinal inflammation in children: color Doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13:751.
  145. Gebert A, Göke M, Rothkötter HJ, Dietrich CF. [The mechanisms of antigen uptake in the small and large intestines: the roll of the M cells for the initiation of immune responses]. Z Gastroenterol 2000; 38:855.
  146. Khaw KT, Yeoman LJ, Saverymuttu SH, et al. Ultrasonic patterns in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Radiol 1991; 43:171.
  147. Mathis G, Metzler J. [Sonography in salmonella enterocolitis]. Ultraschall Med 1992; 13:106.
  148. Matsushita M, Suzaki T, Hajiro K. Intussusception associated with Salmonella typhimurium enterocolitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89:1246.
  149. Puylaert JB, Vermeijden RJ, van der Werf SD, et al. Incidence and sonographic diagnosis of bacterial ileocaecitis masquerading as appendicitis. Lancet 1989; 2:84.
  150. Seelen JL, Puylaert JB. [Bacterial ileocecitis: a "new" disease]. Ultraschall Med 1991; 12:269.
  151. Ueda D, Sato T, Yoshida M. Ultrasonographic assessment of Salmonella enterocolitis in children. Pediatr Radiol 1999; 29:469.
  152. Corral de la Calle MÁ, Encinas de la Iglesia J. Ultrasonography in infectious and neoplastic diseases of the bowel and peritoneum. Radiologia (Engl Ed) 2021; 63:270.
  153. Puylaert JB, Lalisang RI, van der Werf SD, Doornbos L. Campylobacter ileocolitis mimicking acute appendicitis: differentiation with graded-compression US. Radiology 1988; 166:737.
  154. Coussi A, Athanassiou M, Tsantali C, et al. Yersinia enterocolitica mesenteric adenitis suspected by ultrasound examination. Eur J Pediatr 1994; 153:299.
  155. Janowitz P, Wechsler JG, Malfertheiner P, et al. [Yersinia enterocolitica infection with extraintestinal manifestations: case report and overview]. Z Gastroenterol 1994; 32:152.
  156. Barreiros AP, Braden B, Schieferstein-Knauer C, et al. Characteristics of intestinal tuberculosis in ultrasonographic techniques. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008; 43:1224.
  157. Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Dirks K, Dietrich CF. [Differential diagnosis of severe hypoechoic oedema of the small bowel]. Ultraschall Med 2006; 27:234.
  158. Brüggemann A, Burchardt H, Lepsien G. Sonographical findings in Whipple's disease. A case report with regard to the literature. Surg Endosc 1992; 6:138.
  159. Carroccio A, Soresi M, Montalto G, et al. Whipple's disease: a non-invasive approach for suspected diagnosis. Case report. Ital J Gastroenterol 1996; 28:229.
  160. Castagnone D, Mandelli C, Rivolta R, et al. [Echography and computerized tomography of the abdomen in Whipple's disease]. Radiol Med 1991; 82:540.
  161. Davis SJ, Patel A. Distinctive echogenic lymphadenopathy in Whipples disease. Clin Radiol 1990; 42:60.
  162. de Wazières B, Fest T, Litzler JF, et al. [Mesenteric lymph node cavitations in Whipple's disease. Apropos of a case]. J Radiol 1993; 74:661.
  163. Hollerbach S, Holstege A, Muscholl M, et al. [Masked course of Whipple disease with uveitis, infection, endocardial involvement and abdominal lymphomas--case report and review of the literature]. Z Gastroenterol 1995; 33:362.
  164. Janisch HD, von Kleist D, Pfretzschner C, et al. [Mesenteric lipodystrophy: differential diagnosis of a benign abdominal tumor]. Wien Med Wochenschr 1984; 134:417.
  165. Hollerweger A, Dietrich CF. ["White bowel". A sonographic sign of intestinal lymph edema?]. Ultraschall Med 2005; 26:127.
  166. Bass D, Cordoba E, Dekker C, et al. Intestinal imaging of children with acute rotavirus gastroenteritis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004; 39:270.
  167. Robinson CG, Hernanz-Schulman M, Zhu Y, et al. Evaluation of anatomic changes in young children with natural rotavirus infection: is intussusception biologically plausible? J Infect Dis 2004; 189:1382.
  168. Gorschlüter M, Marklein G, Höfling K, et al. Abdominal infections in patients with acute leukaemia: a prospective study applying ultrasonography and microbiology. Br J Haematol 2002; 117:351.
  169. Tsujimoto T, Kuriyama S, Yoshiji H, et al. Ultrasonographic findings of amebic colitis. J Gastroenterol 2003; 38:82.
  170. Hussain S, Dinshaw H. Ultrasonography in amebic colitis. J Ultrasound Med 1990; 9:385.
  171. Bolondi L, Ferrentino M, Trevisani F, et al. Sonographic appearance of pseudomembranous colitis. J Ultrasound Med 1985; 4:489.
  172. Dietrich CF, Lembcke B, Seifert H, et al. [Ultrasound diagnosis of penicillin-induced segmental hemorrhagic colitis]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2000; 125:755.
  173. Gebel M. [Ultrasound of the gastrointestinal tract: good educational background is required]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2000; 125:749.
  174. Ludolph T, Schmidt-Wilcke HA. [Ultrasound diagnosis of pseudomembranous colitis]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2000; 125:750.
  175. Oei TK, van Engelshoven JM. Pseudomembranous colitis: an ultrasound diagnosis. Eur J Radiol 1992; 15:154.
  176. Pieri L, Mazzeo S, Caramella D, et al. [Imaging diagnosis in pseudomembranous colitis]. Radiol Med 1994; 87:775.
  177. Ros PR, Buetow PC, Pantograg-Brown L, et al. Pseudomembranous colitis. Radiology 1996; 198:1.
  178. Thomas SM, Howlett DC, Hearn FJ. Ultrasound appearance of pseudomembranous colitis. Australas Radiol 1996; 40:162.
  179. Truong M, Atri M, Bret PM, et al. Sonographic appearance of benign and malignant conditions of the colon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:1451.
  180. Zamora S, Coppes MJ, Scott RB, Mueller DL. Clostridium difficile, pseudomembranous enterocolitis: striking CT and sonographic features in a pediatric patient. Eur J Radiol 1996; 23:104.
  181. Dietrich CF, Zeuzem S, Caspary WF, Wehrmann T. [Ultrasound lymph node imaging in the abdomen and retroperitoneum of healthy probands]. Ultraschall Med 1998; 19:265.
  182. Downey DB, Wilson SR. Pseudomembranous colitis: sonographic features. Radiology 1991; 180:61.
  183. Matsumoto T, Iida M, Matsui T, et al. Ultrasonic and CT findings in penicillin-induced nonpseudomembranous colitis. Gastrointest Radiol 1990; 15:329.
  184. Alexander JE, Williamson SL, Seibert JJ, et al. The ultrasonographic diagnosis of typhlitis (neutropenic colitis). Pediatr Radiol 1988; 18:200.
  185. Glass-Royal MC, Choyke PL, Gootenberg JE, Grant EG. Sonography in the diagnosis of neutropenic colitis. J Ultrasound Med 1987; 6:671.
  186. Gootenberg JE, Abbondanzo SL. Rapid diagnosis of neutropenic enterocolitis (typhlitis) by ultrasonography. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1987; 9:222.
  187. Klein SA, Hermann S, Dietrich JW, et al. Transplantation-related toxicity and acute intestinal graft-versus-host disease after conditioning regimens intensified with Rhenium 188-labeled anti-CD66 monoclonal antibodies. Blood 2002; 99:2270.
  188. Pausch AM, Kammerer S, Weber F, et al. Parametric Imaging of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the Evaluation of Acute Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease. Cells 2021; 10.
  189. Mac Sweeney EJ, Oades PJ, Buchdahl R, et al. Relation of thickening of colon wall to pancreatic-enzyme treatment in cystic fibrosis. Lancet 1995; 345:752.
  190. Antonelli M, Matrunola M, Tontini A, Diamanti S. Colonic changes in cystic fibrosis: clinical-ultrasonographic features and their value for treatment. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998; 30:232.
  191. Connett GJ, Lucas JS, Atchley JT, et al. Colonic wall thickening is related to age and not dose of high strength pancreatin microspheres in children with cystic fibrosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 11:181.
  192. Haber HP, Benda N, Fitzke G, et al. Colonic wall thickness measured by ultrasound: striking differences in patients with cystic fibrosis versus healthy controls. Gut 1997; 40:406.
  193. Hahn H, von Kalle T, Pfadler E, et al. [Ultrasound appendix imaging in mucoviscidosis patients]. Rofo 1999; 170:181.
  194. Pohl M, Krackhardt B, Posselt HG, Lembcke B. Ultrasound studies of the intestinal wall in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997; 25:317.
  195. Ramsden WH, Moya EF, Littlewood JM. Colonic wall thickness, pancreatic enzyme dose and type of preparation in cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child 1998; 79:339.
  196. Wilschanski M, Fisher D, Hadas-Halperin I, et al. Findings on routine abdominal ultrasonography in cystic fibrosis patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999; 28:182.
  197. Bargon J, Stein J, Dietrich CF, et al. [Gastrointestinal complications of adult patients with cystic fibrosis]. Z Gastroenterol 1999; 37:739.
  198. Quillin SP, Siegel MJ. Color Doppler US of children with acute lower abdominal pain. Radiographics 1993; 13:1281.
  199. Sianesi M, Rossi A, Miselli A, Farinon AM. Ultrasonic detection of colonic carcinoma in emergency. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27:168.
  200. Vignault F, Filiatrault D, Brandt ML, et al. Acute appendicitis in children: evaluation with US. Radiology 1990; 176:501.
  201. Dehmani S, Penkalla N, Jung EM, et al. Scoping Review: Ultrasonographic evidence of intraabdominal manifestations of COVID-19 infection. Med Ultrason 2022.
  202. Lagalla R, Caruso G, Novara V, et al. Color Doppler ultrasonography in pediatric intussusception. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13:171.
  203. Lam AH, Firman K. Value of sonography including color Doppler in the diagnosis and management of long standing intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 1992; 22:112.
  204. Lim HK, Bae SH, Lee KH, et al. Assessment of reducibility of ileocolic intussusception in children: usefulness of color Doppler sonography. Radiology 1994; 191:781.
  205. Patsikas MN, Papazoglou LG, Jakovljevic S, Dessiris AK. Color Doppler ultrasonography in prediction of the reducibility of intussuscepted bowel in 15 young dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005; 46:313.
  206. Dietrich CF, Brunner V, Seifert H, et al. [Intestinal B-mode sonography in patients with endemic sprue. Intestinal sonography in endemic sprue]. Ultraschall Med 1999; 20:242.
  207. Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, et al. Adult celiac disease: US signs. Radiology 1999; 211:389.
  208. Riccabona M, Rossipal E. Sonographic findings in celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1993; 17:198.
  209. Bozkurt T, Lux G. [Transabdominal ultrasonography in inflammatory and tumorous intestinal diseases]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1998; 123:128.
  210. Limberg B. Diagnosis and staging of colonic tumors by conventional abdominal sonography as compared with hydrocolonic sonography. N Engl J Med 1992; 327:65.
  211. Schwerk WB, Braun B. [The use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal tumors (author's transl)]. Z Gastroenterol 1978; 16:431.
  212. Wood WJ, Archer R, Schaefer JW, et al. Coexistence of regional enteritis and carcinoid tumor. Gastroenterology 1970; 59:265.
  213. Goerg C, Schwerk WB, Goerg K. Gastrointestinal lymphoma: sonographic findings in 54 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 155:795.
  214. Catalano O, De Lutio di Castelguidone E, Nunziata A, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: Pictorial review. Radiol Med 2005; 110:484.
  215. Dietrich CF, Jenssen C, Hocke M, et al. Imaging of gastrointestinal stromal tumours with modern ultrasound techniques - a pictorial essay. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50:457.
  216. Danse EM, Van Beers BE, Goffette P, et al. Acute intestinal ischemia due to occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery: detection with Doppler sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15:323.
  217. Erden A, Yurdakul M, Cumhur T. Marked increase in flow velocities during deep expiration: A duplex Doppler sign of celiac artery compression syndrome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1999; 22:331.
  218. Geelkerken RH, van Bockel JH. Duplex ultrasound examination of splanchnic vessels in the assessment of splanchnic ischaemic symptoms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999; 18:371.
  219. Koslin DB, Mulligan SA, Berland LL. Duplex assessment of the splanchnic vasculature. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1992; 13:34.
  220. Mirk P, Cotroneo AR, Palazzoni G, Bock E. [Doppler ultrasonography assessment of the inferior mesenteric artery. Feasibility study and definition of morphologic and flowmetric characteristics]. Radiol Med 1994; 87:275.
  221. Nicoloff AD, Williamson WK, Moneta GL, et al. Duplex ultrasonography in evaluation of splanchnic artery stenosis. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77:339.
  222. Perko MJ, Just S, Schroeder TV. Importance of diastolic velocities in the detection of celiac and mesenteric artery disease by duplex ultrasound. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26:288.
  223. Zwolak RM, Fillinger MF, Walsh DB, et al. Mesenteric and celiac duplex scanning: a validation study. J Vasc Surg 1998; 27:1078.
  224. Danse EM, Van Beers BE, Jamart J, et al. Prognosis of ischemic colitis: comparison of color doppler sonography with early clinical and laboratory findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:1151.
  225. Gandhi SK, Hanson MM, Vernava AM, et al. Ischemic colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39:88.
  226. Ripollés T, Simó L, Martínez-Pérez MJ, et al. Sonographic findings in ischemic colitis in 58 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184:777.
  227. Beyer D, Krug B, Stelzner M. [Gastrointestinal amyloidosis as a differential diagnostic problem]. Rofo 1986; 145:551.
  228. Watanabe T, Kato K, Sugitani M, et al. A case of solitary amyloidosis localized within the transverse colon presenting as a submucosal tumor. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:644.
  229. Whitby EH, Peck RJ. Case report: ultrasound of primary generalised AL amyloid of the small bowel. Clin Radiol 1996; 51:447.
  230. Barreiros AP, Otto G, Ignee A, et al. Sonographic signs of amyloidosis. Z Gastroenterol 2009; 47:731.
  231. Creteur V, De Poerck AF, De Raedemaeker K, et al. [diagnostic ultrasonography of air in the portal venous system: apropos of a case of colonic radionecrosis and literature review]. J Belge Radiol 1994; 77:270.
  232. Nguyen BD, Hamper UM. Pelvic silicone prosthesis for prevention of radiation enteritis: US and CT features. Abdom Imaging 1997; 22:175.
  233. Puylaert JB, Hoekstra F, de Vries BC, et al. Radiation appendicitis: demonstration with graded compression US. Radiology 1987; 164:342.
  234. Shimizu S, Tada M, Kawai K. Endoscopic ultrasonography in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1995; 5:851.
  235. Solomon MJ, McLeod RS, Cohen EK, Cohen Z. Anal wall thickness under normal and inflammatory conditions of the anorectum as determined by endoluminal ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90:574.
  236. Bulger K, O'Riordan M, Purdy S, et al. Gastrointestinal sarcoidosis resembling Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1988; 83:1415.
  237. Clague RB. Sarcoidosis or Crohn's disease? Br Med J 1972; 3:804.
  238. Dumot JA, Adal K, Petras RE, Lashner BA. Sarcoidosis presenting as granulomatous colitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93:1949.
  239. Ell SR, Frank PH. Spectrum of lymphoid hyperplasia: colonic manifestations of sarcoidosis, infectious mononucleosis, and Crohn's disease. Gastrointest Radiol 1981; 6:329.
  240. MacRury SM, McQuaker G, Morton R, Hume R. Sarcoidosis: association with small bowel disease and folate deficiency. J Clin Pathol 1992; 45:823.
  241. Dietrich CF, Braden B. Sonographic assessments of gastrointestinal and biliary functions. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 23:353.
  242. Maconi G, Hausken T, Dietrich CF, et al. Gastrointestinal Ultrasound in Functional Disorders of the Gastrointestinal Tract - EFSUMB Consensus Statement. Ultrasound Int Open 2021; 7:E14.
  243. Tefera S, Gilja OH, Olafsdottir E, et al. Intragastric maldistribution of a liquid meal in patients with reflux oesophagitis assessed by three dimensional ultrasonography. Gut 2002; 50:153.
  244. Gilja OH, Heimdal A, Hausken T, et al. Strain during gastric contractions can be measured using Doppler ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28:1457.
  245. Gubler C, Bauerfeind P, Vavricka SR, et al. Bedside sonographic control for positioning enteral feeding tubes: a controlled study in intensive care unit patients. Endoscopy 2006; 38:1256.
  246. Jenssen C, Dietrich CF. Endoscopic ultrasound of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions. Ultraschall Med 2008; 29:236.
Topic 2565 Version 24.0

References